LQD: Lithium Versus Quetiapine in Treatment Resistant Depression

Sponsor
King's College London (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03004521
Collaborator
University of Oxford (Other), Newcastle University (Other), Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (Other), Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (Other), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (Other), Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (Other), Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (Other), Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust (Other)
276
1
2
57
4.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

LQD is a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of lithium versus quetiapine when used as add-on therapies to antidepressant medication for patients with treatment resistant depression. The Lithium versus Quetiapine in Depression (LQD) study will assess patients over 12 months to establish which (if any) treatment is more likely to improve TRD over a long duration of time. Professor Anthony Cleare is the Chief Investigator and recruitment began in November 2016.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Detailed Description

This 12 month parallel group, multi-centre, patient randomised, pragmatic, open label trial is comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the decision to prescribe lithium versus quetiapine add-on treatment to antidepressant medication. There will be two parallel groups:

  1. Quetiapine add-on to existing antidepressant medication; 2) Lithium add-on to existing antidepressant medication. 276 patients will be randomised 1:1 at baseline to the decision to prescribe either lithium or quetiapine, and treatment will then be undertaken by clinicians on a real world basis. All patients, regardless of their treatment status, will be followed up in the trial for one year. This is a superiority design whereby we hypothesise that quetiapine will be superior to lithium in terms of time to treatment discontinuation and average symptom burden (QIDS-SR) over 12 months.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
276 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomised Pragmatic Trial Comparing the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Lithium and Quetiapine Augmentation in Treatment Resistant Depression
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2016
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Lithium

Lithium will be prescribed to patients in this arm as an augmenter on top of a patient's existing antidepressant treatment.

Drug: Lithium
Lithium prescribed in addition to the patient's existing antidepressant treatment.

Experimental: Quetiapine

Quetiapine will be prescribed to patients in this arm as an augmenter on top of a patient's existing antidepressant treatment.

Drug: Quetiapine
Quetipatine prescribed in addition to the patient's existing antidepressant treatment.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Longitudinal depressive symptom severity [52 weeks]

    QIDS-SR

  2. Difference in time to all-cause treatment discontinuation [12 months]

    The difference in the time at which patients stop taking the medication for any reason between the two treatment arms.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in clinician rated depression severity [From baseline to weeks 8 and 52]

    MADRS

  2. Response rates [8 weeks and 52 weeks]

    Assessed using the MADRS questionnaire

  3. Remission rates [8 and 52 weeks]

    Assessed using the MADRS questionnaire

  4. Health related quality of life [Measured at 8 and 52 weeks]

    Assessed using the EuroQol-5D questionnaire

  5. Social functioning [Measured at baseline, 8 and 52 weeks]

    Measured using the WSAS self rated questionnaire

  6. Adherence to treatment [Measured at weeks 8 and 52]

    Assessed using the MARS-5 questionnaire

  7. Change in weight in kilograms [Measured at 8 and 52 weeks]

    Assessed by weighing participants

  8. Change in diastolic blood pressure [Change from baseline to 8 and 52 weeks]

    Assessed by measuring blood pressure

  9. Change in systolic blood pressure [Change from baseline to 8 and 52 weeks]

    Assessed by measuring blood pressure

  10. Time to uptake of a new intervention (pharmacological or non-pharmalogical) [12 months]

    Assessed by recording all pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions

  11. Time to initiation of treatment [Up to 12 months]

    Assessed using treatment initiation form

  12. CGI Global Improvement [Measured at 8 and 52 weeks]

    CGI

  13. Side effects [Measured at 8 and 52 weeks]

    PRISE total score

  14. Serious Adverse Events [52 weeks]

    Serious adverse events will be monitored and reported throughout the patient's participation in the trial.

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Change in global severity [Measured at 8, 26 and 52 weeks]

    Change in CGI severity score

  2. Global efficacy [Measured at 8, 26 and 52 weeks]

    Change in CGI efficacy score

  3. Side effects [Measured at 8 and 52 weeks]

    Frequency of individual items on the PRISE

  4. Physical health changes [Measured at baseline, 8, 26 and 52 weeks]

    Not completed for all participants. Will be reported if there is a sufficient number e.g. blood parameters and waist circumference

  5. Satisfaction with lithium / quetiapine treatment [Measured at 8, 26 and 52 weeks]

    Measured using TSQM subscales

  6. Change in self-report manic symptoms [Measured at baseline, 8, 26 and 52 weeks]

    Measured using the Altman Mania Self Rating Scale

  7. Change in anxiety symptoms [Measured at baseline, 8, 26 and 52 weeks]

    GAD-7 score

  8. Time to prescription [0-52 weeks]

    First date participant is given a prescription for the treatment

  9. Baseline adherence to antidepressant [Measured at baseline]

    MARS-5 score

  10. Change in cognition [Measured at baseline, 8, 26 and 52 weeks]

    Total DSCT score

  11. Adherence of clinicians [0-52 weeks]

    Clinician adherence to prescribing and monitoring guidelines

  12. Proportion of participants having an adequate treatment trial [0-8 weeks]

    Adequate treatment trial as defined in study protocol

  13. Number of hospital admissions for depressive episode [52 weeks]

    Measured using psychiatric history assessment

  14. Change in personality measure [Measured at baseline, 8, 26 and 52 weeks]

    SAPAS

  15. Social functioning [Measured weekly over 12 months]

    WSAS

  16. Economic analysis [52 weeks]

    Costs from the NHS and Personal Social Services perspective and from a societal perspective.

  17. Predictors of treatment response [52 weeks]

    Measured using the Maudsley Staging Model, HAM-D, MINI 7, IDS-C and SAPAS questionnaires.

  18. Longitudinal depression severity until time to all cause treatment discontinuation [52 weeks]

    Measured weekly using the QIDS-SR

  19. Collection and analysis of biological samples for genetic, cytokine and cortisol analysis [0-52 weeks]

    Blood/hair/saliva samples collected in collaboration with the BRC BioResource

  20. Reliability and validity of the Maudsley VAS [Measured at baseline, 8, 26 and 52 weeks]

    Measured using the Maudsley VAS, validated against the QIDS-SR and MADRS

  21. Discrepancy between the self-rated and clinician-rated version of 16 item IDS [Measured at baseline and 8 weeks]

    Assessed using QIDS and IDS

  22. Relationship between quetiapine and lithium serum levels, prescribed dose and depressive symptom severity [52 weeks]

    MADRS

  23. Time to new interventions for depression. [52 weeks]

    Measured using concomitant medication and concomitant therapy questionnaires

  24. Number of new interventions for depression [52 weeks]

    Measured using concomitant medication and concomitant therapy questionnaires

  25. Patient rated experience of the True Colours weekly monitoring system [8 / 26 / 52 weeks]

    Qualitative Interview in a subset of participants

  26. Change in cognitive function [Baseline, 8, 26 and 52 weeks]

    THINC-it composite and individual tests scores in a subset of participants

  27. 12. Patient views and experiences of lithium and quetiapine [52 week visit]

    Qualitative interviews in a subset of participants

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Under the care of a GP and/or adult mental health services

  2. Current episode of depression meeting DSM-5 criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) - single or recurrent episode 3.17-item HAM-D score ≥ 14 - this cut-off reflects a pragmatic minimum severity of depression as also chosen in comparable studies such as STAR*D (Rush et al 2006, Trivedi et al 2006)

4.Any gender and aged 18 years or over 5.Meet criteria for treatment resistant depression (Fekadu et al., 2009a; Cleare et al., 2015): current episode has not responded to at least two antidepressants given for at least 6 weeks at minimum therapeutic dose defined as fluoxetine ≥20mg/day, paroxetine ≥20mg/day, sertraline ≥50mg/day, citalopram ≥20mg/day, escitalopram ≥10mg/day, venlafaxine ≥75mg/day, duloxetine ≥60 mg/day, mirtazapine ≥15mg/day, tricyclic antidepressant ≥125mg/day, and dosage as guided by the national Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines or BNF for any other antidepressant. Please note, relapse whilst on an antidepressant also counts as a failed treatment trial 6.Current antidepressant treatment has remained unchanged and at, or above, a therapeutic dose for ≥6 weeks 7.Provision of written, informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Diagnosis of bipolar disorder (defined as meeting DSM-5 criteria for bipolar 1 or bipolar 2) on the MINI 7.0 (as recommended treatments are different for bipolar depression)

  2. Diagnosis of current psychosis (as recommended treatments are different for current psychosis - antidepressants plus antipsychotics is the first-line treatment recommendation (NiCE, 2009; Cleare et al., 2015)

  3. Adequate use of lithium or quetiapine during the current episode. An adequate dose of lithium is defined as the patient taking lithium for at least 4 weeks at an adequate dose (leading to a documented plasma concentration of >0.4mmol/L) and for quetiapine, prescription in the range of 150-300mg/d for 4 weeks or longer. Or, if the patient has taken an inadequate dose of lithium or quetiapine in the current episode, the patient and clinician are not willing to re-prescribe/take the medication.

  4. Ongoing use of another atypical antipsychotic (discontinuation will be required before study entry i.e. any time prior to randomisation)

  5. Known contraindication to use of either lithium or quetiapine: known hypersensitivity of lithium or quetiapine or any of their excipients; severe renal insufficiency / impairment; untreated hypothyroidism; severe cardiac disease / insufficiency; low sodium levels e.g. dehydrated patients or those on low sodium diets; Addison's disease; Brugada syndrome or family history of Brugada syndrome; the rare hereditary inborn errors of metabolism galactosaemia, the Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption; concomitant administration of cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors; or congenital QT prolongation.

  6. We will not recruit any individual who is currently participating in a clinical trial of an investigational medical product (CTIMP).

  7. Insufficient degree of comprehension or attention to be able to engage in trial procedures.

  8. We will exclude women who are pregnant, actively trying for pregnancy, or currently breastfeeding. This will be based on verbal report of the subject. Otherwise the management will be as appropriate according to standard clinical practice within the context of a pragmatic, open trial, for example adequate contraceptive precautions decided on the clinical judgement of the prescriber.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London London United Kingdom SE5 8AF

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • King's College London
  • University of Oxford
  • Newcastle University
  • Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
  • Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust
  • Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
  • Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anothony Cleare, Professor of Psychiatry

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
King's College London
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03004521
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • HTA 14/222/02
First Posted:
Dec 29, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Mar 5, 2021
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Keywords provided by King's College London
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 5, 2021