DAS: Diagnostic Accuracy of the Stepped Screening Protocol and Its Screening Tools in the Perinatal Period.
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
We know that 1 in 5 women experience psychological difficulties during their pregnancy or in the first year after giving birth. Unfortunately, in 75% of cases, these problems go undetected, resulting in the woman, her partner and the baby not receiving the proper care. For this reason, the Flemish government wants to screen all women in the perinatal period for their mental well-being using short questionnaires with the aim of referring them to appropriate care. Before we can recommend this screening to all women in the perinatal period, we want to investigate the effectiveness of these short questionnaires, as well as the proposed stepped screening protocol. We want to use this study to determine whether the questionnaires and the stepped screening protocol are sufficiently sensitive to detect mental health problems during this period. This means that we want to check whether the (future) moms who screen positive actually have problems and whether the (future) moms who screen negative effectively do not have psychological problems. In case of positive findings, we want to recommend that screening for psychological well-being should best be part of standard care in the future.
Participants will be asked to answer some questions regarding depressive and anxiety symptoms using existing screening instruments (Whooley, GAD-2, EPDS and GAD-7). On the basis of an online application one can be assigned to the group that will be invited for a telephone interview by a study employee of the UZ Gent (psychologist or psyciatrist) to conduct a semi-structured interview within 2 weeks after completing these questions. The interviewer will ask questions about current psychological well-being and, where applicable, psychological problems in the past. The interviewer will not be aware of the responses to the questionnaires, so as not to be prejudiced. Being contacted for an interview does not necessarily mean that those women scored higher on the questionnaires, as they may also belong to the control group.
In addition, a number of demographic data are requested (such as age, marital status, level of education, occupational category, how many pregnancies, number of other (living) children, (expected) delivery date, current forms of treatment (medications, psychotherapeutic interventions) and psychiatric history).
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
This research follows an ongoing study at UZ Gent (registration number B670201836088).
In order to investigate the stepped screening instrument proposed therein for its value in clinical practice, it is important to 1) gain insight into the diagnostic accuracy of its individual screening instruments and 2) examine whether the implementation of the stepped screening protocol leads to better predictability in identifying women at increased risk of a major depressive episode and/or anxiety disorders, with inclusion of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in the perinatal period.
The diagnostic accuracy of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) shows good accuracy for major depression in both the ante- and postnatal periods (Levis et al., 2020) and for any psychiatric disorder postnatally (Hewitt et al., 2009). The Whooley questions also have high diagnostic accuracy for depression and any psychiatric disorder in pregnancy (Howard et al., 2018) and postnatally (Mann et al., 2012). Negative responses to both Whooley questions excluded with acceptable accuracy both perinatal depression (Mann et al., 2012, Fontein-Kuipers and Jomeen, 2019) and anxiety disorder (Fontein-Kuipers and Jomeen, 2019).
For anxiety instruments, research to date is less unequivocal (Sinesi et al., 2019, Fairbrother et al., 2019). The NICE Guidelines recommend the use of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) (cut-off ≥ 3) for screening for anxiety symptoms based on research in a non-perinatal population (NICE - 2011). However, research (Nath et al., 2018) shows that the GAD-2 is not specific enough to detect anxiety disorders in general, given that the population prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is only 5% (compared to 17% for all anxiety disorders). As possible good alternatives to the GAD-2, the use of the EDS-3A (a subset of the EPDS) and the GAD-7 (Nath et al., 2018, Meltzer-Brody et al., 2018) are recommended.
This study aims to examine whether the screening protocol using the Whooley (clinical score, score 1) and GAD-2 (clinical score, score 2) as triage instruments followed by the EPDS/EDS-3A and GAD-7 should be updated for detecting a depressive episode, anxiety disorder or another psychiatric disorder ((hypo)manic episode in the context of bipolar disorder, OCD and/or PTSD). To our knowledge, to date, no studies are known concerning the validation of the above-mentioned screening instruments, nor concerning prevalence rates for the above-mentioned disorders for Flanders. This study will contribute to that.
This study will be conducted through hospitals encouraging their pregnant and/or recently delivered mothers to participate in this study by means of flyers. If there is a shortage of participants, this study can also be spread via the website and social media of https://wolkinmijnhoofd.be (initiative of UZ Gent).
Through a QR code (different for each site) interested parties can log in, after which they receive more information about the study (ICF letter) and, if they wish to participate, are led to the online informed consent. After this, (future) moms are asked to fill in demographic data and answer questionnaires. All questionnaires will be administered from all participants. Based on a positive score on one of the questions of the Whooley and/or GAD-2, a standardized diagnostic interview, SCID-5 (American Psychiatric Association, 2017) will also be administered, to determine whether a depressive episode and/or anxiety disorder or another psychiatric disorder ((hypo)manic episode i.k.a. bipolar disorder, OCD and/or PTSD) is effectively present. The diagnostic interview will be conducted by telephone by a trainee psychiatrist and/or psychologist who will be blinded to the screening results. A sample of those individuals who obtain negative scores on the triage questions (Whooley and GAD-2) will serve as a control group, after which the above-mentioned standardized interview will also be conducted from them. This should allow us to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the screening instruments based on their estimated sensitivity and specificity with respect to the structured interview, the SCID-5 and this for different cut-off scores.
The sample size is based on calculating Wilson score confidence intervals for proportions. A sample size of at least 95 positive scores on the EDS-3A and 95 negative scores on the EDS-3A allows us to estimate the PPV, NPV, and prevalence in each of the groups, respectively, using a Wilson score confidence interval with a half-width of 10% (total width 20%) with a probability of greater than 90%. We estimate that 10% will score positive on the EDS-3A finally need a sample size of 950 (95* 1/0.2) women, antenatal and postnatal each, or until the beholden number of positive scores on the EDS-3A is reached. Depending on the number of hospitals wishing to participate in this study, we expect the duration of recruitment to be 24 months.
Data processing Data collection and processing will be through REDCaP. The positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of the GAD-2, EDS-3A and GAD-7 will be calculated for anxiety disorders (generalized anxiety, panic disorder, agoraphobia without panic disorder, social phobia, specific phobia). In addition, differential diagnostic also depressive episode (uni- and bipolar), PTSD and OCD will be included in this study. Positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) will also be calculated for major depression for the Whooley and the EPDS.
A statistician will be used for randomization.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| antenatal period Pregnant women between 20 and 24 weeks of pregnancy will be invited to participate |
Diagnostic Test: SCID 5
SCID 5 is a semi-structured standard clinical interview. We will focus on current depressive episode, (hypo)manic episode, anxiety disorders, OCD and PTSD
|
| postnatal period Moms, 6 to 10 weeks after delivery will be invited to participate |
Diagnostic Test: SCID 5
SCID 5 is a semi-structured standard clinical interview. We will focus on current depressive episode, (hypo)manic episode, anxiety disorders, OCD and PTSD
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- anxiety disorders [max 2 weeks after screening]
SCID-5
Secondary Outcome Measures
- depressive episode [max 2 weeks after screening]
SCID-5
- (hypo)manic episode [max 2 weeks after screening]
SCID-5
- OCD [max 2 weeks after screening]
SCID-5
- PTSD [max 2 weeks after screening]
SCID-5
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years or older, antenatal period (20-24 th week of pregnancy) or postnatal period (6 to 10 weeks after birth) and Dutch-speaking.
Exclusion Criteria:
- <18 years, non-Dutch speaking and outside the above mentioned period.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- University Hospital, Ghent
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gilbert MD Lemmens, Prof dr, University Hospital, Ghent
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- ONZ-2022-0084