CHRODOLURG: Description of Chronic Pain in Emergencies Room and Medical Care Modalities

Sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03499301
Collaborator
(none)
292
1
1
286.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The rate of patients with chronic pain (CP) is 40% in patients with acute pain in emergency department (ED). Patients with CP come more frequently to ED than patients without CP. Reasons for their visit to ED are often in relation with this CP. Few studies have been interested to management modalities of these patients in ED. The investigators are going to realize a prospective observational study in one center. The hypothesis is that patients with chronic pain are less satisfied of ED management that patients without CP.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    Chronic pain is defined by a daily pain since more than 3 months. CP is different of acute pain because of their mechanisms, treatments and therapeutic objectives. CP is associated with an alteration of quality of life with psychological, social and economic consequences. The prevalence of CP in France is 15%. In ED, the rate of CP in patients with acute pain was around 40%. Patients with CP come more frequently to ED than patients without CP. Their use of care structures, particularly ED, is all the more frequent that their disability is important. The satisfaction of these patients in ED is associated with age, nature of pain, wait duration, realisation of imaging, and administration of painkillers and relieving of pain. The reasons why these patients go to ED were pain exacerbation, inadequate strategy of coping, severity of disease and sometime despair associated with stress or anxiety. Currently the investigators do not know if these managements in ED are adequate or not. And finally the investigators do not know whether the satisfaction about their ED management is different from patients without CP. The investigators are going to collect data about all patients admitted in ED with the objective to compare the satisfaction between patients with CP and patients without CP. The follow up will be restricted to the area of ED. The last data will be collected just before the exit from ED.

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Actual Enrollment :
    292 participants
    Observational Model:
    Cohort
    Time Perspective:
    Prospective
    Official Title:
    Description of Chronic Pain in Emergencies Room and Medical Care Modalities
    Actual Study Start Date :
    Jan 3, 2018
    Actual Primary Completion Date :
    Feb 3, 2018
    Actual Study Completion Date :
    Feb 3, 2018

    Arms and Interventions

    Arm Intervention/Treatment
    Chronic pain

    Patients with chronic pain when arrived to emergency room.

    No chronic pain

    Patients without chronic pain when arrived to emergency room.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Medical care modalities satisfaction [Day 1]

      Proportion of patients satisfied or very satisfied with the management at the emergency department (ED)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Rate of patients with chronic pain. [Day 1]

      History of a chronic pain or daily pain since 3 months.

    2. Duration of management between first medical contact and delivery from ED. [Day 1]

      Time on arrival at the ED and time on discharge from ED.

    3. Pain intensity [Day 1]

      Measurement with numerical pain scale, from 0 (without pain) to 10 (the worst pain intensity imaginable).

    4. Anxiety intensity [Day 1]

      Measurement with numerical anxiety scale, from 0 (without anxiety) to 10 (the worst anxiety intensity imaginable).

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • 18 years old or more admitted in ED

    • between 8 am and 5pm

    • from Monday to Friday.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patients admitted directly in emergency intensive care for vital distress defined by hemodynamic, respiratory, or neurological failure distress,

    • multitrauma patients;

    • patient without possibility to communicate because of neurologic disease or mental status disease;

    • linguistic barrier.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Hôpital Pellegrin - Service des urgences adultes Bordeaux France 33000

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University Hospital, Bordeaux

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    University Hospital, Bordeaux
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03499301
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CHUBX 2017/15
    First Posted:
    Apr 17, 2018
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 25, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2018
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by University Hospital, Bordeaux
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jun 25, 2020