CO-IMPACT: Caring Others Increasing EngageMent in PACT

Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development (U.S. Fed)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02328326
Collaborator
(none)
478
2
2
42.6
239
5.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This trial will compare two methods of increasing engagement in care and success in diabetes management, among patients with diabetes with high-risk features, who also have family members involved in their care.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: CO-IMPACT
  • Other: PACT
N/A

Detailed Description

Background:

Veterans with diabetes must control cardiovascular risk factors in order to prevent disabling and life-threatening complications. However, despite system wide advances in diabetes quality of care, over 30% of VHA patients with diabetes continue to have uncontrolled blood pressure, hyperglycemia, or hyperlipidemia. The nationwide VA PACT (Patient-Aligned Care Teams) initiative seeks to provide patients comprehensive, team-based support for following diabetes care regimens. PACT's success, however, hinges on its ability to effectively engage patients in care. One relatively untapped resource for supporting engagement in PACT is patients' family and friends. Three out of four adults with diabetes reach out to an unpaid family member or friend (a 'Care Partner') for ongoing help with diabetes management. These supporters help patients with medication adherence, tracking home glucose measurements, maintaining a healthy eating plan, and often accompany patients to their medical visits. However, while PACT emphasizes the importance of family members as part of the care team, PACT does not have formal mechanisms to involve health supporters in PACT care. Health supporters report that, in order to be more effective, they need more information on patient's medical care plans, clear channels for communicating with PACT team members, and information on navigating PACT resources.

Objectives:

The overall objective of this randomized trial is to test a strategy to strengthen the capacity of supporters to help patients with high-risk diabetes engage in PACT care and successfully enact care plans.

The central hypothesis is that providing health care engagement tools to both Care Partners and patients will increase patient activation and improve management of diabetes complication risks.

Methods:

This is a randomized controlled trial evaluating an intervention (Caring Others Increasing EngageMent in PACT, or CO-IMPACT) designed to structure and facilitate health supporter involvement in PACT so that patients can become more actively engaged in PACT care. 240 patients with diabetes receiving PACT primary care who: 1) are at high risk for diabetes complications due to hyperglycemia OR high blood pressure and 2) have a health supporter involved in their care will be recruited along with their health supporter. Patient-supporter dyads are randomized to the CO-IMPACT intervention or usual PACT care for high-risk diabetes, for 12 months.

The intervention provides patient-supporter dyads: one coaching session on action planning, communicating with providers, navigation skills and support skills; preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns. CO-IMPACT builds on medical record-integrated patient activation tools in the PACT toolkit and is designed to be implementable within existing PACT nurse encounters.

Primary outcomes for this study include a validated measure of patient activation (Patient Activation Measure-13) and a cardiac event 5-year risk score designed for patients with diabetes (UKPDS Risk Engine). Secondary outcomes include patients' self-efficacy for diabetes self-care; diabetes self-management behaviors including medication adherence; diabetes distress; and glycemic and blood pressure control. Measures among supporters include supporter activation, use of effective support techniques, distress about patient's diabetes care, and caregiver burden. We are also measuring patient-supporter and patient-provider relationship quality, patient safety (e.g. hypoglycemia), utilization, potential moderators of intervention effect such as patient health literacy level, and facilitators and barriers to wider implementation.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
478 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Engaging Veterans and Family Supporters in PACT to Improve Diabetes Management
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 16, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 6, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 6, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: CO-IMPACT

patient and supporter (dyad) receive one coaching session on action planning, communicating with providers, navigation skills and support skills; preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns

Other: CO-IMPACT
Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter

Active Comparator: PACT

patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which includes (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits

Other: PACT
participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which includes (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in Patient Activation, as Measured by Patient Activation Measure - 13 [Baseline to 12 months]

    Patient Activation Measure-13. Range of potential values (0,100), higher scores mean a better outcome, Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months, among patient participants

  2. Change in Cardiac Event 5-year Risk Score, as Measured by UKPDS Risk Engine [Baseline to 12 months]

    UKPDS Risk Engine, among patient participants only, range is 0 to 100% risk of cardiac event over the next 5 years. Lower score equals a better outcome. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in Diabetes Self-Management Behavior - Healthy Eating [Baseline to 12 months]

    Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) - range of potential values for healthy eating subscale (0 - 7 days per week), higher scores mean better outcomes, among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.

  2. Change in Glycemic Control [Baseline to 12 months]

    Hemoglobin A1c, among patient participants. Common range is 4% to 14%, lower values indicate better outcomes. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.

  3. Change in Systolic Blood Pressure [Baseline to 12 months]

    mmHg, Average of two readings done at each time point. Common physiologic range is 80mmHg - 220mmHg. Lower values indicate better outcomes, among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.

  4. Change in Diabetes Distress [Baseline to 12 months]

    Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) - range of potential values (0,20), higher scores indicate worse outcomes (greater diabetes-related emotional distress), among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.

  5. Change in Activation in Health Encounters [Baseline to 12 months]

    Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) - range of potential values (5, 25), higher scores indicate better outcomes (higher perceived self-efficacy in patient-physician interactions), among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.

  6. Change in Non-Fasting Lipid Levels [Baseline to 12 months]

    Total cholesterol mg/DL to HDL mg/DL Ratio, common range is 1-10, lower values indicate better outcomes, among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.

  7. Change in Patient Satisfaction With Healthcare System Support for Family Supporter [Baseline to 12 months]

    Measured as percent of patient participants answering they were 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied' with healthcare system support for their Care Partner (family supporter)'s participation in their healthcare. Response options were 'very unsatisfied', 'unsatisfied', 'neither', 'satisfied', or 'very satisfied'. Increase in proportion of 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied' indicates better outcomes (higher satisfaction), among patient participants.

  8. Change in Supporter Use of Autonomy-Supportive Communication [Baseline to 12 months]

    Important Other Climate Questionnaire (IOCQ) - patient rating of supporter communication. Range of potential values (1,7), higher scores indicate better outcomes (higher patient perception of supporter use of autonomy supportive communication), among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.

  9. Change in Smoking Status [Baseline to 12 months]

    Global Adult Tobacco Survey, values include 'current smoker', 'former smoker', or 'never smoker'. Change from current to former smoker over 12 months indicates a better outcome. Measured among patient participants.

  10. Change in Diabetes Self-Management Behavior - Physical Activity [Baseline to 12 months]

    Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) - range of potential values for physical activity subscale (0-7 days per week), higher scores mean better outcome, among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.

  11. Change in Diabetes Self-Management Behavior - Blood Sugar Home Testing [Baseline to 12 months]

    Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) - range of potential values (0-7 days per week), higher scores mean better outcome, among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.

  12. Change in Diabetes Self-Management Behavior - Blood Pressure Home Testing [Baseline to 12 months]

    Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) - range of potential values (0-7 days per week), higher scores mean better outcome, among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.

  13. Change in Diabetes Self-Management Behavior - Take Oral Meds as Prescribed [Baseline to 12 months]

    Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) - range of potential values (0-7 days per week), higher scores mean better outcome, among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.

  14. Change in Diabetes Self-Management Behavior - Take Insulin as Prescribed [Baseline to 12 months]

    Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) - range of potential values (0-7 days per week), higher scores mean better outcome, among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.

  15. Change in Diabetes Self-Management Behavior - Check Feet [Baseline to 12 months]

    Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) - range of potential values (0-7 days per week), higher scores mean better outcome, among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Change in Diabetes Self-Efficacy [Baseline to 12 months]

    Adapted Stanford Chronic Disease self-efficacy scale, among patient participants. Range of potential values (1,10), higher score indicates higher self-efficacy. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.

  2. Change in Supporter Self-Efficacy for Helping With Diabetes Care [Baseline to 12 months]

    Adapted Stanford Chronic Disease self-efficacy scale, among family supporter participants. Range of potential values (1,10), higher score indicates higher self-efficacy. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.

  3. Change in Caregiver Burden [Baseline to 12 months]

    Caregiver Strain Index - range of potential values (0,13), higher scores (7 or more) mean worse outcomes, among family supporter participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.

  4. Change in Supporter Distress About Patient Participant's Diabetes [Baseline to 12 months]

    Adapted Problem Areas In Diabetes Scale (PAID) - range of potential values (0,20), higher scores indicate worse outcomes (greater diabetes-related emotional distress), among family supporter participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
30 Years to 70 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient Inclusion Criteria:
  • Provide signed and dated informed consent form

  • Plan to be be available for the duration of the study

  • Male or female, age 30-70 years old

  • Plan to get most diabetes care at recruiting VA primary care clinic over the subsequent 12 months

  • Able to use telephone to respond to bi-weekly automated Interactive Voice Response (IVR) calls

  • Be able to identify an adult family member or friend who is regularly involved in their health management or health care (involved with medications, managing sugars, coming to appointments, etc)

  • Have a diagnosis of diabetes and be at high-risk for diabetes complications, defined as: (1) a diagnosis of diabetes based on encounter diagnoses from 1 inpatient or 2 outpatient encounters (OR a diabetes medication (at least one >3 month prescription from VA drug classes HS501 (insulin) or HS502, other than metformin), (2) have an assigned VAprimary care provider and at least 2 visits to VA primary care in the previous 12 months, (3) poor glycemic control (last HbA1C within 9 months >8%) OR poor blood pressure control (last BP 160/100 or mean 6 month BP >150/90)

Care Partner Inclusion Criteria:
  • 21 years old or older

  • Fluent in English

  • Live in the United States

Exclusion Criteria:
Patient Exclusion Criteria:
  • Expect to have >1 month gap in VA care in the 12 months following enrollment (e.g. snowbird travel).

  • Plan to receive the majority of their care for diabetes mainly from a non-Primary Care provider in the 12 months following enrollment

  • Have a VA resident/trainee as their main primary care provider

  • Live in a nursing home OR assisted living

  • Have significant cognitive impairment as measured by an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease or dementia, or a score of <4 on the Callahan screener to identify cognitive impairment

  • Need help with more than two basic activities of daily living (ADLs) as measured by the Katz Basic Activities of Daily Living Scale

  • Do not speak English

  • Have a life-limiting severe illness (such as stage renal disease [ESRD] requiring dialysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring oxygen, cancer undergoing active treatment, receiving palliative/hospice care)

  • Are concurrently enrolled in another research study or clinical program, at time of enrollment, that could conflict with the current study's protocol (e.g. another diabetes management research intervention, or VA tele-buddy program involving frequent phone calls)

  • Do not have a working phone or are not able to use a telephone to respond to automated IVR calls

  • Currently Pregnant or planning to become pregnant at time of enrollment

  • Have a serious mental illness or active substance abuse issue

Care Partner Exclusion Criteria:
  • Receive pay for caring for the patient

  • talks with patient about health less than two times per month

  • Have significant cognitive impairment as measured by a score of 4 or less <4 on the Callahan screener to identify cognitive impairment

  • Need help with more than two basic ADL as measured by the Katz Basic Activities of Daily Living Scale

  • Have a life-limiting severe illness (such as end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis, chronic lung disease requiring oxygen, cancer undergoing active treatment, receiving palliative/hospice care)

  • Ever told by a doctor they have dementia, schizophrenia, or manic depression

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI Ann Arbor Michigan United States 48105
2 VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA Pittsburgh Pennsylvania United States 15240

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • VA Office of Research and Development

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ann-Marie Rosland, MD MS, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
VA Office of Research and Development
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02328326
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IIR 14-074
First Posted:
Dec 31, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Oct 6, 2021
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Keywords provided by VA Office of Research and Development
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details Participants were recruited from 11/16/16 to 5/22/18. Eligible patient participants were identified from one of two participating VHA sites. Once identified, they received an introductory letter about the study and indicated interest by phone or mail.
Pre-assignment Detail None. All patient-supporter dyads who enrolled in the study were randomized to one of two study arms.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one coaching session on action planning, communicating with providers, navigation skills and support skills; preparation by phone before patients? primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which includes (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which includes (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 246 232
6-month Follow Up 221 221
COMPLETED 224 224
NOT COMPLETED 22 8

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT Total
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one coaching session on action planning, communicating with providers, navigation skills and support skills; preparation by phone before patients? primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which includes (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which includes (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 246 232 478
Age (years) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ]
Patient Participants
62
64
64
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
6
2.4%
2
0.9%
8
1.7%
Male
117
47.6%
114
49.1%
231
48.3%
Female
14
5.7%
10
4.3%
24
5%
Male
109
44.3%
106
45.7%
215
45%
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
Hispanic or Latino
10
4.1%
4
1.7%
14
2.9%
Not Hispanic or Latino
112
45.5%
112
48.3%
224
46.9%
Unknown or Not Reported
1
0.4%
0
0%
1
0.2%
Hispanic or Latino
6
2.4%
5
2.2%
11
2.3%
Not Hispanic or Latino
117
47.6%
111
47.8%
228
47.7%
Unknown or Not Reported
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
American Indian or Alaska Native
6
2.4%
0
0%
6
1.3%
Asian
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0
0%
1
0.4%
1
0.2%
Black or African American
12
4.9%
18
7.8%
30
6.3%
White
90
36.6%
92
39.7%
182
38.1%
More than one race
6
2.4%
0
0%
6
1.3%
Unknown or Not Reported
9
3.7%
5
2.2%
14
2.9%
American Indian or Alaska Native
1
0.4%
0
0%
1
0.2%
Asian
0
0%
1
0.4%
1
0.2%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Black or African American
10
4.1%
16
6.9%
26
5.4%
White
103
41.9%
92
39.7%
195
40.8%
More than one race
5
2%
2
0.9%
7
1.5%
Unknown or Not Reported
4
1.6%
5
2.2%
9
1.9%
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants)
United States
246
100%
232
100%
478
100%
Insulin Use among Patient Participants (Count of Participants)
Count of Participants [Participants]
78
31.7%
64
27.6%
142
29.7%
PAM-13 Cutoff (Count of Participants)
PAM-13 Prorated Score <40
55
22.4%
65
28%
120
25.1%
PAM-13 Prorated Score >40
68
27.6%
51
22%
119
24.9%
Care Partner Lives with Patient Participant (Count of Participants)
Count of Participants [Participants]
86
35%
82
35.3%
168
35.1%
Patient Baseline Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
62.8
(11.2)
59.8
(12.6)
61.3
(12.0)
Baseline UKPDS 5-Year Cardiac Risk Score (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
14.7
(10.0)
13.6
(9.9)
14.2
(9.9)
Enrolled at Hospital-based clinic (vs. community clinic site) (Count of Participants)
Count of Participants [Participants]
78
31.7%
87
37.5%
165
34.5%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Change in Patient Activation, as Measured by Patient Activation Measure - 13
Description Patient Activation Measure-13. Range of potential values (0,100), higher scores mean a better outcome, Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months, among patient participants
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
This outcome was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 123 116
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
2.94
(9.86)
1.78
(10.84)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in PAM is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly increase patient participants' PAM score compared to patient participants in PACT.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.048
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model was adjusted for baseline value of PAM, insulin use, randomization stratification variables: care partner not in home and PAM cutoff of 40
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 2.60
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.02 to 5.18
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Net difference defined as 12 months minus baseline
2. Primary Outcome
Title Change in Cardiac Event 5-year Risk Score, as Measured by UKPDS Risk Engine
Description UKPDS Risk Engine, among patient participants only, range is 0 to 100% risk of cardiac event over the next 5 years. Lower score equals a better outcome. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
This outcome was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one coaching session on action planning, communicating with providers, navigation skills and support skills; preparation by phone before patients? primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which includes (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which includes (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits
Measure Participants 123 116
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
0.14
(6.77)
-0.73
(6.51)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in ukpds 5 year risk score is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly decrease patient participants' 5-year cardiovascular event risk.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.32
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model adjusted for baseline value of ukpds, insulin use, site, randomization stratification variables: care partner not in home and PAM cutoff of 40
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.9
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.87 to 2.67
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Net difference defined as 12 months minus baseline. Reference for comparison is PACT.
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Diabetes Self-Management Behavior - Healthy Eating
Description Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) - range of potential values for healthy eating subscale (0 - 7 days per week), higher scores mean better outcomes, among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The outcomes was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 116 113
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
1.12
(2.30)
0.50
(2.54)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in Healthy Eating is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly change patient participants' Healthy Eating scores compared to patient participants in PACT.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.01
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model adjusted for BL value of Healthy Eating, insulin use, randomization stratification variables: care partner not in home and PAM cutoff of 40
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.71
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.20 to 1.22
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Net difference defined as 12 months minus baseline
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Glycemic Control
Description Hemoglobin A1c, among patient participants. Common range is 4% to 14%, lower values indicate better outcomes. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The outcomes was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 114 113
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percent of glycosylated hemoglobin]
-0.05
(1.38)
-0.28
(1.43)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in A1c is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly decrease patient participants' A1c score compared to patient participants in PACT.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.33
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model was adjusted for baseline value of A1c, insulin use, randomization stratification variables: care partner not in home and PAM cutoff of 40
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.17
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.17 to 0.51
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Net difference defined as 12 months minus baseline
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Systolic Blood Pressure
Description mmHg, Average of two readings done at each time point. Common physiologic range is 80mmHg - 220mmHg. Lower values indicate better outcomes, among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The outcomes was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 110 110
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mmHg]
-6.41
(1.75)
-2.46
(1.77)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in SBP is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly decrease patient participants' SBP score compared to patient participants in PACT.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.18
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model was adjusted for baseline value of SBP, insulin use, randomization stratification variables: care partner not in home and PAM cutoff of 40.
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -2.82
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-7.00 to 1.35
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Net difference defined as 12 months minus baseline
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Diabetes Distress
Description Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) - range of potential values (0,20), higher scores indicate worse outcomes (greater diabetes-related emotional distress), among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The outcomes was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 114 111
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
-0.25
(4.06)
-0.62
(4.60)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in PAID is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly increase patient participants' PAID score compared to patient participants in PACT.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.83
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model was adjusted for baseline value of PAID, insulin use, randomization stratification variables: care partner not in home and PAM cutoff of 40
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.12
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.95 to 1.19
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Net difference defined as 12 months minus baseline
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Activation in Health Encounters
Description Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) - range of potential values (5, 25), higher scores indicate better outcomes (higher perceived self-efficacy in patient-physician interactions), among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The outcomes was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 115 113
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
0.23
(3.41)
0.33
(4.01)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in PEPPI is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly increase patient participants' PEPPI score compared to patient participants in PACT.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.79
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model was adjusted for baseline value of PEPPI, insulin use, randomization stratification variables: care partner not in home and PAM cutoff of 40
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.11
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.71 to 0.93
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Net difference defined as 12 months minus baseline
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Non-Fasting Lipid Levels
Description Total cholesterol mg/DL to HDL mg/DL Ratio, common range is 1-10, lower values indicate better outcomes, among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The outcomes was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 114 113
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/dL]
-0.11
(0.99)
-0.21
(1.01)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in Chol to HDL Ratio is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly decrease patient participants' Chol to HDL Ratio score compared to patient participants in PACT.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.21
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model adjusted for BL value of Cho to HDL Ratio, insulin use, randomization stratification variables: care partner not in home and PAM cutoff of 40.
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Median Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.15
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.09 to 0.40
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Net difference defined as 12 months minus baseline
9. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Patient Satisfaction With Healthcare System Support for Family Supporter
Description Measured as percent of patient participants answering they were 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied' with healthcare system support for their Care Partner (family supporter)'s participation in their healthcare. Response options were 'very unsatisfied', 'unsatisfied', 'neither', 'satisfied', or 'very satisfied'. Increase in proportion of 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied' indicates better outcomes (higher satisfaction), among patient participants.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The outcomes was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 115 111
Number moving from not satisfied/neither to satisfied
35
14.2%
20
8.6%
Those not changing or getting worse
80
32.5%
91
39.2%
10. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Supporter Use of Autonomy-Supportive Communication
Description Important Other Climate Questionnaire (IOCQ) - patient rating of supporter communication. Range of potential values (1,7), higher scores indicate better outcomes (higher patient perception of supporter use of autonomy supportive communication), among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The outcomes was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 110 113
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
0.27
(0.93)
0.05
(0.94)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in IOCQ is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly increase patient participants' IOCQ score compared to patient participants in PACT.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.01
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model was adjusted for baseline value of IOCQ, insulin use, randomization stratification variables: care partner not in home and PAM cutoff of 40
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.30
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.08 to 0.53
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Net difference defined as 12 months minus baseline
11. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Smoking Status
Description Global Adult Tobacco Survey, values include 'current smoker', 'former smoker', or 'never smoker'. Change from current to former smoker over 12 months indicates a better outcome. Measured among patient participants.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The outcomes was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 115 113
Changed from active smoker at baseline to non-smoker at 12 months
2
0.8%
3
1.3%
Changed from non-smoker at baseline to smoker at 12 months
1
0.4%
5
2.2%
No change
112
45.5%
105
45.3%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Equivalence
Comments Equivalent distribution among categories
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.17
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter difference in count
Estimated Value -1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
to
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Other Statistical Analysis Difference in count of those who stopped smoking in CO-IMPACT vs. those who stopped smoking in PACT.
12. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Diabetes Self-Management Behavior - Physical Activity
Description Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) - range of potential values for physical activity subscale (0-7 days per week), higher scores mean better outcome, among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The outcomes was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 115 113
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
0.09
(2.46)
0.46
(2.13)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in Physical activity is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly increase patient participants' Physical activity score compared to patient participants in PACT.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.87
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model adjusted for BL value of Physical Activity, insulin use, randomization stratification variables: care partner not in home and PAM cutoff of 40
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.04
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.56 to 0.47
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Net difference defined as 12 months minus baseline
13. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Diabetes Self-Management Behavior - Blood Sugar Home Testing
Description Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) - range of potential values (0-7 days per week), higher scores mean better outcome, among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The outcome was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 101 94
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
0.17
(1.75)
0.19
(1.80)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in Blood Sugar Home Testing is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly increase patient participants' Blood Sugar Home Testing score compared to patient participants in PACT.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.31
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model adjusted for BL value of Blood Sugar Home Testing, insulin use, randomization strat. variables: care partner not in home and PAM cutoff of 40
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.23
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.22 to 0.68
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Net difference defined as 12 months minus baseline
14. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Diabetes Self-Management Behavior - Blood Pressure Home Testing
Description Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) - range of potential values (0-7 days per week), higher scores mean better outcome, among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
This outcome was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. The outcomes was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 75 62
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
0.51
(2.52)
0.48
(1.88)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in Blood Pressure Home Testing is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly increase patient participants' Blood Pressure Home Testing score compared to patient participants in PACT.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.87
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model adjusted for BL value of Blood Pressure Home Testing, insulin use, randomization strat. variables: care partner not in home and PAM cutoff of 40
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.07
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.76 to 0.89
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Net difference defined as 12 months minus baseline
15. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Diabetes Self-Management Behavior - Take Oral Meds as Prescribed
Description Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) - range of potential values (0-7 days per week), higher scores mean better outcome, among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The outcomes was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 99 96
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
0.14
(1.17)
0.23
(1.30)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in Take Oral Meds as Prescribed is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly increase patient participants' Take Oral Meds as Prescribed score compared to patient participants in PACT.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.56
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model adjusted for BL value of Take Oral Meds as Prescribed, insulin use, randomization strat variables: care partner not in home and PAM cutoff of 40
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.10
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.42 to 0.23
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Net difference defined as 12 months minus baseline
16. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Diabetes Self-Management Behavior - Take Insulin as Prescribed
Description Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) - range of potential values (0-7 days per week), higher scores mean better outcome, among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The outcomes was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 73 61
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
0.14
(1.34)
0.48
(2.08)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in Take Insulin as prescribed is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly increase patient participants' Take Insulin as Prescribed compared to patient participants in PACT.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.67
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model adjusted for baseline value of Take Insulin as Prescribed, randomization stratification variables: care partner not in home and PAM cutoff of 40
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.07
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.26 to 0.41
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Net difference defined as 12 months minus baseline
17. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Diabetes Self-Management Behavior - Check Feet
Description Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) - range of potential values (0-7 days per week), higher scores mean better outcome, among patient participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The outcomes was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 115 113
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
0.72
(2.06)
0.72
(2.26)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in Foot Care is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly increase patient participants' Foot Care score compared to patient participants in PACT.
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.29
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model was adjusted for baseline value of Foot Care, insulin use, randomization stratification variables: care partner not in home and PAM cutoff of 40
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Median Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.26
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.22 to 0.75
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Other Statistical Analysis Net difference defined as 12 months minus baseline
18. Other Pre-specified Outcome
Title Change in Diabetes Self-Efficacy
Description Adapted Stanford Chronic Disease self-efficacy scale, among patient participants. Range of potential values (1,10), higher score indicates higher self-efficacy. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The outcomes was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 115 113
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
0.26
(1.38)
0.23
(1.48)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in SE is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly change patient participants' SE scores compared to patient participants in PACT.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.01
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model was adjusted for baseline value of SE, insulin use, randomization stratification variables: care partner not in home and PAM cutoff of 40
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.40
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.09 to 0.71
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Net difference defined as 12 months minus baseline
19. Other Pre-specified Outcome
Title Change in Supporter Self-Efficacy for Helping With Diabetes Care
Description Adapted Stanford Chronic Disease self-efficacy scale, among family supporter participants. Range of potential values (1,10), higher score indicates higher self-efficacy. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The outcomes was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 108 110
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
0.19
(1.77)
0.29
(1.83)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in Lorig_CP is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly increase patient participants' Lorig_CP score compared to patient participants in PACT.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.67
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model was adjusted for baseline value of Lorig_CP, insulin use, randomization stratification variables: care partner not in home and PAM cutoff of 40
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.10
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.34 to 0.55
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Net difference defined as 12 months minus baseline
20. Other Pre-specified Outcome
Title Change in Caregiver Burden
Description Caregiver Strain Index - range of potential values (0,13), higher scores (7 or more) mean worse outcomes, among family supporter participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The outcomes was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 108 108
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
0.18
(3.77)
-0.54
(3.30)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in CSIS is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly increase patient participants' CSIS score compared to patient participants in PACT.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.53
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.28
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.60 to 1.16
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Net difference defined as 12 months minus baseline
21. Other Pre-specified Outcome
Title Change in Supporter Distress About Patient Participant's Diabetes
Description Adapted Problem Areas In Diabetes Scale (PAID) - range of potential values (0,20), higher scores indicate worse outcomes (greater diabetes-related emotional distress), among family supporter participants. Outcome is the participant's difference in the measure between baseline and 12 months.
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The outcomes was assessed only among patient participants and not among family supporters, so sample size for these analyses are approximately half of the total study population. Only participants with complete baseline and 12 month data for the outcome were included in that outcome's analysis.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one 45-minute coaching session on understanding care partner's role; understanding patient's diabetes-related health information; patient engagement (action planning, communicating with providers); effective supporter techniques; and how to navigate VA resources (explain what PACT team is, how to reach them, VA diabetes-related programs). Throughout the year of the CO-IMPACT intervention, patient-supporter dyads receive preparation by phone before patients' primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter. patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which follow VA/DoD diabetes management guidelines. At the primary care team's discretion, patients in PACT may also receive: nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits. Participants will also be given access to the CO-IMPACT educational information on general diabetes management in web or hardcopy format. PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which may include (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, and clinical pharmacist visits.
Measure Participants 107 108
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
-0.50
(3.57)
-1.08
(3.71)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection CO-IMPACT, PACT
Comments The null hypothesis was that change (baseline to 12 months) in PAID_CP is the same for CO-IMPACT (intervention) compared to PACT (control). The alternative hypothesis is that that COIMPACT will significantly increase patient participants' PAID_CP score compared to patient participants in PACT.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.50
Comments
Method Regression, Linear
Comments Model was adjusted for baseline value of PAID_CP, insulin use, randomization stratification variables: care partner not in home and PAM cutoff of 40
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.32
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.61 to 1.25
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Net difference defined as 12 months minus baselineNet difference defined as 12 months minus baseline

Adverse Events

Time Frame Adverse event data were collected during the year participants were enrolled in the study. All participants participated between the dates of 01/03/17 to 06/03/19.
Adverse Event Reporting Description Definitions of adverse event and serious adverse event used by study team were consistent with the clinicaltrials.gov definitions. Adverse events were collected when self-reported by participants or family members when study staff reached out to schedule or conduct intervention components or assessment visits.
Arm/Group Title CO-IMPACT PACT
Arm/Group Description patient and supporter (dyad) receive one coaching session on action planning, communicating with providers, navigation skills and support skills; preparation by phone before patients? primary care visits; after-visit summaries by mail; and biweekly automated phone calls to prompt action on new patient health concerns CO-IMPACT: Primary care-integrated activation and social support intervention that provides tools and training in patient activation and effective support techniques for patients and their family supporter patient and their health supporter (dyad) will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which includes (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits PACT: participants will receive PACT care for high-risk diabetes, which includes (at primary care team discretion): nurse care manager visits, diabetes education classes, chronic disease self-management groups, telehealth, clinical pharmacist visits
All Cause Mortality
CO-IMPACT PACT
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 2/246 (0.8%) 1/232 (0.4%)
Serious Adverse Events
CO-IMPACT PACT
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 29/246 (11.8%) 2/232 (0.9%)
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Events 6/246 (2.4%) 6 0/232 (0%) 0
General disorders
General Diagnoses, Hospitalizations 2/246 (0.8%) 2 1/232 (0.4%) 1
Multiple Issues 1/246 (0.4%) 1 0/232 (0%) 0
Infections and infestations
Infection 4/246 (1.6%) 4 0/232 (0%) 0
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Injury 4/246 (1.6%) 4 0/232 (0%) 0
Nervous system disorders
Stroke 4/246 (1.6%) 4 0/232 (0%) 0
Social circumstances
Social Circumstances 1/246 (0.4%) 1 0/232 (0%) 0
Surgical and medical procedures
Surgeries 4/246 (1.6%) 4 0/232 (0%) 0
Vascular disorders
Vascular Issues 3/246 (1.2%) 3 1/232 (0.4%) 1
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
CO-IMPACT PACT
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/246 (0%) 0/232 (0%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Dr. Ann-Marie Rosland
Organization VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion
Phone 4123602259
Email Ann-Marie.rosland@va.gov
Responsible Party:
VA Office of Research and Development
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02328326
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IIR 14-074
First Posted:
Dec 31, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Oct 6, 2021
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2021