Variation in Sulphonylurea Response in Type 2 Diabetes

Sponsor
NHS Tayside (Other)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT00738088
Collaborator
(none)
14
1
1
45
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The study hypothesis is that people who respond well to sulphonylureas have a different underlying cause for their diabetes than people who respond poorly to this medication. We are using two approaches to study this. In one approach we look at people who have previously responded well or poorly, confirm this by rechallenging them with a sulphonylurea drug, and then looking at how well they produce insulin in response to glucose and an intravenous sulphonylurea called tolbutamide. The second approach identifies people with a certain genetic predisposition to diabetes (due to changes in the TCF7L2 gene) and then looks at how well they respond to sulphonylurea medication.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
14 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The Use of Glycaemic Response to Sulphonylureas as a Tool to Investigate Type 2 Diabetes Pathophysiology
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Mar 3, 2011
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 3, 2011

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: 1

Withdrawal of sulphonylurea for 6 weeks, then re-introduction for 6 weeks, assessed by fasting glucose and HbA1c

Drug: gliclazide
Gliclazide 80mg bd for 6 weeks
Other Names:
  • Diamicron
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. HbA1c reduction [6 weeks]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. insulin secretory response to glucose and tolbutamide [acute]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    35 Years to 70 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Type 2 diabetes

    • Age >35 and < 70

    • Age of diabetes diagnosis >35 and <70

    • White European

    • Pre-SU HbA1c <=10%

    • HbA1c (on treatment) <= 9%

    • No myocardial infarction or Acute coronary syndrome in previous year

    • No stroke or transient ischaemic attack in previous year

    • No or stable (background) retinopathy (no unscheduled laser treatment in the last 6 months)

    • eGFR > 60mls/min

    • No Proteinuria >30mg/dl on multistix 10SG

    • No active foot ulceration or infection

    • Liver ALT ≤ twice the upper limit of the reference range

    • Contactable by telephone

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Type 1 diabetes

    • HbA1c >10% prior to commencing SU

    • HbA1c>9% on SU treatment

    • Recent MI or Stroke within last 12 months

    • Pre-proliferative or proliferative retinopathy

    • eGFR<60 ml/min

    • Proteinuria >30mg/dl on multistix 10SG

    • Active foot ulceration or infection

    • Liver ALT > twice the upper limit of the reference range

    • Female planning to conceive within the study period

    • Any other significant medical reason for exclusion as determined by the investigator

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 NHS Tayside Dundee United Kingdom DD1 9SY

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • NHS Tayside

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Ewan R Pearson, NHS Tayside

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Ewan Pearson, Professor of Diabetic Medicine, NHS Tayside
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00738088
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2007DM02
    • EudraCT 2007-000594-29
    First Posted:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Last Update Posted:
    May 3, 2018
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2018
    Keywords provided by Ewan Pearson, Professor of Diabetic Medicine, NHS Tayside
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 3, 2018