Dose-Ranging Study In Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Are Treatment-Naive

Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00495469
Collaborator
(none)
250
157
2
9.6
1.6
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a dose-ranging study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a range of doses of GSK189075 (an SGLT2 inhibitor) compared to placebo, administered over 12 weeks in treatment-naive subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
250 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Once-Daily Dose-Ranging Study of GSK189075 Versus Placebo In The Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Treatment-Naïve Subjects
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 17, 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 5, 2008
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 5, 2008

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: GSK189075

Participants will receive GSK189075 for 12 weeks

Drug: GSK189075
GSK189075 is available as a white, capsule-shaped tablet dosage form containing 50mg, 125mg, 250mg or 500mg of GSK189075 per tablet

Placebo Comparator: Placebo

Participants will receive GSK189075 matching Placebo for 12 weeks

Drug: Placebo
Available as Placebo matching tablet to GSK189075

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (Glycosylated Hemoglobin) (HbA1c) at Week 12 [Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 12]

    The blood samples were collected at Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and at Week 12 (or early withdrawal). Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. The primary analysis was performed on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population with Last observation carried forward (LOCF). Adjusted mean is presented as least square (LS) mean.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4 and 8 [Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 4 nad 8]

    The blood samples were collected at Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and at Week 12 (or early withdrawal). Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 4 and 8 minus Baseline value. The primary analysis was performed on the ITT Population with LOCF.

  2. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) [Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 12]

    The samples were collected at Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Week 14 (follow up). Participants were asked to be on fast for at least 8 hours prior to each study visits and collection of lab samples. Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. The primary analysis was performed on the ITT Population with LOCF. Adjusted mean is presented as LS mean.

  3. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fructosamine (Corrected) [Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 12]

    The blood samples were collected at Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Week 14 (follow up). Participants were asked to be on fast for at least 8 hours prior to each study visits and collection of lab samples. Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. The primary analysis was performed on the ITT Population with LOCF. Adjusted mean is presented as LS mean.

  4. Number of Participants Who Were HbA1c Responders at Week 12 [Week 12]

    Differences between treatment groups in the proportion of participants who achieved HbA1c targets of <=6.5% and <7% at Week 12 in the ITT population with LOCF were assessed based on a logistic regression model with terms included for treatment and Baseline HbA1c. Differences between treatment groups in the proportion of participants who achieved a clinically meaningful decreases from Baseline in HbA1c (>=0.7%) at Week 12 were assessed in the same manner.

  5. Number of Participants Who Were Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Responders at Week 12 [Week 12]

    Differences between treatment groups in the proportion of participants who achieved FPG targets of <7.0 millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (126 milligrams per deciliter [mg/dL]) and <7.8 mmol/L (140 mg/dL) at Week 12 in the ITT population with LOCF were assessed based on a logistic regression model with terms included for treatment and Baseline FPG. The proportion of participants who achieved the target of <5.5 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) at Week 12 within each treatment group were summarized only. Differences between treatment groups in the proportion of participants who achieved a clinically meaningful decreases from Baseline in FPG (1.7 mmol/L [>=30 mg/dL]) at Week 12 were assessed in the same manner.

  6. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Triglycerides [Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 12]

    Samples were collected at Baseline and at Week 12 (or early withdrawal). Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean is presented as LS mean.

  7. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol [Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 12]

    Samples were collected at Baseline and at Week 12 (or early withdrawal). Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean is presented as LS mean.

  8. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-c) [Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12]

    Blood samples were collected at Baseline and at Week 12 (or early withdrawal). Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean is presented as LS mean.

  9. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-c) [Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12]

    Blood samples were collected at Baseline and at Week 12 (or early withdrawal). Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean is presented as LS mean.

  10. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in LDL-c/HDL-c Ratio [Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12]

    Blood samples were collected at Baseline and at Week 12 (or early withdrawal). Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean is presented as LS mean.

  11. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol/HDL-c Ratio [Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12]

    Blood samples were collected at Baseline and at Week 12 (or early withdrawal). Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean is presented as LS mean.

  12. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Body Weight [Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12]

    Body weight measurement was taken at Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and at Week 14 (follow up). Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean is presented as LS mean.

  13. Number of Participants With Any On-therapy Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [Up to Week 12]

    AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE was defined as any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment.

  14. Number of Participants With On-therapy Hypoglycemia [Up to Week 12]

    Participants were provided with a Daily Glucose Monitoring Log to record glucose meter readings and to record symptoms of hypoglycemia. A separate electronic case report form (eCRF) page was provided to capture events of hypoglycemia.

  15. Number of Participants With Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) at Any Time on Therapy [Up to Week 12]

    Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR) were measured pre-dose in duplicate, after the participant has been lying quietly for 5 minutes, and then in duplicate 3 minutes after standing up. Participants were asked to refrain from smoking for at least 30 minutes prior to vital sign measurements.

  16. Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at Any Time Post-Baseline [Up to Week 12]

    Full 12-lead ECGs were recorded at Randomization (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 12 or early withdrawal. If the QTc was >500 milliseconds on the locally read ECG recording, an additional 2 ECG recordings at 10 minute intervals were made at that visit. If the average QTc for the 3 recordings was >500 milliseconds, the participant was withdrawn from the study.

  17. Number of Participants With Abnormal Chemistry Value of PCI at Any Time on Therapy [Up to Week 12]

    Chemistry parameters: Albumin, Alkaline phosphatase, Alanine animotransferase, Aspartate aminotransferase, Total billirubin, Calcium, Carbon dioxide/Bicarbonate, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Phosphorus and Total protein were assessed for abnormal PCI values. Participants were instructed to fast for at least 8 hours prior to all study visits for the collection of laboratory samples. Samples were collected at Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and at Week 14 (follow up).

  18. Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology Value of PCI at Any Time on Therapy [Up to Week 12]

    Hematology parameters: Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Platelet count and White blood cells were assessed for abnormal PCI values. Participants were instructed to fast for at least 8 hours prior to all study visits for the collection of laboratory samples. Samples were collected at Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and at Week 14 (follow up).

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Subjects with a documented diagnosis of T2DM and HbA1c ≥7.0% and ≤9.5% measured by the central laboratory at Visit 1.

  • Note: Subjects with HbA1c <7.5% must have a fasting fingerstick glucose ≥7 mmol/L (126 mg/dL) at Week 0, prior to randomization.

  • Note: The proportion of subjects who are randomized with an HbA1c <7.5% will be limited to be no more than 20% (approximately 51 subjects)

  • Subjects who are treatment-naïve, and have not taken insulin, or any oral or injectable anti-diabetic medication in the past 3 months and have not taken a glucose lowering agent for ≥4 weeks at any time in the past, or subjects who are newly diagnosed and treated with diet and exercise for a minimum of 6 weeks

  • Subjects who are 18 to 70 years of age inclusive at the time of Screening.

  • Females of childbearing and non-childbearing and potential are eligible to participate as follows:

  • Women of childbearing potential must be willing to use one of the following contraception methods: intrauterine device, condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) plus spermicidal agent for at least 30 days prior to the start of study medication, throughout the study and the follow-up visit. Note: use of oral contraceptives is not permitted.

  • Women of non-child bearing potential are defined as follows: females regardless of age, with functioning ovaries who have a current documented tubal ligation, or who are surgically sterile (i.e. documented total hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy), or females who are post-menopausal.

All females must have a negative urine pregnancy test on the day of, and prior to randomization.

  • Informed Consent: a signed and dated written consent must be obtained from the subject before any procedures are performed.
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Metabolic Disease

  • Diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes mellitus

  • History of ketoacidosis which has required hospitalization

  • Thyroid disorder

  • TSH <0.4 MIU/L (<0.4 MCIU/mL) or >5.5 mIU/L (>5.5 MCIU/mL) at Screening

  • BMI of <22 kg/m2 or >43 kg/m2

  • Significant weight gain or loss (as defined as >5% of total body weight) in the 3 months prior to Screening

  • Diabetic Medication

  • Has taken insulin, or any oral or injectable anti-diabetic medication within 3 months of screening

  • Has taken insulin or any oral or injectable anti-diabetic medication ≥4 weeks at any time in the past

  • Cardiovascular Disease

Recent history or presence of clinically significant acute cardiovascular disease including:

  • Documented myocardial infarction in the 6 months prior to Screening.

  • Coronary revascularization including percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery either planned and/or occurred in the 6 months prior to Screening.

  • Unstable angina in the 6 months prior to Screening.

  • Clinically significant supraventricular arrhythmias requiring medical therapy, or history of nonsustained or sustained ventricular tachycardia. Symptomatic valvular heart disease or valvular heart disease requiring therapy other than endocarditis prophylaxis.

  • Congestive heart failure (CHF, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II to IV) requiring pharmacologic treatment or the NYHA Class criteria in accordance with the local prescribing information for pioglitazone.

  • Blood pressure (BP) >150/100mmHg. If a subject is receiving permitted antihypertensive therapy, then they must be on stable dose(s) of therapy for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening.

  • Based on local readings, the subject has an initial QTc interval (Bazett's)≥450msec at Screening, and after two additional ECGs taken 5 minutes apart, the average of the QTC interval from the three ECGs is ≥450msec.

  • Other clinically significant ECG abnormalities which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may affect the interpretation of efficacy or safety data, or which otherwise contraindicates participation in a clinical trial with a new chemical entity.

  • Fasting triglycerides ≥400mg/dL (4.56mmol/L) at Screening. If a subject is receiving permitted lipid-lowering therapy, then they must be on a stable dose(s) of therapy for at least 6 weeks prior to Screening. Niacin and bile acid sequestrants are prohibited.

  • Hepatic Disease

Has a diagnosis of active hepatitis (hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C antibody), or clinically significant hepatic enzyme elevation including:

Any one of the following enzymes greater than 2 times the upper limit of the reference range (ULRR) value at Screening.

  • alanine aminotransferase (ALT)

  • aspartate aminotransferase (AST)

  • alkaline phosphatase (AP) Has a total bilirubin level that is >1.5 times the ULRR at Screening with the exception of suspected or confirmed Gilbert's disease.

  • Pancreatic Disease

  • Secondary causes of diabetes:

  • history of chronic or acute pancreatitis

  • Renal Disease

Significant renal disease at Screening as manifested by:
  • Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60mL/min (as calculated by Quest at Visit using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation

•≥1+ protein on urine dipstick

  • Trace or ≥1+ leukocyte esterase on urine dipstick

  • Trace or ≥1+ blood on urine dipstick

  • Positive nitrite on urine dipstick

  • Recurrent genitourinary tract infections defined as ≥2 episodes of complicated or uncomplicated cystitis or pyelonephritis in the 6 months prior to Screening.

  • Concurrent Disease

  • Has any concurrent condition or any clinically significant abnormality identified on the screening physical examination, laboratory tests (including blood electrolytes), ECG, including pulmonary, neurological or inflammatory diseases, which, in the opinion of the investigator, may affect the interpretation of efficacy and safety data, or which otherwise contraindicates participation in a clinical trial with a new chemical entity.

  • History of significant co-morbid diseases active in the 6 months prior to Screening (e.g., cholecystitis, acute pancreatitis, gastrointestinal disease, chronic diarrhea, etc.).

  • History of malignancy within the past 5 years other than superficial squamous cell carcinoma (non-invasive on pathology) or basal cell carcinoma (successfully treated with local excision).

  • History of cervical cancer in situ treated definitively at least 6 months prior to Screening.

  • Concurrent Medication

Is currently taking or has taken any of the following medications in the 8 weeks prior to

Screening:
  • Digoxin

  • Warfarin and other oral anticoagulants (aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are permitted)

  • Bile acid sequestrants

  • Niacin (excluding routine vitamin supplementation)

  • Antiobesity agents (including fat absorption blocking agents)

  • Oral or injectable corticosteroids (inhaled, topical and intranasal corticosteroids are permitted)

  • Loop diuretics

  • Monoamine oxidase inhibitors and tricyclic amines

  • Antiretroviral drugs

  • St John's Wort

  • Oral chromium 9.Breast Feeding 10.Other

  • Current smoker who is unable to abstain from smoking while in the clinic at each visit

  • Has a history of alcohol or substance abuse within the past year at Screening or alcohol or substance abuse during treatment, as determined by the investigator:

  • Unwilling to refrain from the use of illicit drugs and adhere to other protocol-stated restrictions while participating in the study

  • Has an average weekly intake of alcohol of >21 units or an average daily intake of >3 units (males) or an average weekly intake of >14 units or an average daily intake of

2 units (females). One unit is equivalent to a half pint of beer or 1 measure of spirits or 1 glass of wine

  • Has participated in any study with an investigational or marketed drug in the 3 months prior to Screening.

  • In the opinion of the investigator has a risk of non-compliance with study procedures, or cannot read, understand, or complete study related materials, particularly the informed consent.

  • Known allergy to any of the tablet or capsule excipients, or history of drug or other allergy, which, in the opinion of the responsible study physician, contraindicates participation.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 GSK Investigational Site Mesa Arizona United States 85206
2 GSK Investigational Site Artesia California United States 90701
3 GSK Investigational Site Buena Park California United States 90620
4 GSK Investigational Site Fresno California United States 93720
5 GSK Investigational Site Greenbrae California United States 94904
6 GSK Investigational Site La Jolla California United States 92037
7 GSK Investigational Site Norwalk California United States 90650
8 GSK Investigational Site Petaluma California United States 94954
9 GSK Investigational Site Sacramento California United States 95823
10 GSK Investigational Site San Mateo California United States 94401
11 GSK Investigational Site Santa Ana California United States 92701
12 GSK Investigational Site Tarzana California United States 91356
13 GSK Investigational Site Torrance California United States 90505
14 GSK Investigational Site Deland/Florida Florida United States 32720
15 GSK Investigational Site Hollywood Florida United States 33023
16 GSK Investigational Site Jacksonville/Florida Florida United States 32223
17 GSK Investigational Site Miami Florida United States 33156
18 GSK Investigational Site Miami Florida United States 33169
19 GSK Investigational Site Ocoee/Florida Florida United States 34761
20 GSK Investigational Site Saint Cloud Florida United States 34769
21 GSK Investigational Site Atlanta Georgia United States 30322
22 GSK Investigational Site Atlanta Georgia United States 30342
23 GSK Investigational Site Bloomingdale Illinois United States 60108
24 GSK Investigational Site Chicago Illinois United States 60616
25 GSK Investigational Site Oak Brook Illinois United States 60523
26 GSK Investigational Site South Bend Indiana United States 46614
27 GSK Investigational Site Lafayette Louisiana United States 70503
28 GSK Investigational Site Lake Charles Louisiana United States 70601
29 GSK Investigational Site Oxon Hill Maryland United States 20745
30 GSK Investigational Site Boston Massachusetts United States 02118
31 GSK Investigational Site Gulfport Mississippi United States 39501
32 GSK Investigational Site Jackson Mississippi United States 39202
33 GSK Investigational Site Kosciusko Mississippi United States 39090
34 GSK Investigational Site Rolling Fork Mississippi United States 39159
35 GSK Investigational Site Chesterfield Missouri United States 63017
36 GSK Investigational Site St. Louis/Missouri Missouri United States 63118
37 GSK Investigational Site Henderson Nevada United States 89014
38 GSK Investigational Site Las Vegas Nevada United States 89016
39 GSK Investigational Site Las Vegas Nevada United States 89106
40 GSK Investigational Site Las Vegas Nevada United States 89119
41 GSK Investigational Site Las Vegas Nevada United States 89128
42 GSK Investigational Site Clifton New Jersey United States 7011
43 GSK Investigational Site Albuquerque New Mexico United States 87102
44 GSK Investigational Site Commack New York United States 11725
45 GSK Investigational Site Ithaca New York United States 14850
46 GSK Investigational Site New York New York United States 10032
47 GSK Investigational Site Asheboro/North Carolina North Carolina United States 27203
48 GSK Investigational Site Canal Fulton Ohio United States 44614
49 GSK Investigational Site Bensalem/Pennsylvania Pennsylvania United States 19020
50 GSK Investigational Site West Chester Pennsylvania United States 19382
51 GSK Investigational Site Manning South Carolina United States 29102
52 GSK Investigational Site Simpsonville South Carolina United States 29681
53 GSK Investigational Site Athens/Tennessee Tennessee United States 37303
54 GSK Investigational Site Corpus Christi Texas United States 78404
55 GSK Investigational Site Dallas Texas United States 75230
56 GSK Investigational Site Dallas Texas United States 75235
57 GSK Investigational Site Harlingen/Texas Texas United States 78550
58 GSK Investigational Site Houston Texas United States 77030
59 GSK Investigational Site Houston Texas United States 77074
60 GSK Investigational Site Houston Texas United States 77081
61 GSK Investigational Site Midland Texas United States 79705
62 GSK Investigational Site San Anonio Texas United States 78221
63 GSK Investigational Site San Antonio Texas United States 78229
64 GSK Investigational Site Burke Virginia United States 22015
65 GSK Investigational Site Bellevue Washington United States 98004
66 GSK Investigational Site Langley British Columbia Canada V3A 4H9
67 GSK Investigational Site Bathurst New Brunswick Canada E2A 4X7
68 GSK Investigational Site Bay Roberts Newfoundland and Labrador Canada A0A 1G0
69 GSK Investigational Site Brampton Ontario Canada L6T 3T1
70 GSK Investigational Site Mississauga Ontario Canada L5A 3V4
71 GSK Investigational Site Oakville Ontario Canada L6H 3P1
72 GSK Investigational Site Ottawa Ontario Canada K1K 4K4
73 GSK Investigational Site Thornhill Ontario Canada L4J 8L7
74 GSK Investigational Site Toronto Ontario Canada M3H 5S4
75 GSK Investigational Site Toronto Ontario Canada M4R 2G4
76 GSK Investigational Site L'ancienne-Lorette Quebec Canada G2E 2X1
77 GSK Investigational Site Québec Canada G1V 4G5
78 GSK Investigational Site Brno Czechia 624 00
79 GSK Investigational Site Brno Czechia 636 00
80 GSK Investigational Site Praha 10 Czechia 100 00
81 GSK Investigational Site Praha 5 Czechia 158 00
82 GSK Investigational Site Parnu Estonia 80018
83 GSK Investigational Site Tallinn Estonia 13415
84 GSK Investigational Site Tallin Estonia 13419
85 GSK Investigational Site Tartu Estonia 51014
86 GSK Investigational Site Allmendingen Baden-Wuerttemberg Germany 89604
87 GSK Investigational Site Wangen Baden-Wuerttemberg Germany 88239
88 GSK Investigational Site Grossheirath Bayern Germany 96269
89 GSK Investigational Site Hohenau Bayern Germany 94545
90 GSK Investigational Site Kuenzing Bayern Germany 94550
91 GSK Investigational Site Muenchen Bayern Germany 80339
92 GSK Investigational Site Muenchen Bayern Germany 80469
93 GSK Investigational Site Parsberg Bayern Germany 92331
94 GSK Investigational Site Ruhmannsfelden Bayern Germany 94239
95 GSK Investigational Site Sulzbach-Rosenberg Bayern Germany 92237
96 GSK Investigational Site Falkensee Brandenburg Germany 14612
97 GSK Investigational Site Brinkum/Stuhr Niedersachsen Germany 28816
98 GSK Investigational Site Einbeck Niedersachsen Germany 37574
99 GSK Investigational Site Hannover Niedersachsen Germany 30159
100 GSK Investigational Site Lueneburg Niedersachsen Germany 21339
101 GSK Investigational Site Tostedt Niedersachsen Germany 21255
102 GSK Investigational Site Hassloch Rheinland-Pfalz Germany 67454
103 GSK Investigational Site Ingelheim Rheinland-Pfalz Germany 55218
104 GSK Investigational Site Wolmirstedt Sachsen-Anhalt Germany 39326
105 GSK Investigational Site Dresden Sachsen Germany 01129
106 GSK Investigational Site Freital Sachsen Germany 01705
107 GSK Investigational Site Schmiedeberg Sachsen Germany 01762
108 GSK Investigational Site Luebeck Schleswig-Holstein Germany 23568
109 GSK Investigational Site Berlin Germany 10115
110 GSK Investigational Site Berlin Germany 10249
111 GSK Investigational Site Berlin Germany 12524
112 GSK Investigational Site Berlin Germany 13347
113 GSK Investigational Site Athens Greece 115 27
114 GSK Investigational Site Athens Greece 11528
115 GSK Investigational Site Thessaloniki, Greece 56429
116 GSK Investigational Site Thessaloniki Greece 564 29
117 GSK Investigational Site Bangalore India 560034
118 GSK Investigational Site Bangalore India 560043
119 GSK Investigational Site Chennai India 600010
120 GSK Investigational Site Mumbai India 400007
121 GSK Investigational Site Pune India 411004
122 GSK Investigational Site Kaunas Lithuania LT-48259
123 GSK Investigational Site Kaunas Lithuania LT-50009
124 GSK Investigational Site Kaunas Lithuania LT-51270
125 GSK Investigational Site Vilnius Lithuania LT-08661
126 GSK Investigational Site Guadalajara Jalisco Mexico 44150
127 GSK Investigational Site Cuernavaca Morelos Mexico 62250
128 GSK Investigational Site Mérida Yucatán Mexico 97129
129 GSK Investigational Site Durango Mexico 34070
130 GSK Investigational Site Rotorua New Zealand 3201
131 GSK Investigational Site Bydgoszcz Poland 85-021
132 GSK Investigational Site Porabka Poland 43-353
133 GSK Investigational Site Siemianowice Slaskie Poland 41-103
134 GSK Investigational Site Wroclaw Poland 50-349
135 GSK Investigational Site Aibonito/Puerto Rico Puerto Rico 00705
136 GSK Investigational Site Caguas Puerto Rico 00725
137 GSK Investigational Site Carolina Puerto Rico 00983
138 GSK Investigational Site Ponce Puerto Rico 00717
139 GSK Investigational Site Rio Piedras Puerto Rico 00921
140 GSK Investigational Site Trujillo Alto/Puerto Rico Puerto Rico 00976
141 GSK Investigational Site Arad Romania 310011
142 GSK Investigational Site Brasov Romania 500365
143 GSK Investigational Site Sfantu Gheorghe Romania 520064
144 GSK Investigational Site Timisoara Romania 300736
145 GSK Investigational Site Moscow Russian Federation 129110
146 GSK Investigational Site Saint-Peterburgh Russian Federation 197022
147 GSK Investigational Site St.Petersburg Russian Federation 191025
148 GSK Investigational Site Tomsk Russian Federation 634 050
149 GSK Investigational Site Tumen Russian Federation 625023
150 GSK Investigational Site Lenasia South Gauteng South Africa 01827
151 GSK Investigational Site Bellville South Africa 7530
152 GSK Investigational Site Gauteng South Africa 1459
153 GSK Investigational Site Parow South Africa 7505
154 GSK Investigational Site Roodepoort South Africa 1709
155 GSK Investigational Site Dnipropetrovsk Ukraine 49027
156 GSK Investigational Site Kyiv Ukraine 02091
157 GSK Investigational Site Vinnitsa Ukraine 21010

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • GlaxoSmithKline

Investigators

  • Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials, GlaxoSmithKline

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00495469
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • KG2110375
First Posted:
Jul 3, 2007
Last Update Posted:
Oct 30, 2017
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2017
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by GlaxoSmithKline
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details The study was conducted at 130 centers in 14 countries (9 European, 3 International countries, Canada, and the United States) during the period from 17 August 2007 to 5 June 2008.
Pre-assignment Detail A total of 822 participants with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus who were treatment naïve, entered the 2-week screening period. Of these, 570 were screen failures. The primary reason for screening failure was the participant not meeting eligibility criteria. Out of 252 randomized participants, 250 participants received study drug.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 twice daily (BID) before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone once daily (QD) before breakfast for 12 weeks Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 milligrams (mg) each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 36 37 34 36 36 36 35
COMPLETED 30 30 27 32 31 31 30
NOT COMPLETED 6 7 7 4 5 5 5

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD Total
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 36 37 34 36 36 36 35 250
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years]
50.6
(10.60)
53.5
(9.35)
54.4
(9.57)
52.6
(10.91)
54.5
(10.19)
50.0
(10.21)
53.2
(10.35)
52.7
(10.19)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
20
55.6%
19
51.4%
14
41.2%
23
63.9%
13
36.1%
21
58.3%
16
45.7%
126
50.4%
Male
16
44.4%
18
48.6%
20
58.8%
13
36.1%
23
63.9%
15
41.7%
19
54.3%
124
49.6%
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Number) [Number]
African American/African Heritage
2
5.6%
3
8.1%
3
8.8%
4
11.1%
2
5.6%
4
11.1%
1
2.9%
19
7.6%
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2.8%
2
5.7%
3
1.2%
Asian - Central/South Asian Heritage
5
13.9%
7
18.9%
3
8.8%
2
5.6%
5
13.9%
5
13.9%
2
5.7%
29
11.6%
Asian - East Asian Heritage
1
2.8%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
0.4%
Asian - South East Asian Heritage
0
0%
1
2.7%
1
2.9%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2.8%
0
0%
3
1.2%
White - Arabic/North African Heritage
2
5.6%
1
2.7%
0
0%
0
0%
3
8.3%
1
2.8%
1
2.9%
8
3.2%
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage
25
69.4%
19
51.4%
24
70.6%
24
66.7%
22
61.1%
23
63.9%
23
65.7%
160
64%
Mixed Race
1
2.8%
6
16.2%
3
8.8%
6
16.7%
4
11.1%
1
2.8%
6
17.1%
27
10.8%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (Glycosylated Hemoglobin) (HbA1c) at Week 12
Description The blood samples were collected at Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and at Week 12 (or early withdrawal). Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. The primary analysis was performed on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population with Last observation carried forward (LOCF). Adjusted mean is presented as least square (LS) mean.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication, had a Baseline assessment, and had at least one corresponding on-therapy efficacy assessment. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks Participants received 2 tablets of 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 33 36 32 34 35 35 34
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Percentage]
-0.19
(0.141)
-0.53
(0.135)
-0.75
(0.143)
-0.53
(0.139)
-0.85
(0.137)
-0.78
(0.137)
-0.38
(0.139)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD, GSK189075 250 mg QD, GSK189075 500 mg QD, GSK189075 1000 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments Tukey's trend test for dose response
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.003
Comments Tukey's trend test adjusts for multiplicity with statistical significance based on p-value <0.05
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD, GSK189075 250 mg QD, GSK189075 500 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments Tukey's trend test for dose response
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.047
Comments Tukey's trend test adjusts for multiplicity with statistical significance based on p-value <0.05.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD, GSK189075 250 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments Tukey's trend test for dose response
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.006
Comments Tukey's trend test adjusts for multiplicity with statistical significance based on p-value <0.05.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments Tukey's trend test for dose response
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.085
Comments Tukey's trend test adjusts for multiplicity with statistical significance based on p-value <0.05.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.085
Comments Pairwise comparison included for informational purposes and not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.34
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.73 to 0.05
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.006
Comments Pairwise comparison included for informational purposes and not controlled for multiplicity
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.56
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.95 to -0.16
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 500 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.084
Comments Pairwise comparison included for informational purposes and not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.34
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.73 to 0.05
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 1000 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.001
Comments Pairwise comparison included for informational purposes and not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.66
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.05 to -0.28
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg BID
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.003
Comments Pairwise comparison included for informational purposes and not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.59
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.97 to -0.20
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.337
Comments Pairwise comparison included for informational purposes and not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.19
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.58 to 0.20
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4 and 8
Description The blood samples were collected at Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and at Week 12 (or early withdrawal). Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 4 and 8 minus Baseline value. The primary analysis was performed on the ITT Population with LOCF.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 4 nad 8

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks Participants received 2 tablets of 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 33 37 33 34 35 35 34
Week 4
-0.18
(0.523)
-0.37
(0.437)
-0.57
(0.639)
-0.40
(0.528)
-0.45
(0.601)
-0.31
(0.541)
-0.07
(0.579)
Week 8
-0.08
(0.943)
-0.42
(0.720)
-0.76
(0.671)
-0.60
(0.827)
-0.77
(0.660)
-0.67
(0.646)
-0.25
(0.819)
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Description The samples were collected at Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Week 14 (follow up). Participants were asked to be on fast for at least 8 hours prior to each study visits and collection of lab samples. Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. The primary analysis was performed on the ITT Population with LOCF. Adjusted mean is presented as LS mean.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 33 36 33 34 35 35 34
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [millimoles per liter (mmol/L)]
-0.50
(0.298)
-1.35
(0.286)
-1.56
(0.298)
-1.13
(0.294)
-1.45
(0.289)
-1.63
(0.289)
-1.01
(0.295)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.039
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.85
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.67 to -0.04
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.013
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -1.06
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.89 to -0.23
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 500 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.131
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.64
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.46 to 0.19
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 1000 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.023
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.95
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.77 to -0.13
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg BID
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.007
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -1.13
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.95 to -0.32
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.223
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.51
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.34 to 0.32
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fructosamine (Corrected)
Description The blood samples were collected at Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Week 14 (follow up). Participants were asked to be on fast for at least 8 hours prior to each study visits and collection of lab samples. Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. The primary analysis was performed on the ITT Population with LOCF. Adjusted mean is presented as LS mean.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 33 36 30 33 33 35 33
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [micromoles per liter (µmol/L)]
-1.4
(6.12)
-25.5
(5.94)
-36.3
(6.44)
-31.2
(6.12)
-37.9
(6.12)
-30.9
(5.94)
-15.2
(6.18)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.005
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -24.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-40.9 to -7.4
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -35.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-52.5 to -17.4
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 500 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.001
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -29.8
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-46.9 to -12.7
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 1000 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -36.5
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-53.6 to -19.5
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg BID
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.001
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -29.5
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-46.3 to -12.7
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.114
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change=Baseline+Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -13.8
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-31.0 to 3.4
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants Who Were HbA1c Responders at Week 12
Description Differences between treatment groups in the proportion of participants who achieved HbA1c targets of <=6.5% and <7% at Week 12 in the ITT population with LOCF were assessed based on a logistic regression model with terms included for treatment and Baseline HbA1c. Differences between treatment groups in the proportion of participants who achieved a clinically meaningful decreases from Baseline in HbA1c (>=0.7%) at Week 12 were assessed in the same manner.
Time Frame Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 33 36 32 34 35 35 34
Responders (<=6.5%)
3
8.3%
5
13.5%
4
11.8%
4
11.1%
7
19.4%
6
16.7%
4
11.4%
Responders (<7%)
7
19.4%
11
29.7%
12
35.3%
10
27.8%
13
36.1%
15
41.7%
11
31.4%
Responders (reduction>=0.7%)
9
25%
13
35.1%
18
52.9%
13
36.1%
18
50%
21
58.3%
13
37.1%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 100 mg QD: Responders (<=6.5%)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.757
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.28
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.27 to 6.06
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 250 mg QD: Responders (<=6.5%)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.580
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.58
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.31 to 8.01
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 500 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 500 mg QD: Responders (<=6.5%)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.881
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.13
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.22 to 5.73
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 1000 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 1000 mg QD: Responders (<=6.5%)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.382
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.95
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.44 to 8.75
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg BID
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 250 mg BID: Responders (<=6.5%)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.409
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.90
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.42 to 8.68
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs Pioglitazone 30 mg QD: Responders (<=6.5%)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.795
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.24
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.24 to 6.29
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 100 mg QD: Responders (<7%)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.765
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.20
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.36 to 3.95
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 250 mg QD: Responders (<7%)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.100
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.74
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.82 to 9.09
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 500 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 500 mg QD: Responders (<7%)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.687
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.28
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.38 to 4.30
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 1000 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 1000 mg QD: Responders (<7%)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.409
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.66
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.50 to 5.52
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 11
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg BID
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 250 mg BID: Responders (<7%)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.086
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.81
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.86 to 9.15
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 12
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs Pioglitazone 30 mg QD: Responders (<7%)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.369
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.75
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.52 to 5.88
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 13
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 100 mg QD: Responders (reduction>=0.7%)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.160
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.17
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.74 to 6.40
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 14
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 250 mg QD: Responders (reduction>=0.7%)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.014
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 3.87
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.31 to 11.42
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 15
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 500 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 250 mg QD: Responders (reduction>=0.7%)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.162
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.17
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.73 to 6.44
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 16
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 1000 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 1000 mg QD: Responders (reduction>=0.7%)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.011
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 4.09
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.38 to 12.17
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 17
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg BID
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 250 mg BID: Responders (reduction>=0.7%)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.003
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 5.31
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.79 to 15.73
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 18
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs Pioglitazone 30 mg QD: Responders (reduction>=0.7%)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.264
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.86
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.63 to 5.49
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants Who Were Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Responders at Week 12
Description Differences between treatment groups in the proportion of participants who achieved FPG targets of <7.0 millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (126 milligrams per deciliter [mg/dL]) and <7.8 mmol/L (140 mg/dL) at Week 12 in the ITT population with LOCF were assessed based on a logistic regression model with terms included for treatment and Baseline FPG. The proportion of participants who achieved the target of <5.5 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) at Week 12 within each treatment group were summarized only. Differences between treatment groups in the proportion of participants who achieved a clinically meaningful decreases from Baseline in FPG (1.7 mmol/L [>=30 mg/dL]) at Week 12 were assessed in the same manner.
Time Frame Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 33 36 33 34 35 35 34
Responders (<7 mmol/L)
6
16.7%
10
27%
14
41.2%
11
30.6%
12
33.3%
14
38.9%
13
37.1%
Responders (<7.8 mmol/L)
13
36.1%
20
54.1%
19
55.9%
17
47.2%
21
58.3%
22
61.1%
15
42.9%
Responders (reduction >=1.7 mmol/L)
5
13.9%
9
24.3%
13
38.2%
11
30.6%
14
38.9%
19
52.8%
17
48.6%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 100 mg QD: Responders (<7 mmol/L)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.480
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.55
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.46 to 5.28
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 250 mg QD: Responders (<7 mmol/L)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.011
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 4.87
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.44 to 16.46
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 500 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 500 mg QD: Responders (<7 mmol/L)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.087
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.92
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.85 to 9.96
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 1000 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 1000 mg QD: Responders (<7 mmol/L)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.082
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.92
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.87 to 9.78
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg BID
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 250 mg BID: Responders (<7 mmol/L)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.024
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 4.00
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.20 to 13.27
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs Pioglitazone 30 mg QD: Responders (<7 mmol/L)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.012
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 4.85
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.41 to 16.66
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 100 mg QD: Responders (<7.8 mmol/L)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.270
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.85
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.62 to 5.54
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 250 mg QD: Responders (<7.8 mmol/L)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.043
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 3.18
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.04 to 9.72
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 500 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 500 mg QD: Responders (<7.8 mmol/L)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.169
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.17
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.72 to 6.53
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 1000 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 1000 mg QD: Responders (<7.8 mmol/L)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.042
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 3.12
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.04 to 9.36
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 11
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg BID
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 250 mg BID: Responders (<7.8 mmol/L)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.020
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 3.69
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.23 to 11.06
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 12
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs Pioglitazone 30 mg QD: Responders (<7.8 mmol/L)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.211
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.04
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.67 to 6.24
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 13
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 100 mg QD: Responders (reduction >=1.7 mmol/L)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.179
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.90
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.61 to 13.75
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 14
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 250 mg QD: Responders (reduction >=1.7 mmol/L)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.030
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 4.93
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.17 to 20.87
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 15
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 500 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 500 mg QD: Responders (reduction >=1.7 mmol/L)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.142
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.99
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.69 to 12.86
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 16
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 1000 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 1000 mg QD: Responders (reduction >=1.7 mmol/L)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.012
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 6.21
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.49 to 25.83
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 17
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg BID
Comments Placebo vs GSK189075 250 mg BID: Responders (reduction >=1.7 mmol/L)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 13.01
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
3.14 to 54.00
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 18
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Comments Placebo vs Pioglitazone 30 mg QD: Responders (reduction >=1.7 mmol/L)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.010
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 6.60
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.56 to 27.99
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Triglycerides
Description Samples were collected at Baseline and at Week 12 (or early withdrawal). Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean is presented as LS mean.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population with LOCF. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 32 34 28 33 31 30 32
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [mmol/L]
-0.01
(0.142)
0.19
(0.138)
-0.32
(0.152)
-0.16
(0.140)
-0.05
(0.144)
-0.18
(0.147)
-0.37
(0.142)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.318
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.20
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.19 to 0.59
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.131
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.32
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.73 to 0.10
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 500 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.452
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.15
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.54 to 0.24
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 1000 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.845
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.04
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.44 to 0.36
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg BID
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.393
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.18
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.58 to 0.23
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.072
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.36
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.76 to 0.03
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol
Description Samples were collected at Baseline and at Week 12 (or early withdrawal). Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean is presented as LS mean.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population with LOCF. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 32 34 28 33 31 30 32
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [mmol/L]
-0.03
(0.127)
-0.08
(0.124)
-0.12
(0.136)
0.10
(0.126)
-0.02
(0.129)
0.22
(0.132)
0.00
(0.128)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.767
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.05
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.40 to 0.30
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.604
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.10
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.46 to 0.27
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 500 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.483
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.13
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.23 to 0.48
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 1000 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.956
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.01
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.35 to 0.37
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg BID
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.185
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.24
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.12 to 0.60
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.863
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.03
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.32 to 0.39
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
9. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-c)
Description Blood samples were collected at Baseline and at Week 12 (or early withdrawal). Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean is presented as LS mean.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population with LOCF. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 32 31 28 31 31 30 32
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [mmol/L]
-0.02
(0.111)
-0.17
(0.113)
-0.03
(0.119)
0.08
(0.114)
-0.04
(0.113)
0.23
(0.115)
0.07
(0.112)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.348
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.15
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.46 to 0.16
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.952
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.01
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.33 to 0.31
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 500 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.523
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.10
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.21 to 0.42
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 1000 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.889
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.02
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.34 to 0.29
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg BID
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.124
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.25
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.07 to 0.56
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.581
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.09
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.22 to 0.40
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
10. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-c)
Description Blood samples were collected at Baseline and at Week 12 (or early withdrawal). Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean is presented as LS mean.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population with LOCF. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 32 34 28 33 31 30 32
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [mmol/L]
-0.02
(0.027)
0.00
(0.026)
0.02
(0.028)
0.06
(0.026)
0.05
(0.027)
0.04
(0.027)
0.09
(0.026)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.518
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.02
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.05 to 0.10
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.352
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.04
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.04 to 0.11
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 500 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.026
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.08
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.01 to 0.16
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 1000 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.069
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.07
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.01 to 0.14
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg BID
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.154
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.06
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.02 to 0.13
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.005
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.11
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.03 to 0.18
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
11. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in LDL-c/HDL-c Ratio
Description Blood samples were collected at Baseline and at Week 12 (or early withdrawal). Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean is presented as LS mean.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population with LOCF. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 32 31 28 31 31 30 32
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Ratio]
0.06
(0.119)
-0.19
(0.121)
-0.06
(0.127)
-0.13
(0.120)
-0.07
(0.121)
0.10
(0.122)
-0.07
(0.120)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.143
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.25
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.58 to 0.08
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.495
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.12
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.46 to 0.22
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 500 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.261
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.19
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.52 to 0.14
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 1000 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.446
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.13
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.46 to 0.20
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg BID
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.783
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 0.05
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.29 to 0.38
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.454
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.13
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.46 to 0.21
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
12. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol/HDL-c Ratio
Description Blood samples were collected at Baseline and at Week 12 (or early withdrawal). Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean is presented as LS mean.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population with LOCF. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 32 34 28 33 31 30 32
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Ratio]
0.14
(0.146)
-0.05
(0.142)
-0.20
(0.156)
-0.22
(0.144)
-0.09
(0.149)
0.01
(0.151)
-0.26
(0.147)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.363
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.19
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.59 to 0.22
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.111
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.34
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.76 to 0.08
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 500 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.080
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.36
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.77 to 0.04
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 1000 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.267
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.23
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.64 to 0.18
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg BID
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.549
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.13
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.54 to 0.29
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.056
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.40
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.81 to 0.01
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
13. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Body Weight
Description Body weight measurement was taken at Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and at Week 14 (follow up). Baseline was defined as the period immediately preceding treatment with study medication (Week 0). For participants with missing Baseline assessment, the last pre-therapy value prior to the Baseline visit was used as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was the value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean is presented as LS mean.
Time Frame Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population with LOCF.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 33 37 33 34 35 35 34
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [kilograms]
-1.03
(0.426)
-1.52
(0.402)
-2.54
(0.425)
-2.46
(0.419)
-2.47
(0.413)
-2.11
(0.413)
0.00
(0.419)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 100 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.396
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -0.50
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.65 to 0.66
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.013
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -1.51
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.70 to -0.33
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 500 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.017
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -1.44
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.61 to -0.26
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 1000 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.015
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -1.45
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.61 to -0.28
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, GSK189075 250 mg BID
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.069
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value -1.09
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.26 to 0.08
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.086
Comments Pairwise comparison not controlled for multiplicity.
Method ANCOVA
Comments Change = Baseline + Treatment
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value 1.03
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.15 to 2.20
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
14. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Any On-therapy Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Description AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE was defined as any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment.
Time Frame Up to Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Safety Population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 36 37 34 36 36 36 35
Any AEs
8
22.2%
15
40.5%
20
58.8%
11
30.6%
21
58.3%
20
55.6%
12
34.3%
Any SAEs
0
0%
1
2.7%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2.8%
0
0%
15. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With On-therapy Hypoglycemia
Description Participants were provided with a Daily Glucose Monitoring Log to record glucose meter readings and to record symptoms of hypoglycemia. A separate electronic case report form (eCRF) page was provided to capture events of hypoglycemia.
Time Frame Up to Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Safety Population.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 36 37 34 36 36 36 35
Count of Participants [Participants]
0
0%
1
2.7%
0
0%
2
5.6%
1
2.8%
1
2.8%
0
0%
16. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) at Any Time on Therapy
Description Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR) were measured pre-dose in duplicate, after the participant has been lying quietly for 5 minutes, and then in duplicate 3 minutes after standing up. Participants were asked to refrain from smoking for at least 30 minutes prior to vital sign measurements.
Time Frame Up to Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 33 37 33 34 35 35 34
SBP, supine, low
1
2.8%
2
5.4%
0
0%
3
8.3%
2
5.6%
2
5.6%
3
8.6%
DBP, supine, high
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2.8%
0
0%
HR, supine, low
1
2.8%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2.8%
0
0%
1
2.9%
Orthostatic SBP, standing, low
1
2.8%
0
0%
3
8.8%
4
11.1%
0
0%
1
2.8%
0
0%
Orthostatic DBP, standing, low
1
2.8%
1
2.7%
3
8.8%
2
5.6%
0
0%
1
2.8%
1
2.9%
Orthostatic HR, standing, high
4
11.1%
5
13.5%
6
17.6%
5
13.9%
5
13.9%
7
19.4%
5
14.3%
17. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at Any Time Post-Baseline
Description Full 12-lead ECGs were recorded at Randomization (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 12 or early withdrawal. If the QTc was >500 milliseconds on the locally read ECG recording, an additional 2 ECG recordings at 10 minute intervals were made at that visit. If the average QTc for the 3 recordings was >500 milliseconds, the participant was withdrawn from the study.
Time Frame Up to Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 33 36 33 34 35 35 34
Count of Participants [Participants]
9
25%
12
32.4%
11
32.4%
7
19.4%
14
38.9%
7
19.4%
8
22.9%
18. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Abnormal Chemistry Value of PCI at Any Time on Therapy
Description Chemistry parameters: Albumin, Alkaline phosphatase, Alanine animotransferase, Aspartate aminotransferase, Total billirubin, Calcium, Carbon dioxide/Bicarbonate, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Phosphorus and Total protein were assessed for abnormal PCI values. Participants were instructed to fast for at least 8 hours prior to all study visits for the collection of laboratory samples. Samples were collected at Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and at Week 14 (follow up).
Time Frame Up to Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 33 37 33 34 35 35 34
Albumin, low
0
0%
1
2.7%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Alkaline phosphatase, high
0
0%
1
2.7%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Alanine aminotransferase, high
0
0%
1
2.7%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Aspartate aminotransferase, high
0
0%
1
2.7%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Total bilirubin, high
1
2.8%
1
2.7%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2.8%
1
2.8%
2
5.7%
Calcium, low
0
0%
1
2.7%
3
8.8%
0
0%
0
0%
2
5.6%
0
0%
carbon dioxide content/Bicarbonate, low
0
0%
2
5.4%
0
0%
1
2.8%
1
2.8%
1
2.8%
0
0%
Glucose, high
1
2.8%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Potassium, high
0
0%
0
0%
1
2.9%
0
0%
2
5.6%
1
2.8%
0
0%
Potassium, low
0
0%
1
2.7%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Sodium, high
0
0%
1
2.7%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Phosphorus, high
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2.8%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Total protein, high
0
0%
1
2.7%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Total protein, low
0
0%
1
2.7%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
19. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology Value of PCI at Any Time on Therapy
Description Hematology parameters: Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Platelet count and White blood cells were assessed for abnormal PCI values. Participants were instructed to fast for at least 8 hours prior to all study visits for the collection of laboratory samples. Samples were collected at Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and at Week 14 (follow up).
Time Frame Up to Week 12

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Safety population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
Measure Participants 36 37 34 36 36 36 35
Hemoglobin, high
1
2.8%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2.8%
2
5.6%
0
0%
0
0%
Hemoglobin, low
2
5.6%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2.9%
Hematocrit, high
1
2.8%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2.8%
2
5.6%
0
0%
0
0%
Hematocrit, low
1
2.8%
2
5.4%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Platelet count, high
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
2
5.6%
0
0%
Platelet count, low
1
2.8%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2.8%
0
0%
0
0%
White blood cell count, low
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2.8%
0
0%
1
2.9%

Adverse Events

Time Frame AEs were reported up to Week 14
Adverse Event Reporting Description Safety Population was used for reporting all AEs
Arm/Group Title Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Arm/Group Description Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 BID before breakfast and dinner and 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone QD before breakfast for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 50 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 250 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 500 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching for GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each, 1 placebo capsule matching for Pioglitazone before breakfast and 2 tablets of GSK189075 125 mg each before dinner daily for 12 weeks. Participants received 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075, 1 capsule of Pioglitazone 30 mg before breakfast and 2 placebo tablets matching GSK189075 before dinner daily for 12 weeks.
All Cause Mortality
Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/36 (0%) 0/37 (0%) 0/34 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 0/35 (0%)
Serious Adverse Events
Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/36 (0%) 1/37 (2.7%) 0/34 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 1/36 (2.8%) 0/35 (0%)
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis 0/36 (0%) 1/37 (2.7%) 0/34 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 0/35 (0%)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Scapula fracture 0/36 (0%) 0/37 (0%) 0/34 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 1/36 (2.8%) 0/35 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Placebo GSK189075 100 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg QD GSK189075 500 mg QD GSK189075 1000 mg QD GSK189075 250 mg BID Pioglitazone 30 mg QD
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 3/36 (8.3%) 9/37 (24.3%) 11/34 (32.4%) 6/36 (16.7%) 17/36 (47.2%) 7/36 (19.4%) 7/35 (20%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation 0/36 (0%) 0/37 (0%) 1/34 (2.9%) 1/36 (2.8%) 0/36 (0%) 3/36 (8.3%) 0/35 (0%)
Abdominal pain upper 2/36 (5.6%) 0/37 (0%) 0/34 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 1/36 (2.8%) 0/36 (0%) 1/35 (2.9%)
Diarrhoea 0/36 (0%) 0/37 (0%) 1/34 (2.9%) 0/36 (0%) 2/36 (5.6%) 1/36 (2.8%) 0/35 (0%)
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection 0/36 (0%) 2/37 (5.4%) 1/34 (2.9%) 1/36 (2.8%) 4/36 (11.1%) 2/36 (5.6%) 2/35 (5.7%)
Influenza 0/36 (0%) 2/37 (5.4%) 2/34 (5.9%) 2/36 (5.6%) 0/36 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 1/35 (2.9%)
Nasopharyngitis 0/36 (0%) 3/37 (8.1%) 0/34 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 1/36 (2.8%) 3/35 (8.6%)
Vaginal infection 0/36 (0%) 1/37 (2.7%) 0/34 (0%) 1/36 (2.8%) 2/36 (5.6%) 1/36 (2.8%) 0/35 (0%)
Upper respiratory tract infection 1/36 (2.8%) 0/37 (0%) 1/34 (2.9%) 0/36 (0%) 2/36 (5.6%) 0/36 (0%) 0/35 (0%)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendonitis 0/36 (0%) 0/37 (0%) 0/34 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 2/36 (5.6%) 0/36 (0%) 0/35 (0%)
Nervous system disorders
Headache 0/36 (0%) 4/37 (10.8%) 2/34 (5.9%) 2/36 (5.6%) 3/36 (8.3%) 0/36 (0%) 1/35 (2.9%)
Dizziness 0/36 (0%) 1/37 (2.7%) 4/34 (11.8%) 0/36 (0%) 2/36 (5.6%) 0/36 (0%) 0/35 (0%)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough 0/36 (0%) 0/37 (0%) 0/34 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 2/36 (5.6%) 0/36 (0%) 0/35 (0%)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash 0/36 (0%) 0/37 (0%) 0/34 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 0/36 (0%) 2/35 (5.7%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title GSK Response Center
Organization GlaxoSmithKline
Phone 866-435-7343
Email
Responsible Party:
GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00495469
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • KG2110375
First Posted:
Jul 3, 2007
Last Update Posted:
Oct 30, 2017
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2017