A Study Comparing the Dulaglutide Pen and the Semaglutide Pen

Sponsor
Eli Lilly and Company (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03724981
Collaborator
(none)
312
14
2
5.8
22.3
3.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

In this study participants will try out two different types of drug injection pens (dulaglutide and semaglutide) on a practice pad and decide which device they prefer. No study drug will be administered.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Dulaglutide Pen
  • Drug: Semaglutide Pen
Phase 4

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
312 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Crossover Study Comparing the Dulaglutide (Trulicity) Pen and the Semaglutide (Ozempic) Pen
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 18, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Apr 12, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Apr 12, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Dulaglutide Pen

Injection of commercial dulaglutide pen on a practice pad.

Drug: Dulaglutide Pen
Injected on a practice pad.

Experimental: Semaglutide Pen

Injection of commercial semaglutide pen on a practice pad.

Drug: Semaglutide Pen
Injected on a practice pad.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Participant Preference Between 2 Injection Devices Based on Global Preference Item [Day 1]

    Preference of injection device was assessed by questionnaire which asks, "Overall, which device do you prefer?" The Prescott test will be run to examine if a statistically significant difference in preference between the devices exits, while controlling for order effects and taking into account the neutral responses.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Participant Preference Between 2 Injection Devices Based on Ease of Use [Day 1]

    Participants responded to the Diabetes Injection Device - Preference Questionnaire (DID-PQ), Item 9 (ease of use) to compare the dulaglutide and semaglutide devices with regard to ease. Response options of "strongly prefer" and "prefer" were combined for each device, resulting in 3 categories: prefer dulaglutide, prefer semaglutide, and no preference. The Prescott test will be run to examine if a statistically significant difference in preference between the devices exists while, controlling for order effects.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes

  • Self-injection naïve to all injectable treatment (for example, diabetes therapies and other medical conditions)

  • Injection naïve to performing all injectable treatment (for example, diabetes therapies and other medical conditions) to others

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Currently diagnosed with gestational diabetes and/or type 1 diabetes

  • Cognitive or physical difficulties that could interfere with ability to understand the training, perform the injection tasks, or complete the study questionnaires as judged by the investigator

  • Is a health care practitioner who is trained in giving injections

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Valley Research Fresno California United States 93720
2 Long Beach Center for Clinical Research Long Beach California United States 90807
3 Palm Harbor Medical Associates Palm Harbor Florida United States 34684
4 Georgia Clinical Research Snellville Georgia United States 30078
5 Cedar-Crosse Research Center Chicago Illinois United States 60607
6 L-Marc Research Center Louisville Kentucky United States 40213
7 Evidera Bethesda Maryland United States 20814
8 Carolina Research Center, Inc. Shelby North Carolina United States 28150
9 Lillestol Research LLC Fargo North Dakota United States 58104
10 BRCR Medical Center, Inc. Camp Hill Pennsylvania United States 17011
11 Juno Research Houston Texas United States 77040
12 Juno Research, LLC Houston Texas United States 77054
13 PI-Coor Clinical Research, LLC Annandale Virginia United States 22003
14 Manassas Clinical Research Center Manassas Virginia United States 20110

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Eli Lilly and Company

Investigators

  • Study Director: Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), Eli Lilly and Company

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Eli Lilly and Company
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03724981
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 17155
  • H9X-MC-B021
First Posted:
Oct 30, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Apr 24, 2020
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail Injections with the 2 injection devices were performed on a practice pad.
Arm/Group Title Dulaglutide to Semaglutide Semaglutide to Dulaglutide
Arm/Group Description Injection of commercial dulaglutide pen on a practice pad, then injection of commercial semaglutide pen on a practice pad. Injection of commercial semaglutide pen on a practice pad, then injection of commercial dulaglutide pen on a practice pad.
Period Title: First Device
STARTED 156 156
COMPLETED 155 155
NOT COMPLETED 1 1
Period Title: First Device
STARTED 155 155
COMPLETED 155 155
NOT COMPLETED 0 0

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Overall
Arm/Group Description Participants were randomized to one of two treatment sequences: dulaglutide injection device to semaglutide injection device or semaglutide injection device to dulaglutide injection device.
Overall Participants 310
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
60.0
(10.86)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
150
48.4%
Male
160
51.6%
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
Hispanic or Latino
39
12.6%
Not Hispanic or Latino
167
53.9%
Unknown or Not Reported
104
33.5%
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3
1%
Asian
10
3.2%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1
0.3%
Black or African American
105
33.9%
White
155
50%
More than one race
8
2.6%
Unknown or Not Reported
28
9%
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants)
United States
310
100%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Participant Preference Between 2 Injection Devices Based on Global Preference Item
Description Preference of injection device was assessed by questionnaire which asks, "Overall, which device do you prefer?" The Prescott test will be run to examine if a statistically significant difference in preference between the devices exits, while controlling for order effects and taking into account the neutral responses.
Time Frame Day 1

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All randomized participants with exposure to both devices and Global Preference data.
Arm/Group Title Dulaglutide to Semaglutide Semaglutide to Dulaglutide
Arm/Group Description Injection of commercial dulaglutide pen on a practice pad, then injection of semaglutide on a practice pad. Injection of commercial semaglutide pen on a practice pad, then injection of commercial dulaglutide on a practice pad.
Measure Participants 155 155
Dulaglutide Device Preference
87.7
28.3%
80.6
NaN
No Device Preference
2.6
0.8%
4.5
NaN
Semaglutide Device Preference
9.7
3.1%
14.8
NaN
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Dulaglutide to Semaglutide, Semaglutide to Dulaglutide
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments
Method Prescott test
Comments
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Participant Preference Between 2 Injection Devices Based on Ease of Use
Description Participants responded to the Diabetes Injection Device - Preference Questionnaire (DID-PQ), Item 9 (ease of use) to compare the dulaglutide and semaglutide devices with regard to ease. Response options of "strongly prefer" and "prefer" were combined for each device, resulting in 3 categories: prefer dulaglutide, prefer semaglutide, and no preference. The Prescott test will be run to examine if a statistically significant difference in preference between the devices exists while, controlling for order effects.
Time Frame Day 1

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All randomized participants with exposure to both devices and Ease of Use data.
Arm/Group Title Dulaglutide to Semaglutide Semaglutide to Dulaglutide
Arm/Group Description Injection of commercial dulaglutide pen on a practice pad, then injection of commercial semaglutide pen on a practice pad. Injection of commercial semaglutide pen on a practice pad, then injection of commercial dulaglutide pen on a practice pad.
Measure Participants 155 155
Dulaglutide Device Preference
87.1
28.1%
86.5
NaN
No Device Preference
5.2
1.7%
7.7
NaN
Semaglutide Device Preference
7.7
2.5%
5.8
NaN
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Dulaglutide to Semaglutide, Semaglutide to Dulaglutide
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments
Method Prescott test
Comments

Adverse Events

Time Frame
Adverse Event Reporting Description All cause mortality: All randomized participants with exposure to both devices. Safety: Zero participants analyzed. No safety data collected as injections were performed on a practice pad.
Arm/Group Title Dulaglutide Semaglutide
Arm/Group Description Injection of commercial dulaglutide pen on a practice pad. Injection of commercial semaglutide pen on a practice pad.
All Cause Mortality
Dulaglutide Semaglutide
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/310 (0%) 0/310 (0%)
Serious Adverse Events
Dulaglutide Semaglutide
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/0 (NaN) 0/0 (NaN)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Dulaglutide Semaglutide
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/0 (NaN) 0/0 (NaN)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Chief Medical Officer
Organization Eli Lilly and Company
Phone 800-545-5979
Email ClinicalTrials.gov@lilly.com
Responsible Party:
Eli Lilly and Company
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03724981
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 17155
  • H9X-MC-B021
First Posted:
Oct 30, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Apr 24, 2020
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2019