Trial Comparing Different Medical Devices for Infragenual Dilatation

Sponsor
University Hospital, Ghent (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00134277
Collaborator
(none)
35
1
4
67
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study is a comparison of different medical devices for infragenual dilatation.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Infragenual dilatation
  • Procedure: Infragenual dilatation with stenting
  • Procedure: Infragenual dilatation with cutting balloon
  • Procedure: Laser therapy
N/A

Detailed Description

Dilatation and recanalisation of the distal veins (infragenual popliteal artery, tibiofibular trunc, posterior tibial artery, anterior tibial artery) by classical balloon dilatation or cutting balloon with or without stenting or by endovascular laser. This intervention happens only once; the duration of the intervention depends on the procedure and the original injuries(30 - 120 minutes).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
35 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Prospective Randomised Comparing Trial Between an Infragenual Dilatation (ID), an ID With Stenting, an ID With Cutting Balloon and Laser Therapy
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2004
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2009
Actual Study Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2010

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Infragenual dilatation with stenting

Procedure: Infragenual dilatation with stenting
Infragenual dilatation with stenting

Active Comparator: Infragenual dilatation with cutting balloon

Procedure: Infragenual dilatation with cutting balloon
Infragenual dilatation with cutting balloon

Active Comparator: Laser therapy

Procedure: Laser therapy
Laser therapy

Placebo Comparator: Infragenual dilatation

Procedure: Infragenual dilatation
Infragenual dilatation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Primary patency after 6 months [After 6 months]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Proving the superiority or non-superiority of one treatment procedure to another treatment procedure [After 6 months.]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Diabetes type I or II with diabetic angiopathy stage IIb to IV (Fontaine)

  • Atherosclerotic patients with distal angiopathy stage IIb to IV (Fontaine)

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Acute ischemia

  • Multisegmentaric damage above the knee

  • Sepsis: acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), C-reactive protein (CRP) > 30, white blood cell (WBC) > 25,000

  • Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during the last 14 days

  • Operative contraindication

  • Life expectancy < 2 years

  • Blue toe syndrome (micro-embolisation)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University Hospital Ghent Ghent Belgium 9000

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Ghent

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Caren Randon, MD, University Hospital, Ghent

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University Hospital, Ghent
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00134277
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2004/161
First Posted:
Aug 24, 2005
Last Update Posted:
Sep 9, 2011
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2011
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 9, 2011