PhagoPied: Standard Treatment Associated With Phage Therapy Versus Placebo for Diabetic Foot Ulcers Infected by S. Aureus

Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT02664740
Collaborator
Pherecydes Pharma (Industry)
60
9
2
26
6.7
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of standard treatment associated with a topical anti-staphylococcal bacteriophage cocktail versus standard treatment plus placebo for diabetic foot ulcers monoinfected by methicillin-resistant or susceptible S. aureus (MRSA or MSSA) as measured by the relative reduction in wound surface area (%) at 12 weeks.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Topical anti-Staphylococcus bacteriophage therapy
  • Drug: Topical placebo corresponding to anti-Staphylococcus bacteriophage therapy
Phase 1/Phase 2

Detailed Description

The secondary objectives of this study are:
  1. To compare the two study arms in terms of treatment safety and tolerance throughout the study.

  2. To compare the two study arms in terms of further changes in wound healing at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12.

  3. To describe the changes in the resistance and virulence of S. aureus (if present in the wound) from baseline to week 4, at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any) and at week 12 if the wound is still not healed.

  4. To describe in the two study arms the antibiotic resistance status of other bacteria isolated from wounds at week 4, at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any) and at week 12 if the wound is still not healed.

  5. To describe in the two study arms changes in wound microbiota from baseline to week 4, at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any) and at week 12 if the wound is still not healed.

  6. To describe the production of anti-phage antibodies during the topical treatment: baseline and week 4, at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any), and at week 12.

  7. Creation of a biobank for future ancillary studies (including, but not limited to, cytokine levels and cellular immune responses): days 0 and week 4, as well as week 12.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of the Efficacy of Standard Treatment Associated With Phage Therapy Versus Standard Treatment Plus Placebo for Diabetic Foot Ulcers Monoinfected by Staphylococcus Aureus: a Randomized, Multi-centre, Controlled, 2-parallel-group, Double-blind, Superiority Trial
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Phage therapy

Patients randomized to this arm will have phage therapy. Intervention: Topical anti-Staphylococcus bacteriophage therapy

Drug: Topical anti-Staphylococcus bacteriophage therapy
Patients randomized to the experimental arm will receive sterile compress dressings impregnated with a phage solution of 10^7 PFU/ml on days 0, 7 and 14 (unless the wound is already healed, i.e. phage solutions are not applied to healed wounds).

Placebo Comparator: Placebo

Patients randomized to this arm will have placebo therapy anologous to that of the experimental arm. Intervention: Topical placebo corresponding to anti-Staphylococcus bacteriophage therapy

Drug: Topical placebo corresponding to anti-Staphylococcus bacteriophage therapy
Patients randomized to the placebo arm will receive sterile compress dressings impregnated with a placebo solution on days 0, 7 and 14 (unless the wound is already healed, i.e. placebo solutions are not applied to healed wounds).

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. The relative reduction in wound surface area (%) [12 weeks]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Immediate Safety [Day 0, 1 hour after application of experimental dressing]

    The presence/absence of the following symptoms during each 1 hour observation periods following the application of each experimental wound dressing: local side effects (local rash onset or worsening of local inflammatory signs) and general symptoms (vital signs, fever, rash, arthralgia, gastro-intestinal symptoms...) will be performed.

  2. Immediate Safety [Day 7, 1 hour after application of experimental dressing]

    The presence/absence of the following symptoms during each 1 hour observation periods following the application of each experimental wound dressing: local side effects (local rash onset or worsening of local inflammatory signs) and general symptoms (vital signs, fever, rash, arthralgia, gastro-intestinal symptoms...) will be performed.

  3. Immediate Safety [Day 14, 1 hour after application of experimental dressing]

    The presence/absence of the following symptoms during each 1 hour observation periods following the application of each experimental wound dressing: local side effects (local rash onset or worsening of local inflammatory signs) and general symptoms (vital signs, fever, rash, arthralgia, gastro-intestinal symptoms...) will be performed.

  4. The number of MedDRA coded Adverse Events per patient [throughout the study; 12 weeks]

  5. The presence/absence of abnormal laboratory results [throughout the study; 12 weeks]

  6. Wound surface area [2 weeks]

  7. Wound surface area [4 weeks]

  8. Wound surface area [6 weeks]

  9. Wound surface area [8 weeks]

  10. Wound surface area [10 weeks]

  11. Wound surface area [12 weeks]

  12. Wound depth [2 weeks]

  13. Wound depth [4 weeks]

  14. Wound depth [6 weeks]

  15. Wound depth [8 weeks]

  16. Wound depth [10 weeks]

  17. Wound depth [12 weeks]

  18. Time to healing [censored at 12 weeks]

  19. The % of completely healed wounds [12 weeks]

  20. Classification of Staphylococcus isolates as MSSA or MRSA resistant [4 weeks]

    MSSA: Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus MRSA: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus What is reported is a binary result: isolates are classified as either "MSSA" or "MRSA"

  21. Classification of Staphylococcus isolates as MSSA or MRSA resistant [at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)]

    MSSA: Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus MRSA: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus What is reported is a binary result: isolates are classified as either "MSSA" or "MRSA"

  22. Classification of Staphylococcus isolates as MSSA or MRSA resistant [at week 12 if the wound is still not healed]

    MSSA: Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus MRSA: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus What is reported is a binary result: isolates are classified as either "MSSA" or "MRSA"

  23. Classification of Staphylococcus isolates according to clonal complexes (virulence classification) [4 weeks]

  24. Classification of Staphylococcus isolates according to clonal complexes (virulence classification) [at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)]

  25. Classification of Staphylococcus isolates according to clonal complexes (virulence classification) [at week 12 if the wound is still not healed]

  26. Presence/absence of non-Staphylococcus aureus bacteria that are antibiotic-resistant [week 0]

  27. Presence/absence of non-Staphylococcus aureus bacteria that are antibiotic-resistant [week 4]

  28. Presence/absence of non-Staphylococcus aureus bacteria that are antibiotic-resistant [at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)]

  29. Presence/absence of non-Staphylococcus aureus bacteria that are antibiotic-resistant [at week 12 if the wound is still not healed]

  30. Wound microbiota: OTU richness [week 0]

    OTU: Operational Taxonomic Unit

  31. Wound microbiota: OTU richness [week 4]

    OTU: Operational Taxonomic Unit

  32. Wound microbiota: OTU richness [at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)]

    OTU: Operational Taxonomic Unit

  33. Wound microbiota: OTU richness [at week 12 if the wound is still not healed]

    OTU: Operational Taxonomic Unit

  34. Wound microbiota: Shannon's Diversity [week 0]

  35. Wound microbiota: Shannon's Diversity [week 4]

  36. Wound microbiota: Shannon's Diversity [at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)]

  37. Wound microbiota: Shannon's Diversity [at week 12 if the wound is still not healed]

  38. Wound microbiota: Functional richness [week 0]

  39. Wound microbiota: Functional richness [week 4]

  40. Wound microbiota: Functional richness [at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)]

  41. Wound microbiota: Functional richness [at week 12 if the wound is still not healed]

  42. Wound microbiota: Functional diversity [week 0]

  43. Wound microbiota: Functional diversity [week 4]

  44. Wound microbiota: Functional diversity [at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)]

  45. Wound microbiota: Functional diversity [at week 12 if the wound is still not healed]

  46. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus relative to other bacteria in the wound [week 0]

  47. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus relative to other bacteria in the wound [week 4]

  48. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus relative to other bacteria in the wound [at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)]

  49. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus relative to other bacteria in the wound [at week 12 if the wound is still not healed]

  50. Wound microbiota: the number of Staphylococcus strains in a wound [week 0]

  51. Wound microbiota: the number of Staphylococcus strains in a wound [week 4]

  52. Wound microbiota: the number of Staphylococcus strains in a wound [at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)]

  53. Wound microbiota: the number of Staphylococcus strains in a wound [at week 12 if the wound is still not healed]

  54. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus relative to other bacteria in the wound [week 0]

  55. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus relative to other bacteria in the wound [week 4]

  56. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus relative to other bacteria in the wound [at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)]

  57. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus relative to other bacteria in the wound [at week 12 if the wound is still not healed]

  58. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus relative to other Staphylococcus in the wound [week 0]

  59. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus relative to other Staphylococcus in the wound [week 4]

  60. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus relative to other Staphylococcus in the wound [at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)]

  61. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus relative to other Staphylococcus in the wound [at week 12 if the wound is still not healed]

  62. Wound microbiota: ordination scores on each of two principal components extracted from UniFrac distances between all bacterial samples taken during the study [week 0]

  63. Wound microbiota: ordination scores on each of two principal components extracted from UniFrac distances between all bacterial samples taken during the study [week 4]

  64. Wound microbiota: ordination scores on each of two principal components extracted from UniFrac distances between all bacterial samples taken during the study [at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)]

  65. Wound microbiota: ordination scores on each of two principal components extracted from UniFrac distances between all bacterial samples taken during the study [at week 12 if the wound is still not healed]

  66. The presence/absence of anti-phage antibodies in plasma samples [week 0]

  67. The presence/absence of anti-phage antibodies in plasma samples [week 4]

  68. The presence/absence of anti-phage antibodies in plasma samples [at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)]

  69. The presence/absence of anti-phage antibodies in plasma samples [at week 12 if the wound is still not healed]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Participant pre-inclusion criteria:
  • The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent

  • The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan

  • The patient is at least 18 years old

  • The patient has type 1 or type 2 diabetes

  • The patient is hospitalized/consulting in a participating centre

  • The patient has a wound below the ankle that has be evolving for >2 weeks

  • The target wound is classified as P (1 or 2), E (1-30 cm^2), D (2), I (2) and S (1 or

  1. according to the PEDIS classification
Participant final inclusion criteria:
  • The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent

  • The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan

  • The patient is at least 18 years old

  • The patient has type 1 or type 2 diabetes

  • The patient is hospitalized/consulting in a participating centre

  • The patient has a wound below the ankle that has be evolving for >2 weeks

  • The target wound is classified as P (1 or 2), E (1-30 cm^2), D (2), I (2) and S (1 or

  1. according to the PEDIS classification
  • The patient's wound is mono-infected with Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA or MSSA)
Participant pre-exclusion criteria:
  • The patient is participating in, or has participated in over the past three months, another trial

  • The patient is participating in, or has participated in over the past three months, another study that may interfere with the results or conclusions of this study

  • The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study

  • The patient is under judicial protection, or is an adult under guardianship

  • It is impossible to correctly inform the patient

  • The patient refuses to sign the consent

  • The patient is pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding

Participant final exclusion criteria:
  • The patient is participating in, or has participated in over the past three months, another trial

  • The patient is participating in, or has participated in over the past three months, another study that may interfere with the results or conclusions of this study

  • The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study

  • The patient is under judicial protection, or is an adult under guardianship

  • It is impossible to correctly inform the patient

  • The patient refuses to sign the consent

  • The patient is pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding

  • Patients who have received antibiotics within the 7 days preceding inclusion

  • Patients with diabetic foot wounds associated with clinical or radiographic signs of arthritis or osteomyelitis*

  • Patients with diabetic foot wounds associated with critical limb ischemia according to P = grade 3 in the PEDIS classification

  • Patients whose wound is infected by a pathogen other than S. aureus (includes multi-infections) according to bacteriological sampling performed at the pre-inclusion visit

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 CHU de Bordeaux - Hôpital Pellegrin Bordeaux France 33000
2 CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire de Réadaptation du Grau du Roi Le Grau du Roi France 30240
3 CHU de Nantes - Hôtel Dieu Nantes Cedex 1 France 44093
4 APHP - Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpetrière Paris Cedex 13 France 75651
5 APHP - Hôpital Lariboisière Paris France 75010
6 CHRU de Toulouse - Hôpital de Rangueil Toulouse Cedex 9 France 31059
7 CH de Tourcoing Tourcoing France 59200
8 Institut Robert Merle d'Aubigné Valenton France 94460
9 CH Intercommunal de Villeneuve-Saint-Georges Villeneuve-Saint-Georges France 94195

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
  • Pherecydes Pharma

Investigators

  • Study Director: Albert Sotto, MD, PhD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02664740
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • PHRC-N/2015/AS-01
First Posted:
Jan 27, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Feb 3, 2022
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 3, 2022