RESPOND: Safety, Efficacy and Cost-efficacy of Ranibizumab (Monotherapy or Combination With Laser) in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
To evaluate, specifically within the Canadian medical environment, the efficacy, safety and cost-efficacy of ranibizumab administered either as combination therapy (ranibizumab plus laser photocoagulation), or as monotherapy in comparison with the current standard of care (laser photocoagulation monotherapy), in patients with visual impairment due to DME.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Combination Therapy Participants received ranibizumab intravitreal injection and laser photocoagulation treatments |
Drug: ranibizumab
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg fixed loading dose via intravitreal injection, given once per month for 3 consecutive months (Day 1, Month 1 and Month 2). This treatment could be reapllied, depending on symptoms.
Procedure: Laser
Laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1. Subsequent laser treatments could be administered if needed, in accordance with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) guidelines.
|
Experimental: Ranibizumab Monotherapy Participants received ranibizumab intravitreal injection therapy only |
Drug: ranibizumab
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg fixed loading dose via intravitreal injection, given once per month for 3 consecutive months (Day 1, Month 1 and Month 2). This treatment could be reapllied, depending on symptoms.
|
Active Comparator: Laser Monotherapy Participants received Laser photocoagulation therapy only |
Procedure: Laser
Laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1. Subsequent laser treatments could be administered if needed, in accordance with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) guidelines.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity- (BCVA) at Month 12 [Baseline and 12 months]
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A positive change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9 [Baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months]
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS)is 0 to 100 letters. A positive change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement.
- Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12 [Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months]
OCT is a diagnostic imaging technique using low-coherence interferometry to produce cross-sectional tomograms of the posterior segment eye structures. OCT was performed prior to study treatment to assess CRT, presence of fluid in the macula (intra-retinal cyst or fluid) and evaluation of image to monitor disease progression/treatment effect and to determine the need to stop/re-initiate ranibizumab treatment
- Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From Baseline [Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months]
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A higher percent of patients achieving a gain of ≥15 letters BCVA indicates a better response.
- Percentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA [12 months]
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A gain of 5,10,15 or more BCVA letters from baseline indicates improvement.
- National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (VFQ-25) Composite Score at Month 12 [12 month]
The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) was used to measure the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains. The 12 subscales in the VFQ-25 are general health, general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social function, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision. For each question, the patient was asked to rate their condition on a scale of 1-5 or 1-6, where a low number reflects a better outcome. A composite score for a patient is calculated by aggregating and averaging the scores from the 11 sub-scales (excluding general health sub-scale), and an algorithm is apply to give equal weight to each sub-scale. Sub-scales and composite scores are calculated by converting the response from questionnaires into a 0-100 scale, with 0 as the worst possible outcome and 100 as the best. Missing data was not imputed
- EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Utility Score at Month 12 [12 month]
The Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D) standardized instrument was utilized to measure health outcomes related to 5 dimensions, namely: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain-discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The possible range for each dimension was 1 to 3, where 1="no problems", 2="some problems" and 3="extreme problems". Missing values were not imputed. Using the scoring algorithm derived from the Canadian value sets (Bansback et al., 2012), a utility score for a patient was calculated based on the EQ-5D responses for a given time-point at which the questionnaire was presented to the patient. This mean EQ-5D utility score ranged between 0 (worst health) to 1 (perfect health).
- Time Trade-Off Questionnaire - 25 (TTO) Composite Score at Month 12 [12 month]
(TTO) questionnaire was used to help determine the patients' health utility. Reported health utility represents the patients' quality of life at the current health state, and is a cardinal value that ranges from 0 (worst possible health or death) to 1 (best possible health). In this questionnaire, patients were first asked to estimate their remaining life expectancy. Second, the patients were presented with a hypothetical situation where a technology existed that could permanently return their vision to normal. This technology would always work, but would decrease their length of survival. Patients were then asked how much of their remaining life expectancy, if any, they would be willing to trade in return for use of the technology and thus for normal vision. The principle of this measure is that if patients were content with their current vision status (i.e., have a utility value of 1.0), they would not want to trade any of their remaining life years to improve their vision.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Stable Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus
-
Visual impairment due to focal or diffuse DME in at least one eye
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Active conditions in the study eye that could prevent the improvement of visual acuity on study treatment
-
Active eye infection or inflammation
-
History of stroke, renal failure or uncontrolled hypertension
Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Calgary Retina Consultants | Calgary | Alberta | Canada | |
2 | UBC - Eye Care Center | Vancouver | British Columbia | Canada | |
3 | Retina Consultants of Victoria | Victoria | British Columbia | Canada | |
4 | Memorial University Health Sciences Centre / Bense Eye Centre | St-John's | Newfoundland and Labrador | Canada | |
5 | Victoria General Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology | Halifax | Nova Scotia | Canada | |
6 | Ivey Eye Institute | London | Ontario | Canada | |
7 | Canadian Centre for Advanced Eye Therapeutics | Mississauga | Ontario | Canada | |
8 | The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus | Ottawa | Ontario | Canada | |
9 | St-Michael's Hospital - Dept of Ophthalmology | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | |
10 | Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | |
11 | Toronto Western Hospital | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | |
12 | Clinique ChirurgiVision | Drummondville | Quebec | Canada | |
13 | Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont | Montreal | Quebec | Canada | |
14 | Hôpital Notre Dame (CHUM) | Montreal | Quebec | Canada | |
15 | Royal Victoria Hospital | Montreal | Quebec | Canada | |
16 | Centre Oculaire de Québec | Québec | Quebec | Canada | |
17 | Dr.Michel Giunta Clinique Médicale | Sherbrooke | Quebec | Canada | |
18 | Saskatoon City Hospital / Spadina Clinic | Saskatoon | Saskatchewan | Canada | |
19 | Institut de l'oeil des Laurentides | Quebec | Canada | ||
20 | Memorial University Health Sciences Centre / Newfoundland Drive Medical Clinic | St-John's | Canada |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Investigators
- Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- CRFB002DCA05
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | A total of 239 patients were enrolled in the study. An additional 2 patients were enrolled but were removed from the database because consent was not signed in accordance with GCP principles." |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | 3 treatment arms: Group C - laser photocoagulation per ETDRS guidelines, Group B - ranibizumab intravitreal injections (3 monthly injections during loading phase, and subsequent treatments per protocol-defined criteria), or Group A - combination therapy, where decisions to treat with laser were independent of decisions to treat with ranibizumab. |
Arm/Group Title | Combination Therapy | Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Laser Monotherapy |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received both a ranibizumab intravitreal injection and laser photocoagulation treatments. | Participants received ranibizumab intravitreal injection therapy only | Participants received Laser photocoagulation therapy only |
Period Title: Overall Study | |||
STARTED | 78 | 80 | 81 |
Intent to Treat (ITT) Population | 73 | 75 | 72 |
Safety Population | 73 | 75 | 74 |
COMPLETED | 74 | 75 | 59 |
NOT COMPLETED | 4 | 5 | 22 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Combination Therapy | Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Laser Monotherapy | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received both a ranibizumab intravitreal injection and laser photocoagulation treatments. | Participants received ranibizumab intravitreal injection therapy only | Participants received Laser photocoagulation therapy only | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 73 | 75 | 72 | 220 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
60.8
(10.21)
|
61.5
(9.86)
|
62.8
(9.44)
|
61.7
(9.83)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||
Female |
26
35.6%
|
33
44%
|
29
40.3%
|
88
40%
|
Male |
47
64.4%
|
42
56%
|
43
59.7%
|
132
60%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity- (BCVA) at Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A positive change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement. |
Time Frame | Baseline and 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one study site were excluded from ITT. patients with both baseline and 12 month data were included. |
Arm/Group Title | Combination Therapy | Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Laser Monotherapy |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received both a ranibizumab intravitreal injection and laser photocoagulation treatments. | Participants received ranibizumab intravitreal injection therapy only | Participants received Laser photocoagulation therapy only |
Measure Participants | 70 | 71 | 62 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Letters] |
8.2
(9.20)
|
8.9
(7.78)
|
0.3
(12.47)
|
Title | Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9 |
---|---|
Description | Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS)is 0 to 100 letters. A positive change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The ITT population was defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one site were excluded from ITT. |
Arm/Group Title | Combination Therapy | Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Laser Monotherapy |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received both a ranibizumab intravitreal injection and laser photocoagulation treatments. | Participants received ranibizumab intravitreal injection therapy only | Participants received Laser photocoagulation therapy only |
Measure Participants | 73 | 75 | 72 |
Month 3 (n=71, 75, 69) |
3.7
(10.71)
|
5.3
(7.58)
|
1.4
(6.55)
|
Month 6 (n= 70, 72, 65) |
5.6
(8.45)
|
7.1
(7.74)
|
0.9
(7.23)
|
Month 9 (n=69, 71, 59) |
7.1
(7.92)
|
6.9
(12.45)
|
-0.2
(10.71)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12 |
---|---|
Description | OCT is a diagnostic imaging technique using low-coherence interferometry to produce cross-sectional tomograms of the posterior segment eye structures. OCT was performed prior to study treatment to assess CRT, presence of fluid in the macula (intra-retinal cyst or fluid) and evaluation of image to monitor disease progression/treatment effect and to determine the need to stop/re-initiate ranibizumab treatment |
Time Frame | Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The ITT population was defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one site were excluded from ITT. |
Arm/Group Title | Combination Therapy | Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Laser Monotherapy |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received both a ranibizumab intravitreal injection and laser photocoagulation treatments. | Participants received ranibizumab intravitreal injection therapy only | Participants received Laser photocoagulation therapy only |
Measure Participants | 73 | 75 | 72 |
Baseline |
422.1
(142.26)
|
448.5
(136.64)
|
458.0
(133.07)
|
Month 3 (n=71,75, 69) |
-105.7
(127.74)
|
-108.9
(113.38)
|
-32.5
(114.15)
|
Month 6 (n= 70,72,65) |
-114.2
(110.88)
|
-129.3
(116.50)
|
-64.4
(110.77)
|
Month 9 (69,70,58) |
-138.1
(125.86)
|
-135.9
(140.90)
|
-85.8
(128.00)
|
Month 12 (70,71,61) |
-152.2
(139.27)
|
-143.5
(143.95)
|
-107.1
(143.86)
|
Title | Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From Baseline |
---|---|
Description | Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A higher percent of patients achieving a gain of ≥15 letters BCVA indicates a better response. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The ITT population was defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one site were excluded from ITT |
Arm/Group Title | Combination Therapy | Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Laser Monotherapy |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received both a ranibizumab intravitreal injection and laser photocoagulation treatments. | Participants received ranibizumab intravitreal injection therapy only | Participants received Laser photocoagulation therapy only |
Measure Participants | 73 | 75 | 72 |
Month 3 (n=71,75,69) |
8.5
|
9.3
|
2.9
|
Month 6 (n=70,72,65) |
11.4
|
13.9
|
1.5
|
Month 9 (69,71,59) |
13.0
|
21.1
|
0
|
Month 12 (70,71,62) |
24.3
|
21.1
|
6.5
|
Title | Percentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA |
---|---|
Description | Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A gain of 5,10,15 or more BCVA letters from baseline indicates improvement. |
Time Frame | 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one study site were excluded from ITT. Patients with 12 month data were included |
Arm/Group Title | Combination Therapy | Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Laser Monotherapy |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received both a ranibizumab intravitreal injection and laser photocoagulation treatments. | Participants received ranibizumab intravitreal injection therapy only | Participants received Laser photocoagulation therapy only |
Measure Participants | 70 | 71 | 62 |
5 letter gain |
61.4
|
70.4
|
40.3
|
10 letter gain |
34.3
|
52.1
|
16.1
|
15 letter gain |
24.3
|
21.1
|
6.5
|
Title | National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (VFQ-25) Composite Score at Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) was used to measure the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains. The 12 subscales in the VFQ-25 are general health, general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social function, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision. For each question, the patient was asked to rate their condition on a scale of 1-5 or 1-6, where a low number reflects a better outcome. A composite score for a patient is calculated by aggregating and averaging the scores from the 11 sub-scales (excluding general health sub-scale), and an algorithm is apply to give equal weight to each sub-scale. Sub-scales and composite scores are calculated by converting the response from questionnaires into a 0-100 scale, with 0 as the worst possible outcome and 100 as the best. Missing data was not imputed |
Time Frame | 12 month |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one study site were excluded from ITT. Patients with both baseline and 12 month data were included |
Arm/Group Title | Combination Therapy | Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Laser Monotherapy |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received both a ranibizumab intravitreal injection and laser photocoagulation treatments. | Participants received ranibizumab intravitreal injection therapy only | Participants received Laser photocoagulation therapy only |
Measure Participants | 70 | 71 | 62 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Units on a Scale] |
85.21
(12.77)
|
84.29
(11.78)
|
78.20
(17.27)
|
Title | EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Utility Score at Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | The Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D) standardized instrument was utilized to measure health outcomes related to 5 dimensions, namely: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain-discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The possible range for each dimension was 1 to 3, where 1="no problems", 2="some problems" and 3="extreme problems". Missing values were not imputed. Using the scoring algorithm derived from the Canadian value sets (Bansback et al., 2012), a utility score for a patient was calculated based on the EQ-5D responses for a given time-point at which the questionnaire was presented to the patient. This mean EQ-5D utility score ranged between 0 (worst health) to 1 (perfect health). |
Time Frame | 12 month |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one study site were excluded from ITT. Patients with both baseline and 12 month data were included |
Arm/Group Title | Combination Therapy | Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Laser Monotherapy |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received both a ranibizumab intravitreal injection and laser photocoagulation treatments. | Participants received ranibizumab intravitreal injection therapy only | Participants received Laser photocoagulation therapy only |
Measure Participants | 68 | 71 | 60 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Units on a scale] |
0.88
(0.15)
|
0.88
(0.17)
|
0.87
(0.17)
|
Title | Time Trade-Off Questionnaire - 25 (TTO) Composite Score at Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | (TTO) questionnaire was used to help determine the patients' health utility. Reported health utility represents the patients' quality of life at the current health state, and is a cardinal value that ranges from 0 (worst possible health or death) to 1 (best possible health). In this questionnaire, patients were first asked to estimate their remaining life expectancy. Second, the patients were presented with a hypothetical situation where a technology existed that could permanently return their vision to normal. This technology would always work, but would decrease their length of survival. Patients were then asked how much of their remaining life expectancy, if any, they would be willing to trade in return for use of the technology and thus for normal vision. The principle of this measure is that if patients were content with their current vision status (i.e., have a utility value of 1.0), they would not want to trade any of their remaining life years to improve their vision. |
Time Frame | 12 month |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one study site were excluded from ITT. Patients with both baseline and 12 month data were included |
Arm/Group Title | Combination Therapy | Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Laser Monotherapy |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received both a ranibizumab intravitreal injection and laser photocoagulation treatments. | Participants received ranibizumab intravitreal injection therapy only | Participants received Laser photocoagulation therapy only |
Measure Participants | 69 | 68 | 60 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Units on a scale] |
0.83
(0.28)
|
0.78
(0.23)
|
0.80
(0.24)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | The Safety population was defined as all patients who received at least 1 administration of ranibizumab/laser treatment for monotherapy, or at least one of the two treatments for combination therapy, excluding patients from one site | |||||
Arm/Group Title | Combination Therapy | Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Laser Monotherapy | |||
Arm/Group Description | Participants received both a ranibizumab intravitreal injection and laser photocoagulation treatments. | Participants received ranibizumab intravitreal injection therapy only | Participants received Laser photocoagulation therapy only | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
Combination Therapy | Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Laser Monotherapy | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
Combination Therapy | Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Laser Monotherapy | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 9/73 (12.3%) | 10/75 (13.3%) | 5/74 (6.8%) | |||
Cardiac disorders | ||||||
Acute myocardial infarction | 0/73 (0%) | 0/75 (0%) | 1/74 (1.4%) | |||
Atrial fibrillation | 1/73 (1.4%) | 0/75 (0%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Cardiac failure congestive | 0/73 (0%) | 0/75 (0%) | 2/74 (2.7%) | |||
Endocrine disorders | ||||||
Hyperthyroidism | 0/73 (0%) | 1/75 (1.3%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Eye disorders | ||||||
Vitreous haemorrhage (Fellow eye) | 0/73 (0%) | 0/75 (0%) | 2/74 (2.7%) | |||
Vitreous haemorrhage (Study eye) | 0/73 (0%) | 0/75 (0%) | 2/74 (2.7%) | |||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||
Abdominal pain | 0/73 (0%) | 1/75 (1.3%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Colitis ischaemic | 1/73 (1.4%) | 0/75 (0%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Impaired gastric emptying | 0/73 (0%) | 1/75 (1.3%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Intestinal obstruction | 1/73 (1.4%) | 0/75 (0%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
General disorders | ||||||
Hypothermia | 1/73 (1.4%) | 0/75 (0%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Immune system disorders | ||||||
Sarcoidosis | 1/73 (1.4%) | 0/75 (0%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Infections and infestations | ||||||
Cellulitis | 0/73 (0%) | 2/75 (2.7%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Diabetic foot infection | 1/73 (1.4%) | 0/75 (0%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Lobar pneumonia | 0/73 (0%) | 0/75 (0%) | 1/74 (1.4%) | |||
Localised infection | 1/73 (1.4%) | 0/75 (0%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Osteomyelitis | 0/73 (0%) | 1/75 (1.3%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Viral infection | 0/73 (0%) | 1/75 (1.3%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||
Rib fracture | 1/73 (1.4%) | 0/75 (0%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||||
Diabetic ketoacidosis | 0/73 (0%) | 0/75 (0%) | 1/74 (1.4%) | |||
Hypoglycaemia | 1/73 (1.4%) | 0/75 (0%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Hypokalaemia | 1/73 (1.4%) | 0/75 (0%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||
Tendonitis | 1/73 (1.4%) | 0/75 (0%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||||
Endometrial cancer stage II | 0/73 (0%) | 1/75 (1.3%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||
Cerebrovascular accident | 0/73 (0%) | 1/75 (1.3%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Transient ischaemic attack | 0/73 (0%) | 1/75 (1.3%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||||
Neurogenic bladder | 0/73 (0%) | 1/75 (1.3%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 0/73 (0%) | 1/75 (1.3%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Dyspnoea | 0/73 (0%) | 1/75 (1.3%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Haemoptysis | 0/73 (0%) | 1/75 (1.3%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Lung disorder | 0/73 (0%) | 1/75 (1.3%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
Combination Therapy | Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Laser Monotherapy | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 26/73 (35.6%) | 26/75 (34.7%) | 17/74 (23%) | |||
Eye disorders | ||||||
Cataract (Fellow eye) | 0/73 (0%) | 5/75 (6.7%) | 3/74 (4.1%) | |||
Cataract (Study eye) | 0/73 (0%) | 5/75 (6.7%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Conjunctival haemorrhage (Study eye) | 9/73 (12.3%) | 6/75 (8%) | 1/74 (1.4%) | |||
Eye irritation (Study eye) | 4/73 (5.5%) | 0/75 (0%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Vision blurred (Study eye) | 4/73 (5.5%) | 0/75 (0%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Vitreous haemorrhage (Fellow eye) | 4/73 (5.5%) | 2/75 (2.7%) | 1/74 (1.4%) | |||
Vitreous haemorrhage (Study eye) | 1/73 (1.4%) | 0/75 (0%) | 4/74 (5.4%) | |||
Infections and infestations | ||||||
Nasopharyngitis | 5/73 (6.8%) | 5/75 (6.7%) | 4/74 (5.4%) | |||
Investigations | ||||||
Intraocular pressure increased (Fellow eye) | 4/73 (5.5%) | 4/75 (5.3%) | 3/74 (4.1%) | |||
Intraocular pressure increased (Study eye) | 8/73 (11%) | 10/75 (13.3%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||
Back pain | 0/73 (0%) | 4/75 (5.3%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||
Headache | 1/73 (1.4%) | 4/75 (5.3%) | 1/74 (1.4%) | |||
Neuropathy peripheral | 5/73 (6.8%) | 1/75 (1.3%) | 0/74 (0%) | |||
Vascular disorders | ||||||
Hypertension | 2/73 (2.7%) | 5/75 (6.7%) | 5/74 (6.8%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until publication of the pooled data (i.e. data from all sites) in the clinical trial or dislcosure of trial results in their entirety.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Study Director |
---|---|
Organization | Novartis Pharmaceuticals |
Phone | 862-778-8300 |
- CRFB002DCA05