Diagnosis of Bile Duct Strictures

Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02000999
Collaborator
(none)
110
1
62
1.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this prospective study is to compare the diagnostic utility of two techniques (brush cytology + FISH and brush cytology + free DNA analysis) in the diagnosis of biliary strictures. Histologic diagnosis (biopsies) in conjunction with clinical and/or imaging follow-up will serve as the gold standard for diagnosis of malignancy. In order to do this the investigators will ask study participants to have a small volume of fluid obtained from the bile duct sent for additional testing at RedPATH. In some patients additional brushings will be obtained for FISH testing (this adds <2 minutes to ERCP and only associated risk is increased procedure duration).

The investigators hypothesize that the use of cytology +DNA analysis has a higher sensitivity and accuracy when compared to cytology +FISH in patients with biliary strictures.

Primary aim:

To compare the sensitivity and accuracy of the two techniques (brush cytology + FISH and brush cytology + free DNA analysis). Histologic diagnosis (histology from biopsy or cytology for fine needle aspiration) in conjunction with clinical and/or imaging follow-up will serve as the gold standard for diagnosis of malignancy.

Secondary aims:
  1. To evaluate the diagnostic yield of malignancy when all three techniques (cytology, FISH and DNA analysis) are used.

  2. To evaluate the added value of biliary forceps biopsies, when used in conjunction with cytology, FISH and DNA analysis.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: brushing of bile duct strictures for cytology

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
110 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Retrospective
Official Title:
The Diagnostic Yield of Malignancy Comparing Cytology, FISH and Molecular Analysis of Cell Free Cytology Brush Supernatant in Patients With Biliary Strictures Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography (ERC): A Prospective Study
Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 2, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 2, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Patients with bile duct strictures

Other: brushing of bile duct strictures for cytology

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. • Sensitivity accuracy of cytology, FISH and mutation profiling using histologic diagnosis in conjunction with clinical and/or imaging follow-up as the gold standard. [2 years]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. • Specimen adequacy [2 years]

  2. • Complications (pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, cholangitis) [2 years]

  3. • Technical success and ease of procedure [2 years]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Patients age: > 18 years

  2. Presence of a biliary stricture

  3. Ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Severe coagulopathy (INR > 1.8) or thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50,000)

  2. Inability to cannulate the common bile duct

  3. Presence of altered anatomy (Billroth II or Roux-en-Y reconstruction)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Washington University Saint Louis Missouri United States 63110

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Washington University School of Medicine

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Washington University School of Medicine
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02000999
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Cytology 2013-201211068
First Posted:
Dec 4, 2013
Last Update Posted:
May 13, 2019
Last Verified:
May 1, 2019

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 13, 2019