Diagnostic Imaging Study for the Melanoma Advanced Imaging Dermatoscope (mAID)

Sponsor
Rockefeller University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT02470273
Collaborator
Oregon Health and Science University (Other), University of California, Irvine (Other), Skin and Cancer Associates (Other)
1,000
5
119
200
1.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of a novel imaging device and associated software algorithm in detecting early stage melanoma versus nevi of the skin. The instrument, which was invented by the PI, for the purposes of this study, will be loaned to three external (to Rockefeller) institutions and used on patients who are scheduled for biopsy of pigmented lesions. The purpose of correlating the output screening result of the novel device and the output diagnosis of the gold standard histology analysis procedure is so that these two diagnoses can be compared to generate the number of true positives, true negatives, false positives and false negatives for the novel device. The purpose of disseminating the device to the external institutions is to achieve the appropriate power such that the specificity can be evaluated at 99% sensitivity. The rationale for the power needed in the study is that in order to be clinically useful, the device needs to be extremely sensitive (i.e. 99%) because false negative diagnosis is a dangerous situation, leading to potential progression of melanoma, the most deadly form of skin cancer.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    The purpose of this study is to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of a novel imaging device and associated software algorithm in detecting early stage melanoma versus nevi of the skin. The instrument, which was invented by the PI, for the purposes of this study, will be loaned to three external (to Rockefeller) institutions and used on patients who are scheduled for biopsy of pigmented lesions. The purpose of correlating the output screening result of the novel device and the output diagnosis of the gold standard histology analysis procedure is so that these two diagnoses can be compared to generate the number of true positives, true negatives, false positives and false negatives for the novel device. The purpose of disseminating the device to the external institutions is to achieve the appropriate power such that the specificity can be evaluated at 99% sensitivity. The rationale for the power needed in the study is that in order to be clinically useful, the device needs to be extremely sensitive (i.e. 99%) because false negative diagnosis is a dangerous situation, leading to potential progression of melanoma, the most deadly form of skin cancer.

    The scientific hypothesis is that the diagnostic mechanism for superficial melanoma is the light tissue interaction that occurs between the blue shifted wavelengths (i.e. blue light, ultra violet light) and the superficial epidermis while the mechanism for diagnosis of deeper melanoma (i.e. Breslow depth >0.5mm) is the light/tissue interaction that occurs between the red shifted light (i.e. red light, infrared light) and the portion of the pigmented lesion that lies within the dermis. These hypotheses were fueled by initial observations that the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were wavelength dependent in a study that looked at only the red, green and blue wavelengths as available in traditional digital dermoscopy imaging. The initial finding was that of the multiple features analyzed, more features were statistically significant diagnostics in the blue channel but there were (a relative minority) other features that fared better in the red channel. It is hypothesized that the diagnostic features that did better in the red channel were features of deep melanin while the superficial regions, which should theoretically be atypical in ALL melanomas, were evident in the quantitative endpoint metrics generated from the blue channel.

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Anticipated Enrollment :
    1000 participants
    Observational Model:
    Cohort
    Time Perspective:
    Cross-Sectional
    Official Title:
    Multicenter Diagnostic Imaging Study for the Melanoma Advanced Imaging Dermatoscope (mAID)
    Study Start Date :
    Aug 1, 2015
    Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
    Jul 1, 2025
    Anticipated Study Completion Date :
    Jul 1, 2025

    Arms and Interventions

    Arm Intervention/Treatment
    Dermatology patients

    Patients with a suspicious skin lesion indicated for biopsy

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. A comparison between gold standard histopathology screening results and mAID screening results [Day 1]

      A comparison between the gold standard invasive biopsy diagnostic result (melanoma or nevus) and the diagnostic result produced by automated computer image processing that operates on the mAID-produced hyperspectral image. This diagnostic result is defined as the melanoma Q-score, which is the percent likelihood that this lesion is melanoma based on a previous computer-learning algorithm that utilized 53 unique malignancy metrics.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. A comparison between gold standard histopathology screening results and analysis of the standard dermatoscope image. [Day 1]

      A comparison between the gold standard invasive biopsy diagnostic result (melanoma or nevus) and the diagnostic result produced by automated computer image processing that operates on the standard dermatoscope image. This diagnostic result is defined as the melanoma Q-score, which is the percent likelihood that this lesion is melanoma based on a previous computer-learning algorithm that utilized 53 unique malignancy metrics.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 80 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Participant has normal appearing skin and a suspicious pigmented lesion.
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Lesion near the eyes (due to safety)

    • Inaccessibility to lesion related to device: ears, toes, fingers, nailbeds, ankles, elbows, genitals

    • Self-reported history of photosensitivity

    • Self-reported history of vitiligo and/or other sun sensitive disease

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Beckman Laser Institute at University of California Irvine Irvine California United States 92617
    2 Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center Orange California United States 92868
    3 The University of California (Davis) Sacramento California United States 95816
    4 Skin and Cancer Associates Plantation Florida United States 33324
    5 Oregon Health Sciences University Portland Oregon United States 97239

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Rockefeller University
    • Oregon Health and Science University
    • University of California, Irvine
    • Skin and Cancer Associates

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Daniel Gareau, PhD, MCR, Rockefeller University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Rockefeller University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02470273
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • DGA-0860
    • Q141095
    First Posted:
    Jun 12, 2015
    Last Update Posted:
    May 12, 2022
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Keywords provided by Rockefeller University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 12, 2022