RHUMM: Diagnostic Performance of Spot Urine Sample for the Monoclonal Components Detection in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Sponsor
Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05208086
Collaborator
(none)
300
20
37.5
15
0.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate at Day 1 Cycle 2, the detection sensitivity of the urinary monoclonal component on a spot urine sample, compared to the reference measurement on 24-hour urine, in patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Diagnostic Test: Detection of monoclonal component

Detailed Description

To evaluate the detection sensitivity of the urinary monoclonal component on a spot urine sample, compared to the reference measurement on 24-hour urine, in Multiple Myeloma patients.

300 evaluable patients are required. For each of them, both spot urine sample and 24h urine sample will be collected at Cycle1 Day1, Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 4 Day 1.

The detection of urine monoclonal component will be performed by urine protein electrophoresis (quantitative) and urine immunofixation (qualitative).

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
300 participants
Observational Model:
Other
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Diagnostic Performance of Spot Urine Sample for the Monoclonal Components Detection in Patients With Multiple Myeloma RHU(M)M Random or H24 Urine in (Multiple) Myeloma
Actual Study Start Date :
May 18, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Patients

Cycle1 day1: collection of 24h urine and an urine sample from miction the day of the visit. Cycle 2 day1:collection of 24h urine and an urine sample from miction the day of the visit Cycle 4 day 1: collection of 24h urine and an urine sample from miction the day of the visit.

Diagnostic Test: Detection of monoclonal component
Monoclonal component analysis by electrophoresis and immnuofixation on the urine sample from miction and 24h urine sample.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Evaluate the detection sensitivity of the urine monoclonal component on spot urine sample [at the first Day of Cycle n°2 (each cycle is 28 days or 21 days)]

    Evaluate the detection sensitivity of the urine monoclonal component on spot urine sample compared to the reference measurement of 24 hours urine. Sensitivity is defined as the proportion, among the patients with positive urinalysis results on 24 hours urine, of positive results on spot urine sample. Evaluation is performed by urine protein electrophoresis and urine immunofixation

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Evaluate the specificity of urine monoclonal component detection on spot urine sample [at the first Day of cycle n°2 (each cycle is 28 days or 21 days)]

    Evaluate the specificity of urine monoclonal component detection on sample at C2D1 compared to the reference measurement of 24 hours urine sample. Specificity is defined as the proportion, among patients with negative urinalysis results on 24 hours urine, of negative results on the spot urine sample.

  2. Evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of urine monoclonal component detection on spot urine sample [at the first day of cycle n°1 and cycle n°4 (each cycle is 28 days or 21 days)]

    Evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of urine monoclonal component detection on spot urine sample at C1D1 and C4D1 compared to reference measurement of 24hours urine sample

  3. Compare the responses rate [at the first day of cycle n° 2 and cycle 4 (each cycle is 28 days or 21 days)]

    Compare the rate of partial responses, very good partial responses and complete responses (IMWG criteria) but only on the urinary monoclonal component) at C2D1 and C4D1 between the two types of samples (spot urine sample and 24hours urine sample)

  4. Compare the monoclonal component / creatininuria ratios [at the first day of cycle n° 1,2 and 4]

    Compare the monoclonal component / creatininuria ratios in both samples (spot urine sample and 24hours urine sample) for components monoclonal which are quantifiable in both types of urine samples

  5. Define the equivalent of 200 mg / 24H (current consensus threshold of measurable urinary disease) [at the first day of cycle n° 1 (each cycle is 28 days or 21 days)]

    Define the equivalent of 200 mg / 24H (current consensus threshold of measurable urinary disease) at C1D1 and on the others points, if the monoclonal component is quantifiable)

  6. Assess the association between the rate of serum light chains and concentration of monoclonal components [at first day of cycle 2 (each cycle is 28 days or 21 days)]

    To assess the association between serum light chains and concentration of monoclonal components for both types of urine samples.

  7. Evaluate the urine monoclonal component by the difference between proteinuria and albuminuria [at first day of cycle 2 (each cycle is 28 days or 21 days)]

    To Evaluate if the rate of urine monoclonal component (in g/L)could by calculated by the difference between proteinuria (in g/L) and albuminuria (in g/L)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patient with Multiple Myeloma

  • Patient starting new treatment line, whatever the line is, but with at least 3 induction cycles

  • Urine monoclonal component ≥ 200mg/24h

Exclusion Criteria:

-Patients with an emergency planned dexamethasone block administration before the first chemotherapy cycle initiation

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Ch Annecy Genevois Annecy France
2 Centre Hospitalier William Morey Chalon Sur Saone France
3 Centre Hospitalier Métropole de Savoie Chambéry France
4 CHU François Mitterand Dijon France
5 CH de Dunkerque Dunkerque France
6 CHD Vendée La Roche Sur Yon France
7 Hopital Bicètre Le Kremlin Bicètre France
8 Ch Le Mans Le Mans France
9 CH de Lens Lens France
10 Hopital Claude Huriez-CHRU LILLE Lille France
11 Centre Hospitalier Lyon sud Lyon France
12 CHU saint Eloi Montpellier France
13 Hôpital E. MULLER Mulhouse France
14 CHRU Nantes Nantes France
15 CHU Poitiers Poitiers France
16 CHU de Reims Reims France
17 Chu Pontchaillou Rennes France
18 CHU Toulouse Toulouse France
19 CHRU Bretonneau Tours France
20 CH Bretagne Atlantique Vannes et Auray-P.Chubert Vannes France

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Olivier DECAUX, PU-PH, Rennes University Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05208086
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IFM 2020-03
First Posted:
Jan 26, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jul 21, 2022
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2021
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 21, 2022