Differences in Immunologic Response to Cryoablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare changes in the body's self-defense (immune response) after two different treatments for small kidney tumors: 1) Cryoablation (freezing) therapy in which the tumor and a margin of normal kidney tissue are frozen and thawed twice with a needle probe and 2) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in which radiofrequency energy delivered through a needle probe is used to heat tissue and thereby destroy a tumor.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Adults 18-99 Adults who are undergoing cryoablation |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Immune Response to Cryoablation, RFA and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy [4 years]
The number of leukocytes found in the tissues cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (control)
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
You are eligible to participate in this study if you are an adult (older than 18 years)
-
Diagnosed with renal cell cancer 1-3 centimeters in size on the CT scan.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
You are not eligible to participate in this study if you are immune compromised (chemotherapy,corticosteroid use, HIV [as documented in your medical record], etc.)
-
Have an autoimmune disorders (Rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, etc)
-
Have a tumor larger than 4 cm
-
Are pregnant.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of California, Irvine
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 2009-6735