Difficult Cannulation Criteria in Trainee Involved ERCP Cannulation
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is one of the most technically challenging procedures in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Selective deep cannulation is a critical step for the performance of ERCP. The incidence of difficult cannulation has been reported in many studies, ranging from 10% to 40% in patients with native papilla. Difficult cannulation is an independent risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP).
The definition of difficult cannulation has been proposed by European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines. Initial cannulation is considered difficult with the presence of one or more of the following: more than 5 min for attempting to cannulate; more than 5 contacts with the papilla; more than 1 unintended pancreatic duct cannulation or opacification. The clear definition of difficult cannulation is important for making decisions during or after ERCP, including determining the appropriate time to transfer to advanced cannulation techniques (e.g. early precut) and whether prophylactic methods should be administrated to reduce the risk of PEP. Although 5-5-1 criteria have been widely used during ERCP practice or in relevant studies, it remains unclear whether the current criteria are suitable for the cannulation procedure with trainee involvement. Because of inexperienced manipulation of the scope and accessories, the involvement of trainees generally increases the overall cannulation time and attempts, which are the two important parameters in the criteria of difficult cannulation. Thus, the investigators hypothesized that the definition of difficult cannulation in trainee-involved cannulation might be different from the traditional 5-5-1 criteria.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| trainee group Patients with native papilla who underwent selective biliary cannulation with trainee involvement |
Procedure: trainee invlovement
Patients underwent selective biliary cannulation with trainee involvement
|
| non-trainee group Patients with native papilla who underwent selective biliary cannulation without trainee involvement |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- rates of difficult cannulation [2 hours]
The proportion of the participants with cannulation-related parameters (cannulation time, cannulation attempts, or inadvertent PD cannulation) above the 75% percentile
Secondary Outcome Measures
- incidences of PEP [48 hours]
- overall adverse events [48 hours]
- the proportion of advanced cannulation methods [4 hours]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with native papilla
Exclusion Criteria:
- indications of major or minor pancreatic duct (PD) cannulation; no attempts of cannulation due to inaccessible papilla; cannulation via the papillary fistula; patients with duodenal stenosis or anatomical deformity secondary to prior surgery.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Endoscopic center, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases | Xi'an | Shaanxi | China | 710032 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Air Force Military Medical University, China
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L, Papanikolaou IS, Tringali A, Vanbiervliet G, Beyna T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Hritz I, Mariani A, Paspatis G, Radaelli F, Lakhtakia S, Veitch AM, van Hooft JE. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2020 Feb;52(2):127-149. doi: 10.1055/a-1075-4080. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
- Halttunen J, Meisner S, Aabakken L, Arnelo U, Grönroos J, Hauge T, Kleveland PM, Nordblad Schmidt P, Saarela A, Swahn F, Toth E, Mustonen H, Löhr JM. Difficult cannulation as defined by a prospective study of the Scandinavian Association for Digestive Endoscopy (SADE) in 907 ERCPs. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun;49(6):752-8. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.894120. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
- Ismail S, Udd M, Lindström O, Rainio M, Halttunen J, Kylänpää L. Criteria for difficult biliary cannulation: start to count. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Oct;31(10):1200-1205. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001515.
- KY20201021-2