Calcium Hydroxide Versus Premixed Bioceramic Putty in Direct Pulp Capping of Primary Molars
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The trial will be conducted to evaluate and compare calcium hydroxide and premixed bioceramic putty regarding the clinical and radiographic outcomes of direct pulp capping in primary molars.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The current equivalent parallel randomized controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate and compare calcium hydroxide and premixed bioceramic putty regarding the clinical and radiographic outcomes of direct pulp capping in primary molars over a 24-month follow-up period.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Group I (control): Calcium hydroxide cement Pulp capping material |
Other: direct pulp capping in primary molars
caries will be removed, and if the pulps are exposed, the material will be place directly over the exposed pulp.
|
Active Comparator: Group 2: Premixed bioceramic putty Pulp capping material |
Other: direct pulp capping in primary molars
caries will be removed, and if the pulps are exposed, the material will be place directly over the exposed pulp.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Clinical findings [2 year follow up]
The children will be recalled for postoperative clinical & radiographic assessments at the following intervals; six, twelve, eighteen,and twenty-four months.the treatment will be considered successful if none of the following clinical or radiographic findings is present: Clinical criteria: Pain. Tenderness to palpation or percussion Gingival swelling or sinus tract. Purulent exudate expressed from the gingival margin. Abnormal tooth mobility.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
- Clinical:
-
Children categorized as class I or II according to American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) scale.
-
Children rated as no. 3 or 4 in Frankl behaviour rating scale (FBRS).
-
Presence of a small carious or traumatic pulp exposure (1 mm or less). 2.
Radiographic:
-
Presence of at least two-thirds of root length.
-
Normal lamina dura and periodontal ligament space.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
- Clinical:
-
History of spontaneous unprovoked toothache.
-
Extensive crown destruction that preclude coronal restoration.
-
Gingival swelling, sinus tract or other soft tissue pathology.
-
Abnormal tooth mobility.
-
A frank pulp exposure (i.e., greater than 1.0mm), requiring pulpotomy.
-
No evidence of visible pulp exposure.
-
Radiographic:
-
Furcation/periapical radiolucency.
-
Pathological internal/external root resorption.
-
Absence of underlying permanent successor
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Minia university | Minya | Egypt |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Minia University
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 524_1/11/2021