Exercise After Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Physical therapy and rehabilitation may improve low back pain and quality of life after lumbar disc herniation. But there is not any agreement of its optimal start time, and rehabilitative methods. This study evaluates the effects of early and late rehabilitation to the low back pain and quality of life following unilateral microdiscectomy.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a frequently encountered ailment in neurosurgery clinics and is prevalent among the general populace, with a reported incidence of about 2%. As it is primarily observed in the workforce, it adversely affects their quality of life. One common reason for referring a patient for surgery is radiculopathy and low back pain co-occurrence. LDH is typically observed in the adult population in active occupation. Most patients with LDH can be treated conservatively, but surgery may be necessary for around 13% of cases.
The decision to operate depends on the individual patient, but persistent radicular pain and neurological dysfunction unresponsive to conservative treatment are common indications. Minimally invasive surgical techniques are becoming more prevalent. Currently, microsurgery is the most common approach for lumbar disc herniation. In addition, endoscopic and minimally invasive surgeries have become more prevalent.
Lumbar microdiscectomy is a surgical procedure involving discectomy with paravertebral muscle dissection. Subsequently, patients may experience postoperative back pain, potentially impacting their quality of life. Physical rehabilitation is frequently suggested following surgery. Some studies have indicated that physical therapy and rehabilitation may not significantly improve low back pain and quality of life after lumbar disc herniation. There is yet to be an agreement on the effectiveness of physical therapy, its optimal start time, and rehabilitative methods.
This study evaluates the effects of early and late rehabilitation following unilateral microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation. It also examines the differences in low back pain and patients' quality of life due to exercise.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Control group One group served as the control and was advised not to participate in any postoperative exercise. |
Other: physical exercise
The patients were randomized into 5 groups as control group, walking at 2 weeks, walking at 4 weeks, waist exercise at 2 weeks, waist exercise at 4 weeks.
|
Experimental: Second week walking group Postoperative walking initiated 2 weeks following surgery. |
Other: physical exercise
The patients were randomized into 5 groups as control group, walking at 2 weeks, walking at 4 weeks, waist exercise at 2 weeks, waist exercise at 4 weeks.
|
Experimental: One month walking group Postoperative walking initiated one month following surgery. |
Other: physical exercise
The patients were randomized into 5 groups as control group, walking at 2 weeks, walking at 4 weeks, waist exercise at 2 weeks, waist exercise at 4 weeks.
|
Experimental: Second week waist exercise group Postoperative waist exercise initiated 2 weeks following surgery. |
Other: physical exercise
The patients were randomized into 5 groups as control group, walking at 2 weeks, walking at 4 weeks, waist exercise at 2 weeks, waist exercise at 4 weeks.
|
Experimental: One month waist exercise group Postoperative waist exercise 1 month following surgery. |
Other: physical exercise
The patients were randomized into 5 groups as control group, walking at 2 weeks, walking at 4 weeks, waist exercise at 2 weeks, waist exercise at 4 weeks.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Affect on back pain [0 - 1 Months in the post-operative period]
Different effects of early and late rehabilitation to the low back pain following unilateral microdiscectomy. Pain status will be evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
radicular pain that persisted despite 4-6 weeks of conservative treatment,
-
detection of single-level disc herniation in MRI lumbar microsurgery.
-
Individuals who underwent single-level unilateral lumbar microsurgery. Those with a surgical incision <3 cm.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Individuals with more than one level of muscle exposure at the time of surgery.
-
those with a skin incision >3 cm
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Istanbul Medeniyet University Medical Faculty Goztepe Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital | Istanbul | Kadıkoy | Turkey | 34722 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Istanbul Medeniyet University
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Barbosa TP, Raposo AR, Cunha PD, et al. Rehabilitation after cervical and lumbar spine surgery. EFORT Open Rev. 2023;8(8):626-638. Published 2023 Aug 1. doi:10.1530/EOR-23-0015
- Hebert JJ, Fritz JM, Thackeray A, Koppenhaver SL, Teyhen D. Early multimodal rehabilitation following lumbar disc surgery: a randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of two exercise programmes on clinical outcome and lumbar multifidus muscle function. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(2):100-106. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-092402
- Hlubek RJ, Mundis GM Jr. Treatment for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10(4):517-520. doi:10.1007/s12178-017-9450-3
- Huang W, Han Z, Liu J, Yu L, Yu X. Risk Factors for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(2):e2378. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000002378
- Kim YK, Kang D, Lee I, Kim SY. Differences in the Incidence of Symptomatic Cervical and Lumbar Disc Herniation According to Age, Sex and National Health Insurance Eligibility: A Pilot Study on the Disease's Association with Work. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(10):2094. Published 2018 Sep 25. doi:10.3390/ijerph15102094
- Lewis RA, Williams NH, Sutton AJ, et al. Comparative clinical effectiveness of management strategies for sciatica: systematic review and network meta-analyses. Spine J. 2015;15(6):1461-1477. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.049
- Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Godil SS, et al. Incidence of Low Back Pain After Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Disc and Its Effect on Patient-reported Outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(6):1988-1999. doi:10.1007/s11999-015-4193-1
- Rasouli MR, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Shokraneh F, Moradi-Lakeh M, Chou R. Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(9):CD010328. Published 2014 Sep 4. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010328.pub2
- Yoon SM, Ahn SS, Kim KH, Kim YD, Cho JH, Kim DH. Comparative Study of the Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Microscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using the Tubular Retractor System Based on the VAS, ODI, and SF-36. Korean J Spine. 2012;9(3):215-222. doi:10.14245/kjs.2012.9.3.215
- SC/2023