Is CASTING of Displaced Pediatric Distal Forearm Fractures Non-inferior to Reduction in General Anesthesia?
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Treatment of displaced distal forearm fractures (DFF) in children have traditionally been closed reduction and pin fixation, although they might heal and remodel without manipulation, with no functional impairment. No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been published comparing the patient-reported functional outcome after non-surgical and surgical treatment of displaced DFF in children.
This is a multicentre RCT. The aim of the trial is to investigate the patient-reported functional outcome after non-surgical treatment of displaced distal forearm fractures (DFF) in children. We will include 44 children aged 4-10 years with a displaced DFF. They will be offered inclusion, if the on-duty orthopedic surgeon finds indication for surgical intervention. If the parents/guardians consent to participate, the children will be allocated equally to non-surgical treatment (intervention) or surgical treatment of surgeon's choice (comparator). We will follow the children during one year, where they will be seen after 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is the between-group difference in 12 months Quick Disabilities Arm Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Pediatric distal forearm fractures (DFF) are very common and accounts for 25-30% of all fractures in children.(1,2) Up to half of all pediatric DFF are displaced to an extent where surgery has been the preferred treatment option.(3) However, surgery does come with a cost.
The most common treatment of displaced pediatric DFF has long been closed reduction with or without pin fixation (or in rare cases plate and screw fixation) under general anesthesia, followed by immobilization in a cast.(4) Pin-related complications vary from 4-23%, depending on what is reported as complications,(5-11) and up to 40% has been reported when including re-displacements.(12) The insertion of a metal wire or plate also requires subsequent procedures to remove these implants again.
Numerous small cohort studies and case series have found pin fixation advantageous in achieving anatomic reduction and avoiding re-displacement.(5-11) However, whether anatomic reduction and stabilization is important regarding the patient-reported functional outcome has not been investigated since most studies use only radiographic or objective measures (e.g. range of motion). In addition, children's bones, and in particular the metaphysis and epiphysis, have a unique ability to heal and remodel throughout the growth period until puberty.(13) Almost 20 years ago, Do et al. (14) stated that "the tremendous capacity of distal metaphyseal radius fractures to heal and remodel makes this one of the most rewarding fractures to treat non-operatively. […]". In accordance with Do et al., other studies indicate that displaced DFF fractures in prepubertal children might heal without manipulation, and that most displaced fractures will remodel within a year or two to almost anatomical position with no functional impairment.(14-17) Although most surgeons are aware that children's bones have this remodeling potential, they still find it challenging to deal with the uncertainty of whether the bone will actually remodel to an acceptable position. Furthermore, surgeons might have difficulties with how families will react to the waiting time until the misaligned arm looks normal again.
If non-surgical treatment of displaced pediatric DFF were more common, the costs associated with surgery could be minimized. Unfortunately, there is limited evidence to guide the decision to operate or not. The available studies are typically small, retrospective cohort studies or case series of low quality with no predefined follow-up or outcome measures. To our knowledge, there are no published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing non-surgical treatment with surgical treatment, and no studies report outcomes from the patient's perspective.
The aim of this trial is to investigate the patient-reported functional outcome after non-surgical treatment of displaced DFF in children aged 4-10 years. Our hypothesis is, that casting without manipulation is non-inferior to surgical treatment.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Non-surgical No reduction. Application of a cast. |
Procedure: Non-surgical treatment
If allocated to non-surgical group, cast optimization in the outpatient clinic may be necessary if the cast from the emergency room is considered insufficient.
|
Active Comparator: Surgical Closed reduction under general anesthesia with or without additional pin fixation of surgeons' choice followed by cast immobilization. |
Procedure: Surgical treatment
Closed reduction with or without fixation
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- QuickDASH [12 months]
Reporting of disability experienced and monitoring changes in symptoms and function over time. The patient (with help by parents if the patient is too young to self-report) rates each item according to the perceived degree of severity using a 5-point Likert Scale. Then, the overall score is transformed to a score between 0 and 100 (0 = no disability, 100 = maximum disability) according to the algorithm [(sum of responses N/N)-1]*25, where N is equal to the number of responses.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- QuickDASH [3 and 6 months]
Reporting of disability experienced and monitoring changes in symptoms and function over time. The patient (with help by parents if the patient is too young to self-report) rates each item according to the perceived degree of severity using a 5-point Likert Scale. Then, the overall score is transformed to a score between 0 and 100 (0 = no disability, 100 = maximum disability) according to the algorithm [(sum of responses N/N)-1]*25, where N is equal to the number of responses.
- EQ-5D-Y [3, 6 and 12 months]
Health-related quality of life. The questionnaire consists of two parts: the descriptive system which assesses health in five dimensions (Mobility; Looking After Myself; Doing Usual Activities; Having Pain or Discomfort; Feeling Worried, Sad or Unhappy). A visual analogue scale (VAS) on which the respondent rates their perceived health from 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health)
- Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBS) [3, 6 and 12 months]
A self-reported tool to assess pain using a series of six facial expressions to illustrate the degree of pain intensity.
Other Outcome Measures
- Radiographs (explorative outcome) [6 and 12 months]
Evaluation of the remodeling process. No statistical analysis will be made.
- Photographs (explorative outcome) [3, 6 and 12 months]
Observation of the cosmetic progress and to be used for documentation of what future patients can expect cosmetically.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Children 4-10 years of age with open physes
-
Fractures in the distal metaphyseal radius (with or without concomitant ulna fracture), including extraarticular physeal fractures (SH I-II)
-
Overriding fractures
-
Angulated fractures of 20-40°
-
The on-duty surgeon finds reduction under anesthesia with or without fixation indicated
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Open fractures
-
Nerve or vascular affection
-
All intraarticular fractures including SH III-V
-
Ulnar physeal fractures
-
Polytrauma
-
Concomitant ipsi- or contralateral upper extremity fractures (except distal ulna fracture)
-
Pathologic fractures
-
The injury is >7 days old
-
Other conditions that may affect bone healing
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Zealand University Hospital
- Aalborg University Hospital
- Aarhus University Hospital
- Odense University Hospital
Investigators
- Study Director: Stig Brorson, MD PhD DMSc, Zealand University Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN; Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):1038-46. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02060.
- Colaris JW, Allema JH, Biter LU, de Vries MR, van de Ven CP, Bloem RM, Kerver AJ, Reijman M, Verhaar JA. Re-displacement of stable distal both-bone forearm fractures in children: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Injury. 2013 Apr;44(4):498-503. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
- Crawford SN, Lee LS, Izuka BH. Closed treatment of overriding distal radial fractures without reduction in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Feb 1;94(3):246-52. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00163.
- Do TT, Strub WM, Foad SL, Mehlman CT, Crawford AH. Reduction versus remodeling in pediatric distal forearm fractures: a preliminary cost analysis. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2003 Mar;12(2):109-15. doi: 10.1097/01.bpb.0000043725.21564.7b.
- Eguia F, Gottlich C, Lobaton G, Vora M, Sponseller PD, Lee RJ. Mid-term Patient-reported Outcomes After Lateral Versus Crossed Pinning of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2020 Aug;40(7):323-328. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001558.
- Ernat J, Ho C, Wimberly RL, Jo C, Riccio AI. Fracture Classification Does Not Predict Functional Outcomes in Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: A Prospective Study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017 Jun;37(4):e233-e237. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000889.
- Franchignoni F, Vercelli S, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Bravini E, Ferriero G. Minimal clinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Jan;44(1):30-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4893. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
- Gao B, Dwivedi S, Patel SA, Nwizu C, Cruz AI Jr. Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Nov;33(11):e439-e446. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001580.
- Garra G, Singer AJ, Taira BR, Chohan J, Cardoz H, Chisena E, Thode HC Jr. Validation of the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale in pediatric emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jan;17(1):50-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00620.x. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
- Gibbons CL, Woods DA, Pailthorpe C, Carr AJ, Worlock P. The management of isolated distal radius fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994 Mar-Apr;14(2):207-10. doi: 10.1097/01241398-199403000-00014.
- Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 May 18;7:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-44.
- Handoll HH, Elliott J, Iheozor-Ejiofor Z, Hunter J, Karantana A. Interventions for treating wrist fractures in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 19;12(12):CD012470. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012470.pub2.
- Hedstrom EM, Svensson O, Bergstrom U, Michno P. Epidemiology of fractures in children and adolescents. Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb;81(1):148-53. doi: 10.3109/17453671003628780.
- Hove LM, Brudvik C. Displaced paediatric fractures of the distal radius. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Jan;128(1):55-60. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0473-x. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
- Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996 Jun;29(6):602-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:63.0.CO;2-L. Erratum In: Am J Ind Med 1996 Sep;30(3):372.
- Laaksonen T, Kosola J, Nietosvaara N, Puhakka J, Nietosvaara Y, Stenroos A. Epidemiology, Treatment, and Treatment Quality of Overriding Distal Metaphyseal Radial Fractures in Children and Adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Feb 2;104(3):207-214. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00850.
- Laaksonen T, Puhakka J, Stenroos A, Kosola J, Ahonen M, Nietosvaara Y. Cast immobilization in bayonet position versus reduction and pin fixation of overriding distal metaphyseal radius fractures in children under ten years of age: a case control study. J Child Orthop. 2021 Feb 1;15(1):63-69. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.200171.
- Marson BA, Ng JWG, Craxford S, Chell J, Lawniczak D, Price KR, Ollivere BJ, Hunter JB. Treatment of completely displaced distal radial fractures with a straight plaster or manipulation under anaesthesia. Bone Joint J. 2021 May;103-B(5):902-907. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B.BJJ-2020-1740.R1. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
- McLauchlan GJ, Cowan B, Annan IH, Robb JE. Management of completely displaced metaphyseal fractures of the distal radius in children. A prospective, randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Apr;84(3):413-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b3.11432.
- McQuinn AG, Jaarsma RL. Risk factors for redisplacement of pediatric distal forearm and distal radius fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Oct-Nov;32(7):687-92. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31824b7525.
- Meling T, Harboe K, Enoksen CH, Aarflot M, Arthursson AJ, Soreide K. Reliable classification of children's fractures according to the comprehensive classification of long bone fractures by Muller. Acta Orthop. 2013 Apr;84(2):207-12. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.752692. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
- Miller BS, Taylor B, Widmann RF, Bae DS, Snyder BD, Waters PM. Cast immobilization versus percutaneous pin fixation of displaced distal radius fractures in children: a prospective, randomized study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005 Jul-Aug;25(4):490-4. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000158780.52849.39.
- Mintken PE, Glynn P, Cleland JA. Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;18(6):920-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.12.015. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
- Phelps EE, Tutton E, Costa ML, Achten J, Moscrop A, Perry DC. Protecting my injured child: a qualitative study of parents' experience of caring for a child with a displaced distal radius fracture. BMC Pediatr. 2022 May 12;22(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03340-z.
- Polson K, Reid D, McNair PJ, Larmer P. Responsiveness, minimal importance difference and minimal detectable change scores of the shortened disability arm shoulder hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire. Man Ther. 2010 Aug;15(4):404-7. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.03.008.
- Proctor MT, Moore DJ, Paterson JM. Redisplacement after manipulation of distal radial fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 May;75(3):453-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B3.8496221.
- Quatman-Yates CC, Gupta R, Paterno MV, Schmitt LC, Quatman CE, Ittenbach RF. Internal consistency and validity of the QuickDASH instrument for upper extremity injuries in older children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Dec;33(8):838-42. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182a00688.
- Ravens-Sieberer U, Wille N, Badia X, Bonsel G, Burstrom K, Cavrini G, Devlin N, Egmar AC, Gusi N, Herdman M, Jelsma J, Kind P, Olivares PR, Scalone L, Greiner W. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: results from a multinational study. Qual Life Res. 2010 Aug;19(6):887-97. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9649-x. Epub 2010 Apr 17.
- Roper B, Parikh S, Haidar L, Warth R, Ambrose C, Younas S, Crawford L, Mansour A. Outcomes After Operative Treatment of Pediatric Monteggia Fracture-Dislocations: Comparison Between Open and Closed Injuries. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Aug 1;42(7):361-366. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002171. Epub 2022 May 10.
- Sorensen AA, Howard D, Tan WH, Ketchersid J, Calfee RP. Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments. J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Apr;38(4):641-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.12.032. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
- Tomlinson D, von Baeyer CL, Stinson JN, Sung L. A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children. Pediatrics. 2010 Nov;126(5):e1168-98. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1609. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
- Verstraete J, Lloyd A, Scott D, Jelsma J. How does the EQ-5D-Y Proxy version 1 perform in 3, 4 and 5-year-old children? Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 May 24;18(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01410-3.
- Wendling-Keim DS, Wieser B, Dietz HG. Closed reduction and immobilization of displaced distal radial fractures. Method of choice for the treatment of children? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Aug;41(4):421-8. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0483-7. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
- Wilkins KE. Principles of fracture remodeling in children. Injury. 2005 Feb;36 Suppl 1:A3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.12.007.
- Wille N, Badia X, Bonsel G, Burstrom K, Cavrini G, Devlin N, Egmar AC, Greiner W, Gusi N, Herdman M, Jelsma J, Kind P, Scalone L, Ravens-Sieberer U. Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res. 2010 Aug;19(6):875-86. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9648-y. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
- Wong DL, Baker CM. Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs. 1988 Jan-Feb;14(1):9-17. No abstract available.
- Zamzam MM, Khoshhal KI. Displaced fracture of the distal radius in children: factors responsible for redisplacement after closed reduction. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Jun;87(6):841-3. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B6.15648.
- REG-099-2022