Fixation of Comminuted Distal Radius Fracture
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
comparison between different methods in fixation of comminuted distal radius fractures
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
This clinical study aims at comparison of treatment outcomes of Spanning plate versus spanning External fixator in fixation of comminuted distal radius fracture.
The primary outcomes that we like to measure are pain, healing. Stiffness and range of motion .
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: External fixator patient treated by external fixator |
Procedure: dorsal plating
Spanning Plate inserted dorsally below tendons Spanning External Fixator by rods inserted in distal radius and metacarpals
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Dorsal plate patient treated by dorsal spanning plate |
Procedure: dorsal plating
Spanning Plate inserted dorsally below tendons Spanning External Fixator by rods inserted in distal radius and metacarpals
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Mayo modified wrist score [up to 6 month]
measure.grip strength
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
-
Inclusion criteria
-
Skeletally mature patients aging 18 or more
-
Comminuted distal radius fractures Fernandez type V
-
Exclusion criteria
-
Age less than 18 year or more
-
Patients with previous fracture affecting wrist joint in the same side.
-
Parients with active infection in the affected joint
-
Pathological fracture
-
Neurological disorder (epilepsy…etc) Reheumatoid
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Sohag University Hospital | Sohag | Egypt |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Sohag University
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- Soh_Med_21_02_11