Inmobilization With Compression Bandage vs Antebraquial Splint in Distal Radius Fractures

Sponsor
Hospital Costa del Sol (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06019585
Collaborator
(none)
120
2
2
67
60
0.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare functional and radiological results in two groups of distal radius fractures treated with internal fixation with locking plate, and immobilized with antebrachial splint or compression bandage for 3 weeks.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Splint inmmobilization
  • Device: Bandage immovilization
N/A

Detailed Description

The aim of the study is to compare functional and radiological results as well as to evaluate possible complications in distal radius fractures operated by open reduction and internal fixation with volar locking plate in two groups , one treated with immobilization using a forearm cast for 3 weeks and the other with immobilization using a compression bandage for 3 weeks, based on the hypothesis that compression bandage group could obtain better results in the short term, and none of the treatments is superior to the other after 3 or 6 months of evolution, as indicated by some reviewed studies.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
120 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
2 parallel groups, each one receives one treatment2 parallel groups, each one receives one treatment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Patient receive the correspondant treatment based on the order of an aleatory numbers table
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Inmobilization With Compression Bandage vs Antebraquial Splint in Distal Radius Fractures Operated by Internal Fixation With Volar Locking Plate: A Pilot Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2026
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2026

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Splint inmmobilization

Distal radius fractures fixed with volar locking plate and immobilized with an antebrachial splint for 3 weeks

Device: Splint inmmobilization
After internal fixation with volar locking plate, groups of distal radius fractures are inmobilized with a plaster splint of París for 3 weeks

Active Comparator: Bandage immovilization

Distal radius fractures fixed with volar locking plate and immobilized with a compressive bandage for 3 weeks

Device: Bandage immovilization
After internal fixation with volar locking plate, groups of distal radius fractures are inmobilized with compressive bandage for 3 weeks

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Pain in Visual Analogue Scale. [1 year]

    Points from 1 to 10. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.

  2. Function in Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation Scale. [1 year]

    Points from 1 to 100. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.

  3. Range Of Motion in Flexion. [1 year]

    Grades from 0 to 70. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.

  4. Range Of Motion in Flexion. [1 year]

    Grades from 0 to 80. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Function in Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Scale. [1 year]

    Points from 1 to 150. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value

  2. Function in Mayo Wrist Score Scale. [1 year]

    Points from 1 to 100. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.

  3. Range of motion in Supination. [1 year]

    Grades from 0 to 90. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.

  4. Number of participants with posoperative complications. [1 year]

    Number of participants per group that suffer some complication or side effect during the follow-up period. Higher number of complications: worse value.

  5. Number of posoperative Fisiotherapy sessions performed. [1 year]

    Number of sessions per participant from 1 to 100. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.

  6. Time of fracture union in radiographs. [12 weeks]

    Number of Weeks from 1 to 12. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.

  7. Number of Instability distal radius fracture Criteria per participant. [1 year]

    Number of criteria from 1 to 6. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.

  8. Grades of Dorsal Displacement in fracture. [6 weeks]

    Grades from -10 to 30 grades. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.

  9. Range of motion in Pronation. [1 year]

    Grades from 0 to 90. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.

  10. Range of motion in Radial Deviation [1 year]

    Grades from 0 to 15. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.

  11. Range of motion in Ulnar deviation. [1 year]

    Grades from 0 to 30. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.

  12. Number of shortening millimeters in fracture. [6 weeks]

    Number of millimeters from 0-10. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.

  13. Number of ulnar variance millimeters in fracture. [6 weeks]

    Number of millimeters from -2 to +4. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.

  14. Number of step-off millimeters in fracture. [6 weeks]

    Number of millimeters from 0 to 4 mm. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with type A, B, C fractures of AO classification of distal radius fractures

  • Patents aged between 18 and 75 years,

  • Patients operated on in the first 3 weeks after the trauma, and independent for the basic activities of daily living

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with open fractures

  • Patients with mental disorders (dementia, alcoholism, etc.),

  • Patient dependent for basic activities of daily living

  • Patients with fractures with severe articular and metaphyseal comminution and/or severe soft tissue injuries (type 2R3C3 AO),

  • Patients with previous diseases or anatomical alterations in the injured wrist (previous fractures, rheumatoid arthritis, etc.).

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Hospital Reina Sofía Córdoba Spain 14004
2 Hospital Costa del Sol Málaga Spain 29603

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Hospital Costa del Sol

Investigators

  • Study Director: Alberto Izquierdo Fernández, Phd, Hospital Reina Sofía ( Córdoba, Spain)

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Hospital Costa del Sol
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06019585
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 003may21PIInmovilizacionfxd
First Posted:
Aug 31, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Aug 31, 2023
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Hospital Costa del Sol
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 31, 2023