DUET: A Study to Test the Efficacy and Safety of Padsevonil as Treatment of Focal-onset Seizures in Adult Subjects With Drug-resistant Epilepsy
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the 3 selected dose regimens of padsevonil (PSL) administered concomitantly with up to 3 anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) compared with placebo for treatment of observable focal-onset seizures in subjects with drug-resistant epilepsy.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Padsevonil dosing regimen 1 Subjects will be randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding. |
Drug: Padsevonil
Padsevonil in different dosages.
Drug: Placebo
Placebo will be provided matching padsevonil.
|
Experimental: Padsevonil dosing regimen 2 Subjects will be randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding. |
Drug: Padsevonil
Padsevonil in different dosages.
Drug: Placebo
Placebo will be provided matching padsevonil.
|
Experimental: Padsevonil dosing regimen 3 Subjects will be randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding. |
Drug: Padsevonil
Padsevonil in different dosages.
Drug: Placebo
Placebo will be provided matching padsevonil.
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Subjects randomized to the placebo group will receive a combination of several placebo tablets to maintain the blinding. |
Drug: Placebo
Placebo will be provided matching padsevonil.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change in Log-transformed Observable Focal-onset Seizure Frequency From Baseline Over the 12-week Maintenance Period [From Baseline over the 12 Week Maintenance Period (up to Week 16)]
During the study, participants kept diaries to record daily seizure activity. Seizure frequency refers to 28-day adjusted frequency. Seizure frequency was based on investigator assessment of participants' reports of daily seizure type and frequency. Observable focal-onset seizures refer to Type IA1, IB, and IC (ILAE Classification of Epileptic Seizures, 1981). Based on ANCOVA on change in log-transformed seizure frequency from Baseline, with treatment group as the main factor, Baseline log-transformed seizure frequency as a continuous covariate, Baseline SV2A use (Yes or No) and Region (Europe, non-Europe) as categorical factors.
- Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) [From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 23)]
An Adverse Event is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE was defined as any event not present before the initiation of the first dose of study treatment or any unresolved event already present before initiation of the first dose that worsened in intensity following exposure to the treatment.
- Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Study Withdrawal [From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 23)]
An Adverse Event is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE was defined as any event not present before the initiation of the first dose of study treatment or any unresolved event already present before initiation of the first dose that worsened in intensity following exposure to the treatment.
- Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 23)]
A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Results in death, is life-threatening, requires in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, is as infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics, other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the patients, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above. A TEAE was defined as any event not present before the initiation of the first dose of study treatment or any unresolved event already present before initiation of the first dose that worsened in intensity following exposure to the treatment.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- 75% Responder Rate From Baseline Over the 12-week Maintenance Period [From Baseline over the 12 Week Maintenance Period (up to Week 16)]
The 75 % responder rate, where a responder was a participant experiencing a ≥75 % reduction in observable focal-onset seizure frequency from Baseline, over the 12-Week Maintenance Period.
- 50% Responder Rate From Baseline Over the 12-week Maintenance Period [From Baseline over the 12 Week Maintenance Period (up to Week 16)]
The 50% responder rate, where a responder was a participant experiencing a ≥50% reduction in observable focal-onset seizure frequency from Baseline, over the 12-week Maintenance Period.
- Percent Change in Observable Focal-onset Seizure Frequency From Baseline Over the 12-week Maintenance Period [From Baseline over the 12 Week Maintenance Period (up to Week 16)]
During the study, participants kept diaries to record daily seizure activity. The percentage of participants who experienced a 50 % or greater reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days relative to Baseline (responders) were assessed.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Diagnosis of focal epilepsy per 1989 International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) criteria at least 3 years before study entry
-
Subject has failed to achieve seizure control with >=4 tolerated and appropriately chosen prior antiepileptic drugs (AED), including past and ongoing treatment, that were individually optimized for adequate dose and duration. Prior discontinued AED treatment would need to be assessed by the Investigator considering the patient medical records and patient and/or caregiver interview. 'Prior AED' is defined as all past and ongoing AED treatments with a start date before the Screening Visit (Visit 1)
-
Average of >= 4 spontaneous and observable focal seizures (type IA1 (i.e. focal aware), IB (i.e. focal impaired awareness), IC (i.e. focal to bilateral tonic-clonic)) per month
-
Current treatment with an individually optimized and stable dose of at least 1 and up to 3 AEDs for the 8 weeks prior to the Screening Visit with or without additional Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) or other neurostimulation treatments
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Subject has a history of or signs of generalized or combined generalized and focal epilepsy
-
Cluster seizures which are uncountable in the previous 8 weeks before study entry and during 4 weeks prospective baseline
-
Current treatment with carbamazepine, phenytoin, primidone, phenobarbital
-
Current treatment/ use of (non-AED) prescription, nonprescription, dietary (eg, grapefruit or passion fruit), or herbal products that are potent inducers or inhibitors of the CYP3A4 or 2C19 pathway for 2 weeks (or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer) prior to the Baseline Visit
-
Subjects taking sensitive substrates of CYP2C19 for 2 weeks (or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer) prior to the Baseline Visit
-
Subject has been taking vigabatrin less than 2 years at study entry
-
Subject has been taking felbamate for less than 12 months
-
Subject taking retigabine for less than 4 years
-
Current treatment with benzodiazepines (i.e. GABA-A-ergic drugs like zolpidem, zaleplon, or zopiclone, excluding GABA-A-ergic AEDs) <3 times per week for emergencies
-
Subject has a current medical condition that occurred within the last 12 months which, in the opinion of the investigator, could compromise his/her safety or ability to participate in this study
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ep0092 839 | Chandler | Arizona | United States | 85226 |
2 | Ep0092 881 | Tucson | Arizona | United States | 85724 |
3 | Ep0092 633 | Carlsbad | California | United States | 92011 |
4 | Ep0092 629 | Orange | California | United States | 92868 |
5 | Ep0092 845 | Washington | District of Columbia | United States | 20037 |
6 | Ep0092 892 | Bradenton | Florida | United States | 34209 |
7 | Ep0092 640 | Hialeah | Florida | United States | 33016 |
8 | Ep0092 641 | Jacksonville | Florida | United States | 32209 |
9 | Ep0092 823 | Orlando | Florida | United States | 32806 |
10 | Ep0092 803 | Honolulu | Hawaii | United States | 96817 |
11 | Ep0092 637 | Urbana | Illinois | United States | 61801 |
12 | Ep0092 880 | Anderson | Indiana | United States | 46011 |
13 | Ep0092 638 | Fort Wayne | Indiana | United States | 46804 |
14 | Ep0092 630 | Ames | Iowa | United States | 50010 |
15 | Ep0092 707 | Lexington | Kentucky | United States | 40536 |
16 | Ep0092 822 | Baltimore | Maryland | United States | 21287 |
17 | Ep0092 818 | Bethesda | Maryland | United States | 20817 |
18 | Ep0092 889 | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02215 |
19 | Ep0092 645 | Golden Valley | Minnesota | United States | 55422 |
20 | Ep0092 644 | Minneapolis | Minnesota | United States | 55416 |
21 | Ep0092 895 | Bronx | New York | United States | 10467 |
22 | Ep0092 878 | Brooklyn | New York | United States | 11203 |
23 | Ep0092 876 | New York | New York | United States | 10075 |
24 | Ep0092 893 | Syracuse | New York | United States | 13210 |
25 | Ep0092 890 | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | United States | 27599 |
26 | Ep0092 884 | Charlotte | North Carolina | United States | 28204 |
27 | Ep0092 642 | Columbus | Ohio | United States | 43210 |
28 | Ep0092 647 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States | 73106 |
29 | Ep0092 882 | Portland | Oregon | United States | 97225 |
30 | Ep0092 802 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States | 19107 |
31 | Ep0092 829 | Charlottesville | Virginia | United States | 22903 |
32 | Ep0092 639 | Renton | Washington | United States | 98055 |
33 | Ep0092 855 | Box Hill | Australia | ||
34 | Ep0092 861 | Camperdown | Australia | ||
35 | Ep0092 850 | Fitzroy | Australia | ||
36 | Ep0092 853 | Heidelberg | Australia | ||
37 | Ep0092 852 | Melbourne | Australia | ||
38 | Ep0092 109 | Brussels | Belgium | ||
39 | Ep0092 107 | Ottignies | Belgium | ||
40 | Ep0092 080 | Bihać | Bosnia and Herzegovina | ||
41 | Ep0092 077 | Mostar | Bosnia and Herzegovina | ||
42 | Ep0092 075 | Sarajevo | Bosnia and Herzegovina | ||
43 | Ep0092 082 | Tuzla | Bosnia and Herzegovina | ||
44 | Ep0092 150 | Blagoevgrad | Bulgaria | ||
45 | Ep0092 151 | Pleven | Bulgaria | ||
46 | Ep0092 156 | Pleven | Bulgaria | ||
47 | Ep0092 154 | Sofia | Bulgaria | ||
48 | Ep0092 125 | Zagreb | Croatia | ||
49 | Ep0092 126 | Zagreb | Croatia | ||
50 | Ep0092 127 | Zagreb | Croatia | ||
51 | Ep0092 128 | Zagreb | Croatia | ||
52 | Ep0092 254 | Brno | Czechia | ||
53 | Ep0092 258 | Ostrava | Czechia | ||
54 | Ep0092 250 | Praha 5 | Czechia | ||
55 | Ep0092 251 | Praha 6 | Czechia | ||
56 | Ep0092 016 | Aarhus | Denmark | ||
57 | Ep0092 015 | Odense | Denmark | ||
58 | Ep0092 276 | Tallinn | Estonia | ||
59 | Ep0092 277 | Tallinn | Estonia | ||
60 | Ep0092 275 | Tartu | Estonia | ||
61 | Ep0092 027 | Tampere | Finland | ||
62 | Ep0092 312 | Lyon | France | ||
63 | Ep0092 310 | Paris | France | ||
64 | Ep0092 301 | Strasbourg | France | ||
65 | Ep0092 365 | Berlin | Germany | ||
66 | Ep0092 362 | Bernau | Germany | ||
67 | Ep0092 363 | Bielefeld | Germany | ||
68 | Ep0092 350 | Frankfurt | Germany | ||
69 | Ep0092 368 | Jena | Germany | ||
70 | Ep0092 357 | Leipzig | Germany | ||
71 | Ep0092 376 | Regensburg | Germany | ||
72 | Ep0092 425 | Ioánnina | Greece | ||
73 | Ep0092 426 | Thessaloníki | Greece | ||
74 | Ep0092 427 | Thessaloníki | Greece | ||
75 | Ep0092 428 | Thessaloníki | Greece | ||
76 | Ep0092 403 | Budapest | Hungary | ||
77 | Ep0092 405 | Debrecen | Hungary | ||
78 | Ep0092 404 | Pécs | Hungary | ||
79 | Ep0092 035 | Cork | Ireland | ||
80 | Ep0092 036 | Dublin | Ireland | ||
81 | Ep0092 452 | Milano | Italy | ||
82 | Ep0092 526 | Asahikawa | Japan | ||
83 | Ep0092 501 | Asaka | Japan | ||
84 | Ep0092 521 | Bunkyō-Ku | Japan | ||
85 | Ep0092 525 | Bunkyō-Ku | Japan | ||
86 | Ep0092 504 | Hamamatsu | Japan | ||
87 | Ep0092 505 | Hiroshima | Japan | ||
88 | Ep0092 513 | Hōfu | Japan | ||
89 | Ep0092 507 | Itami | Japan | ||
90 | Ep0092 531 | Izumi | Japan | ||
91 | Ep0092 539 | Kumamoto | Japan | ||
92 | Ep0092 533 | Kure | Japan | ||
93 | Ep0092 514 | Kyoto | Japan | ||
94 | Ep0092 512 | Nagakute | Japan | ||
95 | Ep0092 515 | Saitama | Japan | ||
96 | Ep0092 508 | Sapporo | Japan | ||
97 | Ep0092 527 | Shinagawa-Ku | Japan | ||
98 | Ep0092 509 | Shizuoka | Japan | ||
99 | Ep0092 529 | Yonago | Japan | ||
100 | Ep0092 522 | Ōmura | Japan | ||
101 | Ep0092 530 | Ōsaka-sayama | Japan | ||
102 | Ep0092 775 | Sandvika | Norway | ||
103 | Ep0092 605 | Katowice | Poland | ||
104 | Ep0092 616 | Katowice | Poland | ||
105 | Ep0092 603 | Kraków | Poland | ||
106 | Ep0092 614 | Kraków | Poland | ||
107 | Ep0092 610 | Lublin | Poland | ||
108 | Ep0092 620 | Lublin | Poland | ||
109 | Ep0092 606 | Nowa Sól | Poland | ||
110 | Ep0092 611 | Warszawa | Poland | ||
111 | Ep0092 615 | Wrocław | Poland | ||
112 | Ep0092 619 | Zamość | Poland | ||
113 | Ep0092 618 | Zgierz | Poland | ||
114 | Ep0092 612 | Łódź | Poland | ||
115 | Ep0092 952 | Aveiro | Portugal | ||
116 | Ep0092 950 | Matosinhos | Portugal | ||
117 | Ep0092 925 | Bucuresti | Romania | ||
118 | Ep0092 926 | Bucuresti | Romania | ||
119 | Ep0092 927 | Târgu-Mureş | Romania | ||
120 | Ep0092 327 | Belgrade | Serbia | ||
121 | Ep0092 325 | Novi Sad | Serbia | ||
122 | Ep0092 004 | Bardejov | Slovakia | ||
123 | Ep0092 662 | Alicante | Spain | ||
124 | Ep0092 651 | Barcelona | Spain | ||
125 | Ep0092 652 | Barcelona | Spain | ||
126 | Ep0092 658 | Barcelona | Spain | ||
127 | Ep0092 674 | Madrid | Spain | ||
128 | Ep0092 657 | Valencia | Spain | ||
129 | Ep0092 676 | Zaragoza | Spain | ||
130 | Ep0092 576 | Göteborg | Sweden | ||
131 | Ep0092 575 | Linköping | Sweden | ||
132 | Ep0092 053 | Zürich | Switzerland | ||
133 | Ep0092 913 | Ankara | Turkey | ||
134 | Ep0092 915 | Antalya | Turkey | ||
135 | Ep0092 900 | Istanbul | Turkey | ||
136 | Ep0092 906 | Istanbul | Turkey | ||
137 | Ep0092 909 | Istanbul | Turkey | ||
138 | Ep0092 908 | Trabzon | Turkey | ||
139 | Ep0092 766 | Brighton | United Kingdom | ||
140 | Ep0092 750 | Manchester | United Kingdom | ||
141 | Ep0092 764 | Swansea | United Kingdom |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- UCB Biopharma SRL
Investigators
- Study Director: UCB Cares, 001 844 599 2273 (UCB)
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- EP0092
- 2018-002303-33
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | The study started to enroll participants in March 2019 and concluded in September 2020. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | The study included: a 4-week Baseline Period, a 16-week Treatment Period, a 4-week Taper Period (for participants who discontinued or choose not to enroll in the open-label extension study) and a Safety Follow-up Period. Participants continuing to the OLE study had a 3-week Conversion Period. The Participant Flow refers to the Randomized Set. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Padsevonil 100 mg BID | Padsevonil 200 mg BID | Padsevonil 400 mg BID |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding, twice daily (bid) up to Week 19. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19 |
Period Title: Treatment Period: Wk0-16 | ||||
STARTED | 56 | 60 | 57 | 59 |
Completed Titration and Stabilization | 54 | 58 | 51 | 54 |
Completed Maintenance Period | 46 | 44 | 44 | 36 |
COMPLETED | 46 | 44 | 44 | 36 |
NOT COMPLETED | 10 | 16 | 13 | 23 |
Period Title: Treatment Period: Wk0-16 | ||||
STARTED | 46 | 44 | 44 | 36 |
Started Conversion Period | 33 | 31 | 29 | 28 |
Completed Conversion Period | 33 | 31 | 29 | 28 |
Started Taper and Safety Follow-up | 19 | 18 | 21 | 13 |
Completed Taper and Safety Follow-up | 15 | 16 | 18 | 12 |
Enrolled in EP0093 | 27 | 26 | 23 | 23 |
COMPLETED | 42 | 42 | 41 | 35 |
NOT COMPLETED | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Padsevonil 100 mg BID | Padsevonil 200 mg BID | Padsevonil 400 mg BID | Total Title |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding, twice daily (bid) up to Week 19. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19 | |
Overall Participants | 56 | 60 | 57 | 59 | 232 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||||
<=18 years |
1
1.8%
|
0
0%
|
4
7%
|
0
0%
|
5
2.2%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
52
92.9%
|
57
95%
|
48
84.2%
|
56
94.9%
|
213
91.8%
|
>=65 years |
3
5.4%
|
3
5%
|
5
8.8%
|
3
5.1%
|
14
6%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
41.9
(13.6)
|
40.7
(13.0)
|
39.5
(14.3)
|
39.7
(13.6)
|
40.4
(13.6)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||||
Female |
34
60.7%
|
34
56.7%
|
29
50.9%
|
34
57.6%
|
131
56.5%
|
Male |
22
39.3%
|
26
43.3%
|
28
49.1%
|
25
42.4%
|
101
43.5%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | |||||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
1
1.8%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.4%
|
Asian |
5
8.9%
|
5
8.3%
|
7
12.3%
|
7
11.9%
|
24
10.3%
|
Black |
0
0%
|
1
1.7%
|
1
1.8%
|
1
1.7%
|
3
1.3%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
2
3.3%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
2
0.9%
|
White |
49
87.5%
|
50
83.3%
|
49
86%
|
51
86.4%
|
199
85.8%
|
Other/mixed |
1
1.8%
|
2
3.3%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
3
1.3%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Change in Log-transformed Observable Focal-onset Seizure Frequency From Baseline Over the 12-week Maintenance Period |
---|---|
Description | During the study, participants kept diaries to record daily seizure activity. Seizure frequency refers to 28-day adjusted frequency. Seizure frequency was based on investigator assessment of participants' reports of daily seizure type and frequency. Observable focal-onset seizures refer to Type IA1, IB, and IC (ILAE Classification of Epileptic Seizures, 1981). Based on ANCOVA on change in log-transformed seizure frequency from Baseline, with treatment group as the main factor, Baseline log-transformed seizure frequency as a continuous covariate, Baseline SV2A use (Yes or No) and Region (Europe, non-Europe) as categorical factors. |
Time Frame | From Baseline over the 12 Week Maintenance Period (up to Week 16) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all study participants in the RS who were administered at least 1 dose or a partial dose of IMP and had Baseline and at least 1 post-Baseline seizure frequency data during the 16-week Treatment Period. Here, number of participants were included who were evaluable for the assessment. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo (FAS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS). | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the FAS. |
Measure Participants | 54 | 59 | 56 | 56 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [log e seizures per 28 days] |
-0.41
|
-0.35
|
-0.47
|
-0.47
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 100 mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Percent reduction over placebo was calculated as 100*(1-exp(diff)), where diff was the model estimate of the log ratio between each PSL group and placebo group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.687 |
Comments | Adjusted p-values are from the Hochberg step-up procedure within SAS® Proc Multtest to control Type I error. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Percent reduction |
Estimated Value | -5.6 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -38.1 to 19.2 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 200 mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Percent reduction over placebo was calculated as 100*(1-exp(diff)), where diff was the model estimate of the log ratio between each PSL group and placebo group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.687 |
Comments | Adjusted p-values were from the Hochberg step-up procedure within SAS® Proc Multtest to control Type I error. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Percent reduction |
Estimated Value | 6.5 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -22.7 to 28.7 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 400 mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Percent reduction over placebo was calculated as 100*(1-exp(diff)), where diff was the model estimate of the log ratio between each PSL group and placebo group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.687 |
Comments | Adjusted p-values were from the Hochberg step-up procedure within SAS® Proc Multtest to control Type I error. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Percent reduction |
Estimated Value | 6.3 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -22.9 to 28.6 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) |
---|---|
Description | An Adverse Event is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE was defined as any event not present before the initiation of the first dose of study treatment or any unresolved event already present before initiation of the first dose that worsened in intensity following exposure to the treatment. |
Time Frame | From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 23) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Safety Set consisted of all study participants who were administered at least 1 dose or a partial dose of IMP. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo (SS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID (SS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID (SS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID (SS) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the Safety Set (SS). | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the SS. |
Measure Participants | 55 | 60 | 57 | 59 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
69.1
123.4%
|
83.3
138.8%
|
78.9
138.4%
|
84.7
143.6%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Study Withdrawal |
---|---|
Description | An Adverse Event is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE was defined as any event not present before the initiation of the first dose of study treatment or any unresolved event already present before initiation of the first dose that worsened in intensity following exposure to the treatment. |
Time Frame | From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 23) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Safety Set consisted of all study participants who were administered at least 1 dose or a partial dose of IMP. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo (SS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID (SS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID (SS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID (SS) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the Safety Set (SS). | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the SS. |
Measure Participants | 55 | 60 | 57 | 59 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
7.3
13%
|
10.0
16.7%
|
10.5
18.4%
|
20.3
34.4%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) |
---|---|
Description | A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Results in death, is life-threatening, requires in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, is as infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics, other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the patients, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above. A TEAE was defined as any event not present before the initiation of the first dose of study treatment or any unresolved event already present before initiation of the first dose that worsened in intensity following exposure to the treatment. |
Time Frame | From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 23) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Safety Set consisted of all study participants who were administered at least 1 dose or a partial dose of IMP. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo (SS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID (SS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID (SS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID (SS) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the Safety Set (SS). | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the SS. |
Measure Participants | 55 | 60 | 57 | 59 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
9.1
16.3%
|
3.3
5.5%
|
1.8
3.2%
|
10.2
17.3%
|
Title | 75% Responder Rate From Baseline Over the 12-week Maintenance Period |
---|---|
Description | The 75 % responder rate, where a responder was a participant experiencing a ≥75 % reduction in observable focal-onset seizure frequency from Baseline, over the 12-Week Maintenance Period. |
Time Frame | From Baseline over the 12 Week Maintenance Period (up to Week 16) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all study participants in the RS who were administered at least 1 dose or a partial dose of IMP and had Baseline and at least 1 post-Baseline seizure frequency data during the 16-week Treatment Period. Here, number of participants were included who were evaluable for the assessment. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo (FAS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS). | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the FAS. |
Measure Participants | 54 | 59 | 56 | 56 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
13.0
23.2%
|
15.3
25.5%
|
12.5
21.9%
|
14.3
24.2%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 100 mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | PSL dose/Placebo calculated using logistic regression with categorical factors for treatment group (each PSL dose group referenced to the placebo group), Region (Europe, non-Europe), Baseline SV2A use (Yes, No) and log-transformed Baseline seizure frequency as a continuous covariate. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.803 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 1.15 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.39 to 3.38 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 200 mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | PSL dose/Placebo calculated using logistic regression with categorical factors for treatment group (each PSL dose group referenced to the placebo group), Region (Europe, non-Europe), Baseline SV2A use (Yes, No) and log-transformed Baseline seizure frequency as a continuous covariate. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.772 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 0.84 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.27 to 2.65 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 400 mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | PSL dose/Placebo calculated using logistic regression with categorical factors for treatment group (each PSL dose group referenced to the placebo group), Region (Europe, non-Europe), Baseline SV2A use (Yes, No) and log-transformed Baseline seizure frequency as a continuous covariate. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.989 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 1.01 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.33 to 3.08 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | 50% Responder Rate From Baseline Over the 12-week Maintenance Period |
---|---|
Description | The 50% responder rate, where a responder was a participant experiencing a ≥50% reduction in observable focal-onset seizure frequency from Baseline, over the 12-week Maintenance Period. |
Time Frame | From Baseline over the 12 Week Maintenance Period (up to Week 16) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all study participants in the RS who were administered at least 1 dose or a partial dose of IMP and had Baseline and at least 1 post-Baseline seizure frequency data during the 16-week Treatment Period. Here, number of participants were included who were evaluable for the assessment. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo (FAS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS). | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the FAS. |
Measure Participants | 54 | 59 | 56 | 56 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
27.8
49.6%
|
35.6
59.3%
|
33.9
59.5%
|
42.9
72.7%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 100 mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | PSL dose/Placebo calculated using logistic regression with categorical factors for treatment group (each PSL dose group referenced to the placebo group), Region (Europe, non-Europe), Baseline SV2A use (Yes, No) and log-transformed Baseline seizure frequency as a continuous covariate. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.425 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 1.40 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.61 to 3.18 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 200 mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | PSL dose/Placebo calculated using logistic regression with categorical factors for treatment group (each PSL dose group referenced to the placebo group), Region (Europe, non-Europe), Baseline SV2A use (Yes, No) and log-transformed Baseline seizure frequency as a continuous covariate | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.625 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 1.23 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.53 to 2.85 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 400 mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | PSL dose/Placebo calculated using logistic regression with categorical factors for treatment group (each PSL dose group referenced to the placebo group), Region (Europe, non-Europe), Baseline SV2A use (Yes, No) and log-transformed Baseline seizure frequency as a continuous covariate | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.125 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 1.90 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.84 to 4.34 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percent Change in Observable Focal-onset Seizure Frequency From Baseline Over the 12-week Maintenance Period |
---|---|
Description | During the study, participants kept diaries to record daily seizure activity. The percentage of participants who experienced a 50 % or greater reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days relative to Baseline (responders) were assessed. |
Time Frame | From Baseline over the 12 Week Maintenance Period (up to Week 16) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all study participants in the RS who were administered at least 1 dose or a partial dose of IMP and had Baseline and at least 1 post-Baseline seizure frequency data during the 16-week Treatment Period. Here, number of participants were included who were evaluable for the assessment. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo (FAS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS). | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the FAS. |
Measure Participants | 54 | 59 | 56 | 56 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percent change] |
22.34
(44.56)
|
11.72
(81.52)
|
30.29
(39.58)
|
22.41
(62.80)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 100 mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dose group comparisons to Placebo p-value are based on the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Hodges Lehmann nonparametric effect estimates and corresponding two-sided 95% asymptotic confidence intervals are provided for the effect difference between each PSL dose and placebo. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.737 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Median Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | 3.25 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -17.08 to 20.36 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 200 mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dose group comparisons to Placebo p-value are based on the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Hodges Lehmann nonparametric effect estimates and corresponding two-sided 95% asymptotic confidence intervals are provided for the effect difference between each PSL dose and placebo. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.458 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Median Difference (Net) |
Estimated Value | 6.17 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -10.00 to 21.91 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 400 mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dose group comparisons to Placebo p-value are based on the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Hodges Lehmann nonparametric effect estimates and corresponding two-sided 95% asymptotic confidence intervals are provided for the effect difference between each PSL dose and placebo. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.341 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Median Difference (Net) |
Estimated Value | 9.31 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -10.92 to 28.21 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | TEAEs were collected from Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 23) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | TEAEs counts are for the number of study participants who entered the respective study period regardless of whether or not they completed the previous period. This is the reason for the difference in number of participants in Taper and SFU period in adverse events section and participant flow. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm/Group Title | Placebo Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Placebo Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Placebo Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | ||||||||||||
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the Safety Set (SS). | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to Week 19. Participants formed the SS. | A 3-Week Conversion Period was required for study participants who chose to enroll in the open-label extension (OLE) study at the end of the 12-Week Maintenance Period. Participants initially randomized to placebo progressively received padsevonil in a blinded way to reach the entry dose of 400 mg/day for the OLE. Participants formed the Safety Set (SS). | A 3-Week Conversion Period was required for study participants who chose to enroll in the OLE study at the end of the 12-Week Maintenance Period. The dose for participants initially randomized to padsevonil 100 mg bid was gradually adapted (increased or decreased) in a blinded way to reach the entry dose of 400 mg/day for the OLE. Participants formed the SS. | A 3-Week Conversion Period was required for study participants who chose to enroll in the OLE study at the end of the 12-Week Maintenance Period. The dose for participants initially randomized to padsevonil 200 mg bid was gradually adapted (increased or decreased) in a blinded way to reach the entry dose of 400 mg/day for the OLE. Participants formed the SS. | A 3-Week Conversion Period was required for study participants who chose to enroll in the OLE study at the end of the 12-Week Maintenance Period. The dose for participants initially randomized to padsevonil 400 mg bid was gradually adapted (increased or decreased) in a blinded way to reach the entry dose of 400 mg/day for the OLE. Participants formed the SS. | A 4-Week Taper Period was required for participants who chose not to enroll in the OLE study or who discontinued prior to the end of the 12-Week Maintenance Period. Participants initially randomized to placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding and have been gradually tapered off the IMP over a 3-week period followed by 1-week drug-free period. Afterwards, participants had a Safety Follow-Up visit 30 days after the last IMP intake. Participants formed the Safety Set (SS). | A 4-Week Taper Period was required for participants who chose not to enroll in the OLE study or who discontinued prior to the end of the 12-Week Maintenance Period. Participants initially randomized to padsevonil 100 mg bid have been gradually tapered off the IMP over a 3-week period followed by 1-week drug-free period. Afterwards, participants had a Safety Follow-Up visit 30 days after the last IMP intake. Participants formed the SS. | A 4-Week Taper Period was required for participants who chose not to enroll in the OLE study or who discontinued prior to the end of the 12-Week Maintenance Period. Participants initially randomized to padsevonil 200 mg bid have been gradually tapered off the IMP over a 3-week period followed by 1-week drug-free period. Afterwards, participants had a Safety Follow-Up visit 30 days after the last IMP intake. Participants formed the SS. | A 4-Week Taper Period was required for participants who chose not to enroll in the OLE study or who discontinued prior to the end of the 12-Week Maintenance Period. Participants initially randomized to padsevonil 400 mg bid have been gradually tapered off the IMP over a 3-week period followed by 1-week drug-free period. Afterwards, participants had a Safety Follow-Up visit 30 days after the last IMP intake. Participants formed the SS. | ||||||||||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Placebo Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Placebo Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Placebo Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | |||||||||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/55 (0%) | 0/60 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/33 (0%) | 0/31 (0%) | 0/29 (0%) | 0/28 (0%) | 0/27 (0%) | 0/30 (0%) | 0/31 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | ||||||||||||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Placebo Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Placebo Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Placebo Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | |||||||||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 3/55 (5.5%) | 0/60 (0%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 5/59 (8.5%) | 1/33 (3%) | 0/31 (0%) | 0/29 (0%) | 0/28 (0%) | 1/27 (3.7%) | 2/30 (6.7%) | 0/31 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | ||||||||||||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radius fracture | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 1/59 (1.7%) | 2 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Skin laceration | 1/55 (1.8%) | 1 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Subdural haematoma | 1/55 (1.8%) | 1 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Wrist fracture | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Contusion | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 1/33 (3%) | 1 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Humerus fracture | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 1/33 (3%) | 1 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Rib fracture | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 1/33 (3%) | 1 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hyponatraemia | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Muscular weakness | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Epilepsy | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 1/57 (1.8%) | 1 | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Focal dyscognitive seizures | 1/55 (1.8%) | 1 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Seizure | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Status epilepticus | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 1/32 (3.1%) | 1 |
Psychiatric disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aggression | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Emotional disorder | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 1/27 (3.7%) | 1 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Suicidal ideation | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 1/27 (3.7%) | 1 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pneumothorax | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Surgical and medical procedures | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abortion induced | 1/55 (1.8%) | 1 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Placebo Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Placebo Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Placebo Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100 mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200 mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400 mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | |||||||||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 25/55 (45.5%) | 37/60 (61.7%) | 40/57 (70.2%) | 41/59 (69.5%) | 7/33 (21.2%) | 0/31 (0%) | 1/29 (3.4%) | 1/28 (3.6%) | 2/27 (7.4%) | 6/30 (20%) | 4/31 (12.9%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | ||||||||||||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nausea | 3/55 (5.5%) | 5 | 1/60 (1.7%) | 1 | 3/57 (5.3%) | 4 | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Diarrhoea | 3/55 (5.5%) | 4 | 1/60 (1.7%) | 1 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 2/59 (3.4%) | 2 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
General disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fatigue | 4/55 (7.3%) | 4 | 5/60 (8.3%) | 5 | 7/57 (12.3%) | 7 | 14/59 (23.7%) | 15 | 1/33 (3%) | 1 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Asthenia | 2/55 (3.6%) | 2 | 6/60 (10%) | 6 | 3/57 (5.3%) | 4 | 2/59 (3.4%) | 2 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 1/31 (3.2%) | 1 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Gait disturbance | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 2/60 (3.3%) | 2 | 2/57 (3.5%) | 3 | 4/59 (6.8%) | 4 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Infections and infestations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nasopharyngitis | 4/55 (7.3%) | 4 | 1/60 (1.7%) | 1 | 4/57 (7%) | 4 | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1 | 1/33 (3%) | 1 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fall | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 3/57 (5.3%) | 4 | 2/59 (3.4%) | 2 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 1/29 (3.4%) | 1 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 1/27 (3.7%) | 1 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 1/31 (3.2%) | 1 | 1/32 (3.1%) | 1 |
Contusion | 3/55 (5.5%) | 4 | 1/60 (1.7%) | 1 | 2/57 (3.5%) | 2 | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1 | 1/33 (3%) | 1 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 1/29 (3.4%) | 1 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Decreased appetite | 1/55 (1.8%) | 1 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 3/57 (5.3%) | 3 | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Somnolence | 2/55 (3.6%) | 2 | 10/60 (16.7%) | 11 | 19/57 (33.3%) | 22 | 20/59 (33.9%) | 23 | 1/33 (3%) | 1 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Dizziness | 4/55 (7.3%) | 5 | 14/60 (23.3%) | 14 | 10/57 (17.5%) | 13 | 18/59 (30.5%) | 19 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 1/27 (3.7%) | 1 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Headache | 8/55 (14.5%) | 13 | 10/60 (16.7%) | 22 | 9/57 (15.8%) | 16 | 5/59 (8.5%) | 8 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 4/30 (13.3%) | 12 | 2/31 (6.5%) | 2 | 1/32 (3.1%) | 1 |
Memory impairment | 1/55 (1.8%) | 1 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 3/57 (5.3%) | 3 | 6/59 (10.2%) | 6 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Tremor | 1/55 (1.8%) | 1 | 3/60 (5%) | 5 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 4/59 (6.8%) | 4 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 1/28 (3.6%) | 1 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Disturbance in attention | 1/55 (1.8%) | 1 | 1/60 (1.7%) | 1 | 5/57 (8.8%) | 5 | 2/59 (3.4%) | 2 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Balance disorder | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 1/60 (1.7%) | 1 | 3/57 (5.3%) | 3 | 2/59 (3.4%) | 2 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 1/31 (3.2%) | 1 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Dysarthria | 1/55 (1.8%) | 1 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 5/59 (8.5%) | 5 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Seizure | 1/55 (1.8%) | 1 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 4/57 (7%) | 5 | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Psychiatric disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Insomnia | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 1/60 (1.7%) | 1 | 5/57 (8.8%) | 6 | 4/59 (6.8%) | 4 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Irritability | 3/55 (5.5%) | 3 | 4/60 (6.7%) | 4 | 3/57 (5.3%) | 3 | 3/59 (5.1%) | 3 | 1/33 (3%) | 1 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Anxiety | 1/55 (1.8%) | 1 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 1/57 (1.8%) | 2 | 3/59 (5.1%) | 3 | 0/33 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Vascular disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hypotension | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 1/60 (1.7%) | 1 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 2/33 (6.1%) | 2 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 0/28 (0%) | 0 | 0/27 (0%) | 0 | 0/30 (0%) | 0 | 0/31 (0%) | 0 | 0/32 (0%) | 0 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | UCB |
---|---|
Organization | Cares |
Phone | +1-844-599-2273 |
UCBCares@ucb.com |
- EP0092
- 2018-002303-33