ARISE: Study to Test the Efficacy and Safety of Padsevonil as Adjunctive Treatment of Focal-onset Seizures in Adults With Drug-resistant Epilepsy
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to characterize the dose-response relationship with respect to efficacy of Padsevonil administered concomitantly with up to 3 anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) for treatment of observable focal-onset seizures in subjects with drug-resistant epilepsy.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Padsevonil dosing regimen 1 Subjects will be randomized to receive a combination of tablets of Padsevonil and Placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding. |
Drug: Padsevonil
Padsevonil in different dosages.
Other: Placebo
Placebo will be provided matching Padsevonil.
|
Experimental: Padsevonil dosing regimen 2 Subjects will be randomized to receive a combination of tablets of Padsevonil and Placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding. |
Drug: Padsevonil
Padsevonil in different dosages.
Other: Placebo
Placebo will be provided matching Padsevonil.
|
Experimental: Padsevonil dosing regimen 3 Subjects will be randomized to receive a combination of tablets of Padsevonil and Placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding. |
Drug: Padsevonil
Padsevonil in different dosages.
Other: Placebo
Placebo will be provided matching Padsevonil.
|
Experimental: Padsevonil dosing regimen 4 Subjects will be randomized to receive a combination of tablets of Padsevonil and Placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding. |
Drug: Padsevonil
Padsevonil in different dosages.
Other: Placebo
Placebo will be provided matching Padsevonil.
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Subjects randomized to the placebo group will receive a combination of several Placebo tablets to maintain the blinding. |
Other: Placebo
Placebo will be provided matching Padsevonil.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change in Log-transformed Observable Focal Onset Seizure Frequency From Baseline Over the 12 Week Maintenance Period [From Baseline over the 12 Week Maintenance Period]
During the study, participants kept diaries to record daily seizure activity. Seizure frequency refers to 28-day adjusted frequency. Seizure frequency was based on investigator assessment of participants' reports of daily seizure type and frequency. Observable focal-onset seizures refer to Type IA1, IB, and IC (ILAE Classification of Epileptic Seizures, 1981). Based on ANCOVA on change in log-transformed, 28-day adjusted seizure frequency from Baseline with treatment group as the main factor, Baseline log-transformed seizure frequency as a continuous covariate, Baseline SV2A use (yes or no) and Region (Europe, Non-Europe) as categorical factors.
- Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported by the Subject and/or Caregiver or Observed by the Investigator During the Entire Study [From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 23)]
An Adverse Event is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
- Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Study Withdrawal [From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 23)]
An Adverse Event is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
- Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Entire Study [From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 23)]
A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Results in death Is life-threatening Requires in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect Is an infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the patients, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- 75 % Responder Rate Over the 12 Week Maintenance Period [End of Maintenance Period (Week 16) following 3 Weeks of titration and 1 Week stabilization]
The 75% responder rate, where a responder is a participant experiencing a ≥75% reduction in observable focal-onset seizure frequency from Baseline, over the 12-Week Maintenance Period.
- 50 % Responder Rate Over the 12 Week Maintenance Period [End of Maintenance Period (Week 16) following 3 Weeks of titration and 1 Week stabilization]
The 50% responder rate, where a responder was a participant experiencing a ≥50% reduction in observable focal-onset seizure frequency from Baseline, over the 12-Week Maintenance Period.
- Percent Change in Observable Focal-onset Seizure Frequency From Baseline Over the 12 Week Maintenance Period [End of Maintenance Period (Week 16) following 3 Weeks of titration and 1 Week stabilization]
During the study, participants kept diaries to record daily seizure activity. The percentage of participants who experienced a 50 % or greater reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days relative to Baseline (responders) was assessed.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Diagnosis of focal epilepsy per 1989 International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) criteria at least 3 years before study entry
-
Subject has failed to achieve seizure control with 4 tolerated and appropriately chosen prior antiepileptic drugs (AED), including past and ongoing treatment, that were individually optimized for adequate dose and duration. Prior discontinued AED treatment would need to be assessed by the Investigator considering the patient medical records and patient and/or caregiver interview. 'Prior AED' is defined as all past and ongoing AED treatments with a start date before the Screening Visit (Visit 1)
-
Average of >= 4 spontaneous and observable focal seizures (type IA1 (i.e. focal aware), IB (i.e. focal impaired awareness), IC (i.e. focal to bilateral tonic-clonic)) per month
-
Current treatment with an individually optimized and stable dose of at least 1 and up to 3 AEDs for the 8 weeks prior to the Screening Visit with or without additional Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) or other neurostimulation treatments
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Subject has a history of or signs of generalized or combined generalized and focal epilepsy
-
Cluster seizures which are uncountable in the previous 8 weeks before study entry and during 4 weeks prospective baseline
-
Current treatment with carbamazepine, phenytoin, primidone, phenobarbital
-
Current treatment/ use of (non-AED) prescription, nonprescription, dietary (eg, grapefruit or passion fruit), or herbal products that are potent inducers or inhibitors of the CYP3A4 or 2C19 pathway for 2 weeks (or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer) prior to the Baseline Visit
-
Subjects taking sensitive substrates of CYP2C19 for 2 weeks (or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer) prior to the Baseline Visit
-
Subject has been taking vigabatrin less than 2 years at study entry
-
Subject has been taking felbamate for less than 12 months
-
Subject taking retigabine for less than 4 years
-
Current treatment with benzodiazepines (i.e. GABA-A-ergic drugs like zolpidem, zaleplon, or zopiclone, excluding GABA-A-ergic AEDs) <3 times per week for emergencies
-
Subject has a current medical condition that occurred within the last 12 months which, in the opinion of the investigator, could compromise his/her safety or ability to participate in this study
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ep0091 839 | Chandler | Arizona | United States | 85226 |
2 | Ep0091 810 | Little Rock | Arkansas | United States | 72205 |
3 | Ep0091 815 | La Jolla | California | United States | 92037 |
4 | Ep0091 801 | San Francisco | California | United States | 94115 |
5 | Ep0091 845 | Washington | District of Columbia | United States | 20037 |
6 | Ep0091 809 | Ocala | Florida | United States | 34471 |
7 | Ep0091 823 | Orlando | Florida | United States | 32806 |
8 | Ep0091 825 | Port Charlotte | Florida | United States | 33952 |
9 | Ep0091 820 | Tallahassee | Florida | United States | 32308 |
10 | Ep0091 873 | Atlanta | Georgia | United States | 30303 |
11 | Ep0091 803 | Honolulu | Hawaii | United States | 96817 |
12 | Ep0091 832 | Peoria | Illinois | United States | 61637 |
13 | Ep0091 822 | Baltimore | Maryland | United States | 21287 |
14 | Ep0091 818 | Bethesda | Maryland | United States | 20817 |
15 | Ep0091 817 | Saint Paul | Minnesota | United States | 55102 |
16 | Ep0091 806 | Hackensack | New Jersey | United States | 07601 |
17 | Ep0091 827 | New York | New York | United States | 10016-48 |
18 | Ep0091 800 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States | 19104 |
19 | Ep0091 802 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States | 19107 |
20 | Ep0091 838 | Cordova | Tennessee | United States | 38018 |
21 | Ep0091 835 | Nashville | Tennessee | United States | 37232 |
22 | Ep0091 805 | Austin | Texas | United States | 78701 |
23 | Ep0091 844 | Austin | Texas | United States | 78758 |
24 | Ep0091 836 | Dallas | Texas | United States | 75231 |
25 | Ep0091 830 | Dallas | Texas | United States | 75390-91 |
26 | Ep0091 824 | Round Rock | Texas | United States | 78681 |
27 | Ep0091 870 | San Antonio | Texas | United States | 78229 |
28 | Ep0091 855 | Box Hill | Australia | ||
29 | Ep0091 857 | Clayton | Australia | ||
30 | Ep0091 850 | Fitzroy | Australia | ||
31 | Ep0091 859 | Herston | Australia | ||
32 | Ep0091 852 | Melbourne | Australia | ||
33 | Ep0091 853 | Melbourne | Australia | ||
34 | Ep0091 856 | Randwick | Australia | ||
35 | Ep0091 854 | Westmead | Australia | ||
36 | Ep0091 102 | Brugge | Belgium | ||
37 | Ep0091 101 | Brussels | Belgium | ||
38 | Ep0091 105 | Gent | Belgium | ||
39 | Ep0091 100 | Leuven | Belgium | ||
40 | Ep0091 150 | Blagoevgrad | Bulgaria | ||
41 | Ep0091 151 | Pleven | Bulgaria | ||
42 | Ep0091 153 | Pleven | Bulgaria | ||
43 | Ep0091 152 | Sofia | Bulgaria | ||
44 | Ep0091 154 | Sofia | Bulgaria | ||
45 | Ep0091 155 | Sofia | Bulgaria | ||
46 | Ep0091 200 | Greenfield Park | Canada | ||
47 | Ep0091 205 | London | Canada | ||
48 | Ep0091 201 | Montréal | Canada | ||
49 | Ep0091 254 | Brno | Czechia | ||
50 | Ep0091 255 | Ostrava-Poruba | Czechia | ||
51 | Ep0091 252 | Praha 4 | Czechia | ||
52 | Ep0091 250 | Praha 5 | Czechia | ||
53 | Ep0091 253 | Praha 8 | Czechia | ||
54 | Ep0091 251 | Praha | Czechia | ||
55 | Ep0091 307 | Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1 | France | ||
56 | Ep0091 309 | Dijon | France | ||
57 | Ep0091 300 | Lille | France | ||
58 | Ep0091 302 | Montpellier | France | ||
59 | Ep0091 305 | Paris | France | ||
60 | Ep0091 303 | Rennes | France | ||
61 | Ep0091 306 | Toulouse Cedex 9 | France | ||
62 | Ep0091 361 | Bad Neustadt An Der Saale | Germany | ||
63 | Ep0091 365 | Berlin | Germany | ||
64 | Ep0091 362 | Bernau | Germany | ||
65 | Ep0091 363 | Bielefeld | Germany | ||
66 | Ep0091 358 | Bonn | Germany | ||
67 | Ep0091 350 | Frankfurt am main | Germany | ||
68 | Ep0091 360 | Freiburg | Germany | ||
69 | Ep0091 364 | Hamburg | Germany | ||
70 | Ep0091 368 | Jena | Germany | ||
71 | Ep0091 366 | Kork | Germany | ||
72 | Ep0091 357 | Leipzig | Germany | ||
73 | Ep0091 353 | Marburg | Germany | ||
74 | Ep0091 354 | München | Germany | ||
75 | Ep0091 351 | Münster | Germany | ||
76 | Ep0091 356 | Osnabrück | Germany | ||
77 | Ep0091 367 | Ravensburg | Germany | ||
78 | Ep0091 301 | Strausberg | Germany | ||
79 | Ep0091 352 | Tübingen | Germany | ||
80 | Ep0091 400 | Budapest | Hungary | ||
81 | Ep0091 403 | Budapest | Hungary | ||
82 | Ep0091 402 | Debrecen | Hungary | ||
83 | Ep0091 462 | Bologna | Italy | ||
84 | Ep0091 450 | Cagliari | Italy | ||
85 | Ep0091 461 | Foggia | Italy | ||
86 | Ep0091 452 | Milano | Italy | ||
87 | Ep0091 459 | Pavia | Italy | ||
88 | Ep0091 453 | Perugia | Italy | ||
89 | Ep0091 458 | Pozzilli | Italy | ||
90 | Ep0091 454 | Reggio Calabria | Italy | ||
91 | Ep0091 455 | Roma | Italy | ||
92 | Ep0091 457 | Roma | Italy | ||
93 | Ep0091 460 | Roma | Italy | ||
94 | Ep0091 501 | Asaka | Japan | ||
95 | Ep0091 511 | Fukuoka | Japan | ||
96 | Ep0091 505 | Hiroshima | Japan | ||
97 | Ep0091 513 | Hōfu | Japan | ||
98 | Ep0091 507 | Itami | Japan | ||
99 | Ep0091 503 | Kodaira | Japan | ||
100 | Ep0091 514 | Kyoto | Japan | ||
101 | Ep0091 512 | Nagakute | Japan | ||
102 | Ep0091 510 | Niigata | Japan | ||
103 | Ep0091 515 | Saitama | Japan | ||
104 | Ep0091 509 | Shizuoka | Japan | ||
105 | Ep0091 703 | Kaunas | Lithuania | ||
106 | Ep0091 701 | Vilnius | Lithuania | ||
107 | Ep0091 702 | Vilnius | Lithuania | ||
108 | Ep0091 553 | Culiacán | Mexico | ||
109 | Ep0091 552 | Mexico Distrito Federal | Mexico | ||
110 | Ep0091 601 | Gdańsk | Poland | ||
111 | Ep0091 607 | Grodzisk Mazowiecki | Poland | ||
112 | Ep0091 605 | Katowice | Poland | ||
113 | Ep0091 608 | Katowice | Poland | ||
114 | Ep0091 603 | Kraków | Poland | ||
115 | Ep0091 604 | Lublin | Poland | ||
116 | Ep0091 606 | Nowa Sól | Poland | ||
117 | Ep0091 600 | Poznań | Poland | ||
118 | Ep0091 609 | Poznań | Poland | ||
119 | Ep0091 602 | Świdnik | Poland | ||
120 | Ep0091 952 | Santa Maria Da Feira | Portugal | ||
121 | Ep0091 004 | Bardejov | Slovakia | ||
122 | Ep0091 001 | Hlohovec | Slovakia | ||
123 | Ep0091 662 | Alicante | Spain | ||
124 | Ep0091 651 | Barcelona | Spain | ||
125 | Ep0091 652 | Barcelona | Spain | ||
126 | Ep0091 658 | Barcelona | Spain | ||
127 | Ep0091 664 | Barcelona | Spain | ||
128 | Ep0091 668 | Bilbao | Spain | ||
129 | Ep0091 666 | Córdoba | Spain | ||
130 | Ep0091 650 | Madrid | Spain | ||
131 | Ep0091 656 | Madrid | Spain | ||
132 | Ep0091 660 | Madrid | Spain | ||
133 | Ep0091 661 | Madrid | Spain | ||
134 | Ep0091 659 | Málaga | Spain | ||
135 | Ep0091 663 | Sevilla | Spain | ||
136 | Ep0091 665 | Terrassa | Spain | ||
137 | Ep0091 657 | Valencia | Spain | ||
138 | Ep0091 667 | Valencia | Spain | ||
139 | Ep0091 653 | Valladolid | Spain | ||
140 | Ep0091 904 | Eskişehir | Turkey | ||
141 | Ep0091 900 | Istanbul | Turkey | ||
142 | Ep0091 901 | Istanbul | Turkey | ||
143 | Ep0091 752 | Birmingham | United Kingdom | ||
144 | Ep0091 751 | Cardiff | United Kingdom | ||
145 | Ep0091 756 | Inverness | United Kingdom | ||
146 | Ep0091 757 | London | United Kingdom | ||
147 | Ep0091 750 | Manchester | United Kingdom | ||
148 | Ep0091 753 | Swansea | United Kingdom |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- UCB Biopharma S.P.R.L.
Investigators
- Study Director: UCB Cares, 001 844 599 2273 (UCB)
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- EP0091
- 2017-003200-48
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | The study started to enroll patients in February 2018 and concluded in January 2020. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | The study included: a 4-week Baseline Period, a 16-week Treatment Period, a 4-week Taper Period (for participants who discontinued or choose not to enroll in the open-label extension study) and a Safety Follow-up Period. Participants continuing to the OLE study had a 3-week Conversion Period. Participant Flow refers to the Randomized Set. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Padsevonil 50mg BID | Padsevonil 100mg BID | Padsevonil 200mg BID | Padsevonil 400mg BID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding up to week 19. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 50 milligrams (mg) and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, twice daily (bid) up to week 19 | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. |
Period Title: Treatment Period: Wk0-16 | |||||
STARTED | 83 | 81 | 83 | 82 | 82 |
Completed Titration and Stabilization | 78 | 72 | 71 | 68 | 65 |
Completed Maintenance Period | 70 | 66 | 68 | 61 | 58 |
Had Taper and Safety Follow-up | 6 | 11 | 8 | 18 | 21 |
COMPLETED | 70 | 66 | 68 | 61 | 58 |
NOT COMPLETED | 13 | 15 | 15 | 21 | 24 |
Period Title: Treatment Period: Wk0-16 | |||||
STARTED | 70 | 66 | 68 | 61 | 58 |
Started Conversion Period | 69 | 64 | 66 | 55 | 57 |
Completed Conversion Period | 68 | 64 | 66 | 55 | 57 |
Had Taper and Safety Follow-up | 3 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 1 |
Enrolled in EP0093 | 67 | 63 | 65 | 55 | 57 |
COMPLETED | 69 | 66 | 68 | 61 | 58 |
NOT COMPLETED | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Padsevonil 50mg BID | Padsevonil 100mg BID | Padsevonil 200mg BID | Padsevonil 400mg BID | Total Title |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding up to week 19. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 50 milligrams (mg) and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, twice daily (bid) up to week 19 | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. | |
Overall Participants | 83 | 81 | 83 | 82 | 82 | 411 |
Age (Count of Participants) | ||||||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
2
2.4%
|
1
1.2%
|
1
1.2%
|
4
1%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
82
98.8%
|
76
93.8%
|
80
96.4%
|
79
96.3%
|
80
97.6%
|
397
96.6%
|
>=65 years |
1
1.2%
|
5
6.2%
|
1
1.2%
|
2
2.4%
|
1
1.2%
|
10
2.4%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
40.0
(12.9)
|
42.5
(11.6)
|
36.9
(13.1)
|
40.9
(12.0)
|
38.8
(12.1)
|
39.8
(12.4)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||||
Female |
48
57.8%
|
46
56.8%
|
47
56.6%
|
51
62.2%
|
43
52.4%
|
235
57.2%
|
Male |
35
42.2%
|
35
43.2%
|
36
43.4%
|
31
37.8%
|
39
47.6%
|
176
42.8%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | ||||||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
1
1.2%
|
1
1.2%
|
1
1.2%
|
2
2.4%
|
0
0%
|
5
1.2%
|
Asian |
7
8.4%
|
7
8.6%
|
5
6%
|
7
8.5%
|
7
8.5%
|
33
8%
|
Black or African American |
2
2.4%
|
1
1.2%
|
1
1.2%
|
2
2.4%
|
2
2.4%
|
8
1.9%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
1
1.2%
|
1
1.2%
|
1
1.2%
|
1
1.2%
|
1
1.2%
|
5
1.2%
|
White |
69
83.1%
|
69
85.2%
|
73
88%
|
69
84.1%
|
71
86.6%
|
351
85.4%
|
Other/mixed |
3
3.6%
|
2
2.5%
|
2
2.4%
|
1
1.2%
|
1
1.2%
|
9
2.2%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Change in Log-transformed Observable Focal Onset Seizure Frequency From Baseline Over the 12 Week Maintenance Period |
---|---|
Description | During the study, participants kept diaries to record daily seizure activity. Seizure frequency refers to 28-day adjusted frequency. Seizure frequency was based on investigator assessment of participants' reports of daily seizure type and frequency. Observable focal-onset seizures refer to Type IA1, IB, and IC (ILAE Classification of Epileptic Seizures, 1981). Based on ANCOVA on change in log-transformed, 28-day adjusted seizure frequency from Baseline with treatment group as the main factor, Baseline log-transformed seizure frequency as a continuous covariate, Baseline SV2A use (yes or no) and Region (Europe, Non-Europe) as categorical factors. |
Time Frame | From Baseline over the 12 Week Maintenance Period |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all study participants in the RS who were administered at least 1 dose or a partial dose of IMP and had Baseline and at least 1 post-Baseline seizure frequency data during the 16-week Treatment Period. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo (FAS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding up to week 19. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS). | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 50 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the FAS. |
Measure Participants | 81 | 80 | 82 | 81 | 81 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [loge seizures per 28 days] |
-0.27585
|
-0.46424
|
-0.48804
|
-0.48960
|
-0.40831
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 50mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Percent reduction over placebo was calculated as 100*(1-exp(diff)), where diff was the model estimate of the log ratio between each PSL group and placebo group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.102 |
Comments | Adjusted p-values were from the Hochberg step-up procedure within SAS® Proc Multtest to control Type I error. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Percent reduction |
Estimated Value | 17.2 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -3.8 to 33.9 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 100mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Percent reduction over placebo was calculated as 100*(1-exp(diff)), where diff was the model estimate of the log ratio between each PSL group and placebo group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.064 |
Comments | Adjusted p-values were from the Hochberg step-up procedure within SAS® Proc Multtest to control Type I error. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Percent reduction |
Estimated Value | 19.1 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -1.2 to 35.4 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 200mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Percent reduction over placebo was calculated as 100*(1-exp(diff)), where diff was the model estimate of the log ratio between each PSL group and placebo group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.063 |
Comments | Adjusted p-values were from the Hochberg step-up procedure within SAS® Proc Multtest to control Type I error. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Percent reduction |
Estimated Value | 19.2 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -1.2 to 35.5 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 400mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Percent reduction over placebo was calculated as 100*(1-exp[diff]), where diff was the model estimate of the log ratio between each PSL group and placebo group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.248 |
Comments | Adjusted p-values were from the Hochberg step-up procedure within SAS® Proc Multtest to control Type I error. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Percent reduction |
Estimated Value | 12.4 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -9.7 to 30.1 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | 75 % Responder Rate Over the 12 Week Maintenance Period |
---|---|
Description | The 75% responder rate, where a responder is a participant experiencing a ≥75% reduction in observable focal-onset seizure frequency from Baseline, over the 12-Week Maintenance Period. |
Time Frame | End of Maintenance Period (Week 16) following 3 Weeks of titration and 1 Week stabilization |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all study participants in the RS who were administered at least 1 dose or a partial dose of IMP and had Baseline and at least 1 post-Baseline seizure frequency data during the 16-week Treatment Period. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo (FAS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding up to week 19. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS). | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 50 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the FAS. |
Measure Participants | 81 | 80 | 82 | 81 | 81 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
6.2
7.5%
|
13.8
17%
|
12.2
14.7%
|
11.1
13.5%
|
16.0
19.5%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 50mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | PSL dose/Placebo was calculated using logistic regression with categorical factors for treatment group, Region (Europe, Non-Europe), Baseline SV2A use (0, 1) and log-transformed Baseline seizure frequency as a continuous covariate. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.081 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 2.72 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.88 to 8.39 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 100mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | PSL dose/Placebo was calculated using logistic regression with categorical factors for treatment group, Region (Europe, Non-Europe), Baseline SV2A use (0, 1) and log-transformed Baseline seizure frequency as a continuous covariate. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.137 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 2.37 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.76 to 7.41 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 200mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | PSL dose/Placebo was calculated using logistic regression with categorical factors for treatment group, Region (Europe, Non-Europe), Baseline SV2A use (0, 1) and log-transformed Baseline seizure frequency as a continuous covariate. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.192 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 2.16 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.68 to 6.89 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 400mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | PSL dose/Placebo was calculated using logistic regression with categorical factors for treatment group, Region (Europe, Non-Europe), Baseline SV2A use (0, 1) and log-transformed Baseline seizure frequency as a continuous covariate. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.041 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 3.14 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 1.05 to 9.42 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Reported by the Subject and/or Caregiver or Observed by the Investigator During the Entire Study |
---|---|
Description | An Adverse Event is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. |
Time Frame | From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 23) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Safety Set consisted of all study participants who were administered at least 1 dose or a partial dose of IMP. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo (SS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID (SS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID (SS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID (SS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID (SS) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding up to week 19. Participants formed the Safety Set (SS). | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 50 mg and Placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the SS. |
Measure Participants | 83 | 81 | 83 | 82 | 81 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
78.3
94.3%
|
84.0
103.7%
|
80.7
97.2%
|
75.6
92.2%
|
92.6
112.9%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Study Withdrawal |
---|---|
Description | An Adverse Event is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. |
Time Frame | From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 23) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Safety Set consisted of all study participants who were administered at least 1 dose or a partial dose of IMP. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo (SS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID (SS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID (SS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID (SS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID (SS) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding up to week 19. Participants formed the Safety Set (SS). | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 50 mg and Placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the SS. |
Measure Participants | 83 | 81 | 83 | 82 | 81 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
8.4
10.1%
|
7.4
9.1%
|
12.0
14.5%
|
18.3
22.3%
|
25.9
31.6%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Entire Study |
---|---|
Description | A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Results in death Is life-threatening Requires in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect Is an infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the patients, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above. |
Time Frame | From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 23) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Safety Set consisted of all study participants who were administered at least 1 dose or a partial dose of IMP. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo (SS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID (SS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID (SS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID (SS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID (SS) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding up to week 19. Participants formed the Safety Set (SS). | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 50 mg and Placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the SS. |
Measure Participants | 83 | 81 | 83 | 82 | 81 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
4.8
5.8%
|
7.4
9.1%
|
4.8
5.8%
|
6.1
7.4%
|
6.2
7.6%
|
Title | 50 % Responder Rate Over the 12 Week Maintenance Period |
---|---|
Description | The 50% responder rate, where a responder was a participant experiencing a ≥50% reduction in observable focal-onset seizure frequency from Baseline, over the 12-Week Maintenance Period. |
Time Frame | End of Maintenance Period (Week 16) following 3 Weeks of titration and 1 Week stabilization |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all study participants in the RS who were administered at least 1 dose or a partial dose of IMP and had Baseline and at least 1 post-Baseline seizure frequency data during the 16-week Treatment Period. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo (FAS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding up to week 19. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS). | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 50 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the FAS. |
Measure Participants | 81 | 80 | 82 | 81 | 81 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
21.0
25.3%
|
33.8
41.7%
|
31.7
38.2%
|
25.9
31.6%
|
32.1
39.1%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 50mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | PSL dose/placebo calculated using logistic regression with categorical factors for treatment group (each PSL dose group referenced to the placebo group), region (Europe, Non-Europe), Baseline SV2A use (0, 1) and log-transformed Baseline seizure frequency as a continuous covariate. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.045 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 2.09 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 1.02 to 4.30 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 100mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | PSL dose/placebo calculated using logistic regression with categorical factors for treatment group (each PSL dose group referenced to the placebo group), region (Europe, Non-Europe), Baseline SV2A use (0, 1) and log-transformed Baseline seizure frequency as a continuous covariate. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.079 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 1.91 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.93 to 3.93 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 200mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | PSL dose/placebo calculated using logistic regression with categorical factors for treatment group (each PSL dose group referenced to the placebo group), region (Europe, Non-Europe), Baseline SV2A use (0, 1) and log-transformed Baseline seizure frequency as a continuous covariate. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.338 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 1.44 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.68 to 3.02 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 400mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | PSL dose/Placebo calculated using logistic regression with categorical factors for treatment group, Region (Europe, Non-Europe), Baseline SV2A use (0, 1) and log-transformed Baseline seizure frequency as a continuous covariate. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.087 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 1.88 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.91 to 3.87 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percent Change in Observable Focal-onset Seizure Frequency From Baseline Over the 12 Week Maintenance Period |
---|---|
Description | During the study, participants kept diaries to record daily seizure activity. The percentage of participants who experienced a 50 % or greater reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days relative to Baseline (responders) was assessed. |
Time Frame | End of Maintenance Period (Week 16) following 3 Weeks of titration and 1 Week stabilization |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all study participants in the RS who were administered at least 1 dose or a partial dose of IMP and had Baseline and at least 1 post-Baseline seizure frequency data during the 16-week Treatment Period. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo (FAS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID (FAS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding up to week 19. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS). | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 50 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the FAS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the FAS. |
Measure Participants | 81 | 80 | 82 | 81 | 81 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percent change] |
12.49
(58.26)
|
24.70
(46.62)
|
25.25
(51.73)
|
20.79
(66.54)
|
15.79
(67.55)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 50mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dose group comparisons to Placebo p-value were based on the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. The Hodges-Lehmann nonparametric estimator was used to estimate the median difference between each PSL dose group versus placebo, along with the corresponding 95% CI of the estimate. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.316 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Median Difference (Net) |
Estimated Value | 7.40 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -6.59 to 21.89 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 100mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dose group comparisons to Placebo p-value were based on the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. The Hodges-Lehmann nonparametric estimator was used to estimate the median difference between each PSL dose group versus placebo, along with the corresponding 95% CI of the estimate. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.133 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Median Difference (Net) |
Estimated Value | 9.99 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -3.15 to 23.26 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 200mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dose group comparisons to Placebo p-value were based on the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. The Hodges-Lehmann nonparametric estimator was used to estimate the median difference between each PSL dose group versus placebo, along with the corresponding 95% CI of the estimate. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.203 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Median Difference (Net) |
Estimated Value | 8.19 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -3.95 to 21.37 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo (FAS), Padsevonil 400mg BID (FAS) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Dose group comparisons to Placebo p-value were based on the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. The Hodges-Lehmann nonparametric estimator was used to estimate the median difference between each PSL dose group versus placebo, along with the corresponding 95% CI of the estimate. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | =0.784 |
Comments | Nominal p-values were not adjusted for multiplicity. | |
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Median Difference (Net) |
Estimated Value | 2.39 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -13.65 to 17.79 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Treatment-emergent AEs were collected from Baseline to Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 23) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Adverse events refer to the SS which consisted of all participants who were administered at least 1 dose or a partial dose of IMP. TEAEs counts are for each study period: Treatment Period, Conversion Period for participants who entered the OLE study and Taper Period followed by SFU for participants not entering OLE study. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm/Group Title | Placebo Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Placebo Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Placebo Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | |||||||||||||||
Arm/Group Description | Participants randomized to the placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding up to week 19. Participants formed the Safety Set (SS). | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 50 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 100 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 200 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the SS. | Participants were randomized to receive a combination of tablets of padsevonil 400 mg and placebo (as appropriate) to maintain the blinding, bid up to week 19. Participants formed the SS. | A 3-week Conversion Period was required for study participants who chose to enroll in the open-label extension (OLE) study at the end of the 12-week Maintenance Period. Participants initially randomized to placebo progressively received padsevonil in a blinded way to reach the entry dose of 400mg/day for the OLE. Participants formed the Safety Set (SS). | A 3-week Conversion Period was required for study participants who chose to enroll in the OLE study at the end of the 12-week Maintenance Period. The dose for participants initially randomized to padsevonil 50mg bid was gradually adapted (increased or decreased) in a blinded way to reach the entry dose of 400mg/day for the OLE. Participants formed the SS. | A 3-week Conversion Period was required for study participants who chose to enroll in the OLE study at the end of the 12-week Maintenance Period. The dose for participants initially randomized to padsevonil 100mg bid was gradually adapted (increased or decreased) in a blinded way to reach the entry dose of 400mg/day for the OLE. Participants formed the SS. | A 3-week Conversion Period was required for study participants who chose to enroll in the OLE study at the end of the 12-week Maintenance Period. The dose for participants initially randomized to padsevonil 200mg bid was gradually adapted (increased or decreased) in a blinded way to reach the entry dose of 400mg/day for the OLE. Participants formed the SS. | A 3-week Conversion Period was required for study participants who chose to enroll in the OLE study at the end of the 12-week Maintenance Period. The dose for participants initially randomized to padsevonil 400mg bid was gradually adapted (increased or decreased) in a blinded way to reach the entry dose of 400mg/day for the OLE. Participants formed the SS. | A 4-week Taper Period was required for participants who chose not to enroll in the OLE study or who discontinued prior to the end of the 12-week Maintenance Period. Participants initially randomized to placebo group received 5-6 placebo tablets to maintain the blinding and have been gradually tapered off the IMP over a 3-week period followed by 1-week drug-free period. Afterwards, participants had a Safety Follow-Up visit 30 days after the last IMP intake. Participants formed the Safety Set (SS). | A 4-week Taper Period was required for participants who chose not to enroll in the OLE study or who discontinued prior to the end of the 12-week Maintenance Period. Participants initially randomized to padsevonil 50 mg bid have been gradually tapered off the IMP over a 3-week period followed by 1-week drug-free period. Afterwards, participants had a Safety Follow-Up visit 30 days after the last IMP intake. Participants formed the SS. | A 4-week Taper Period was required for participants who chose not to enroll in the OLE study or who discontinued prior to the end of the 12-week Maintenance Period. Participants initially randomized to padsevonil 100 mg bid have been gradually tapered off the IMP over a 3-week period followed by 1-week drug-free period. Afterwards, participants had a Safety Follow-Up visit 30 days after the last IMP intake. Participants formed the SS. | A 4-week Taper Period was required for participants who chose not to enroll in the OLE study or who discontinued prior to the end of the 12-week Maintenance Period. Participants initially randomized to padsevonil 200 mg bid have been gradually tapered off the IMP over a 3-week period followed by 1-week drug-free period. Afterwards, participants had a Safety Follow-Up visit 30 days after the last IMP intake. Participants formed the SS. | A 4-week Taper Period was required for participants who chose not to enroll in the OLE study or who discontinued prior to the end of the 12-week Maintenance Period. Participants initially randomized to padsevonil 400 mg bid have been gradually tapered off the IMP over a 3-week period followed by 1-week drug-free period. Afterwards, participants had a Safety Follow-Up visit 30 days after the last IMP intake. Participants formed the SS. | |||||||||||||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Placebo Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Placebo Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Placebo Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | ||||||||||||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/83 (0%) | 0/81 (0%) | 0/83 (0%) | 0/82 (0%) | 0/81 (0%) | 0/69 (0%) | 0/64 (0%) | 0/66 (0%) | 0/55 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | 0/9 (0%) | 0/14 (0%) | 0/11 (0%) | 0/24 (0%) | 0/22 (0%) | |||||||||||||||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Placebo Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Placebo Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Placebo Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | ||||||||||||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 3/83 (3.6%) | 5/81 (6.2%) | 4/83 (4.8%) | 3/82 (3.7%) | 5/81 (6.2%) | 0/69 (0%) | 0/64 (0%) | 0/66 (0%) | 2/55 (3.6%) | 0/57 (0%) | 1/9 (11.1%) | 1/14 (7.1%) | 0/11 (0%) | 0/24 (0%) | 0/22 (0%) | |||||||||||||||
Cardiac disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atrial flutter | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 1/81 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Infections and infestations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diverticulitis | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 1/81 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concussion | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Fall | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 1/82 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Head injury | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 1/81 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 1/14 (7.1%) | 1 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Toxicity to various agents | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 1/82 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Traumatic haemothorax | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hyperkalaemia | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Altered state of consciousness | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 1/81 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Encephalopathy | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 1/81 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Focal dyscognitive seizures | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 1/81 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Partial seizures | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 1/81 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Seizure cluster | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Status epilepticus | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 | 1/81 (1.2%) | 1 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 | 1/82 (1.2%) | 1 | 1/81 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 1/55 (1.8%) | 1 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Syncope | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 1/81 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Psychiatric disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depression | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 1/55 (1.8%) | 1 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Acute psychosis | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 1/9 (11.1%) | 1 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Renal disorder | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pneumonia aspiration | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Surgical and medical procedures | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Medical device battery replacement | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 1/81 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Placebo Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID Treatment Period (SS) | Placebo Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID Conversion Period (SS) | Placebo Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 50mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 100mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 200mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | Padsevonil 400mg BID Taper and SFU Period (SS) | ||||||||||||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 45/83 (54.2%) | 54/81 (66.7%) | 60/83 (72.3%) | 53/82 (64.6%) | 65/81 (80.2%) | 11/69 (15.9%) | 18/64 (28.1%) | 10/66 (15.2%) | 5/55 (9.1%) | 5/57 (8.8%) | 3/9 (33.3%) | 3/14 (21.4%) | 0/11 (0%) | 3/24 (12.5%) | 4/22 (18.2%) | |||||||||||||||
Ear and labyrinth disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vertigo | 7/83 (8.4%) | 7 | 3/81 (3.7%) | 3 | 2/83 (2.4%) | 2 | 3/82 (3.7%) | 3 | 4/81 (4.9%) | 5 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nausea | 7/83 (8.4%) | 7 | 4/81 (4.9%) | 4 | 7/83 (8.4%) | 7 | 2/82 (2.4%) | 3 | 7/81 (8.6%) | 13 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 1/66 (1.5%) | 1 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Diarrhoea | 3/83 (3.6%) | 3 | 6/81 (7.4%) | 8 | 3/83 (3.6%) | 4 | 5/82 (6.1%) | 7 | 4/81 (4.9%) | 5 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 1/64 (1.6%) | 1 | 1/66 (1.5%) | 1 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 1/57 (1.8%) | 1 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
General disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fatigue | 10/83 (12%) | 10 | 20/81 (24.7%) | 27 | 12/83 (14.5%) | 17 | 14/82 (17.1%) | 22 | 20/81 (24.7%) | 21 | 3/69 (4.3%) | 3 | 5/64 (7.8%) | 5 | 2/66 (3%) | 2 | 1/55 (1.8%) | 1 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 1/24 (4.2%) | 2 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Gait disturbance | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 | 2/81 (2.5%) | 2 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 1/82 (1.2%) | 1 | 5/81 (6.2%) | 5 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Infections and infestations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nasopharyngitis | 5/83 (6%) | 5 | 5/81 (6.2%) | 5 | 9/83 (10.8%) | 13 | 7/82 (8.5%) | 11 | 5/81 (6.2%) | 5 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 1/64 (1.6%) | 1 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 1/55 (1.8%) | 1 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Upper respiratory tract infection | 1/83 (1.2%) | 3 | 5/81 (6.2%) | 5 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 2/81 (2.5%) | 3 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/64 (1.6%) | 1 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 1/14 (7.1%) | 1 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Urinary tract infection | 2/83 (2.4%) | 2 | 1/81 (1.2%) | 1 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 2/81 (2.5%) | 2 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 1/66 (1.5%) | 1 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 1/9 (11.1%) | 1 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 1/22 (4.5%) | 1 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fall | 4/83 (4.8%) | 4 | 2/81 (2.5%) | 2 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 | 1/82 (1.2%) | 2 | 7/81 (8.6%) | 7 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 1/66 (1.5%) | 2 | 1/55 (1.8%) | 1 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Ligament sprain | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 2/81 (2.5%) | 2 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 2/64 (3.1%) | 2 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 1/9 (11.1%) | 1 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Burns second degree | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 1/14 (7.1%) | 1 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Investigations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Platelet count decreased | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 1/9 (11.1%) | 1 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Anticonvulsant drug level increased | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 1/9 (11.1%) | 1 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Back pain | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 1/81 (1.2%) | 1 | 2/83 (2.4%) | 2 | 2/82 (2.4%) | 2 | 5/81 (6.2%) | 5 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 1/9 (11.1%) | 1 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dizziness | 9/83 (10.8%) | 9 | 18/81 (22.2%) | 19 | 23/83 (27.7%) | 31 | 19/82 (23.2%) | 25 | 28/81 (34.6%) | 55 | 3/69 (4.3%) | 3 | 2/64 (3.1%) | 2 | 1/66 (1.5%) | 1 | 2/55 (3.6%) | 2 | 2/57 (3.5%) | 6 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 1/24 (4.2%) | 1 | 1/22 (4.5%) | 1 |
Somnolence | 10/83 (12%) | 11 | 19/81 (23.5%) | 24 | 24/83 (28.9%) | 29 | 25/82 (30.5%) | 26 | 30/81 (37%) | 35 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 4/64 (6.3%) | 5 | 1/66 (1.5%) | 1 | 1/55 (1.8%) | 1 | 2/57 (3.5%) | 2 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Headache | 10/83 (12%) | 14 | 17/81 (21%) | 29 | 9/83 (10.8%) | 16 | 15/82 (18.3%) | 21 | 9/81 (11.1%) | 31 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 3/64 (4.7%) | 3 | 2/66 (3%) | 3 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 1/57 (1.8%) | 5 | 1/9 (11.1%) | 1 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 2/24 (8.3%) | 2 | 1/22 (4.5%) | 1 |
Memory impairment | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 | 3/81 (3.7%) | 3 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 1 | 8/82 (9.8%) | 9 | 14/81 (17.3%) | 14 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 1/66 (1.5%) | 1 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 1/22 (4.5%) | 1 |
Tremor | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 5/81 (6.2%) | 5 | 2/83 (2.4%) | 2 | 6/82 (7.3%) | 6 | 5/81 (6.2%) | 5 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Balance disorder | 1/83 (1.2%) | 2 | 3/81 (3.7%) | 3 | 3/83 (3.6%) | 3 | 5/82 (6.1%) | 5 | 3/81 (3.7%) | 3 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Nystagmus | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 1/14 (7.1%) | 1 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Psychiatric disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Irritability | 8/83 (9.6%) | 8 | 4/81 (4.9%) | 4 | 7/83 (8.4%) | 7 | 1/82 (1.2%) | 1 | 5/81 (6.2%) | 6 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 1/64 (1.6%) | 1 | 1/66 (1.5%) | 1 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 1/22 (4.5%) | 1 |
Anxiety | 3/83 (3.6%) | 3 | 1/81 (1.2%) | 1 | 1/83 (1.2%) | 2 | 7/82 (8.5%) | 9 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 1/69 (1.4%) | 1 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 0/14 (0%) | 0 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Paranoia | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/83 (0%) | 0 | 0/82 (0%) | 0 | 0/81 (0%) | 0 | 0/69 (0%) | 0 | 0/64 (0%) | 0 | 0/66 (0%) | 0 | 0/55 (0%) | 0 | 0/57 (0%) | 0 | 0/9 (0%) | 0 | 1/14 (7.1%) | 1 | 0/11 (0%) | 0 | 0/24 (0%) | 0 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | UCB |
---|---|
Organization | Cares |
Phone | +1844 599 ext 2273 |
UCBCares@ucb.com |
- EP0091
- 2017-003200-48