Phase 2a Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of AA4500 in Treatment of Dupuytren's Disease Nodules

Sponsor
Endo Pharmaceuticals (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02193828
Collaborator
(none)
76
11
4
5
6.9
1.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The objectives of this study are to assess the safety and effectiveness of AA4500 in treating palmar Dupuytren's disease nodules.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Biological: Collagenase clostridium histolyticum
  • Biological: Placebo
Phase 2

Detailed Description

Approximately 13 sites in the United States and Australia, approximately 90 study subjects.

After all pre-injection procedures are completed on day 1, eligible men and women will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to dose group and then in a 4:1 ratio to treatment group. Study drug will be administered into a palmar nodule located on the selected hand.

AA4500 (collagenase clostridium histolyticum) 3 doses (low, medium, and high) after reconstitution with sterile diluent (0.3 mg/mL calcium chloride dihydrate in 0.9% sodium chloride). Each dose of study drug will be injected into the nodule. The injection will be administered in 3 different volumes according to randomization.

Placebo after reconstitution with sterile diluent (0.3 mg/mL calcium chloride dihydrate in 0.9% sodium chloride). Each dose of study drug will be injected into the nodule. The injection will be administered in 3 different volumes according to randomization.

Follow up visits for the evaluation of safety and efficacy will be required for all subjects on days 8, 29, and 57.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
76 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Phase 2a, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of AA4500 in the Treatment of Dupuytren's Disease Nodules
Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: AA4500 0.25 mg

Collagenase clostridium histolyticum, single 0.25 mg injection

Biological: Collagenase clostridium histolyticum
Single injection into nodule
Other Names:
  • AA4500
  • XIAFLEX
  • XIAPEX
  • Experimental: AA4500 0.40 mg

    Collagenase clostridium histolyticum, single 0.40 mg injection

    Biological: Collagenase clostridium histolyticum
    Single injection into nodule
    Other Names:
  • AA4500
  • XIAFLEX
  • XIAPEX
  • Experimental: AA4500 0.60 mg

    Collagenase clostridium histolyticum, single 0.60 mg injection

    Biological: Collagenase clostridium histolyticum
    Single injection into nodule
    Other Names:
  • AA4500
  • XIAFLEX
  • XIAPEX
  • Placebo Comparator: Placebo

    Placebo, single 0.25 mg, 0.40 mg, or 0.60 mg injection

    Biological: Placebo
    Single injection into nodule

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Percent Change From Baseline in Surface Area and Volume of the Treated Nodule at Day 57 Using Caliper Measurements [Baseline, Day 57]

      Percent change from baseline in surface area and volume of the treated nodule was determined from hand-held caliper measurements of the length and width of the nodule. Percent change = 100*(Day 57 area [or volume] - baseline area [or volume])/baseline area [or volume]. A negative value represents the improvement from baseline (decreased size) while a positive value represents worsening.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Percent Change From Baseline in Surface Area and Volume of the Treated Nodule at Day 57 Using Ultrasound [Baseline, Day 57]

      Percent change from baseline in surface area and volume of the treated nodule was determined from ultrasound measurements of the length, width, and depth of the nodule. Percent change = 100*(Day 57 area [or volume] - baseline area [or volume])/baseline area [or volume]. A negative value represents the improvement from baseline (decreased size) while a positive value represents worsening.

    2. Change From Baseline in Consistency of the Treated Nodules at Day 57 [Baseline, Day 57]

      Investigators determined the consistency of the nodule through palpitation using a 5-point scale: 5 = hard (solid), 4 = firm throughout, 3 = moderate firmness, 2 = soft, and 1 = non-palpable. The change scores could range from +4 (greatest worsening in consistency) to -4 (greatest improvement in consistency); a negative change from baseline value reflects improvement from baseline (softening) while a positive value reflects worsening.

    3. Percent Change From Baseline in Hardness of the Treated Nodule at Day 57 [Baseline, Day 57]

      A durometer was used to assess nodule hardness on a scale of 0 (soft) to 100 (hard). Percent change = 100*(Day 57 hardness - baseline hardness)/baseline hardness. A negative value represents the improvement from baseline (softening) while a positive value represents worsening.

    4. Change From Baseline in Nodular Pain of the Treated Nodule at Day 57 [Baseline, Day 57]

      After the nodule was squeezed using a dynamometer, subjects were asked to rate the amount of pain they felt on an 11-point visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain or discomfort) to 10 (extreme pain or discomfort). A negative change from baseline value reflects improvement from baseline (less pain) while a positive value reflects worsening.

    5. Investigator Global Assessment of Improvement With Treatment [Day 57]

      Investigators were asked to determine the degree of improvement in the subject's treated nodule compared with screening on a 7-point scale: 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse.

    6. Subject Satisfaction With Treatment [Day 57]

      Subjects were asked to rate their satisfaction with treatment on a 5-point scale: 1 = very satisfied, 2 = quite satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = quite dissatisfied, and 5 = very dissatisfied.

    7. Composite Responder Analysis [Day 57]

      A composite responder is a subject who had an improved assessment [values of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved)] on the investigator global assessment and had a satisfied assessment [values of 1 (very satisfied) or 2 (quite satisfied)] on the subject assessment.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Provide a signed and dated informed consent

    2. Be a man or woman ≥ 18 years of age

    3. Have a diagnosis of Dupuytren's disease AND have at least one palmar nodule on the selected hand that is:

    4. Palpable

    5. Measures between 0.5 cm and 2.0 cm in length and between 0.5 cm and 2.0 cm in width using hand-held calipers n

    6. Not directly associated with a Dupuytren's cord

    7. Have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening and before injection of study drug and be using a highly effective (ie, < 1% failure rate) contraception method as judged by the investigator (eg, abstinence, intrauterine device [IUD], hormonal [estrogen/progestin] contraceptives, or barrier control) for at least one menstrual cycle prior to study enrollment and for the duration of the study or be surgically sterile (if female of childbearing potential); or be a postmenopausal female (no menses for at least 1 year or hysterectomy)

    8. Be able to comply with the study visit schedule as specified in the protocol

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Received steroid injections (eg, tri-amcinolone acetonide) on the selected nodule within 3 months before administration of study drug

    2. Has a chronic muscular, neurological, or neuromuscular disorder that affects the hands

    3. Has a known systemic allergy to collagenase or any other excipient of AA4500

    4. Has received any collagenase treatments (eg, Santyl® ointment and/or XIAFLEX®/XIAPEX®) within 30 days before injection of study drug in the hand selected for treatment

    5. Is currently receiving or plans to receive anticoagulant medication or has received anticoagulant medication (except for ≤ 150 mg aspirin daily) within 7 days before injection of study drug

    6. Has a known recent history of stroke, bleeding, or other medical condition, which in the investigator's opinion would make the subject unsuitable for enrollment in the study

    7. Received an investigational drug within 30 days before injection of study drug

    8. Is pregnant or intends on becoming pregnant during the study or is breastfeeding a child

    9. Has any clinically significant medical history or condition(s), including conditions that affect the hands, that would, in the opinion of the investigator, substantially increase the risk associated with the subject's participation in the protocol or compromise the scientific objectives of the study

    10. Had surgery on the selected hand within 3 months before the screening visit

    11. Has jewelry on the hand to be treated that cannot be removed

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Tucson Orthopaedic Institute Tucson Arizona United States 85712
    2 CORE Orthopaedic Medical Center Encinitas California United States 92024
    3 Marin Endocrine Care & Research, Inc. Greenbrae California United States 94904
    4 Brigid Freyne, MD, Inc. Murrieta California United States 92563
    5 Indiana Hand to Shoulder Center Indianapolis Indiana United States 46260
    6 State University of New York Stony Brook New York United States 11794
    7 OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc. Charlotte North Carolina United States 28207
    8 Orthopedic and Reconstructive Center Oklahoma City Oklahoma United States 73109
    9 Blair Orthopedic Associates, Inc. Altoona Pennsylvania United States 16602
    10 Brisbane Hand & Upper Limb Clinic Brisbane Queensland Australia 4000
    11 Houston Medical Kippa Ring Queensland Australia 4021

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Endo Pharmaceuticals

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Veronica Urdaneta, MD MPH, Endo Pharmaceuticals

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Endo Pharmaceuticals
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02193828
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • AUX-CC-750
    First Posted:
    Jul 18, 2014
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 5, 2017
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2017
    Keywords provided by Endo Pharmaceuticals
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title AA4500 0.60 mg AA4500 0.40 mg AA4500 0.25 mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.60 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.40 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.25 mg injection into the nodule Placebo, single 0.25 mg, 0.40 mg, or 0.60 mg injection into the nodule
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 18 18 23 17
    COMPLETED 18 18 22 16
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0 1 1

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title AA4500 0.60 mg AA4500 0.40 mg AA4500 0.25 mg Placebo Total
    Arm/Group Description Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.60 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.40 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.25 mg injection into the nodule Placebo, single 0.25 mg, 0.40 mg, or 0.60 mg injection into the nodule Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 18 18 22 17 75
    Age (Count of Participants)
    <=18 years
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Between 18 and 65 years
    13
    72.2%
    12
    66.7%
    16
    72.7%
    11
    64.7%
    52
    69.3%
    >=65 years
    5
    27.8%
    6
    33.3%
    6
    27.3%
    6
    35.3%
    23
    30.7%
    Age (years) [Median (Full Range) ]
    Median (Full Range) [years]
    62.0
    60.0
    57.0
    58.0
    58.0
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    6
    33.3%
    10
    55.6%
    11
    50%
    7
    41.2%
    34
    45.3%
    Male
    12
    66.7%
    8
    44.4%
    11
    50%
    10
    58.8%
    41
    54.7%
    Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    Hispanic or Latino
    1
    5.6%
    1
    5.6%
    1
    4.5%
    1
    5.9%
    4
    5.3%
    Not Hispanic or Latino
    17
    94.4%
    17
    94.4%
    21
    95.5%
    16
    94.1%
    71
    94.7%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    American Indian or Alaska Native
    0
    0%
    1
    5.6%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    1
    1.3%
    Asian
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Black or African American
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    White
    18
    100%
    17
    94.4%
    22
    100%
    17
    100%
    74
    98.7%
    More than one race
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    12
    66.7%
    10
    55.6%
    14
    63.6%
    12
    70.6%
    48
    64%
    Australia
    6
    33.3%
    8
    44.4%
    8
    36.4%
    5
    29.4%
    27
    36%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Percent Change From Baseline in Surface Area and Volume of the Treated Nodule at Day 57 Using Caliper Measurements
    Description Percent change from baseline in surface area and volume of the treated nodule was determined from hand-held caliper measurements of the length and width of the nodule. Percent change = 100*(Day 57 area [or volume] - baseline area [or volume])/baseline area [or volume]. A negative value represents the improvement from baseline (decreased size) while a positive value represents worsening.
    Time Frame Baseline, Day 57

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Analysis based on Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population; all randomized subjects who received study medication and had pre- and post-baseline nodule measurements for ultrasound and calipers. Analytical outliers (subjects whose percent change in ultrasound volume was greater than the 75th percentile + 3× the interquartile range) were excluded.
    Arm/Group Title AA4500 0.60 mg AA4500 0.40 mg AA4500 0.25 mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.60 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.40 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.25 mg injection into the nodule Placebo, single 0.25 mg, 0.40 mg, or 0.60 mg injection into the nodule
    Measure Participants 17 18 20 15
    Surface Area
    -81.61
    (20.251)
    -80.11
    (21.459)
    -58.30
    (29.849)
    -41.76
    (32.445)
    Volume
    -89.03
    (15.016)
    -87.58
    (16.372)
    -68.15
    (33.859)
    -49.13
    (36.736)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, AA4500 0.40 mg, AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments For surface area
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, Placebo
    Comments For surface area
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.40 mg, Placebo
    Comments For surface area
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments For surface area
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0713
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, AA4500 0.40 mg, AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments For volume
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0002
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, Placebo
    Comments For volume
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 7
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.40 mg, Placebo
    Comments For volume
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 8
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments For volume
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0446
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percent Change From Baseline in Surface Area and Volume of the Treated Nodule at Day 57 Using Ultrasound
    Description Percent change from baseline in surface area and volume of the treated nodule was determined from ultrasound measurements of the length, width, and depth of the nodule. Percent change = 100*(Day 57 area [or volume] - baseline area [or volume])/baseline area [or volume]. A negative value represents the improvement from baseline (decreased size) while a positive value represents worsening.
    Time Frame Baseline, Day 57

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Analysis based on mITT population; all randomized subjects who received study medication and had pre- and post-baseline nodule measurements for ultrasound and calipers. Analytical outliers (subjects whose percent change in ultrasound volume was greater than the 75th percentile + 3× the interquartile range) were excluded.
    Arm/Group Title AA4500 0.60 mg AA4500 0.40 mg AA4500 0.25 mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.60 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.40 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.25 mg injection into the nodule Placebo, single 0.25 mg, 0.40 mg, or 0.60 mg injection into the nodule
    Measure Participants 17 18 20 15
    Surface Area
    -34.23
    (41.353)
    -19.37
    (39.658)
    -10.30
    (41.696)
    -4.54
    (54.784)
    Volume
    -40.99
    (46.612)
    -13.01
    (68.804)
    -9.52
    (60.156)
    -7.19
    (69.877)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, AA4500 0.40 mg, AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments For surface area
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .2431
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, Placebo
    Comments For surface area
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0625
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.40 mg, Placebo
    Comments For surface area
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .3409
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments For surface area
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .7040
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, AA4500 0.40 mg, AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments For volume
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3556
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, Placebo
    Comments For volume
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .1275
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 7
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.40 mg, Placebo
    Comments For volume
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .7883
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 8
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments For volume
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .9123
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Consistency of the Treated Nodules at Day 57
    Description Investigators determined the consistency of the nodule through palpitation using a 5-point scale: 5 = hard (solid), 4 = firm throughout, 3 = moderate firmness, 2 = soft, and 1 = non-palpable. The change scores could range from +4 (greatest worsening in consistency) to -4 (greatest improvement in consistency); a negative change from baseline value reflects improvement from baseline (softening) while a positive value reflects worsening.
    Time Frame Baseline, Day 57

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Analysis based on mITT population; all randomized subjects who received an injection of study medication and had pre- and post-baseline nodule measurements for both ultrasound and calipers. Subjects with an incomplete assessment (not done) on Day 57 were excluded.
    Arm/Group Title AA4500 0.60 mg AA4500 0.40 mg AA4500 0.25 mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.60 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.40 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.25 mg injection into the nodule Placebo, single 0.25 mg, 0.40 mg, or 0.60 mg injection into the nodule
    Measure Participants 16 17 22 15
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    -1.9
    (0.93)
    -1.9
    (1.05)
    -1.2
    (1.10)
    -0.3
    (0.96)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, AA4500 0.40 mg, AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0002
    Comments
    Method Kruskal-Wallis
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.40 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0002
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0139
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percent Change From Baseline in Hardness of the Treated Nodule at Day 57
    Description A durometer was used to assess nodule hardness on a scale of 0 (soft) to 100 (hard). Percent change = 100*(Day 57 hardness - baseline hardness)/baseline hardness. A negative value represents the improvement from baseline (softening) while a positive value represents worsening.
    Time Frame Baseline, Day 57

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Analysis based on mITT population; all randomized subjects who received an injection of study medication and had pre- and post-baseline nodule measurements for both ultrasound and calipers. Subjects with an incomplete assessment (not done) on Day 57 were excluded.
    Arm/Group Title AA4500 0.60 mg AA4500 0.40 mg AA4500 0.25 mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.60 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.40 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.25 mg injection into the nodule Placebo, single 0.25 mg, 0.40 mg, or 0.60 mg injection into the nodule
    Measure Participants 16 17 22 15
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage of change]
    -17.05
    (15.584)
    -30.40
    (24.930)
    -17.87
    (22.265)
    4.80
    (23.959)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, AA4500 0.40 mg, AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0004
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0075
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.40 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <.0001
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0031
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Nodular Pain of the Treated Nodule at Day 57
    Description After the nodule was squeezed using a dynamometer, subjects were asked to rate the amount of pain they felt on an 11-point visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain or discomfort) to 10 (extreme pain or discomfort). A negative change from baseline value reflects improvement from baseline (less pain) while a positive value reflects worsening.
    Time Frame Baseline, Day 57

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Analysis based on mITT population; all randomized subjects who received an injection of study medication and had pre- and post-baseline nodule measurements for both ultrasound and calipers. Subjects with an incomplete assessment (not done) on Day 57 were excluded.
    Arm/Group Title AA4500 0.60 mg AA4500 0.40 mg AA4500 0.25 mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.60 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.40 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.25 mg injection into the nodule Placebo, single 0.25 mg, 0.40 mg, or 0.60 mg injection into the nodule
    Measure Participants 16 17 22 15
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    -0.8
    (1.97)
    -1.6
    (2.21)
    -1.7
    (2.57)
    -0.5
    (1.77)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, AA4500 0.40 mg, AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .3135
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .7249
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.40 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .1573
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .1234
    Comments
    Method ANOVA
    Comments
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Investigator Global Assessment of Improvement With Treatment
    Description Investigators were asked to determine the degree of improvement in the subject's treated nodule compared with screening on a 7-point scale: 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse.
    Time Frame Day 57

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Analysis based on mITT population; all randomized subjects who received an injection of study medication and had pre- and post-baseline nodule measurements for both ultrasound and calipers.
    Arm/Group Title AA4500 0.60 mg AA4500 0.40 mg AA4500 0.25 mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.60 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.40 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.25 mg injection into the nodule Placebo, single 0.25 mg, 0.40 mg, or 0.60 mg injection into the nodule
    Measure Participants 18 18 22 16
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    1.7
    (0.84)
    1.7
    (0.75)
    2.5
    (1.10)
    3.0
    (1.15)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, AA4500 0.40 mg, AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0006
    Comments
    Method Kruskal-Wallis
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0014
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.40 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0012
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .1298
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Subject Satisfaction With Treatment
    Description Subjects were asked to rate their satisfaction with treatment on a 5-point scale: 1 = very satisfied, 2 = quite satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = quite dissatisfied, and 5 = very dissatisfied.
    Time Frame Day 57

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Analysis based on mITT population; all randomized subjects who received an injection of study medication and had pre- and post-baseline nodule measurements for both ultrasound and calipers.
    Arm/Group Title AA4500 0.60 mg AA4500 0.40 mg AA4500 0.25 mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.60 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.40 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.25 mg injection into the nodule Placebo, single 0.25 mg, 0.40 mg, or 0.60 mg injection into the nodule
    Measure Participants 18 18 22 16
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    1.5
    (0.79)
    1.6
    (0.85)
    2.3
    (1.17)
    2.8
    (1.34)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, AA4500 0.40 mg, AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0048
    Comments
    Method Kruskal-Wallis
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0034
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.40 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0079
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .3216
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Composite Responder Analysis
    Description A composite responder is a subject who had an improved assessment [values of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved)] on the investigator global assessment and had a satisfied assessment [values of 1 (very satisfied) or 2 (quite satisfied)] on the subject assessment.
    Time Frame Day 57

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Analysis based on mITT population; all randomized subjects who received an injection of study medication and had pre- and post-baseline nodule measurements for both ultrasound and calipers.
    Arm/Group Title AA4500 0.60 mg AA4500 0.40 mg AA4500 0.25 mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.60 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.40 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.25 mg injection into the nodule Placebo, single 0.25 mg, 0.40 mg, or 0.60 mg injection into the nodule
    Measure Participants 18 18 22 16
    Responder: Yes
    14
    77.8%
    16
    88.9%
    12
    54.5%
    6
    35.3%
    Responder: No
    4
    22.2%
    2
    11.1%
    10
    45.5%
    10
    58.8%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, AA4500 0.40 mg, AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0065
    Comments
    Method Fisher Exact
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.60 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0349
    Comments
    Method Fisher Exact
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.40 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0033
    Comments
    Method Fisher Exact
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AA4500 0.25 mg, Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .3423
    Comments
    Method Fisher Exact
    Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Adverse events were collected from enrollment through the end of the study (Day 57).
    Adverse Event Reporting Description Adverse events are reported for the Safety population; all randomized subjects who received an injection of study medication.
    Arm/Group Title AA4500 0.60 mg AA4500 0.40 mg AA4500 0.25 mg Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.60 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.40 mg injection into the nodule Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (AA4500), single 0.25 mg injection into the nodule Placebo, single 0.25 mg, 0.40 mg, or 0.60 mg injection into the nodule
    All Cause Mortality
    AA4500 0.60 mg AA4500 0.40 mg AA4500 0.25 mg Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    AA4500 0.60 mg AA4500 0.40 mg AA4500 0.25 mg Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/18 (0%) 0/18 (0%) 0/22 (0%) 0/17 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    AA4500 0.60 mg AA4500 0.40 mg AA4500 0.25 mg Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 17/18 (94.4%) 18/18 (100%) 21/22 (95.5%) 7/17 (41.2%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Lymphadenopathy 1/18 (5.6%) 0/18 (0%) 0/22 (0%) 0/17 (0%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Nausea 0/18 (0%) 1/18 (5.6%) 0/22 (0%) 0/17 (0%)
    General disorders
    Axillary pain 4/18 (22.2%) 1/18 (5.6%) 6/22 (27.3%) 0/17 (0%)
    Injection site bruising 6/18 (33.3%) 4/18 (22.2%) 5/22 (22.7%) 0/17 (0%)
    Injection site haemorrhage 1/18 (5.6%) 0/18 (0%) 2/22 (9.1%) 0/17 (0%)
    Injection site hypoaesthesia 1/18 (5.6%) 0/18 (0%) 0/22 (0%) 0/17 (0%)
    Injection site oedema 2/18 (11.1%) 0/18 (0%) 2/22 (9.1%) 0/17 (0%)
    Injection site pain 2/18 (11.1%) 4/18 (22.2%) 4/22 (18.2%) 0/17 (0%)
    Injection site pruritus 2/18 (11.1%) 3/18 (16.7%) 2/22 (9.1%) 1/17 (5.9%)
    Injection site swelling 0/18 (0%) 4/18 (22.2%) 5/22 (22.7%) 0/17 (0%)
    Local swelling 10/18 (55.6%) 7/18 (38.9%) 8/22 (36.4%) 3/17 (17.6%)
    Localised oedema 1/18 (5.6%) 1/18 (5.6%) 0/22 (0%) 0/17 (0%)
    Pain 0/18 (0%) 0/18 (0%) 0/22 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%)
    Tenderness 1/18 (5.6%) 0/18 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%) 0/17 (0%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Contusion 9/18 (50%) 9/18 (50%) 13/22 (59.1%) 1/17 (5.9%)
    Injection related reaction 1/18 (5.6%) 0/18 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%) 0/17 (0%)
    Investigations
    Liver function test abnormal 1/18 (5.6%) 0/18 (0%) 0/22 (0%) 0/17 (0%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia 0/18 (0%) 0/18 (0%) 0/22 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%)
    Arthritis 0/18 (0%) 0/18 (0%) 0/22 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%)
    Dupuytren's contracture 1/18 (5.6%) 0/18 (0%) 0/22 (0%) 0/17 (0%)
    Joint range of motion decreased 0/18 (0%) 1/18 (5.6%) 0/22 (0%) 0/17 (0%)
    Musculoskeletal pain 0/18 (0%) 0/18 (0%) 0/22 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%)
    Pain in extremity 7/18 (38.9%) 10/18 (55.6%) 10/22 (45.5%) 1/17 (5.9%)
    Pain in jaw 1/18 (5.6%) 0/18 (0%) 0/22 (0%) 0/17 (0%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache 0/18 (0%) 0/18 (0%) 0/22 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Blister 0/18 (0%) 1/18 (5.6%) 0/22 (0%) 0/17 (0%)
    Blood blister 1/18 (5.6%) 1/18 (5.6%) 0/22 (0%) 0/17 (0%)
    Night sweats 1/18 (5.6%) 0/18 (0%) 0/22 (0%) 0/17 (0%)
    Pruritus 1/18 (5.6%) 2/18 (11.1%) 2/22 (9.1%) 0/17 (0%)
    Rash 0/18 (0%) 1/18 (5.6%) 0/22 (0%) 0/17 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Clinical Trial Coordinator
    Organization Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
    Phone
    Email clinicalsite.inquiries@endo.com
    Responsible Party:
    Endo Pharmaceuticals
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02193828
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • AUX-CC-750
    First Posted:
    Jul 18, 2014
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 5, 2017
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2017