Sensory Integration Therapy in Children With Dyslexia

Sponsor
Biruni University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04740853
Collaborator
(none)
35
1
2
6.5
5.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to examine the sensory and functional effects of sensory integration therapy in children with dyslexia according to the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO).

35 participant (17 intervention, 18 control, aged 8.7;8.5 years) diagnosed with dyslexia were included in the study. In the special education and rehabilitation centers, where they were followed, both groups received special individual training sessions twice a week for eight weeks, and in addition to the intervention group, sensory integration therapy was applied once a week for eight weeks (45 minutes therapy, 15 minutes family briefing - 60 minutes in total). Sensory Profile Test was used for sensory processing evaluation and SCOPE (The Short Child Occupational Profile) for occupational performance analysis. Intervention results and intergroup scores were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Paired Two Sample Test and the Mann Whitney-U test.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Sensory Integration Therapy+Special Education
N/A

Detailed Description

This study aims to examine the effect of sensory integration therapy on sensory modulation and daily functional performance in children with dyslexia, according to the occupational therapy model MOHO.

The study was carried out in Biruni University Sensory Integration Unit on 35 participants ( intervention group:17, aged 8,7±0,85 years; control group:18, aged 8,5±1,1 years) with dyslexia.

According to the results of the analysis made in the R program, it was calculated that the sample volume should be 35 at 80% Power.

The investigators talked about the study with a special education and rehabilitation center. They will briefly ask the families of children with dyslexia who meet the inclusion criteria, during their routine education/therapy sessions, whether they might be interested in taking part in the study or not. Following this, the informed consent form was signed by the parents who accepted and were willing to volunteer to take part in the study, since the individuals participating in the study were under the age of 18.

Children between the ages of 6 and 10 years who were diagnosed with dyslexia by a psychiatrist according to DSM-V criteria were included in the study. Children with any secondary diagnosis were excluded from the study. 40 participants were randomly divided into 20 control and 20 intervention groups using a random number table.

Children in the intervention group were included in sensory integration therapy sessions at Biruni University Sensory Integration Unit for eight weeks, one session a week, 45 minutes sessions, and 15 minutes of family information. Both groups continued special education sessions in special education and rehabilitation centers twice a week for eight weeks. Three participants from the intervention group and two participants from the control group left the study.

The socio-demographic data was collected and recorded, including age, parentage, gender, health status. During the evaluation phase, the Sensory Profile test and the SCOPE (The Short Child Occupational Profile) was applied to both groups.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
35 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Investigation of the Effectiveness of Sensory Integration Therapy in Children With Dyslexia
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 15, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 20, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Sensory Integration Therapy+Special Education

The therapy program was prepared and applied according to the Ayres theory and based on the basic principles of sensory integration therapy prepared by Parham depending on the evaluation results. Therapy was applied to the intervention group, with a 45-minute session+15 minutes of family information once a week for eight weeks, in addition to the special education sessions they received twice a week in special education institutions. The sensory integration therapy included sensory diet practices and activities consisting of vestibular, tactile, proprioceptive, auditory and visual stimuli. The intervention group continued special education sessions in special education and rehabilitation centers twice a week for eight weeks. In the special education sessions, reading, writing, sequencing, arithmetic, language, organization, memory studies were applied.

Behavioral: Sensory Integration Therapy+Special Education
Sensory integration is a theory first put forward by Ayres in 1972. It is a neurological process that organizes sensory stimuli from our body and our environment for use in the daily life. When the sensory integrity organization of individuals is provided, it is possible to use their body effectively against the environment. Sensory integration therapy, which is defined as a physiologically based process by Ayres and Dunn, also provides changes in individuals' occupations.

Active Comparator: Special Education

The control group continued special education sessions in special education and rehabilitation centers twice a week for eight weeks. Within the scope of special education sessions, reading, writing, sequencing, arithmetic, language, organization, memory studies were applied.

Behavioral: Sensory Integration Therapy+Special Education
Sensory integration is a theory first put forward by Ayres in 1972. It is a neurological process that organizes sensory stimuli from our body and our environment for use in the daily life. When the sensory integrity organization of individuals is provided, it is possible to use their body effectively against the environment. Sensory integration therapy, which is defined as a physiologically based process by Ayres and Dunn, also provides changes in individuals' occupations.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. The Sensory Profile Test [2 weeks]

    The Sensory Profile Test is an assessment tool for sensory modulation developed by Winnie Dunn and it is used to determine the types of sensory response during daily activities and which sensory systems are most affected. Functional performance is a valid and reliable assessment tool for measuring sensory processing skills. In the scale, there are 125 questions asked to parents, divided into three parts as sensory processing, modulation, and behavioral-emotional responses. It is evaluated according to the Likert scale (1 = Always, 2 = Frequently, 3 = Sometimes, 4 = Rarely, 5 = Never) with 9 factor scores consisting of these parameters. Typical performance, probably difference and definite difference score ranges are determined for each parameter. Total score for each parameter; There is an improvement from the absolute difference score range to the typical performance score range.

  2. The Short Child Occupational Profile [2 weeks]

    The SCOPE is an assessment tool to evaluate children's activity participation within the framework of MOHO. This questionnaire consists 25 questions (4 questions from each performance area of MOHO and 5 questions for the environment) and it is scored 4-point likert scale. The higher scores mean better performance. The SCOPE is a scale with proven validity and reliability, in which activities, roles and tasks are evaluated comprehensively, the child's skills and environmental opportunities are examined.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
6 Years to 10 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Were between the ages of 6 and 10 years

  • Diagnosed with dyslexia by a psychiatrist according to DSM-V criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

• Had any secondary diagnosis

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Remziye Akarsu İstanbul Turkey 34020

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Biruni University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Remziye Akarsu, Lecturer, Biruni University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04740853
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Rakarsu
First Posted:
Feb 5, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Feb 9, 2021
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Remziye Akarsu, Lecturer, Biruni University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 9, 2021