Safety and Efficacy Study Comparing ABT-335 Coadministered With Atorvastatin and Ezetimibe to Atorvastatin Coadministered With Ezetimibe in Subjects With Multiple Abnormal Lipid (Fat) Levels in the Blood
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of ABT-335 (investigational drug) coadministered with atorvastatin and ezetimibe to atorvastatin coadministered with ezetimibe in subjects with abnormal lipid (fat) levels in the blood.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: ABT-335 + atorvastatin + ezetimibe
|
Drug: ABT-335
135 mg capsule, daily, 12 weeks
Other Names:
Drug: atorvastatin
40 mg, tablet, daily, 12 weeks
Other Names:
Drug: ezetimibe
10 mg capsule, daily, 12 weeks
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + atorvastatin + ezetimibe
|
Drug: placebo
placebo capsule, daily, 12 weeks
Drug: atorvastatin
40 mg, tablet, daily, 12 weeks
Other Names:
Drug: ezetimibe
10 mg capsule, daily, 12 weeks
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Median Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Final Visit [Baseline to 12 Weeks (Final Visit)]
[(Week 12 triglycerides minus baseline triglycerides)/baseline triglycerides] x 100
- Mean Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Final Visit [Baseline to 12 weeks (Final Visit)]
[(Week 12 HDL-C minus baseline HDL-C)/baseline HDL-C] x 100
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Mean Percent Change in Apolipoprotein AI (apoAI) From Baseline to Final Visit [Baseline to 12 weeks (Final Visit)]
[(Week 12 apoAI minus baseline apoAI)/baseline apoAI] x 100
- Mean Percent Change in Very Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) From Baseline to Final Visit [Baseline to 12 weeks (final visit)]
[(Week 12 VLDL-C minus baseline VLDL-C)/baseline VLDL-C] x 100
- Mean Percent Change in Apolipoprotein CIII (apoCIII) From Baseline to Final Visit [Baseline to 12 weeks (Final Visit)]
[(Week 12 apoCIII minus baseline apoCIII)/baseline apoCIII] x 100
- Mean Percent Change in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) From Baseline to Final Visit [Baseline to 12 weeks (Final Visit)]
[(Week 12 non-HDL-C minus baseline non-HDL-C)/baseline non-HDL-C] x 100
- Mean Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B (apoB) From Baseline to Final Visit [Baseline to 12 weeks (Final Visit)]
[(Week 12 apoB minus baseline apoB)/baseline apoB] x 100
- Median Percent Change in High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) From Baseline to Final Visit [Baseline to 12 weeks (Final Visit)]
[(Week 12 hsCRP minus baseline hsCRP)/baseline hSCRP] x 100
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Subjects with mixed dyslipidemia (trigylcerides, > or = to 150 mg/dL to < 400 mg/dL; HDL-C < 40 mg/dL for males, < 50 mg/dL for females; LDL-C, > or = to 130 mg/dL).
-
Subjects must agree to use adequate birth control methods and to adhere to the American Heart Association (AHA) Diet.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Subjects with unstable or uncontrolled medical conditions considered inappropriate in a clinical trial.
-
Subjects with an unstable dose of medications or receiving Coumadin, oral, intravenous or intramuscular cyclosporine, statins, or certain other medications.
-
Women who are pregnant or plan on becoming pregnant, or women who are lactating.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Birmingham | Alabama | United States | 35209 | |
2 | Columbiana | Alabama | United States | 35051 | |
3 | Hueytown | Alabama | United States | 35023 | |
4 | Ozark | Alabama | United States | 36360 | |
5 | Tuscaloosa | Alabama | United States | 35406 | |
6 | Sierra Vista | Arizona | United States | 85635 | |
7 | Hot Springs | Arkansas | United States | 71913 | |
8 | Carmichael | California | United States | 95608 | |
9 | Concord | California | United States | 94520 | |
10 | Long Beach | California | United States | 90806 | |
11 | Long Beach | California | United States | 90822 | |
12 | Los Angeles | California | United States | 90057 | |
13 | Norwalk | California | United States | 90650 | |
14 | Roseville | California | United States | 95661 | |
15 | Sacramento | California | United States | 95825 | |
16 | Santa Ana | California | United States | 92701 | |
17 | Tustin | California | United States | 92780 | |
18 | West Hills | California | United States | 91307 | |
19 | Colorado Springs | Colorado | United States | 80904 | |
20 | Denver | Colorado | United States | 80206 | |
21 | Clearwater | Florida | United States | 33756 | |
22 | Delray Beach | Florida | United States | 33484 | |
23 | Fort Myers | Florida | United States | 33907 | |
24 | Holly Hill | Florida | United States | 32117 | |
25 | Jacksonville | Florida | United States | 32216 | |
26 | Jacksonville | Florida | United States | 32259 | |
27 | Kissimmee | Florida | United States | 34741 | |
28 | Longwood | Florida | United States | 32750 | |
29 | Miami | Florida | United States | 33173 | |
30 | New Port Richey | Florida | United States | 34652 | |
31 | New Smyrna Beach | Florida | United States | 32168 | |
32 | Ocala | Florida | United States | 34471 | |
33 | Ormond Beach | Florida | United States | 32174 | |
34 | Pembroke Pines | Florida | United States | 33002 | |
35 | Sarasota | Florida | United States | 34233 | |
36 | Tampa | Florida | United States | 33607 | |
37 | Winter Haven | Florida | United States | 33880 | |
38 | Atlanta | Georgia | United States | 30342 | |
39 | Augusta | Georgia | United States | 30904 | |
40 | Roswell | Georgia | United States | 30076 | |
41 | Suwanee | Georgia | United States | 30024 | |
42 | Woodstock | Georgia | United States | 30189 | |
43 | Boise | Idaho | United States | 83704 | |
44 | Chicago | Illinois | United States | 60607 | |
45 | Chicago | Illinois | United States | 60610 | |
46 | Peoria | Illinois | United States | 61602 | |
47 | Evansville | Indiana | United States | 47713 | |
48 | Evansville | Indiana | United States | 47714 | |
49 | Indianapolis | Indiana | United States | 46260 | |
50 | Iowa City | Iowa | United States | 52242 | |
51 | Arkansas City | Kansas | United States | 67005 | |
52 | Overland Park | Kansas | United States | 66202 | |
53 | Wichita | Kansas | United States | 67207 | |
54 | Louisville | Kentucky | United States | 40213 | |
55 | Mt. Sterling | Kentucky | United States | 40353 | |
56 | Slidell | Louisiana | United States | 70458 | |
57 | Baltimore | Maryland | United States | 21209 | |
58 | Oxon Hill | Maryland | United States | 20745 | |
59 | Brockton | Massachusetts | United States | 02301 | |
60 | Edina | Minnesota | United States | 55435 | |
61 | Olive Branch | Mississippi | United States | 38654 | |
62 | St Louis | Missouri | United States | 63110 | |
63 | St Louis | Missouri | United States | 63141 | |
64 | St. Louis | Missouri | United States | 63141 | |
65 | St. Peters | Missouri | United States | 63376 | |
66 | Billings | Montana | United States | 59101 | |
67 | Las Vegas | Nevada | United States | 89123 | |
68 | Berlin | New Jersey | United States | 08009 | |
69 | Elizabeth | New Jersey | United States | 07202 | |
70 | Hillsborough | New Jersey | United States | 08844 | |
71 | Trenton | New Jersey | United States | 08611 | |
72 | Johnson City | New York | United States | 13790 | |
73 | Charlotte | North Carolina | United States | 28209 | |
74 | Hickory | North Carolina | United States | 28601 | |
75 | Morehead City | North Carolina | United States | 28557 | |
76 | Raleigh | North Carolina | United States | 27609 | |
77 | Salisbury | North Carolina | United States | 28144 | |
78 | Statesville | North Carolina | United States | 25677 | |
79 | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | United States | 27103 | |
80 | Cincinnati | Ohio | United States | 45219 | |
81 | Mason | Ohio | United States | 45040 | |
82 | Mogadore | Ohio | United States | 44260 | |
83 | Warren | Ohio | United States | 44483 | |
84 | Tulsa | Oklahoma | United States | 74136 | |
85 | Hillsboro | Oregon | United States | 97123 | |
86 | Duncansville | Pennsylvania | United States | 16635 | |
87 | Harleysville | Pennsylvania | United States | 19438 | |
88 | Jersey Shore | Pennsylvania | United States | 17740 | |
89 | Lansdale | Pennsylvania | United States | 19446 | |
90 | Melrose Park | Pennsylvania | United States | 19027 | |
91 | Newtown | Pennsylvania | United States | 18940 | |
92 | Perkasie | Pennsylvania | United States | 18944 | |
93 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States | 19114 | |
94 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States | 19152 | |
95 | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | United States | 15216 | |
96 | Sellersville | Pennsylvania | United States | 18960 | |
97 | Tipton | Pennsylvania | United States | 16684 | |
98 | Warminster | Pennsylvania | United States | 18974 | |
99 | Cumberland | Rhode Island | United States | 02864 | |
100 | Anderson | South Carolina | United States | 29621 | |
101 | Greenville | South Carolina | United States | 29615 | |
102 | Greer | South Carolina | United States | 29651 | |
103 | Simpsonville | South Carolina | United States | 29681 | |
104 | Summerville | South Carolina | United States | 29485 | |
105 | Nashville | Tennessee | United States | 37205 | |
106 | Dallas | Texas | United States | 75230 | |
107 | Fort Worth | Texas | United States | 76104 | |
108 | Houston | Texas | United States | 77030 | |
109 | San Antonio | Texas | United States | 78229 | |
110 | Salt Lake City | Utah | United States | 84102 | |
111 | Salt Lake City | Utah | United States | 84103 | |
112 | Salt Lake City | Utah | United States | 84107 | |
113 | West Jordan | Utah | United States | 84088 | |
114 | Norfolk | Virginia | United States | 23502 | |
115 | Richmond | Virginia | United States | 23294 | |
116 | Roanoke | Virginia | United States | 24014 | |
117 | Virginia Beach | Virginia | United States | 23455 | |
118 | Spokane | Washington | United States | 99216 | |
119 | Madison | Wisconsin | United States | 53719 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Abbott
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- M10-275
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | One subject was randomized to the atorvastatin and ezetimibe treatment group and never received study drug. |
Arm/Group Title | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | ||
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 272 | 270 |
COMPLETED | 246 | 240 |
NOT COMPLETED | 26 | 30 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Total of all reporting groups | ||
Overall Participants | 272 | 270 | 542 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
227
83.5%
|
206
76.3%
|
433
79.9%
|
>=65 years |
45
16.5%
|
64
23.7%
|
109
20.1%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
54.4
(11.23)
|
56.4
(10.67)
|
55.4
(10.99)
|
Age (participants) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
United States |
54.4
(11.23)
20%
|
56.4
(10.67)
20.9%
|
55.4
(10.99)
10.2%
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
143
52.6%
|
155
57.4%
|
298
55%
|
Male |
129
47.4%
|
115
42.6%
|
244
45%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Median Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Final Visit |
---|---|
Description | [(Week 12 triglycerides minus baseline triglycerides)/baseline triglycerides] x 100 |
Time Frame | Baseline to 12 Weeks (Final Visit) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All randomized subjects with a baseline triglyceride value and at least 1 postbaseline triglyceride value, last observation carried forward. |
Arm/Group Title | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | ||
Measure Participants | 262 | 262 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [Percent change] |
-57.3
(22.32)
|
-39.7
(29.44)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe, Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe |
---|---|---|
Comments | A sample size of 212 per arm provided 90% power and > 99% power with a 2-sided alpha = 0.05 level to detect differences between treatment arms of 6% and 17% in the percent change in HDL-C and TG, respectively, assuming an SD of 19% and 30%, respectively. This sample size provided an overall power of approximately 90% for the 2 primary comparisons. If a loss to follow-up rate of 8% was assumed, the sample size needed to be increased to 230 per arm to maintain the above power. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.001 |
Comments | The treatment group comparisons for both primary efficacy variables must have demonstrated superiority of ABT-335 + atorvastatin + ezetimibe to declare this arm successful. Thus, no adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. | |
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments |
Title | Mean Percent Change in Apolipoprotein AI (apoAI) From Baseline to Final Visit |
---|---|
Description | [(Week 12 apoAI minus baseline apoAI)/baseline apoAI] x 100 |
Time Frame | Baseline to 12 weeks (Final Visit) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All randomized subjects with a baseline apoAI value and at least 1 postbaseline apoAI value, last observation carried forward. |
Arm/Group Title | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | ||
Measure Participants | 248 | 239 |
Mean (Standard Error) [Percent change] |
1.8
(0.74)
|
-1.3
(0.76)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe, Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe |
---|---|---|
Comments | Secondary endpoints were tested in fixed sequence. If superiority of ABT-335 + atorvastatin + ezetimibe treatment was demonstrated for primary endpoints, secondary endpoints were tested in ranked order of apoA1, VLDL-C, apoC3, non-HDL-C, apoB, and hsCRP at alpha = 0.05 level until 1 secondary endpoint failed to reach statistical significance. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.004 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | Corresponding baseline lipid value as the covariate and with effect for treatment group. |
Title | Mean Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Final Visit |
---|---|
Description | [(Week 12 HDL-C minus baseline HDL-C)/baseline HDL-C] x 100 |
Time Frame | Baseline to 12 weeks (Final Visit) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All randomized subjects with a baseline high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) value and at least 1 postbaseline HDL-C value, last observation carried forward. |
Arm/Group Title | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | ||
Measure Participants | 262 | 262 |
Mean (Standard Error) [Percent change] |
13.0
(0.95)
|
4.2
(0.95)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe, Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe |
---|---|---|
Comments | A sample size of 212 per arm provided 90% power and > 99% power with a 2-sided alpha = 0.05 level to detect differences between treatment arms of 6% and 17% in the percent change in HDL-C and TG, respectively, assuming an SD of 19% and 30%, respectively. This sample size provided an overall power of approximately 90% for the 2 primary comparisons. If a loss to follow-up rate of 8% was assumed, the sample size needed to be increased to 230 per arm to maintain the above power. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.001 |
Comments | The treatment group comparisons for both primary efficacy variables must have demonstrated superiority of ABT-335 + atorvastatin + ezetimibe to declare this arm successful. Thus, no adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | Corresponding baseline lipid value as the covariate and with effect for treatment group. |
Title | Mean Percent Change in Very Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) From Baseline to Final Visit |
---|---|
Description | [(Week 12 VLDL-C minus baseline VLDL-C)/baseline VLDL-C] x 100 |
Time Frame | Baseline to 12 weeks (final visit) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All randomized subjects with a baseline VLDL-C value and at least 1 postbaseline VLDL-C value, last observation carried forward. |
Arm/Group Title | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | ||
Measure Participants | 261 | 262 |
Mean (Standard Error) [Percent change] |
-57.8
(1.87)
|
-41.1
(1.87)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe, Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe |
---|---|---|
Comments | Secondary endpoints were tested in fixed sequence. If superiority of ABT-335 + atorvastatin + ezetimibe treatment was demonstrated for primary endpoints, secondary endpoints were tested in ranked order of apoA1, VLDL-C, apoC3, non-HDL-C, apoB, and hsCRP at alpha = 0.05 level until 1 secondary endpoint failed to reach statistical significance. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | Corresponding baseline lipid value as the covariate and with effect for treatment group. |
Title | Mean Percent Change in Apolipoprotein CIII (apoCIII) From Baseline to Final Visit |
---|---|
Description | [(Week 12 apoCIII minus baseline apoCIII)/baseline apoCIII] x 100 |
Time Frame | Baseline to 12 weeks (Final Visit) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All randomized subjects with a baseline apoCIII value and at least 1 postbaseline apoCIII value, last observation carried forward. |
Arm/Group Title | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | ||
Measure Participants | 249 | 242 |
Mean (Standard Error) [Percent change] |
-42.5
(1.22)
|
-25.3
(1.23)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe, Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe |
---|---|---|
Comments | Secondary endpoints were tested in fixed sequence. If superiority of ABT-335 + atorvastatin + ezetimibe treatment was demonstrated for primary endpoints, secondary endpoints were tested in ranked order of apoA1, VLDL-C, apoC3, non-HDL-C, apoB, and hsCRP at alpha = 0.05 level until 1 secondary endpoint failed to reach statistical significance. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | Corresponding lipid value as the covariate and with effect for treatment group. |
Title | Mean Percent Change in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) From Baseline to Final Visit |
---|---|
Description | [(Week 12 non-HDL-C minus baseline non-HDL-C)/baseline non-HDL-C] x 100 |
Time Frame | Baseline to 12 weeks (Final Visit) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All randomized subjects with a baseline non-HDL-C value and at least 1 postbaseline non-HDL-C value, last observation carried forward. |
Arm/Group Title | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | ||
Measure Participants | 262 | 262 |
Mean (Standard Error) [Percent change] |
-55.6
(0.94)
|
-51.0
(0.94)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe, Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe |
---|---|---|
Comments | Secondary endpoints were tested in fixed sequence. If superiority of ABT-335 + atorvastatin + ezetimibe treatment was demonstrated for primary endpoints, secondary endpoints were tested in ranked order of apoA1, VLDL-C, apoC3, non-HDL-C, apoB, and hsCRP at alpha = 0.05 level until 1 secondary endpoint failed to reach statistical significance. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | Corresponding baseline lipid value as the covariate and with effect for treatment group. |
Title | Mean Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B (apoB) From Baseline to Final Visit |
---|---|
Description | [(Week 12 apoB minus baseline apoB)/baseline apoB] x 100 |
Time Frame | Baseline to 12 weeks (Final Visit) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All randomized subjects with a baseline apoB value and at least 1 postbaseline apoB value, last observation carried forward. |
Arm/Group Title | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | ||
Measure Participants | 248 | 239 |
Mean (Standard Error) [Percent change] |
-49.1
(0.91)
|
-44.7
(0.93)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe, Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe |
---|---|---|
Comments | Secondary endpoints were tested in fixed sequence. If superiority of ABT-335 + atorvastatin + ezetimibe treatment was demonstrated for primary endpoints, secondary endpoints were tested in ranked order of apoA1, VLDL-C, apoC3, non-HDL-C, apoB, and hsCRP at alpha = 0.05 level until 1 secondary endpoint failed to reach statistical significance. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | Corresponding baseline lipid value as the covariate and with effect for treatment group. |
Title | Median Percent Change in High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) From Baseline to Final Visit |
---|---|
Description | [(Week 12 hsCRP minus baseline hsCRP)/baseline hSCRP] x 100 |
Time Frame | Baseline to 12 weeks (Final Visit) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All randomized subjects with a baseline hsCRP value and at least 1 postbaseline hsCRP value, last observation carried forward. |
Arm/Group Title | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | ||
Measure Participants | 261 | 262 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [Percent change] |
-52.1
(102.82)
|
-40.3
(516.56)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe, Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe |
---|---|---|
Comments | Secondary endpoints were tested in fixed sequence. If superiority of ABT-335 + atorvastatin + ezetimibe treatment was demonstrated for primary endpoints, secondary endpoints were tested in ranked order of apoA1, VLDL-C, apoC3, non-HDL-C, apoB, and hsCRP at alpha = 0.05 level until 1 secondary endpoint failed to reach statistical significance. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments | Rank-sum test |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | ||
Arm/Group Description | ||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 3/272 (1.1%) | 5/270 (1.9%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Abdominal Pain Upper | 1/272 (0.4%) | 0/270 (0%) | ||
Dyspepsia | 1/272 (0.4%) | 0/270 (0%) | ||
Esophageal Pain | 1/272 (0.4%) | 0/270 (0%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Chest Pain | 1/272 (0.4%) | 0/270 (0%) | ||
Non-Cardiac Chest Pain | 1/272 (0.4%) | 0/270 (0%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Subcutaneous Abscess | 0/272 (0%) | 1/270 (0.4%) | ||
Wound Infection Staphylococcal | 1/272 (0.4%) | 0/270 (0%) | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Dehydration | 0/272 (0%) | 1/270 (0.4%) | ||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
Bladder Cancer | 0/272 (0%) | 1/270 (0.4%) | ||
Breast Cancer | 0/272 (0%) | 1/270 (0.4%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Cerebrovascular Accident | 0/272 (0%) | 1/270 (0.4%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
ABT-335 + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | Placebo + 40 mg Atorvastatin + 10 mg Ezetimibe | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 41/272 (15.1%) | 51/270 (18.9%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Diarrhea | 9/272 (3.3%) | 6/270 (2.2%) | ||
Nausea | 4/272 (1.5%) | 9/270 (3.3%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Fatigue | 6/272 (2.2%) | 10/270 (3.7%) | ||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Arthralgia | 6/272 (2.2%) | 10/270 (3.7%) | ||
Muscle Spasms | 10/272 (3.7%) | 9/270 (3.3%) | ||
Myalgia | 7/272 (2.6%) | 10/270 (3.7%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Headache | 6/272 (2.2%) | 9/270 (3.3%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
Not to publish or present the results before the publication of the multi-center investigator paper, but in no event shall be so restricted after the expiration of twelve (12) months from completion of the studies at all sites. Any presentation or publication to be submitted to Sponsor (in Draft of the same) for Sponsor review and comment.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Global Medical Services |
---|---|
Organization | Abbott |
Phone | 800-633-9110 |
- M10-275