Effects of Early Vocal Contact (EVC) in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Sponsor
Elisa Della Casa Muttini (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04759573
Collaborator
(none)
80
1
2
64
1.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Background: Preterm infants are at risk for developing altered trajectories of cognitive, social, and linguistic competences compared to a term population. This is mainly due to medical and environmental factors, as they are exposed to an atypical auditory environment and, simultaneously, to long periods of early separation from their parents. The short-term effects of Early Vocal Contact (EVC) on an infant's early stability have been investigated, but currently, there is limited evidence of its impact on the infant's autonomic nervous system maturation, as indexed by the heart rate variability, as well as on its long-term impact on infant neurodevelopment. This multi-centric study aims to investigate the effects of EVC on a preterm infant's physiology, neurobehaviour, and development.

Methods: Eighty stable preterm infants, born at 25 to 32 weeks and 6 days gestational age, without specific abnormalities, will be selected and randomized to either an intervention or a control group. The intervention group will receive EVC: mothers talking and singing to their preterm infants for 10 minutes thrice a week for 2 weeks. Mothers in the control group will be encouraged to spend the same amount of time next to the incubator, observing the infant's behaviour through a standard cluster of indicators. Infants will be assessed at baseline, at the end of the intervention, at term equivalent age, and at 3, 6, 12- and 24-months corrected age, with a battery of physiological, neurobehavioral, and developmental measures.

Discussion: Early interventions in the neonatal intensive care unit have shown important effects on the neurodevelopment of preterm infants, lowering the negative long-term effects of an atypical auditory and interactional environment. This study will provide new insights into the mother-infant early contact as protective intervention against the sequelae of prematurity during the sensitive period of development. An early intervention, such as EVC, is intuitive and easy to implement in the daily care of preterm infants. However, its long-term effects on infant neurodevelopment and on maternal sensitivity and stress still need accurate investigations.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Early Vocal Contact
  • Behavioral: Behavioral Observation
N/A

Detailed Description

Aims This study aims to test the effects of EVC on infants born prematurely between 25 and 32 weeks and 6 days GA.

The effects on newborns will be assessed at physiological (primary outcome), neurobehavioral, and developmental levels during the intervention, at term equivalent age, and at 12- and 24-months CA. The effect of EVC will also be assessed on maternal stress at hospital discharge and on the mother's presence in the NICU.

Design A four-site randomized controlled trial will be conducted to investigate the short- and long-term physiological and neurobehavioral effects of EVC.

Participants Eighty preterm infants, born at 25 to 32 weeks and 6 days GA, will be recruited from the four centres (20 per centre).

Recruitment will be undertaken in each centre by a trained research assistant (RA), who will review birth records daily. After obtaining permission from the attending physicians of both the mother and the infant, the RA will invite qualifying families to participate in the study and will obtain written informed consent from those enrolling. Infants will be then assigned to the EVC intervention or control group using a randomized design, stratifying infants by gender and GA (see Randomization). Mothers whose infants are assigned to the control group will be asked to spend the same amount of time as that of mothers in the intervention group, observing their infants' spontaneous behaviour, with the subsequent compilation of an observation grid developed ad hoc, according to few indicators drawn from The Neonatal Behavioural Assessment Scale (NBAS).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
80 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
A four-site randomized controlled trial will be conducted to investigate the short- and long-term physiological and neurobehavioral effects of Early Vocal Contact.A four-site randomized controlled trial will be conducted to investigate the short- and long-term physiological and neurobehavioral effects of Early Vocal Contact.
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
The intervention is performed by mothers who have to administer the speech or singing or they have to observe. The research assistant will support mothers to deliver the intervention The outcome assessors will be blinded
Primary Purpose:
Health Services Research
Official Title:
Effects of Early Vocal Contact (EVC) in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Multi-centre, Randomized Clinical Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Early Vocal Contact

The EVC will take place in the hospital room while infants are in their individual incubators or open cribs. In the intervention group, mothers will be asked to speak and sing to their infants continuously over a 10-min period for each type of intervention (20 min in total). Mothers will be asked to talk in their native language and to sing familiar songs, while observing their infant's reactions. The order of the two vocalizations, speaking and singing, will be reversed in the next intervention. Early Vocal Contact will be performed by mothers three times a week for 2 weeks, more than one hour after afternoon feeding. It will begin when the newborns are in an active sleep state, in calm awake state or in active awake state, but not in deep sleep or crying. Preterm infants will be enrolled from 25+0 to 32+6 weeks of GA, following the established inclusion criteria.

Behavioral: Early Vocal Contact
Mothers will be asked to speak and sing to their infants continuously over a 10-min period for each type of intervention (20 min in total). Mothers will be asked to talk in their native language and to sing familiar songs, while observing their infant's reactions. The order of the two vocalizations, speaking and singing, will be reversed in the next intervention.

Active Comparator: Behavioral observation

Mothers in the active control group will be encouraged to spend the same amount of time next to the incubator, observing the infant's behaviours through a standard cluster of indicators.

Behavioral: Behavioral Observation
Mothers in the active control group will be encouraged to spend the same amount of time next to the incubator, observing the infant's behaviours through a standard cluster of indicators.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in Heart Rate Variability [Pre intervention (baseline), during the intervention and immediately after the intervention]

    Heart rate is the number of heartbeats per minute.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in General Movement Assessment [Pre intervention (baseline)]

    The General Movement quality from video recording will be scored according to the Ferrari optimality score. Two blinded coders will attribute a single final score for each infant at each time point. For each item a description of optimal performance is given and scored with "2" (e.g., cramped components are absent). Less optimal performance is scored with "1" (e.g., cramped components are occasionally present); non-optimal performance is scored with "0" (e.g., cramped components are predominately present). Adding the scores of each item within a category ("neck and trunk", "upper extremity" and "lower extremity") plus the score for "sequence" gives the GM optimality score with a minimum value of 5 and a maximum value of 42, indicating optimal performance. The minimum score (worst performance) is 5.

  2. Change in General Movement Assessment [After the intervention, at Term Equivalent Age]

    The General Movement quality from video recording will be scored according to the Ferrari optimality score. Two blinded coders will attribute a single final score for each infant at each time point. For each item a description of optimal performance is given and scored with "2" (e.g., cramped components are absent). Less optimal performance is scored with "1" (e.g., cramped components are occasionally present); non-optimal performance is scored with "0" (e.g., cramped components are predominately present). Adding the scores of each item within a category ("neck and trunk", "upper extremity" and "lower extremity") plus the score for "sequence" gives the GM optimality score with a minimum value of 5 and a maximum value of 42, indicating optimal performance. The minimum score (worst performance) is 5.

  3. Change in General Movement Assessment [At 3 months]

    The General Movement quality from video recording will be scored according to the Ferrari optimality score. Two blinded coders will attribute a single final score for each infant at each time point. For each item a description of optimal performance is given and scored with "2" (e.g., cramped components are absent). Less optimal performance is scored with "1" (e.g., cramped components are occasionally present); non-optimal performance is scored with "0" (e.g., cramped components are predominately present). Adding the scores of each item within a category ("neck and trunk", "upper extremity" and "lower extremity") plus the score for "sequence" gives the GM optimality score with a minimum value of 5 and a maximum value of 42, indicating optimal performance. The minimum score (worst performance) is 5.

  4. The Griffiths Mental Development Scales (GMDS) [At 6 months corrected age]

    The GMDS will be assessed with mean values in 4 subscales (Locomotor, Per-Social, Hear/Speech, Hand/Eye). A composite final Performance score will also be assessed for each participant at each time point. The mean values will be compared between the intervention and control groups. Scores range from 0 to 109, with better results with higher values.

  5. The Griffiths Mental Development Scales (GMDS) [At 12 months corrected age]

    The GMDS will be assessed with mean values in 4 subscales (Locomotor, Per-Social, Hear/Speech, Hand/Eye). A composite final Performance score will also be assessed for each participant at each time point. The mean values will be compared between the intervention and control groups. Scores range from 0 to 109, with better results with higher values.

  6. MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories [At 12 months (Gestures and Words Form) and 24 months (Words and Sentences Form) corrected age.]

    Each child, at each time point, will receive a final score for each questionnaire, measured as a discrete numeric value; the mean values will be compared in the intervention and control groups. The minimum score il 0 and the maximum is 429, with higher scores for better performance.

  7. MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories [At 12 months corrected age]

    Each child, at each time point, will receive a final score for each questionnaire, measured as a discrete numeric value; the mean values will be compared in the intervention and control groups. The minimum score il 0 and the maximum is 429, with higher scores for better performance.

  8. MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories [At 24 months corrected age]

    Each child, at each time point, will receive a final score for each questionnaire, measured as a discrete numeric value; the mean values will be compared in the intervention and control groups. The minimum score il 0 and the maximum is 429, with higher scores for better performance.

  9. Parole in Gioco (PinG) test [At 24 months corrected age]

    Linguistic test for assessing lexical comprehension and production for early childhood. The minimum score il 0 and the maximum is 60, with higher scores for better performance.

  10. Change in Parental Stressor Scale (PSS-NICU) [Pre intervention]

    The PSS-NICU aims at assessing the parental perception of stressors derived from the physical and psycho-social environment of the NICU across three domains: (i) their parental role, (ii) their infant's behaviour and appearance, and (iii) the sights and sounds in the NICU. For each domain, a mean score will be assessed, and a final composite stress score will be calculated from the mean values of the single scores. Each mother, at each time point, will receive a final score for the single questionnaire (range 0-10). The minimum score il 0 and the maximum is 156, with lower scores for better mental health levels.

  11. Change in Parental Stressor Scale (PSS-NICU) [At hospital discharge]

    The PSS-NICU aims at assessing the parental perception of stressors derived from the physical and psycho-social environment of the NICU across three domains: (i) their parental role, (ii) their infant's behaviour and appearance, and (iii) the sights and sounds in the NICU. For each domain, a mean score will be assessed, and a final composite stress score will be calculated from the mean values of the single scores. Each mother, at each time point, will receive a final score for the single questionnaire (range 0-10). The minimum score il 0 and the maximum is 156, with lower scores for better mental health levels.

  12. Maternal presence in the NICU [At hospital discharge]

    Time that the mothers spend in the NICU (hours) using maternal self-report forms will be filled out after each visit to the NICU

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
25 Weeks to 33 Weeks
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • • GA between 25+0 and 32 +6 weeks at birth

  • Apgar score: ≥ 7 at 10 minutes

  • Birth weight: >3th centile and <97th centile

  • Birth cranial circumference: >10th centile

  • Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) grade 1

  • Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) grade 1-2

  • Hypoglycaemia

  • Hyponatremia acceptable, provided they are not persistent and severe

  • Hypocalcaemia

Exclusion Criteria:
  • • PVL, grade III and IV

  • IVH, grade III and IV

  • Sepsis (vertical and horizontal)

  • Congenital malformations and/or genetic abnormalities

  • Need of respiratory support with high flow/nCPAP

  • Repeated apnoea associated with bradycardia and fall of saturation

  • Hyaline membrane disease

  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome

  • Hyperbilirubinemia, requiring exchange transfusions during hospitalization

  • Lack of informed consent signed by the parents

The exclusion criteria for the mothers will be:
  • Presence of depressive symptoms

  • Drug abuse

  • Age ˂18 years

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Uiversity Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia Modena Italy 41100

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Elisa Della Casa Muttini

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Elisa Della Casa Muttini, Principal Investigator, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04759573
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Early Vocal Contact
First Posted:
Feb 18, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Feb 18, 2021
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Elisa Della Casa Muttini, Principal Investigator, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 18, 2021