SOUND: Sentinel Node Vs Observation After Axillary Ultra-souND

Sponsor
European Institute of Oncology (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT02167490
Collaborator
(none)
1,560
18
2
120
86.7
0.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The hypothesis of this trial are that:
  • avoiding axillary surgery does not worsen the outcome of patients with small breast cancer the absence of the pathological information on the risk of recurrence given by nodal status is not worsening outcome of these patients

  • pre-operative imaging of the axilla can identify patients with clinically relevant nodal burden.

The aims of this prospective randomized study are:
  • to verify whether, in presence of a negative preoperative axillary assessment, SLN can be spared

  • to verify whether, in presence of a negative preoperative axillary assessment, the decision on adjuvant medical treatment can be taken according only to the biology of the tumour without the prognostic information achieved by SLNB on the nodal status

  • to verify whether, in presence of a negative preoperative axillary assessment, the patients' quality of life can be improved by a less invasive surgical procedure.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Arm 1: sentinel node biopsy
N/A

Detailed Description

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard approach for axillary staging in patients with breast cancer worldwide. The evident trend of breast cancer treatment is going towards minimizing axillary surgery, even in presence of involvement of the sentinel lymph node (SLN). In fact, it is well known that removal of lymph nodes is performed with staging purposes and to improve regional control but not with curative intent. Recent data from a prospective randomized trial which compared axillary dissection vs. no further axillary surgery in presence of positive SLN did not show any difference in term of overall and disease-free survival. Moreover, to date the impact of the prognostic information of axillary lymph node status in the decision-making process is less important than in the past as the adjuvant treatment is more and more tailored on the biological features of the disease rather than on the risk of recurrence.

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial in which patients with small breast cancer (T<2 cm), with a negative preoperative assessment of the axilla (ultra-sound with FNAC in presence of doubtful findings) will be randomized into two treatment arms:

  • SLNB ± axillary dissection

  • No axillary surgical staging In the arm 1, no axillary dissection will be performed in case of either negative SLN or in presence of isolated tumour cells or micrometastases. SLNB will be completed by axillary dissection in presence of macrometastases diagnosed in the SLN.

The aims of this prospective randomized study are:

to verify whether, in presence of a negative preoperative axillary assessment, SLN can be spared to verify whether, in presence of a negative preoperative axillary assessment, the decision on adjuvant medical treatment can be taken according only to the biology of the tumour without the prognostic information achieved by SLNB on the nodal status to verify whether, in presence of a negative preoperative axillary assessment, the patients' quality of life can be improved by a less invasive surgical procedure.

Endpoints

The primary endpoint of the study is distant-disease free survival. This endpoint, a proxi of overall survival, will allow to have reliable results in a shorter period of time compared to overall survival.

Secondary endpoints will be the cumulative incidence of distant recurrences, the cumulative incidence of axillary recurrences, the disease free survival (DFS) and the overall survival (OS). Other secondary endpoints are quality of life and evaluation of type of adjuvant treatment administered.

Sample size calculation and statistical considerations

We will consider women who will undergo SLNB as the reference group, and we will test for non-inferiority the group of women not undergoing any treatment in the axilla. For the purpose of sample size calculation, the 5-year DDFS in the reference group is assumed to be 96.5%. Overall, 1560 women (780 per arm) will be enrolled to decide whether the group without treatment of the axilla is no worse than the reference group, given a margin delta of non-inferiority of 2.5% (maximum tolerable 5-years DDFS = 94%). Statistical power and one-sided type I error are set to 80% and 5%, respectively. After 3 years from the start of accrual an interim safety analysis will be performed.

Standard survival analyses and survival analyses with competing events will be performed. Multivariable Cox regression models will be applied to adjust the risk estimates of interest for other variables. The Chi-square test for trend, Chi-square test and the Fisher exact test will be used to evaluate differences in percentages between the two treatment groups, as appropriate. The T-tests will be used to evaluate differences in means for continuous variables.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
1560 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized Trial Comparing Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Vs no Axillary Surgical Staging in Patients With Small Breast Cancer and a Negative Preoperative Axillary Assessment (IEO S637/311)
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2012
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm 1: sentinel node biopsy

Sentinel node biopsy policy

Procedure: Arm 1: sentinel node biopsy
Sentinel node biopsy policy

No Intervention: Arm 2: observation

No axillary staging

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Distant-disease free survival [6 months]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Cumulative incidence of distant recurrences [6 months]

  2. Cumulative incidence of axillary recurrences [6 months]

  3. Disease free survival (DFS) [6 months]

  4. Overall survival [6 months]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • breast cancer <2 cm, and a clinically negative axilla

  • any age

  • candidates to receive breast conserving surgery + radiotherapy

  • negative preoperative assessment of the axilla (ultra-sound with or without FNAC in case one doubtful node is found)

  • written informed consent must be signed and dated by the patient and the investigator prior to inclusion.

  • patients must be accessible for follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • synchronous distant metastases

  • previous malignancy

  • bilateral breast cancer

  • multicentric or multifocal breast cancer

  • previous primary systemic therapy

  • pregnancy or breastfeeding

  • pre-operative diagnosis (cytology or histology) of axillary lymph node metastases

  • pre-operative radiological evidence of multiple involved or suspicious nodes

  • patients with psychiatric, addictive, or any disorder, which compromises ability to give informed consent for participation in this study.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Instituto Oncologico Fundacion Arturo Lopez Perez Santiago Chile
2 Comprensorio Sanitario Bolzano Italy 39100
3 Azienda Ospedaliera Spedali Civili Brescia Italy 25123
4 Ospedale Oncologico Regionale Cagliari Italy 09121
5 Humanitas Mater Domini Castellanza Italy
6 Ospedale S. Anna Como Italy 22100
7 Azienda Ospedaliera Carlo Poma Mantova Italy 46100
8 Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori Milano Italy 20133
9 European Institute of Oncology Milan Italy 20141
10 AOU Federico II Napoli Italy 80131
11 Istituto Nazionale Tumori Napoli Italy 80131
12 Ospedale San Matteo Pavia Italy
13 Ospedale Guglielmo di Saliceto Piacenza Italy 29100
14 Ospedale Fatebenefratelli Roma Italy 00186
15 Humanitas Cancer Center Rozzano Italy 20089
16 Ospedale S. Anna Torino Italy 10100
17 Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe Valencia Spain
18 Universitätsspital Bern Klinik und Poliklinik für Medizinische Onkologie Bern Switzerland

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • European Institute of Oncology

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Oreste D Gentilini, MD, European Institute of Oncology

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
European Institute of Oncology
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02167490
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IEO S637/311
First Posted:
Jun 19, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Feb 4, 2021
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2021
Keywords provided by European Institute of Oncology
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 4, 2021