EMERGE: Intervention for Sexual and Biomedical HIV Prevention in Vulnerable U.S. Young Adults

Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06096324
Collaborator
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) (NIH)
780
1
2
42.3
18.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The study team will conduct a two-group study to examine the efficacy of implementing an enhanced microenterprise intervention to improve economic stability and HIV preventive behaviors. The team will enroll approximately 780 young adults. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. The first group ("control") will receive text messages with information on job openings. The second group ("intervention") will receive text messages with information on job openings plus HIV prevention and employment educational sessions, mentorship, a micro-grant, and HIV behavioral economics text messages.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Job announcements plus educational sessions, mentoring, a micro-grant, and behavioral economic text messages
  • Behavioral: Job announcements
N/A

Detailed Description

The study team will conduct a two-group study to examine the efficacy of implementing an enhanced microenterprise intervention to improve economic stability and HIV preventive behaviors. The team will enroll approximately 780 young adults, aged 18 to 24, who are African-American, economically-vulnerable, sexually active, living in Baltimore, and have access to a mobile phone with text messaging. Participants will be recruited using respondent-driven sampling and be randomly assigned to one of two groups by cluster, equal to a seed and recruits. The first group ("control") will receive text messages with information on job openings. The second group ("intervention") will receive text messages with information on job openings plus HIV prevention and employment educational sessions, mentorship, a micro-grant, and HIV behavioral economics text messages. Both groups will receive the assigned intervention for 12 weeks, equal to approximately 3 months. Data will be collected using participant surveys for two years at pre-intervention (Time 0), immediately post-intervention (Time 1, primary endpoint), and 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-months post-intervention (Time 2 to Time 5, longitudinal endpoints). Participants will undergo a baseline interview at the time of enrollment (Time 0) and be randomized to a group. Each group will receive the assigned activities for 12 weeks, at which point a follow-up interview will be conducted (Time 1, primary endpoint).

The study team will collect efficacy data pertaining to the following outcomes at T1 (Aim 1):

(i) the mean economic stability score of participants in each group in the past six months (=primary outcome); (ii), the proportion of participants in each group who report one or more vaginal or anal sex acts without using a condom in the past six months (=secondary outcome); and (iii) the proportion of participants in each group who report PrEP continuum progressive movement of one or more stages in the past six months (=secondary outcome). All outcomes data will be collected using participant surveys.

The study team will also collect data on other pre-specified measures from T1 to T5 to characterize the primary and secondary aims (Aim 1), to assess differences in the efficacy of the intervention by gender identity and peer support (Aim 2), and to explore potential mediating factors over time (Aim 3). These other pre-specified measures include: (i) the proportion of participants in each group who report one or more paid hours of work in the past six months; (ii) the mean financial distress score of participants in each group in the past six months; (iii) the mean total money spent on HIV prevention activities of participants in each group in the past six months; (iv) the mean economic self-efficacy score of participants in each group in the past six months; (v) the proportion of participants in each group who report one or more other sexual risk behaviors associated with HIV acquisition in the past six months; (vi) the proportion of participants in each group who report one or more other care-seeking behaviors associated with HIV prevention in the past six months; (vii) the mean condom self-efficacy score of participants in each group in the past six months; (viii) the mean PrEP self-efficacy score of participants in each group in the past six months; (ix) the mean grit score of participants in each group in the past six months; and (x) the mean industriousness score of participants in each group in the past six months. All other pre-specified data will also be collected using participant surveys.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
780 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Microenterprise and Behavioral Economics Intervention for Sexual and Biomedical HIV Prevention in Vulnerable U.S. Young Adults (EMERGE)
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 19, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 31, 2027
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 31, 2027

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Intervention

Job announcements plus educational sessions, mentoring, a micro-grant, and behavioral economic text messages.

Behavioral: Job announcements plus educational sessions, mentoring, a micro-grant, and behavioral economic text messages
Participants will receive job announcements plus educational sessions, mentoring, a micro-grant, and behavioral economic text messages.

Other: Control

Job announcements only

Behavioral: Job announcements
Participants will receive job announcements only.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Mean economic stability score of participants in each group in the past six months [Month 3]

    The economic stability score of participants in each group in the past six months will be measured using a participant survey. The economic stability scale measures extent of economic stability and ranges from 0 to 64 with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more vaginal or anal sex acts without using a condom in the past six months [Month 3]

    The proportion of participants in each group who report one or more vaginal or anal sex acts without using a condom in the past six months will be measured using a participant survey.

  2. Proportion of participants in each group who report pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) continuum progressive movement of one or more stages in the past six months [Month 3]

    The proportion of participants in each group who report pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) continuum progressive movement of one or more stages in the past six months will be measured using a participant survey. Participants will be assigned to one of nine stages based on their survey responses.

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more paid hours of work in the past six months [Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24]

    The proportion of participants in each group who report one or more paid hours of work in the past six months will be measured using a participant survey.

  2. Mean financial distress score of participants in each group in the past six months [Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24]

    The mean financial distress score of participants in each group in the past six months will be measured using a participant survey. The financial distress scale measures extent of financial distress and ranges from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

  3. Mean total money spent on HIV prevention activities of participants in each group in the past six months [Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24]

    The mean total money spent on HIV prevention activities of participants in each group in the past six months will be measured using a participant survey.

  4. Mean economic self-efficacy score of participants in each group in the past six months [Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24]

    The mean economic self-efficacy score of participants in each group in the past six months will be measured using a participant survey. The economic self-efficacy scale measures extent of economic self-efficacy and ranges from 0 to 16 with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  5. Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more other sexual risk behaviors associated with HIV acquisition in the past six months [Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24]

    The proportion of participants in each group who report one or more other sexual risk behaviors associated with HIV acquisition in the past six months will be measured using a participant survey.

  6. Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more other care-seeking behaviors associated with HIV prevention in the past six months [Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24]

    The proportion of participants in each group who report one or more other care-seeking behaviors associated with HIV prevention in the past six months will be measured using a participant survey.

  7. Mean condom self-efficacy score of participants in each group in the past six months [Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24]

    The mean condom self-efficacy score of participants in each group in the past six months will be measured using a participant survey. The condom self-efficacy scale measures extent of condom self-efficacy and ranges from 0 to 16 with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  8. Mean pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) self-efficacy score of participants in each group in the past six months [Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24]

    The mean pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) self-efficacy score of participants in each group in the past six months will be measured using a participant survey. The pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) self-efficacy scale measures extent of PrEP self-efficacy and ranges from 0 to 14 with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  9. Mean grit score of participants in each group in the past six months [Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24]

    The mean grit score of participants in each group in the past six months will be measured using a participant survey. The grit scale measures extent of grit and ranges from 0 to 18 with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  10. Mean industriousness score of participants in each group in the last six months [Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24]

    The mean industriousness score of participants in each group in the last six months will be measured using a participant survey. The industriousness scale measures extent of industriousness and ranges from 0 to 26 with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  11. Mean economic stability score of participants in each group in the past six months [Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24]

    The mean economic stability score of participants in each group in the past six months will be measured using a participant survey. The economic stability scale measures extent of economic stability and ranges from 0 to 64 with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

  12. Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more vaginal or anal sex acts without using a condom in the past six months [Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24]

    The proportion of participants in each group who report one or more vaginal or anal sex acts without using a condom in the past six months will be measured using a participant survey.

  13. Proportion of participants in each group who report pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) continuum progressive movement of one or more stages in the past six months [Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24]

    The proportion of participants in each group who report pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) continuum progressive movement of one or more stages in the past six months will be measured using a participant survey. Participants will be assigned to one of nine stages based on their survey responses.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 24 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion criteria are:
  • Aged 18-24

  • African-American

  • Economically-vulnerable in past 12 months

  • Sexually active in past 12 months

  • Living in Baltimore

  • Has access to mobile phone with text messaging

Exclusion criteria are:
  • Aged 17 or younger

  • Older than 24 years

  • Unwilling to provide consent for study participation

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland United States 21205

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Larissa Jennings Mayo-Wilson, PhD MHS, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • Study Director: Adriana Parker, MPH, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06096324
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 23-1034
  • R01MD016815
First Posted:
Oct 23, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Oct 23, 2023
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 23, 2023