The Effect of Informative Letters on the Prescription and Receipt of Schedule II Controlled Substances

Sponsor
Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02345434
Collaborator
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S. Fed), General Services Administration (GSA) (U.S. Fed)
1,525
2
12

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Fraud and waste is estimated to cost the American health care system nearly $200 billion each year, and the public Medicare and Medicaid programs about $60 billion each year. This study will evaluate a new method for fighting fraud: mailing informative letters to outlier providers to notify them of their aberrant behavior. These letters are targeted at high prescribers of schedule II controlled substances in Medicare Part D. The investigators will look at the effects of these letters on the behavior of providers and their patients. These effects are of substantial policy interest as they suggest how to best design anti-fraud policies. They are also of academic interest, shedding light on the behavior of physicians and their patients.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Informative letter
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
1525 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Health Services Research
Official Title:
The Effect of Informative Letters on the Prescription and Receipt of Schedule II Controlled Substances
Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: No informative letter

This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber

Experimental: Informative letter

This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report)

Other: Informative letter
The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers.
Other Names:
  • Comparative billing report
  • Peer activity report
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances [3 months]

      The prescribing of schedule II controlled substances over the 3 months following the initial sending of the letters. Prescribing is defined as the total "days supply" of schedule II controlled substances attributed to the prescriber, expressed in "30-day equivalents" i.e. divided by 30.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances [1 month]

    2. 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances [6 months]

    3. 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances [9 months]

    4. 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances [1 year]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    N/A and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Outlier with respect to the count of schedule II prescription drug events relative to peer group of prescribers in two of the three years 2011, 2012, and 2013

    • Outlier with respect to the 30-day equivalent prescriptions of schedule II substances relative to peer group of prescribers in two of the three years 2011, 2012, and 2013

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Deceased

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab
    • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
    • General Services Administration (GSA)

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Amy Finkelstein, PhD, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02345434
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • JPAL-LETTERS-SII
    First Posted:
    Jan 26, 2015
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 8, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2021

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details There was no recruitment in the traditional sense. High prescribers of Schedule II controlled substances were identified in Medicare administrative data using a Tukey outlier method.
    Pre-assignment Detail Seven of the identified outliers had died by the time of the study and were excluded from the intervention and later analysis.
    Arm/Group Title No Informative Letter Informative Letter
    Arm/Group Description This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report) Informative letter: The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 763 762
    COMPLETED 758 760
    NOT COMPLETED 5 2

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title No Informative Letter Informative Letter Total
    Arm/Group Description This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report) Informative letter: The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 0 0 0
    Age (years) []
    Sex: Female, Male () []
    Female
    Male
    Race and Ethnicity Not Collected () []

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances
    Description The prescribing of schedule II controlled substances over the 3 months following the initial sending of the letters. Prescribing is defined as the total "days supply" of schedule II controlled substances attributed to the prescriber, expressed in "30-day equivalents" i.e. divided by 30.
    Time Frame 3 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title No Informative Letter Informative Letter
    Arm/Group Description This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report) Informative letter: The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers.
    Measure Participants 758 760
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Deviation) [30-day equivalent prescription fills]
    461.1
    (443.9)
    450.0
    (450.9)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection No Informative Letter, Informative Letter
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value 3.53
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -6.35 to 13.4
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances
    Description
    Time Frame 1 month

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title No Informative Letter Informative Letter
    Arm/Group Description This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report) Informative letter: The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers.
    Measure Participants 758 760
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Deviation) [30-day equivalent prescription fills]
    155.5
    (148.8)
    151.1
    (150.4)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection No Informative Letter, Informative Letter
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value -0.79
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -3.68 to 2.1
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances
    Description
    Time Frame 6 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Outcome measure not collected for study
    Arm/Group Title No Informative Letter Informative Letter
    Arm/Group Description This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report) Informative letter: The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers.
    Measure Participants 0 0
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances
    Description
    Time Frame 9 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Outcome measure not collected for study
    Arm/Group Title No Informative Letter Informative Letter
    Arm/Group Description This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report) Informative letter: The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers.
    Measure Participants 0 0
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances
    Description
    Time Frame 1 year

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Outcome measure not collected for study
    Arm/Group Title No Informative Letter Informative Letter
    Arm/Group Description This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report) Informative letter: The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers.
    Measure Participants 0 0

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title No Informative Letter Informative Letter
    Arm/Group Description This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report) Informative letter: The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers.
    All Cause Mortality
    No Informative Letter Informative Letter
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    No Informative Letter Informative Letter
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/758 (0%) 0/760 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    No Informative Letter Informative Letter
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/758 (0%) 0/760 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Adam Sacarny
    Organization Columbia University
    Phone 212 305 7084
    Email ajs2102@columbia.edu
    Responsible Party:
    Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02345434
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • JPAL-LETTERS-SII
    First Posted:
    Jan 26, 2015
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 8, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2021