The Effect of Informative Letters on the Prescription and Receipt of Schedule II Controlled Substances
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Fraud and waste is estimated to cost the American health care system nearly $200 billion each year, and the public Medicare and Medicaid programs about $60 billion each year. This study will evaluate a new method for fighting fraud: mailing informative letters to outlier providers to notify them of their aberrant behavior. These letters are targeted at high prescribers of schedule II controlled substances in Medicare Part D. The investigators will look at the effects of these letters on the behavior of providers and their patients. These effects are of substantial policy interest as they suggest how to best design anti-fraud policies. They are also of academic interest, shedding light on the behavior of physicians and their patients.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: No informative letter This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber |
|
Experimental: Informative letter This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report) |
Other: Informative letter
The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances [3 months]
The prescribing of schedule II controlled substances over the 3 months following the initial sending of the letters. Prescribing is defined as the total "days supply" of schedule II controlled substances attributed to the prescriber, expressed in "30-day equivalents" i.e. divided by 30.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances [1 month]
- 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances [6 months]
- 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances [9 months]
- 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances [1 year]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Outlier with respect to the count of schedule II prescription drug events relative to peer group of prescribers in two of the three years 2011, 2012, and 2013
-
Outlier with respect to the 30-day equivalent prescriptions of schedule II substances relative to peer group of prescribers in two of the three years 2011, 2012, and 2013
Exclusion Criteria:
- Deceased
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
- General Services Administration (GSA)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amy Finkelstein, PhD, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
None provided.- JPAL-LETTERS-SII
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | There was no recruitment in the traditional sense. High prescribers of Schedule II controlled substances were identified in Medicare administrative data using a Tukey outlier method. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | Seven of the identified outliers had died by the time of the study and were excluded from the intervention and later analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | No Informative Letter | Informative Letter |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber | This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report) Informative letter: The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 763 | 762 |
COMPLETED | 758 | 760 |
NOT COMPLETED | 5 | 2 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | No Informative Letter | Informative Letter | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber | This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report) Informative letter: The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Age (years) [] | |||
Sex: Female, Male () [] | |||
Female | |||
Male | |||
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected () [] |
Outcome Measures
Title | 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances |
---|---|
Description | The prescribing of schedule II controlled substances over the 3 months following the initial sending of the letters. Prescribing is defined as the total "days supply" of schedule II controlled substances attributed to the prescriber, expressed in "30-day equivalents" i.e. divided by 30. |
Time Frame | 3 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | No Informative Letter | Informative Letter |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber | This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report) Informative letter: The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers. |
Measure Participants | 758 | 760 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Deviation) [30-day equivalent prescription fills] |
461.1
(443.9)
|
450.0
(450.9)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | No Informative Letter, Informative Letter |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | 3.53 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -6.35 to 13.4 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | 1 month |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | No Informative Letter | Informative Letter |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber | This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report) Informative letter: The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers. |
Measure Participants | 758 | 760 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Deviation) [30-day equivalent prescription fills] |
155.5
(148.8)
|
151.1
(150.4)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | No Informative Letter, Informative Letter |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -0.79 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -3.68 to 2.1 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Outcome measure not collected for study |
Arm/Group Title | No Informative Letter | Informative Letter |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber | This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report) Informative letter: The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers. |
Measure Participants | 0 | 0 |
Title | 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | 9 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Outcome measure not collected for study |
Arm/Group Title | No Informative Letter | Informative Letter |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber | This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report) Informative letter: The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers. |
Measure Participants | 0 | 0 |
Title | 30-day Equivalent Prescribing of Schedule II Controlled Substances |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | 1 year |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Outcome measure not collected for study |
Arm/Group Title | No Informative Letter | Informative Letter |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber | This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report) Informative letter: The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers. |
Measure Participants | 0 | 0 |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | No Informative Letter | Informative Letter | ||
Arm/Group Description | This is the control arm and it involves no contact with the prescriber | This is the treatment arm; prescribers in this arm receive an informative letter (called a comparative billing report or peer activity report) Informative letter: The intervention is a letter that describes the Schedule II prescribing activity of the individual in comparison to a peer group of similar prescribers. It highlights the fact that the prescriber's activity is highly unlike her peers. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
No Informative Letter | Informative Letter | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
No Informative Letter | Informative Letter | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/758 (0%) | 0/760 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
No Informative Letter | Informative Letter | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/758 (0%) | 0/760 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Adam Sacarny |
---|---|
Organization | Columbia University |
Phone | 212 305 7084 |
ajs2102@columbia.edu |
- JPAL-LETTERS-SII