Comparison of Hyaluronidase and Dexametasone in Reduction of Postoperative Edema

Sponsor
Hacettepe University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05466604
Collaborator
(none)
60
2
4
30.9
30
1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The present study is designed to reveal effectiveness of hyaluronidase and dexamethasone on reduction of postoperative edema, pain, trismus, and infection. For this purpose, 60 participants with symmetrical mandibular wisdom teeth enrolled the present study. All measurements and evaluations were performed before and 1, 2, 3, and 7 days later the operation.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Hyaluronidase Injection mesomedica
  • Drug: Dexamethasone dekort
Phase 4

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Comparison of the Effects of Hyaluronidase and Dexamethasone on Reduction of Postoperative Edema in Impacted Wisdom Teeth Surgery
Actual Study Start Date :
Dec 1, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2022
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: hyaluronidase

Drug: Hyaluronidase Injection mesomedica
injection of 150 IU hyaluronidase to perioperative region, submucosally.

No Intervention: hyaluronidase control

Experimental: dexamethasone

Drug: Dexamethasone dekort
injection of 8 mg dexamethasone to perioperative region, submucosally.

No Intervention: dexamethasone control

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 1. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase experimental group [postoperative 1. day]

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 1. day in hyaluronidase experimental group

  2. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 2. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase experimental group [postoperative 2. day]

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 2. day in hyaluronidase experimental group

  3. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 3. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase experimental group [postoperative 3. day]

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in hyaluronidase experimental group

  4. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 7. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase experimental group [postoperative 7. day]

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in hyaluronidase experimental group

  5. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 1. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase control group [postoperative 1. day]

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 1. day in hyaluronidase control group

  6. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 2. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase control group [postoperative 2. day]

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 2. day in hyaluronidase control group

  7. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 3. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase control group [postoperative 3. day]

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in hyaluronidase control group

  8. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 7. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase control group [postoperative 7. day]

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in hyaluronidase control group

  9. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 1. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone experimental group [postoperative 1. day]

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 1. day in dexamethasone experimental group

  10. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 2. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone experimental group [postoperative 2. day]

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 2. day in dexamethasone experimental group

  11. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 3. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone experimental group [postoperative 3. day]

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in dexamethasone experimental group

  12. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 7. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone experimental group [postoperative 7. day]

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in dexamethasone experimental group

  13. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 1. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone control group [postoperative 1. day]

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 1. day in dexamethasone controlgroup

  14. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 2. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone control group [postoperative 2. day]

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 2. day in dexamethasone controlgroup

  15. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 3. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone control group [postoperative 3. day]

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in dexamethasone controlgroup

  16. evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 7. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone control group [postoperative 7. day]

    preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in dexamethasone controlgroup

  17. evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between hyaluronidase experimental and hyaluronidase control groups in postoperative 1. day using a measuring tape [postoperative 1. day]

    edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 1. day

  18. evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between hyaluronidase experimental and hyaluronidase control groups in postoperative 2. day using a measuring tape [postoperative 2. day]

    edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 2. day

  19. evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between hyaluronidase experimental and hyaluronidase control groups in postoperative 3. day using a measuring tape [postoperative 3. day]

    edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 3. day

  20. evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between hyaluronidase experimental and hyaluronidase control groups in postoperative 7. day using a measuring tape [postoperative 7. day]

    edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 7. day

  21. evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between dexamethasone experimental and dexamethasone control groups in postoperative 1. day using a measuring tape [postoperative 1. day]

    edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 1. day

  22. evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between dexamethasone experimental and dexamethasone control groups in postoperative 2. day using a measuring tape [postoperative 2. day]

    edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 2. day

  23. evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between dexamethasone experimental and dexamethasone control groups in postoperative 3. day using a measuring tape [postoperative 3. day]

    edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 3. day

  24. evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between dexamethasone experimental and dexamethasone control groups in postoperative 7. day using a measuring tape [postoperative 7. day]

    edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 7. day

  25. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 1. day [postoperative 1. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day

  26. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 2. day [postoperative 2. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day

  27. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 3. day [postoperative 3. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day

  28. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 4. day [postoperative 4. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day

  29. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 5. day [postoperative 5. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day

  30. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 6. day [postoperative 6. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day

  31. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 7. day [postoperative 7. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day

  32. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 1. day [postoperative 1. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day

  33. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 2. day [postoperative 2. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day

  34. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 3. day [postoperative 3. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day

  35. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 4. day [postoperative 4. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day

  36. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 5. day [postoperative 5. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day

  37. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 6. day [postoperative 6. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day

  38. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 7. day [postoperative 7. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day

  39. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 1. day [postoperative 1. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day

  40. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 2. day [postoperative 2. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day

  41. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 3. day [postoperative 3. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day

  42. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 4. day [postoperative 4. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day

  43. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 5. day [postoperative 5. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day

  44. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 6. day [postoperative 6. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day

  45. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 7. day [postoperative 7. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day

  46. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 1. day [postoperative 1. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day

  47. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 2. day [postoperative 2. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day

  48. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 3. day [postoperative 3. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day

  49. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 4. day [postoperative 4. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day

  50. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 5. day [postoperative 5. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day

  51. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 6. day [postoperative 6. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day

  52. evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 7. day [postoperative 7. day]

    pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day

  53. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase experimental group preoperatively. [preoperative]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  54. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 1. day. [postoperative 1. day]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  55. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 2. day. [postoperative 2. day]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  56. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 3. day. [postoperative 3. day]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  57. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 7. day. [postoperative 7. day]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  58. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase control group preoperatively. [preoperative]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  59. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 1. day. [postoperative 1. day]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  60. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 2. day. [postoperative 2. day]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  61. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 3. day. [postoperative 3. day]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  62. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 7. day. [postoperative 7. day]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  63. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone experimental group preoperatively. [preoperative]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  64. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 1. day. [postoperative 1. day]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  65. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 2. day. [postoperative 2. day]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  66. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 3. day. [postoperative 3. day]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  67. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 7. day. [postoperative 7. day]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  68. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone control group preoperatively. [preoperative]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  69. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 1. day. [postoperative 1. day]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  70. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 2. day. [postoperative 2. day]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  71. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 3. day. [postoperative 3. day]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  72. evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 7. day. [postoperative 7. day]

    amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

  73. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase experimental group preoperatively. [preoperative]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  74. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 1. day. [postoperative 1. day]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  75. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 2. day. [postoperative 2. day]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  76. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 3. day. [postoperative 3. day]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  77. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 7. day. [postoperative 7. day]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  78. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase control group preoperatively. [preoperative]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  79. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 1. day. [postoperative 1. day]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  80. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 2. day. [postoperative 2. day]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  81. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 3. day. [postoperative 3. day]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  82. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 7. day. [postoperative 7. day]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  83. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone experimental group preoperatively. [preoperative]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  84. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 1. day [postoperative 1. day]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  85. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 2. day [postoperative 2. day]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  86. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 3. day [postoperative 3. day]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  87. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 7. day [postoperative 7. day]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  88. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone control group preoperatively. [preoperatively]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  89. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 1. day [postoperative 1. day]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  90. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 2. day [postoperative 2. day]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  91. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 3. day [postoperative 3. day]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

  92. evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 7. day [postoperative 7. day]

    existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • symmetrical mandibular wisdom teeth with bone retention

  • patients who are signed informed consent and acceptance of study involvement forms

Exclusion Criteria:
  • existence of any systemic disease

  • existence of any periodical drug intake

  • existence of difference in operation times of right and left impacted wisdom teeth extractions more than 5 minutes

  • existence of pregnancy

  • existence of breastfeeding

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Near East University Nicosia Cyprus 99138
2 Hacettepe University Ankara Sıhhiye Turkey 06100

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Hacettepe University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Onur Koç, Doctor, Hacettepe University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05466604
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • YDU/2019//74-921
First Posted:
Jul 20, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jul 20, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Onur Koç, Doctor, Hacettepe University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 20, 2022