Evaluating the Burst Pressure of Simulated Bowel Anastomosis Constructed Using the Reverse Half-Hitch Alternating Post Knots

Sponsor
Queen's University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03742583
Collaborator
(none)
20
1
2
5
4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Square knots are the gold standard for hand-tied surgical knots; however, they are difficult to reproduce in deep body cavities and can inadvertently result in slipped knots. The investigators have shown in previous work that the reversing half-hitch alternating post (RHAP) surgical knot is a non-inferior alternative to the square surgical knot based on its tensile strength and performance in limited working spaces. Prior to introducing RHAP knot in routine surgical practice, it is important to objectively demonstrate similar physical characteristics of anastomosis created using RHAP and standard square knots. This study aims to compare the burst pressure of cadaveric porcine small bowel anastomosis constructed using RHAP and standard square knots on a flat surface and in a simulated deep body cavity.

The investigators are conducting a prospective randomized controlled study of novice medical students allocated to proficiency-based training in RHAP and square surgical knots. Knot tying proficiency will be assessed using a knot-tying checklist. Number of repetitions and time required to achieve proficiency will be tracked for each group. Once proficiency has been achieved by participants in RHAP and square knots group, each participant will perform two-hand sewn small bowel anastomosis using cadaveric porcine small bowel. One anastomosis will be performed on a flat surface and the other will be formed in a simulated deep body cavity. Burst pressure of the anastomoses will be tested using a column of water, and results will be compared between groups. Simple descriptive statistics will be performed for both groups. Between group comparisons of knot-tying proficiency and burst pressure will be performed using t-test. Learning curves within each group will be analyzed using paired 1-way ANOVA. SPSS Statistics (v. 21, IBM, New York, USA) will be used for all statistical analysis, with significance set to p<0.05.

The investigators hypothesize that burst pressure of cadaveric porcine small bowel anastomosis will be equivalent for anastomosis constructed using RHAP and standard square knots.

The results of this study will provide further validity evidence in support of RHAP as suitable alternative to the square surgical knots.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Square Knot
  • Other: RHAP Knot
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
20 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Evaluating the Burst Pressure of Simulated Bowel Anastomosis Constructed Using the Reverse Half-Hitch Alternating Post Knots
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Square Knot

Other: Square Knot
Standard square knot

Active Comparator: Reversing Half-Hitch Alternating Post Knot

Other: RHAP Knot
Reversing half-hitch alternating post knot

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Burst pressure (mm Hg) of repaired enterotomies [One session ~2-4 hours]

    Once the enterotomy in the porcine small bowel has been repaired by participants with knots according to the randomized intervention arm, blinded evaluators will tie off one end of the bowel and fill the other end with normal saline. Pressure will be applied the bag of normal saline and the pressure at which the repaired enterotomy leaks will be recorded. The pressure will be recorded in mm Hg.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Undergraduate first or second year medical/non-medical student
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Third year or greater undergraduate medical student

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Queen's Unviersity Kingston Ontario Canada K7L 3N6

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Queen's University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Dr. Boris Zevin, Investigator, Queen's University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03742583
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • SURG-431-18
First Posted:
Nov 15, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Feb 11, 2019
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 11, 2019