RACCOR: Effect of Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on 3-year Survival After Colorectal Surgery for Cancer
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Several recent studies have shown that the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol reduces morbidity and mortality and shortens the length of stay compared to conventional recovery strategy (pre-ERAS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the implementation of this protocol on 3-year overall survival and postoperative outcome in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
|
Other: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
Multidisciplinary approach to perioperative care.
|
Conventional Recovery Strategy (pre-ERAS)
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Evaluate the effect of the implementation of this protocol on 3-year overall survival. [3 years]
3-year overall survival rate
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Aadult patients, who had undergone resection for colorectal cancer or a precancerous lesion and were cared for using the ERAS protocol or received conventional care (pre-ERAS).
-
Informed patients
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients presenting or developing peritoneal cancer,
-
Patients having resection for palliative reasons,
-
Patients those under curatorship or tutelage
-
Opposed patients
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Jean-Luc Faucheron | Grenoble | France |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University Hospital, Grenoble
Investigators
- Study Director: Jean-Luc Faucheron, CHU Grenoble Alpes
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 2021