EPPROSTATECT: Ejaculation Preserving Photoselective Vaporization Versus Plasma Kinetic Vaporization Versus Transurethral Resection Of The Prostate: A RCT

Sponsor
Mansoura University (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT03589196
Collaborator
(none)
84
1
3
20.7
4.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

To Evaluate and compare the outcome and coast of ejaculation sparing management of BPH using 3 different techniques: PVP, PKVP and TURP. Ejaculation sparing TURP group is considered the standard control group. Evaluation will be carried out through a prospective randomized powered trial

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Ejaculation Preserving Photoselective Vaporization
  • Procedure: Ejaculation Preserving Plasma Kinetic Vaporization
  • Procedure: Ejaculation Preserving Transurethral Resection Of The Prostate
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
84 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Ejaculation Preserving Photoselective Vaporization Versus Plasma Kinetic Vaporization Versus Transurethral Resection Of The Prostate For Management Of Benign Prostatic Enlargement: An Objective Evaluation Through a Prospective Randomized Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 10, 2018
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2019
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Photoselective Vaporization

Procedure: Ejaculation Preserving Photoselective Vaporization
Ejaculation Preserving Photoselective Vaporization

Active Comparator: Plasma Kinetic Vaporization

Procedure: Ejaculation Preserving Plasma Kinetic Vaporization
Ejaculation Preserving Plasma Kinetic Vaporization

Active Comparator: Transurethral Resection Of The Prostate

Procedure: Ejaculation Preserving Transurethral Resection Of The Prostate
Ejaculation Preserving Transurethral Resection Of The Prostate

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. estimate and compare the ejaculation preservation effect of the 3 techniques (PKVP, PVP and TURP). [1 years]

    assessed by Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. change in flow rate [1 years]

    measured by uroflowmetery in ml/sec

  2. postoperative complication [1 year]

    measured by Clavien-Dindo Classification scale

  3. change in patients' symptoms. [1 year]

    measured by International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
50 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Age >50 years 2. Prostate volume (measured by TRUS): 30-80 gm 3. International prostate symptom score (IPSS )>15 and quality of life score (QOL)< 3.
  1. Maximum flow rate of uroflometry <10 ml/second 5. Patients with active sexual life (or interested) and having the ability to ejaculate and desire to preserve ejaculation.

  2. Failure or intolerance to medical treatment, recurrent urinary infection, urine retention, significant hematuria or deterioration of the upper urinary tract function secondary to BOO.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Bleeding disorders and patients on anticoagulant treatment

  2. Histologically proved cancer prostate

  3. Neurogenic voiding dysfunction

  4. Lower urinary tract malignancy

  5. Preoperative ejaculation or sexual dysfunction

  6. Presence of stricture urethra

  7. Unfit for spinal anathesia -

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Urology & Nephrology Center Mansourah Egypt

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Mansoura University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Mansoura University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03589196
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • MS/18.02.30
First Posted:
Jul 17, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Jul 17, 2018
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2018
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 17, 2018