EKG Criteria and Identification of Acute Coronary Occlusion

Sponsor
Stony Brook University (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT03863327
Collaborator
Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis (Other)
2,000
2
13
1000
76.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The objective of this research study is to test the accuracy of preexisting criteria versus expert interpretation for the diagnosis of acute coronary occlusion (major heart attack due to a completely blocked blood vessel). If our hypothesis proves to be true, this would provide a significant improvement in the care for patients who present to the hospital with possible symptoms of coronary ischemia (symptoms due to lack of blood flow to the heart).

The primary analysis will be designed as a multi-center, retrospective case-control study.

Detailed Description

In this retrospective, 2-center, case-control study the investigators will investigate and compare the accuracy of various ECG criteria and expert interpretation to diagnose Acute Coronary Occlusion (ACO), with an emphasis on the diagnosis of patients with ACO but without obvious ST segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) criteria. The investigators will use two cohorts of patients who present with symptoms consistent with acute MI, one subsequently proven to have ACO and one proven to not have ACO.

The groups will be identified by chart reviewers who will use all clinical data except the ECGs to determine, in retrospect, and using strict criteria, if the patient had ACO at the time of the ECGs to be evaluated, or not. These reviewers will be blinded to all ECGs. The diagnosis of ACO will be dependent upon angiographic occlusion. Because in many cases of ACO, the artery spontaneously opens by the time of the angiogram, the investigators will need to have surrogate endpoints: this will be culprit on the angiogram PLUS a very elevated peak troponin, as peak troponin I > 10.0 ng/mL and peak troponin T > 1.0 ng/mL are highly correlated with ACO.

The investigators will find cases of subtle STEMI (ACO without STEMI criteria) by searching for all myocardial infarction cases that underwent angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The investigators will attempt by various criteria to determine from all available sources other than the ECG (angiography, echo, troponins) whether the involved artery was occluded at the time of the most diagnostic ECG that was recorded while the patient had symptoms and before the angiogram. Reviewers determining ACO or not ACO will be blinded to the ECGs. The investigators will use each pre-angiogram ECG, in sequence, for analysis, to determine if expert interpretation can not only identify occlusion that is not identified by STEMI criteria, but also to find if expert interpretation can identify occlusion on an earlier ECG. Expert ECG interpreters will interpret the ECG for evidence of ACO. Their accuracy will be compared to traditional STEMI criteria and other methods of interpretation if available.

The investigators will use as controls patients with any ST elevation, or ST depression, of any etiology that are proven to NOT have occlusion. The investigators will establish absence of occlusion by a combination of objective data points including angiogram (if performed), troponins, echocardiograms, clinical course, etc. Details of the methods are below, including specific outcome definitions used to claim the presence or absence of ACO.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
2000 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Control
Time Perspective:
Retrospective
Official Title:
EKG Criteria and Identification of Acute Coronary Occlusion
Actual Study Start Date :
May 1, 2018
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2019
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Acute Coronary Occlusion or near-occlusion (TIMI 0-1)

a. Acute occlusion proven on angiogram (an acute culprit lesion with TIMI 0-1 flow, or description of acute total thrombotic occlusion) b. Acute culprit lesion (any TIMI score) with Peak cTNI > 10 ng/mL or cTnT > 1.0 ng/mL c. If no catheterization performed (contraindicated, not compatible with goals of care, etc), then highly elevated troponin as above plus a new/presumed new focal wall motion abnormality on echocardiography d. Positive ECG findings (by any criteria) with death occurring before attempted emergent coronary angiography and autopsy confirming ACO. For cases with positive ECG findings and death before cath but NO autopsy, these will be marked and saved in a separate group, not to be used in the primary analysis.

Other: No intervention
There will be no intervention as a part of this protocol.

Acute Coronary Occlusion or near-occlusion (TIMI 0-2)

a. Acute occlusion proven on angiogram (an acute culprit lesion with TIMI 0-2 flow, or description of acute total thrombotic occlusion) b. Acute culprit lesion (any TIMI score) with Peak cTNI > 10 ng/mL or cTnT > 1.0 ng/mL c. If no catheterization performed (contraindicated, not compatible with goals of care, etc), then highly elevated troponin as above plus a new/presumed new focal wall motion abnormality on echocardiography d. Positive ECG findings (by any criteria) with death occurring before attempted emergent coronary angiography and autopsy confirming ACO. For cases with positive ECG findings and death before cath but NO autopsy, these will be marked and saved in a separate group, not to be used in the primary analysis.

Other: No intervention
There will be no intervention as a part of this protocol.

Acute severe 3-vessel disease or critical left main stenosis

Severe 3-vessel disease: >/=75% stenosis in all three major coronary vessels (or equivalents in the case of anatomic variants or preexisting bypass) with an acute culprit lesion (TIMI<3) or Left main stenosis > 50% (see Smith review paper for reference): acute left main culprit of any TIMI score, or any lesion of the left main with TIMI<3 or Any other cardiac catheterization findings prompting initiation of emergent coronary artery bypass grafting within the next 120 hours

Other: No intervention
There will be no intervention as a part of this protocol.

No evidence of acute coronary occlusion

At least three sequential negative cardiac biomarkers within 24 hours of presentation cardiac catheterization showing no culprit lesion. Angiogram showing an acute culprit lesion but both no occlusion (TIMI 2 or greater) and troponins not exceeding the cutoff above If positive troponin values present but no angiography, then the patient must have echocardiography showing no wall motion abnormality and troponin values less than the above cutoff If the patient has insufficient data to classify into one of these categories, the patient must be excluded from the study as they cannot be classified as ACO or non-ACO. For example, patients with extremely high troponin but no culprit seen on cath may have acute occlusion with complete autolysis of thrombus, myocarditis, spasm, etc. Thus the investigators cannot classify them as NO ACO when the possibility of ACO remains and cannot be disproven.

Other: No intervention
There will be no intervention as a part of this protocol.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. The difference in time to diagnosis of acute coronary occlusion (ACO) between the current standard of care and advanced human ECG interpretation in patients with confirmed occlusive myocardial infarction without ST elevation myocardial infarction [1 year]

    How long does it take for an expert human ECG interpreter to diagnose ACO compared to the standard of care utilizing STEMI criteria

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. The difference in sensitivity among the occlusive myocardial infarction (OMI) cohort for experts versus ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) criteria [1 year]

    The difference in sensitivity among the occlusive myocardial infarction cohort for experts versus STEMI criteria

  2. The difference in sensitivity among the occlusive myocardial infarction (OMI) cohort for experts versus ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) criteria in all studied patients [1 year]

    The difference in sensitivity among the occlusive myocardial infarction (OMI) cohort for experts versus ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) criteria in all studied patients

  3. The difference in sensitivity among the occlusive myocardial infarction (OMI) cohort for experts versus ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) criteria in patients with widened QRS [1 year]

    The difference in sensitivity among the occlusive myocardial infarction (OMI) cohort for experts versus ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) criteria in patients with widened QRS

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Expert accuracy (sens/spec) for acute triple vessel / left main disease acute coronary syndrome (ACS) as evidenced by global depressions with aVR elevations, other ECG changes. [1 year]

    Expert accuracy (sens/spec) for acute triple vessel / left main disease acute coronary syndrome (ACS) as evidenced by global depressions with aVR elevations, other ECG changes. Currently, there are no ECG diagnostic criteria for these entities.

  2. Time difference in the subtle OMI group stratified based on the presence or absence of opioid pain medications. [1 year]

    Time difference in the subtle OMI group stratified based on the presence or absence of opioid pain medications.

  3. The rate of patients with ECGs that meet STEMI criteria that then experience a delay despite positive EKG [1 year]

    The rate of patients with ECGs that meet STEMI criteria that then experience a delay despite positive EKG

  4. Explore the rate of false positive cath lab activations [1 year]

    Explore the rate of false positive cath lab activations

  5. Explore the rationale for correct expert ECG interpretation of OMI without STEMI criteria [1 year]

    Explore the rationale for correct expert ECG interpretation of OMI without STEMI criteria

  6. Explore the rationale for correct expert ECG interpretation of false positive STEMI criteria [1 year]

    Explore the rationale for correct expert ECG interpretation of false positive STEMI criteria

  7. Time from initial ECG with subtle OMI without STEMI criteria to development of ECG meeting STEMI criteria. [1 year]

    Time from initial ECG with subtle OMI without STEMI criteria to development of ECG meeting STEMI criteria.

  8. Determine the rate of correct expert ECG interpretation of OMI without STEMI criteria [1 year]

    Determine the rate of correct expert ECG interpretation of OMI without STEMI criteria

  9. Determine the rate of correct expert ECG interpretation of false positive STEMI criteria [1 year]

    Determine the rate of correct expert ECG interpretation of false positive STEMI criteria

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Recorded EKG prior to cardiac catheterization
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Absence of documented EKG prior to cardiac catheterization

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Hennepin County Medical Center Minneapolis Minnesota United States 55415
2 Stony Brook University Hospital Stony Brook New York United States 11794

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Stony Brook University
  • Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephen W Smith, MD, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Stony Brook University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03863327
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 1173733-2
First Posted:
Mar 5, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Mar 5, 2019
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Stony Brook University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 5, 2019