Improving Quality & Equity of Emergency Care Decisions (IQED)

Sponsor
University of Southern California (Other)
Overall Status
Withdrawn
CT.gov ID
NCT03966989
Collaborator
National Institute on Aging (NIA) (NIH), University of California, Los Angeles (Other), Olive View-UCLA Education & Research Institute (Other), LAC+USC Medical Center (Other), University of California, Davis (Other)
0
4
2
6
0
0

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Recent work in emergency medicine has shown errors were more likely to occur at the end of shifts, as pressure exists to make a number of decisions simultaneously, and after what may be an already long series of cognitive challenges. Decision fatigue may also contribute to disparities by surfacing subconscious bias. The objective of the R21 pilot phase of Improving Quality & Equity of Emergency Care Decisions (IQED) is to identify addressable gaps in quality and equity and use performance feedback as an intervention to improve performance on chest pain, CT imaging, and antibiotic prescribing. Performance feedback intervention will include feedback offline via email or text.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Performance Feedback
N/A

Detailed Description

The objective of the R21 pilot phase of Improving Quality & Equity of Emergency Care Decisions (IQED) is to identify addressable gaps in quality and equity and use performance feedback as an intervention to improve performance on chest pain, CT imaging, and antibiotic prescribing. Performance feedback intervention will include feedback offline via email or text.

Each clinician will be randomized at the provider or clinic level to either the intervention or control group. Once clinicians are randomized, the aforementioned intervention will be turned on for a 3-6 month time period.

For providers in the intervention group, the goal is to evaluate the effect of social norms on overuse and underuse behavior related to prescriptions or testing. Near real-time social norms will be delivered to providers which benchmark their own performance on various metrics to that of their peers. The investigators performance feedback reports for each provider randomized to receive the audit and feedback intervention will have three key characteristics: (1) each target provider will receive his or her individual performance, (2) benchmarks will prominently feature the performance of providers who would be considered credible peers of the target provider, and (3) benchmarks will reflect only performance that is desirable (e.g., showing only the performance of the best-performing credible peers).

Providers randomized to the control group will follow standard practice.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
0 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Improving Quality & Equity of Emergency Care Decisions (IQED): R21 Pilot Phase
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Dec 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Performance Feedback

Feedback offline either via email or text

Behavioral: Performance Feedback
Performance feedback offline that benchmarks providers' own performance to that of their peers

No Intervention: Control

Standard practice control

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Efficacy of behavioral nudges to improve quality and safety in Emergency Medicine through measurement of adherence to guidelines: Chest Pain [6 months]

    Measurement of clinician adherence to guidelines for quality measures related to chest pain (proportion of cases in which HEART score algorithm was used for chest pain patients)

  2. Efficacy of behavioral nudges to improve quality and safety in Emergency Medicine through measurement of adherence to guidelines: CT imaging [6 months]

    Measurement of clinician adherence to guidelines for quality measures related to CT imaging (proportion of orders for unnecessary CT scans)

  3. Efficacy of behavioral nudges to improve quality and safety in Emergency Medicine through measurement of adherence to guidelines: Antibiotic prescribing [6 months]

    Measurement of clinician adherence to guidelines for quality measures related to antibiotic prescribing (proportion of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for acute respiratory infections)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Attendings and residents that see patients in the Emergency Department.
Exclusion Criteria:
  • None

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Lac + Usc Los Angeles California United States 90033
2 University of California, Davis Sacramento California United States 95817
3 Olive View Medical Center Sylmar California United States 91342
4 Harbor UCLA Torrance California United States 90502

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Southern California
  • National Institute on Aging (NIA)
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • Olive View-UCLA Education & Research Institute
  • LAC+USC Medical Center
  • University of California, Davis

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniella Meeker, University of Southern California

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Daniella Meeker, Assistant Professor, University of Southern California
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03966989
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • HS-18-00522
  • R21AG057400
First Posted:
May 29, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Dec 20, 2021
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2021
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Daniella Meeker, Assistant Professor, University of Southern California
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 20, 2021