Clinical Utility of Pediatric Whole Exome Sequencing

Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03525431
Collaborator
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) (NIH)
529
4
1
57.4
132.3
2.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The investigator aims to examine the clinical utility of WES, including assessment of a variety of clinical outcomes in undiagnosed pediatric cases.

Detailed Description

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is changing the paradigm of clinical genetic testing. Unlike highly focused single-gene tests, NGS allows one to examine gene panels, the exome, and the whole genome. With the broad array of molecular tests now available, ordering physicians face the conundrum of selecting the best diagnostic tool for patients with suspected genetic conditions. Single-gene testing is often most appropriate for conditions with distinctive clinical features and minimal locus heterogeneity. NGS-based gene panel testing, which can be complemented with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and other ancillary methods, provides a comprehensive and feasible approach for well documented but genetically heterogeneous disorders. Whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) have the advantage of enabling parallel interrogation of most of the genes in the human genome. To some, WES is preferable to previously used methods due to higher diagnostic yield, shorter time to diagnosis, and improved cost-efficiency.

The ability to survey the exome opens up both new opportunities and new challenges. For example, all coding regions of known genes must be analyzed when applying WES to undiagnosed cases with unclear inheritance patterns. Current limitations on variant interpretation capabilities and clinical validity raise questions about the clinical utility of WES as either a stand-alone or a first-choice diagnostic test. Additional challenges include pre- and post-test counseling with appropriate and robust informed consent, bioinformatics analysis setup and validation, variant interpretation and classification, the need for policies and protocols concerning the discovery and reporting of secondary findings unrelated to the presenting indication, a requirement for validation of WES results, assurance of conformation to quality control standards, data storage and accessibility, and reimbursement issues.

Introducing WES into pediatric clinical care of underrepresented populations raises additional issues and considerations of payment coverage, access, and standards of care. Beyond the sheer complexity of the test and its results, clinicians and health systems must address numerous considerations, including: private and public insurance coverage; language and culture differences and their implications for genetic counseling and clinician-patient relationships; ability to access follow-up testing and clinical care; and ability to access appropriate treatment and services. These issues and others will affect not only patients' decision-making regarding WES, but also their post-test needs for patient follow up. The importance of systematically assessing the clinical utility of NGS is critical for determining in which clinical and health care contexts WES will be useful and for commencing research on these considerations.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
529 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Genomic Sequencing to Aid Diagnosis in Pediatric and Prenatal Practice: Examining Clinical Utility, Ethical Implications, Payer Coverage, and Data Integration in a Diverse Population.
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 13, 2022
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 13, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Whole Exome Sequencing

Following consent and collection of standardized phenotypic data, probands and biological parents will undergo WES with variant analysis conducted utilizing primary gene lists based on referring clinical indication. After results provision and follow up 6-12 months later, clinical utility will be assessed in those with a positive result (pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant) and those with negative results (no variant returned or a VUS) using specific outcomes at each site to examine effectiveness for both the child and family.

Diagnostic Test: Whole Exome Sequencing
Whole Exome Sequencing is a form of Next Generation Sequencing allowing investigators to assess the coding regions of many thousands of genes to find variants implicated in disease.
Other Names:
  • Next Generation Sequencing
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Clinical Utility of WES [At the completion of data collection (follow-up visit at 6-12 months after return of results)]

      Our outcome will be an assessment of clinical utility in patients that receive a positive (pathogenic or likely pathogenic) result. Clinical utility will be measured with a quantitative score based on changes in medical care, such as starting or ceasing medications or medical surveillance, investigations, other forms of treatments and specialist visits and prognosis.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    N/A to 18 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Presenting clinical features suggestive of a genetic etiology, including intellectual disability, seizures, multiple congenital anomalies, metabolic conditions, and neurodegenerative conditions or idiopathic cerebral palsy.

    2. A minimum of one biological parent is available and willing to provide a specimen for WES, with a preference for two available parents. At least one parent consenting to WES of the child.

    3. Pediatric patients must have had at least one prior genetics appointment or evaluation

    4. Pediatric patients may have had a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array or oligonucleotide array that did not provide a diagnosis.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Prior WES performed for a clinical or research indication

    2. Lack of phenotypic indication of a likely underlying genetic etiology

    3. Both biological parents are unavailable.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 UCSF Fresno Fresno California United States 93701
    2 UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland Oakland California United States 94609
    3 Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital San Francisco California United States 94110
    4 Benioff Children's Hospital Mission Bay San Francisco California United States 94158

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of California, San Francisco
    • National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Pui-Yan Kwok, MD/PhD, University of California, San Francisco
    • Principal Investigator: Barbara Koenig, PhD, University of California, San Francisco
    • Principal Investigator: Mary Norton, MD, University of California, San Francisco

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    University of California, San Francisco
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03525431
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 1U01HG009599-01
    • U01HG009599
    First Posted:
    May 15, 2018
    Last Update Posted:
    May 31, 2022
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    Yes
    Keywords provided by University of California, San Francisco
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 31, 2022