ISO-UF: Hemodynamics in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients Undergoing Isolated Ultrafiltration Compared to Conventional Hemodialysis

Sponsor
Medical University of Graz (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05642156
Collaborator
(none)
32
1
2
13.9
2.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Patients treated with hemodialysis (HD) bear increased risk of cardiovascular events, which results in high morbidity and mortality among this cohort of patients. Intradialytic hypotension (IDH), which is an independent risk factor for mortality, occurs in up to 20% of hemodialysis session and may lead to myocardial stunning and cerebral ischemia resulting in increased white matter lesions, gastrointestinal ischemia and shunt vessel thrombosis. Due to the deleterious effects of IDH during HD, preventive measurements such as limiting interdialytic weight gain are recommended, but frequently fluid and salt restriction are not adhered to, thus increasing dialysis time or frequency of treatments is a common strategy in those patients.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: isolated Ultrafiltration (iso-UF)
N/A

Detailed Description

A KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) controversies conference suggested that isolated ultrafiltration (iso-UF) may provide a benefit in hemodynamic stability, but whether this translates into benefits in hard outcomes is unclear and requires further research. So called-sequential dialysis, that is, isolated ultrafiltration followed by HD is commonly recommended, but evidence is very limited and mainly based on small older studies.

In conclusion, the supposed benefit for intradialytic hemodynamic stability attributed to isolated ultrafiltration compared to hemodialysis seems to be due to less pronounced changes in vascular resistance, but the reason for this discrepancy is unclear. Thus far, recommendations for using iso-UF to improve hemodynamic stability are mainly based on old studies which may not be applicable to modern technique used nowadays. Furthermore, there is no standardized approach on how to use isolated ultrafiltration, with neither a time period nor ultrafiltration rate recommended by the guidelines.

In this study, the investigators try to assess changes in peripheral resistance, osmolality, cardiac output, and cardiac power index and try to establish exploratory correlations to IDH episodes. Furthermore, the investigators want to assess the impact on dialysis quality by reduced time on dialysis.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
32 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Hemodynamics in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients Undergoing Isolated Ultrafiltration Compared to Conventional Hemodialysis
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 2, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Sequential HD - Conventional HD

In sequence A patients will be treated with sequential HD first, for a total of 8 session and then switched to a conventional HD schedule for another 8 sessions.

Procedure: isolated Ultrafiltration (iso-UF)
isolated Ultrafiltration

Active Comparator: Conventional HD - Sequential HD

In sequence A patients will be treated with conventional HD first, for a total of 8 session and then switched to a sequential HD schedule for another 8 sessions.

Procedure: isolated Ultrafiltration (iso-UF)
isolated Ultrafiltration

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Total peripheral resistance index (TPRI) [up to 8 weeks]

    Absolute change of TPRI (expressed as dyn*sec/cm*m2) in each individual session from baseline to the nadir.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Written consent of the participant after being informed

  • At least 18 years of age

  • End stage kidney disease patient undergoing hemodialysis

  • Dry weight stable for a minimum of one month

  • Interdialytic weight gain of >2 liters in the short interdialytic interval

Exclusion Criteria:
  • No informed consent was obtained

  • Patients with a pacemaker or implanted medical device that prevents compliance with study regulations

  • Patients treated with hemodiafiltration

  • Patients treated with medium cut-off membranes (Theranova, Baxter)

  • Patients with recurrent severe hyperkalemia after the short interdialytic interval (K+ concentration > 6.0 mmol/L, requiring more than 2 hours of dialysis to ameliorate the post-dialytic shift from other compartments.

  • Women of childbearing age not using contraception

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Medical University of Graz Graz Austria

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Medical University of Graz

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Medical University of Graz
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05642156
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • ISO-UF
First Posted:
Dec 8, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Dec 8, 2022
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Medical University of Graz
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 8, 2022