Trial of Fistula Versus Graft in Elderly Patients

Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03668002
Collaborator
(none)
50
1
2
71.6
0.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This open-label pilot randomized controlled trial will test the feasibility and safety of randomizing patients over 65 years old who start hemodialysis with a tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC), and are eligible to receive either arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG), to an AVF strategy (comparator) or to an AVG strategy (intervention). The primary outcome is feasibility, which we will assess by measuring: (1) the proportion of randomized participants who receive the assigned arteriovenous access; and (2) the annual rate of enrollment in the study, accounting for the number of surgeons who participate. Secondary outcomes will include perioperative morbidity and mortality, catheter removal rates, additional procedures performed, and the reasons a patient may not receive the assigned AV access.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF)
  • Procedure: Arteriovenous Graft (AVG)
N/A

Detailed Description

End-stage renal disease requiring dialysis affects approximately 400,000 patients in the United States with 100,000 new patients starting dialysis annually. The vast majority of those patients utilize hemodialysis (HD), and of that group, approximately 80% start with a tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC). Current guidelines discourage TDC, due to the risk of serious complications like bloodstream infections, central venous stenosis, and an associated increased mortality risk. The preferred alternative is an arteriovenous (AV) access, either native arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) or prosthetic arteriovenous grafts (AVG). AVF are considered the ideal long-term vascular access due to longer patency, lower costs, and an association with longer survival as compared to AVG when they successfully mature. However, AVF frequently require many months to mature after being constructed and have high primary failure rates (i.e., inability to be used without revision); AVG typically perform better short term, enabling early TDC removal and reduction in catheter related harms, but higher rates of failure and complications long term.

In older populations, multiple studies have suggested that the elderly population may not benefit from AVF as opposed to AVG, due to high AVF primary failure rates and overall abbreviated life expectancy that minimizes any possible long-term benefit with AVF.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This open-label pilot randomized controlled trial will test the feasibility and safety of randomizing patients over 65 years old who start hemodialysis with a TDC (the most common initial type of HD access), and are eligible to receive either AVF or AVG, to an AVF strategy (comparator) or to an AVG strategy (intervention). We will enroll 50 patients. Participants will provide informed consent, and they will be assigned to the AVF or AVG arms. The primary outcome is feasibility, which we will assess by measuring: (1) the annual rate of enrollment in the study, accounting for the number of surgeons who participate; and (2) the proportion of randomized participants who receive the assigned AV access. Secondary outcomes will include perioperative morbidity and mortality, catheter removal rates, additional procedures performed, and the reasons a patient may not receive the assigned AV access after randomization.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
50 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
This study will provide preliminary data and possibly demonstrate feasibility of a large scale randomized controlled trial comparing AVF and AVG in elderly patients (defined as patients over 65 years of age) receiving hemodialysis through a TDC.This study will provide preliminary data and possibly demonstrate feasibility of a large scale randomized controlled trial comparing AVF and AVG in elderly patients (defined as patients over 65 years of age) receiving hemodialysis through a TDC.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Randomized Trial of Fistula Versus Graft in Elderly Patients Pilot Study (RIGEL Pilot)
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 14, 2018
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 31, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 31, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF)

If the participant is randomized to the AVF arm of the trial, the surgeon will connect an artery to a vein in the upper extremity, without using artificial material as conduit.

Procedure: Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF)
If the participant is randomized to the AVF arm of the trial, the surgeon will connect an artery to a vein in the upper extremity, without using artificial material as conduit.

Active Comparator: Arteriovenous Graft (AVG)

If the participant is randomized to the AVG arm of the trial, the surgeon will place a synthetic graft connecting an artery and vein under the skin in an upper extremity.

Procedure: Arteriovenous Graft (AVG)
If the participant is randomized to the AVG arm of the trial, the surgeon will place a synthetic graft connecting an artery and vein under the skin in an upper extremity.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Proportion of subjects that received assigned AV access (AVF vs. AVG) [12 months]

    Adherence to assigned AV access (AVF vs. AVG) during randomization will be measured, expressed as a proportion of all subjects randomized.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Rate of accrual of subjects to the study [12 months]

    Rate of subjects successfully randomized, expressed as subjects per year per surgeon.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
65 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Age greater than 65 years old.

  • On hemodialysis through a tunneled dialysis catheter.

  • In the surgeon's opinion, both a fistula and a graft can be reasonably attempted, based on the patient's anatomy.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Unable to provide informed consent.

  • Unable to be medically cleared for surgery

  • Does not wish to have surgery.

  • Does not wish to be randomized.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania United States 15213

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Pittsburgh

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Theodore Yuo, MD MSc, University of Pittsburgh

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Theodore Yuo, Assistant Professor, University of Pittsburgh
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03668002
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • PRO17100473
First Posted:
Sep 12, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Aug 10, 2022
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Theodore Yuo, Assistant Professor, University of Pittsburgh
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 10, 2022