ZoptEC: Zoptarelin Doxorubicin (AEZS 108) as Second Line Therapy for Endometrial Cancer

Sponsor
AEterna Zentaris (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01767155
Collaborator
(none)
511
123
2
46
4.2
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Open-label, randomized, active-controlled, two-arm Phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of AEZS-108 and doxorubicin.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Detailed Description

The study will include about 500 patients with endometrial cancer resistant to platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
511 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Randomized Controlled Study Comparing AEZS-108 With Doxorubicin as Second Line Therapy for Locally Advanced, Recurrent or Metastatic Endometrial Cancer.
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 30, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 30, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: AEZS-108 / zoptarelin doxorubicin

267 mg/m^2 by 2-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles up to 9 cycles

Drug: AEZS-108 / zoptarelin doxorubicin
267 mg/m^2 by 2-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles for a maximum of 9 cycles
Other Names:
  • AEZS-108
  • Active Comparator: doxorubicin/ standard chemotherapy

    60 mg/m^2 by intravenous bolus injection or 1-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles

    Drug: doxorubicin
    60 mg/m^2 by intravenous bolus injection or 1-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Compare the Overall Survival (OS) of Patients Treated With AEZS-108 to the OS of Patients Treated With Doxorubicin. [From randomization to death from any cause. During ongoing treatment: response evaluation every 3 cycles. For patients gone of treatment: re-assessment every 12 weeks.]

      Overall survival was defined as the elapsed time from randomization to death from any cause. For surviving patients, follow-up was to be censored at the date of last contact. The final analysis, which was event-based, was conducted after approximately 384 randomized patients had died. A log-rank test with an overall two sided Type I Error rate of 0.05 after taking the interim analyses into account was used to compare OS between the two treatment arms via a SAS (Statistical Analysis System) LIFETEST procedure. Kaplan Meier estimates were used to calculate median OS and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the median OS. The proportion of patients alive at 6 and 12 months (from randomization date) and the 95% CIs for these estimated proportions were calculated.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Compare Efficacy Based on Objective Response Rate (ORR). [3 years]

      The ORR was defined as the sum of the Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR). CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) was to have a reduction in the short axis to <10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. All responses were confirmed at least 4 weeks after the initial response was observed. Tumor assessments occurred every 3 cycles (± 7 days) during ongoing treatment then every 3 months (± 7 days) thereafter while the patient was on study. The last assessment occurred either when progression was confirmed or when approximately 384 randomized patients had died.

    2. Compare Efficacy Based on Progression-free Survival (PFS). [During ongoing treatment: response evaluation every 3 cycles. For patients gone of treatment: re-assessment every 12 weeks.]

      Progression-free survival (PFS): days between randomization and the date of documented progression or death for any cause that occurred up to the end of the study. For patients whose progression status could not be determined, their PFS data was censored for the last adequate progression assessment date that the patient was confirmed to have no progression. Response and progression were to be evaluated using the international criteria proposed by the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline (version 1.1). Changes in the largest diameter (uni-dimensional measurement) of the tumor lesions and the shortest diameter in the case of malignant lymph nodes were to be used. During ongoing treatment, patients were to be re-evaluated for response every 3 cycles (i.e. every 9 weeks). A subsequent scan was obtained no earlier than 4 weeks following the initial documentation of an objective status of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).

    3. Compare Efficacy Based on Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR). [3 years]

      Clinical benefit was defined as having stable disease (SD) or better lasting for at least 9 weeks. The CBR was analyzed using the same methods for the ORR analyses. The analysis of CBR (CR+PR+SD) was performed in the ITT (intention-to-treat) population. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) was to have a reduction in the short axis to <10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. All responses were confirmed at least 4 weeks after the initial response was observed. Tumor assessments occurred every 3 cycles (± 7 days) during ongoing treatment then every 3 months (± 7 days) thereafter while the patient was on study. The last assessment occurred either when progression was confirmed or when approximately 384 randomized patients had died.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Women ≥ 18 years of age

    2. Histologically confirmed endometrial cancer

    3. Advanced (FIGO stage III or IV), recurrent or metastatic disease.

    4. Measurable or non-measurable disease that has progressed since last treatment.

      1. Patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer who have received one chemotherapeutic regimen with platinum and taxane (either as adjuvant or as first line treatment) and who have progressed.
    5. Availability of fresh or archival FFPE (formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded) tumor specimens for analysis of LHRH (luteinizing hormone releasing hormone) receptor expression.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status > 2.

    2. Inadequate hematologic, hepatic or renal function

    3. Red blood cell transfusion within 2 weeks prior to anticipated start of study treatment.

    4. History of myocardial infarction, acute inflammatory heart disease, unstable angina, or uncontrolled arrhythmia within the past 6 months.

    5. Impaired cardiac function defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50 % (or below the study site's lower limit of normal) as measured by MUGA (multigated radionuclide angiography) or ECHO (echocardiography).

    6. Concomitant use of prohibited therapy (specified in protocol)

    7. Chemo-, immune-, or hormone-therapy within 5 elimination half life times or 4 weeks prior to randomization, whichever is the shorter. Radiotherapy (including pre- or post-operative brachytherapy) within 4 weeks prior to randomization.

    8. Previous anthracycline-based chemotherapy (daunorubicin, doxorubicin, epirubicin, idarubicin, mitoxantrone and valrubicin), in any formulation.

    9. Anticipated ongoing concomitant anticancer therapy during the study.

    10. History of serious co-morbidity or uncontrolled illness that would preclude study therapy, such as active tuberculosis or any other active infection.

    11. Brain metastasis, leptomeningeal disease.

    12. Pregnant or lactating female or female of child-bearing potential not employing adequate contraception.

    13. Subjects with known hypersensitivity to peptide drugs, including LHRH agonists.

    14. Receipt of 2 or more prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens for advanced, recurrent, or metastatic endometrial cancer.

    15. Prior treatment with AEZS-108.

    16. Use of LHRH agonist or antagonist treatment within 6 months prior to randomization.

    17. Malignancy within last 5 years except non-melanoma skin cancer.

    18. Any concomitant disease or condition which would interfere with the subjects' proper completion of the protocol assignment.

    19. Concomitant or recent treatment with other investigational drug (within 4 weeks or 5 elimination half life times prior to anticipated start of study treatment).

    20. Lack of ability or willingness to give informed consent.

    21. Anticipated non-availability for study visits/procedures.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center Phoenix Arizona United States 85013
    2 USC Norris Hospital and LAC+USC Medical Center Los Angeles California United States 90033
    3 University of California, Irvine - Medical Center Orange California United States 92868-3200
    4 University of Colorado Aurora Colorado United States 80045
    5 Hartford Hospital Hartford Connecticut United States 06106
    6 The Hospital of Central Connecticut New Britain Connecticut United States 06050
    7 Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa Florida United States 33612
    8 Northside Hospital Atlanta Georgia United States 30342
    9 Northwestern University Chicago Illinois United States 60611
    10 University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City Iowa United States 52242
    11 Women's Cancer Center Covington Louisiana United States 70433
    12 University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center Baltimore Maryland United States 21201
    13 Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Boston Massachusetts United States 02114
    14 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts United States 02215
    15 Washington University School of Medecine Saint Louis Missouri United States 63110
    16 Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Institute New York New York United States 10065
    17 Hope Women's Cancer Centers / Mission Hospital, Inc. Asheville North Carolina United States 28806
    18 Levine Cancer Institute Charlotte North Carolina United States 28204
    19 Roger Maris Cancer Center Fargo North Dakota United States 58122
    20 Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio United States 43210
    21 Peggy and Charles Oklahoma Cancer Center Oklahoma City Oklahoma United States 73104
    22 Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC Charleston South Carolina United States 29425
    23 Sanford Research/USD Sioux Falls South Dakota United States 57104
    24 University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas United States 75390-9179
    25 University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia United States 22908
    26 Inova Fairfax Hospitals Falls Church Virginia United States 22024
    27 Henrico Doctor's Hospital Richmond Virginia United States 23229
    28 Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc. Milwaukee Wisconsin United States 53226
    29 Medizinische Universität Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria 6020
    30 Alexandrov National Cancer centre of Belarus Minsk Belarus 223040
    31 Minsk City Clinical Oncologic Dispensary Minsk Belarus
    32 Mogilev Regional Clinical Oncologic Dispensary Mogilev Belarus 212018
    33 Vitebsk Regional Clinical Oncologic Dispensary Vitebsk Belarus 210603
    34 Institut Jules Bordet Brussels Belgium 1000
    35 UZ Leuven - Campus Gasthuisberg Leuven Belgium
    36 Hospital Centre Liege University_CHU Sart Tilman Liege Belgium 4000
    37 CHWAPI Tournai Belgium 7500
    38 Clinical Center Banja Luka, Oncology Clinic Banja Luka Bosnia and Herzegovina 78000
    39 University Clinical Hospital Mostar, Oncology clinic Mostar Bosnia and Herzegovina 88000
    40 Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina 71000
    41 Specialized Hospital for Active Treatment in Obstetrics and Gynecology Pleven Bulgaria
    42 Cross Cancer Institute Edmonton Alberta Canada T6G 1Z2
    43 Princess Margaret Cancer Center Toronto Ontario Canada M5G 2M9
    44 Hopital Notre Dame - CHUM Montreal Quebec Canada H2L 4M1
    45 McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada H2W 1S6
    46 Royal Victoria Hospital Montreal Quebec Canada H3A 1A1
    47 Hotel Dieu de Quebec- CHUQ Quebec Canada G1R 2J6
    48 Masarykův onkologický ústav Brno Czechia 65653
    49 Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc Olomouc Czechia 77520
    50 Všeobecná fakultní nemocnice v Praze Praha Czechia 12851
    51 Copenhagen University Hospital "Rigshospitalet" Copenhagen Denmark 2100
    52 Herlev Hospital Herlev Denmark 2730
    53 Kuopio University Hospital Kuopio Finland 70029 KYS
    54 Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland 33521
    55 Turku University Central Hospital Turku Finland 20521
    56 Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst Frankfurt Germany 65929
    57 Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Universitäts-Frauenklinik, Abteilung für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe Göttingen Germany
    58 Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie Martin Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg Halle Germany 06097
    59 Universitätsklinikum Köln Köln Germany 50931
    60 University Clinic Münster Münster Germany 48149
    61 Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der Universität Regensburg am Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef Regensburg Germany
    62 Mater Misericordiae University Hospital Dublin Ireland 7
    63 Mater Private Hospital Dublin Ireland 7
    64 St James's Hospital Dublin Ireland 8
    65 University Hospital Galway Galway Ireland
    66 Waterford Regional Hospital Waterford Ireland
    67 Barzilai Medical Center Ashkelon Israel 78278
    68 Rambam Health Care Campus Haifa Israel 31096
    69 Hadassah Hospital Jerusalem Israel 91120
    70 Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center Petah-Tikva Israel 49100
    71 Oncology Institute Kaplan Rehovot Israel 76100
    72 Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Tel Aviv Israel 64239
    73 Chaim Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer Israel 52661
    74 Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari Bari Italy 70124
    75 Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Modena Italy 41124
    76 Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Napoli Italy 80131
    77 Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS Padova Italy 35128
    78 Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord Pesaro Italy 61122
    79 Policlinico A. Gemelli Rome Italy 00168
    80 Academic Medical Center Amsterdam Netherlands 1105
    81 Maastricht University Medical Center (UMC) Maastricht Netherlands 6229 HX
    82 Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway 5021
    83 The Norwegian Radium Hospital Oslo Norway 0310
    84 Helse Stavanger HF, Stavanger Universitetssjukhus Stavanger Norway NO-4068
    85 Bialostockie Centrum Onkologii Bialystok Poland 15-027
    86 I Klinika Ginekologii Onkologicznej i Ginekologii Lublin Poland 20-081
    87 Wojewodzki Szpital Specjalistyczny Olsztyn Poland 10-561
    88 NZOZ Magodent, Szpital Onkologiczny Warszawa Poland 03-291
    89 Centrum Terapii Współczesnej ul. Łódź Poland 90-242
    90 Oncolab Craiova Dolj County Romania 200385
    91 Spitalul Clinic Judetean Mures Targu Mures Mures County Romania 540072
    92 Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuta" Cluj Npaoca Romania 400015
    93 Centru de Oncologie Sf. Nectarie Craiova Romania
    94 Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta "Sf. Ioan cel Nou" Suceava Romania 720237
    95 Oncomed Timisoara Romania 300239
    96 GAUZ "Republican Clinical Oncology Center" Kazan Republic Of Tatarstan Russian Federation 420029
    97 FGBU "RONC n.a. N.N. Blokhin" Moscow Russian Federation 115478
    98 Nizhny Novgorod Regional Oncology Dispensary Nizhny Novgorod Russian Federation 603081
    99 Pyatigorsk Regional Oncology Dispensary Pyatigorsk Russian Federation
    100 FGBU "NIIO n.a. N.N. Petrov" Saint-Petersburg Russian Federation
    101 Budget Institution of Health / Leningrad Regional Oncological Dispensary St. Petersburg Russian Federation 191014
    102 Saint-Petersburg State Budgetary Institution Healthcare "City Clinical Oncology Center" St. Petersburg Russian Federation 198255
    103 Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary Ufa Russian Federation 450071
    104 Volgograd Regional Oncology Dispensary #3 Volzhskiy Russian Federation
    105 Hospital Vall d´Hebron Barcelona Spain
    106 MD Anderson cáncer center Madrid Spain 28033
    107 Ramon Y Cajal Hospital Madrid Spain 28034
    108 Hospital Clínico San Carlos Madrid Spain 28040
    109 Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre Madrid Spain 28045
    110 Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia Valencia Spain 46009
    111 Zina Memorial Cancer Hospital (LISSOD) Plyuty Kiev Region Ukraine 08720
    112 Municipal institution "Dnipropetrovsk City Multidisciplinary Clinical Hospital No. 4" Dnepropetrovsk Ukraine 49102
    113 CCMP I Donetsk Regional Anticancer Center Donetsk Ukraine 83092
    114 Public health enterprise "Kharkov regional Clinical Oncological Center" Kharkov Ukraine 61070
    115 Kiev City Clinical Oncology Center Kiev Ukraine 03115
    116 Zakarpatskyi Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary Uzhgorod Ukraine 88014
    117 Vinnitsa Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary Vinnitsa Ukraine 21029
    118 The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Sutton Surrey United Kingdom SM2 5PT
    119 The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust Bebington Wirral United Kingdom CH63 4JY
    120 University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust Coventry United Kingdom CV2 2DX
    121 St James's University Hospital Leeds United Kingdom LS9 7TF
    122 Imperial college Healthcare NHS Trust London United Kingdom
    123 Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust Nottingham United Kingdom NG5 1PB

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • AEterna Zentaris

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: David S Miller, MD, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
    • Principal Investigator: Hani Gabra, MD, Imperial College London Hammersmith Campus, London, UK

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    AEterna Zentaris
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01767155
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • AEZS-108-050
    First Posted:
    Jan 14, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 31, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2018
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title AEZS-108 / Zoptarelin Doxorubicin Doxorubicin/ Standard Chemotherapy
    Arm/Group Description 267 mg/m2 by 2-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles up to 9 cycles AEZS-108 / zoptarelin doxorubicin: 267 mg/m2 by 2-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles for a maximum of 9 cycles 60 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus injection or 1-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles doxorubicin: 60 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus injection or 1-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 256 255
    Modified ITT (mITT) 252 249
    Safety Population (SAF) 252 249
    COMPLETED 243 240
    NOT COMPLETED 13 15

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title AEZS-108 / Zoptarelin Doxorubicin Doxorubicin/ Standard Chemotherapy Total
    Arm/Group Description 267 mg/m2 by 2-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles up to 9 cycles AEZS-108 / zoptarelin doxorubicin: 267 mg/m2 by 2-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles for a maximum of 9 cycles 60 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus injection or 1-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles doxorubicin: 60 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus injection or 1-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 256 255 511
    Age (Count of Participants)
    <=18 years
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Between 18 and 65 years
    130
    50.8%
    136
    53.3%
    266
    52.1%
    >=65 years
    126
    49.2%
    119
    46.7%
    245
    47.9%
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    63.7
    (8.63)
    63.8
    (8.81)
    63.7
    (8.71)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    256
    100%
    255
    100%
    511
    100%
    Male
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants)
    White
    237
    92.6%
    240
    94.1%
    477
    93.3%
    Black or African American
    10
    3.9%
    7
    2.7%
    17
    3.3%
    Asian
    6
    2.3%
    5
    2%
    11
    2.2%
    Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    1
    0.4%
    1
    0.4%
    2
    0.4%
    Other
    1
    0.4%
    2
    0.8%
    3
    0.6%
    Unknown
    1
    0.4%
    0
    0%
    1
    0.2%
    ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) PS (Performance Status) (Count of Participants)
    0
    120
    46.9%
    125
    49%
    245
    47.9%
    1
    121
    47.3%
    118
    46.3%
    239
    46.8%
    2
    15
    5.9%
    11
    4.3%
    26
    5.1%
    unknown
    0
    0%
    1
    0.4%
    1
    0.2%
    Stage of endometrial cancer at study entry (Count of Participants)
    Advanced (FIGO III or IV)
    99
    38.7%
    94
    36.9%
    193
    37.8%
    Metastatic
    86
    33.6%
    90
    35.3%
    176
    34.4%
    Recurrent
    71
    27.7%
    71
    27.8%
    142
    27.8%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Compare the Overall Survival (OS) of Patients Treated With AEZS-108 to the OS of Patients Treated With Doxorubicin.
    Description Overall survival was defined as the elapsed time from randomization to death from any cause. For surviving patients, follow-up was to be censored at the date of last contact. The final analysis, which was event-based, was conducted after approximately 384 randomized patients had died. A log-rank test with an overall two sided Type I Error rate of 0.05 after taking the interim analyses into account was used to compare OS between the two treatment arms via a SAS (Statistical Analysis System) LIFETEST procedure. Kaplan Meier estimates were used to calculate median OS and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the median OS. The proportion of patients alive at 6 and 12 months (from randomization date) and the 95% CIs for these estimated proportions were calculated.
    Time Frame From randomization to death from any cause. During ongoing treatment: response evaluation every 3 cycles. For patients gone of treatment: re-assessment every 12 weeks.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title AEZS-108 / Zoptarelin Doxorubicin Doxorubicin/ Standard Chemotherapy
    Arm/Group Description 267 mg/m2 by 2-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles up to 9 cycles AEZS-108 / zoptarelin doxorubicin: 267 mg/m2 by 2-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles for a maximum of 9 cycles 60 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus injection or 1-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles doxorubicin: 60 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus injection or 1-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles
    Measure Participants 256 255
    Death Events
    196
    76.6%
    188
    73.7%
    Censored
    60
    23.4%
    67
    26.3%
    Survivors at 6 months
    171
    66.8%
    174
    68.2%
    Survivors at 12 months
    111
    43.4%
    106
    41.6%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AEZS-108 / Zoptarelin Doxorubicin
    Comments Kaplan-Meier log-log transformed estimates: survivors at 6 months
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Kaplan-Meier
    Estimated Value 69.8
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    63.6 to 75.1
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AEZS-108 / Zoptarelin Doxorubicin
    Comments Kaplan-Meier log-log transformed estimates: survivors at 12 months
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Kaplan-Meier
    Estimated Value 45.8
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    39.5 to 52.0
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Doxorubicin/ Standard Chemotherapy
    Comments Kaplan-Meier log-log transformed estimates: survivors at 6 months
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Kaplan-Meier
    Estimated Value 72.1
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    66.0 to 77.3
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Doxorubicin/ Standard Chemotherapy
    Comments Kaplan-Meier log-log transformed estimates: survivors at 12 months
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Kaplan-Meier
    Estimated Value 44.6
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    38.2 to 50.7
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AEZS-108 / Zoptarelin Doxorubicin, Doxorubicin/ Standard Chemotherapy
    Comments A Cox model with treatment effects was used to estimate the hazard ratio and perform hypothesis testing. The estimated hazard ratio and the 95% CI of the hazard ratio were presented.
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5441
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments 2-sided
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.06
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.87 to 1.30
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Compare Efficacy Based on Objective Response Rate (ORR).
    Description The ORR was defined as the sum of the Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR). CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) was to have a reduction in the short axis to <10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. All responses were confirmed at least 4 weeks after the initial response was observed. Tumor assessments occurred every 3 cycles (± 7 days) during ongoing treatment then every 3 months (± 7 days) thereafter while the patient was on study. The last assessment occurred either when progression was confirmed or when approximately 384 randomized patients had died.
    Time Frame 3 years

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title AEZS-108 / Zoptarelin Doxorubicin Doxorubicin/ Standard Chemotherapy
    Arm/Group Description 267 mg/m2 by 2-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles up to 9 cycles AEZS-108 / zoptarelin doxorubicin: 267 mg/m2 by 2-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles for a maximum of 9 cycles 60 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus injection or 1-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles doxorubicin: 60 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus injection or 1-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles
    Measure Participants 256 255
    CR
    6
    2.3%
    5
    2%
    PR
    26
    10.2%
    31
    12.2%
    ORR
    32
    12.5%
    36
    14.1%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AEZS-108 / Zoptarelin Doxorubicin, Doxorubicin/ Standard Chemotherapy
    Comments Hypothesis testing between the two treatment arms was performed using a Mantel Haenszel test. The odds ratio and 95% CI of the odds ratio were presented.
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5907
    Comments
    Method Mantel Haenszel
    Comments 2-sided test
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
    Estimated Value 0.87
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.52 to 1.45
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Compare Efficacy Based on Progression-free Survival (PFS).
    Description Progression-free survival (PFS): days between randomization and the date of documented progression or death for any cause that occurred up to the end of the study. For patients whose progression status could not be determined, their PFS data was censored for the last adequate progression assessment date that the patient was confirmed to have no progression. Response and progression were to be evaluated using the international criteria proposed by the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline (version 1.1). Changes in the largest diameter (uni-dimensional measurement) of the tumor lesions and the shortest diameter in the case of malignant lymph nodes were to be used. During ongoing treatment, patients were to be re-evaluated for response every 3 cycles (i.e. every 9 weeks). A subsequent scan was obtained no earlier than 4 weeks following the initial documentation of an objective status of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).
    Time Frame During ongoing treatment: response evaluation every 3 cycles. For patients gone of treatment: re-assessment every 12 weeks.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The population analyzed is the mITT. PFS was analyzed in the subset of patients from mITT that have CR, PR or stable disease (SD) as best overall response.
    Arm/Group Title AEZS-108 / Zoptarelin Doxorubicin Doxorubicin/ Standard Chemotherapy
    Arm/Group Description 267 mg/m2 by 2-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles up to 9 cycles AEZS-108 / zoptarelin doxorubicin: 267 mg/m2 by 2-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles for a maximum of 9 cycles 60 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus injection or 1-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles doxorubicin: 60 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus injection or 1-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles
    Measure Participants 252 249
    PFS events
    166
    64.8%
    148
    58%
    Censored
    90
    35.2%
    107
    42%
    Progression Free Survivors at 6 months
    69
    27%
    51
    20%
    Progression Free Survivors at 12 months
    28
    10.9%
    12
    4.7%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AEZS-108 / Zoptarelin Doxorubicin
    Comments Kaplan-Meier log-log transformed estimates: survivors at 6 months.
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Kaplan-Meier
    Estimated Value 46.7
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    39.5 to 53.6
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AEZS-108 / Zoptarelin Doxorubicin
    Comments Kaplan-Meier log-log transformed estimates: survivors at 12 months
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Kaplan-Meier
    Estimated Value 20.6
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    14.6 to 27.4
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Doxorubicin/ Standard Chemotherapy
    Comments Kaplan-Meier log-log transformed estimates: survivors at 6 months
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Kaplan-Meier
    Estimated Value 47.5
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    40.0 to 54.7
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Doxorubicin/ Standard Chemotherapy
    Comments Kaplan-Meier log-log transformed estimates: survivors at 12 months
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Kaplan-Meier
    Estimated Value 12.3
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    6.9 to 19.3
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AEZS-108 / Zoptarelin Doxorubicin, Doxorubicin/ Standard Chemotherapy
    Comments Hypothesis testing between the two treatment arms was performed using a log rank test.
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3089
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments 2-sided
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.89
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.71 to 1.11
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Compare Efficacy Based on Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR).
    Description Clinical benefit was defined as having stable disease (SD) or better lasting for at least 9 weeks. The CBR was analyzed using the same methods for the ORR analyses. The analysis of CBR (CR+PR+SD) was performed in the ITT (intention-to-treat) population. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) was to have a reduction in the short axis to <10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. All responses were confirmed at least 4 weeks after the initial response was observed. Tumor assessments occurred every 3 cycles (± 7 days) during ongoing treatment then every 3 months (± 7 days) thereafter while the patient was on study. The last assessment occurred either when progression was confirmed or when approximately 384 randomized patients had died.
    Time Frame 3 years

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title AEZS-108 / Zoptarelin Doxorubicin Doxorubicin/ Standard Chemotherapy
    Arm/Group Description 267 mg/m2 by 2-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles up to 9 cycles AEZS-108 / zoptarelin doxorubicin: 267 mg/m2 by 2-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles for a maximum of 9 cycles 60 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus injection or 1-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles doxorubicin: 60 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus injection or 1-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles
    Measure Participants 256 255
    CR
    6
    2.3%
    5
    2%
    PR
    26
    10.2%
    31
    12.2%
    SD
    106
    41.4%
    102
    40%
    Progressive Disease (PD)
    65
    25.4%
    67
    26.3%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection AEZS-108 / Zoptarelin Doxorubicin, Doxorubicin/ Standard Chemotherapy
    Comments Hypothesis testing between the two treatment arms was performed using a Mantel Haenszel test.
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6924
    Comments
    Method Mantel Haenszel
    Comments 2-sided
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
    Estimated Value 1.07
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.76 to 1.52
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Approx. over 3 years, during the whole duration of the trial.
    Adverse Event Reporting Description The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE; version 4.03 or subsequent ones) were to be used for the grading of severity of symptoms and abnormal findings.
    Arm/Group Title AEZS-108 / Zoptarelin Doxorubicin Doxorubicin/ Standard Chemotherapy
    Arm/Group Description 267 mg/m^2 by 2-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles up to 9 cycles AEZS-108 / zoptarelin doxorubicin: 267 mg/m2 by 2-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles for a maximum of 9 cycles 60 mg/m^2 by intravenous bolus injection or 1-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles doxorubicin: 60 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus injection or 1-hour intravenous infusion, on Day 1 of 21-day (3-week) cycles
    All Cause Mortality
    AEZS-108 / Zoptarelin Doxorubicin Doxorubicin/ Standard Chemotherapy
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 196/252 (77.8%) 188/249 (75.5%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    AEZS-108 / Zoptarelin Doxorubicin Doxorubicin/ Standard Chemotherapy
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 92/252 (36.5%) 75/249 (30.1%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Neutropenia 21/252 (8.3%) 15/249 (6%)
    Anemia 16/252 (6.3%) 9/249 (3.6%)
    Febrile neutropenia 17/252 (6.7%) 8/249 (3.2%)
    Thrombocytopenia 8/252 (3.2%) 3/249 (1.2%)
    Leukopenia 4/252 (1.6%) 6/249 (2.4%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Nause 11/252 (4.4%) 8/249 (3.2%)
    Vomiting 7/252 (2.8%) 9/249 (3.6%)
    Intestinal obstruction 6/252 (2.4%) 2/249 (0.8%)
    Abdominal pain 5/252 (2%) 3/249 (1.2%)
    Small intestinal obstruction 3/252 (1.2%) 4/249 (1.6%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Dehydratation 8/252 (3.2%) 2/249 (0.8%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Pulmonary embolism 7/252 (2.8%) 5/249 (2%)
    Dyspnoe 6/252 (2.4%) 1/249 (0.4%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    AEZS-108 / Zoptarelin Doxorubicin Doxorubicin/ Standard Chemotherapy
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 239/252 (94.8%) 240/249 (96.4%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Neutropenia 132/252 (52.4%) 126/249 (50.6%)
    Aneamia 107/252 (42.5%) 101/249 (40.6%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Nausea 120/252 (47.6%) 125/249 (50.2%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    According to the study protocol, "draft versions of abstracts or manuscripts must be made available to the co-authors and to the sponsor before any presentation of results or submission for publication. At least 3 weeks should be allowed for review and comment of an abstract and 4 weeks in case of a full paper, respectively. Multiple review cycles are usual for full papers and respective planning must account for this." In addition, the definitions per individual trial site agreement did apply.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Dr. Nicola Ammer
    Organization Aeterna Zentaris
    Phone +496942602 ext 3472
    Email nammer@aezsinc.com
    Responsible Party:
    AEterna Zentaris
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01767155
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • AEZS-108-050
    First Posted:
    Jan 14, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 31, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2018