Detection of SLN in Patients With Endometrial Cancer Undergoing Robotic Assisted Staging: Comparison of ISB and ICG
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesis is that if sensitivity and specificity are found to be significantly higher than the current reports with Technesium-99 and ISB colorimetric dye, SLN biopsies might allow omission of full lymphadenectomy in lower-risk cases, thereby limiting peri-operative morbidity. SLN biopsies might also improve the detection of metastatic disease, essentially lowering the recognized false-negative rate of standard lymphadenectomy analyzed by routine H&E pathologic analysis.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The study objective is to compare two sentinel lymph node detection technologies [fluorescence imaging and Indocyanine Green (ICG) dye verses standard laparoscopic colorimetric analysis using Isosulfan Blue (ISB) dye] for sensitivity and specificity of detecting metastatic disease in pelvic lymph nodes of women with endometrial cancer undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy. The following three specific aims would be addressed in this research proposal:
Specific Aim 1: To determine the ability of mapping bilaterally pelvic SLN in women with endometrial cancer undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic staging comparing two different methods (i.e., comparing the combination of colorimetric analysis-ISB dye + fluorescence imaging-ICG dye vs. colorimetric analysis-ISB dye alone).
Specific Aim 2: To estimate the negative predictive value (NPV) of pelvic SLN in endometrial cancer with respect to predicting nodal metastasis.
Specific Aim 3: To evaluate the ability of sentinel lymph nodes to increase the detection of metastatic disease through ultra-sectioning and immuno-histochemical (IHC) staining by comparing IHC results and standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) results.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: ISB dye, standard white light SLN mapping utilizing da Vinci surgical system with Isosulfan Blue (ISB) dye and standard white light imaging. |
Device: ISB dye and standard white light imaging
Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system and ISB dye with standard white light imaging.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: ICG dye, FireFly fluorescence imaging SLN mapping utilizing da Vinci surgical system with ISB dye and standard white light first, and then additionally, Indocyanine Green (ICG) dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging. |
Device: ISB dye and standard white light imaging
Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system and ISB dye with standard white light imaging.
Other Names:
Device: ICG dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging
Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system with ICG dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of Pelvic Sentinel Lymph Nodes (SLN) in Endometrial Cancer Patients Detected by Either ICG and/or ISB Dyes. [through 6 weeks post-operative]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of Pelvic SLN in Endometrial Cancer in Relation to the Number of Nodes With Metastasis. [through 6 weeks post-operative]
The standard definition for negative predictive value was used to calculate NPV. There was one false negative SLN in this study, 39 true positive sentinel lymph nodes, and 140 negative pelvic metastatic patients. NPV = 140/141=99.3%
Other Outcome Measures
- Number of Pelvic Sentinal Lymph Nodal Metastasis in Regard to Staining by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining in Comparison to Standard Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E). [through 6 weeks post-operative]
Of the 127 positive nodes with pathology information, the percentage of each type of node will be summarized by the staining method. Statistical testing of the individual staining methods compared to both will be computed using Chi-square test of independence.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
The patient must be ≥18 and ≤85 years of age.
-
The patient must be female.
-
The patient must be willing and able to provide informed consent.
-
The patient is willing and able to comply with the study protocol.
-
The patient has endometrial cancer and is scheduled for robotic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy.
-
The patient agrees to follow-up examinations out to 6-weeks post-treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
-
The patient is not a candidate for robotic assisted hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy.
-
The patient has known or suspected allergies to iodine, ICG or ISB.
-
The patient has hepatic dysfunction confirmed by elevated liver function studies (i.e., hepatic enzyme SGOT, SGPT or Bilirubin > 2 x normal (based on reference values from the laboratory used by the patient)
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Florida Hospital Gynecologic Oncology | Orlando | Florida | United States | 32804 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- AdventHealth
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Robert Holloway, MD, Florida Hospital Gynecologic Oncology
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- SLN Mapping
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | ISB Dye, Standard White Light | ICG Dye, FireFly Fluorescence Imaging |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | SLN mapping utilizing da Vinci surgical system with Isosulfan Blue (ISB) dye and standard white light imaging. ISB dye and standard white light imaging: Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system and ISB dye with standard white light imaging. | SLN mapping utilizing da Vinci surgical system with ISB dye and standard white light first, and then additionally, Indocyanine Green (ICG) dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging. ISB dye and standard white light imaging: Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system and ISB dye with standard white light imaging. ICG dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging: Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system with ICG dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 20 | 180 |
COMPLETED | 20 | 180 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | ISB Dye, Standard White Light | ICG Dye, FireFly Fluorescence Imaging | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | SLN mapping utilizing da Vinci surgical system with Isosulfan Blue (ISB) dye and standard white light imaging. ISB dye and standard white light imaging: Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system and ISB dye with standard white light imaging. | SLN mapping utilizing da Vinci surgical system with ISB dye and standard white light first, and then additionally, Indocyanine Green (ICG) dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging. ISB dye and standard white light imaging: Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system and ISB dye with standard white light imaging. ICG dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging: Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system with ICG dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 20 | 180 | 200 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
7
35%
|
79
43.9%
|
86
43%
|
>=65 years |
13
65%
|
101
56.1%
|
114
57%
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
20
100%
|
180
100%
|
200
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants) | |||
United States |
20
100%
|
180
100%
|
200
100%
|
Age (years) [Median (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Median (Standard Deviation) [years] |
66.0
(6.7)
|
64.4
(8.6)
|
64.5
(8.4)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Number of Pelvic Sentinel Lymph Nodes (SLN) in Endometrial Cancer Patients Detected by Either ICG and/or ISB Dyes. |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | through 6 weeks post-operative |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The ISB dye alone group (n=20) and the ICG group (n=180) are combined, because both groups received the ISB dye. |
Arm/Group Title | ISB Dye, Standard White Light | ICG Dye, FireFly Fluorescence Imaging |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | SLN mapping utilizing da Vinci surgical system with Isosulfan Blue (ISB) dye and standard white light imaging. ISB dye and standard white light imaging: Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system and ISB dye with standard white light imaging. | SLN mapping utilizing da Vinci surgical system with ISB dye and standard white light first, and then additionally, Indocyanine Green (ICG) dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging. ISB dye and standard white light imaging: Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system and ISB dye with standard white light imaging. ICG dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging: Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system with ICG dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging. |
Measure Participants | 200 | 180 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [nodes] |
1.25
(.901)
|
2.03
(.720)
|
Title | Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of Pelvic SLN in Endometrial Cancer in Relation to the Number of Nodes With Metastasis. |
---|---|
Description | The standard definition for negative predictive value was used to calculate NPV. There was one false negative SLN in this study, 39 true positive sentinel lymph nodes, and 140 negative pelvic metastatic patients. NPV = 140/141=99.3% |
Time Frame | through 6 weeks post-operative |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Comparison of metastatic disease (yes or no) with ICG dye node detection (yes or no) |
Arm/Group Title | ICG Negative | ICG Positive |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Experimental subjects with Indocyanine Green (ICG) negative test results | Experimental subjects with Indocyanine Green (ICG) positive test results |
Measure Participants | 141 | 39 |
Metastatic Disease |
1
5%
|
39
21.7%
|
Non Metastatic Disease |
140
700%
|
0
0%
|
Title | Number of Pelvic Sentinal Lymph Nodal Metastasis in Regard to Staining by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining in Comparison to Standard Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E). |
---|---|
Description | Of the 127 positive nodes with pathology information, the percentage of each type of node will be summarized by the staining method. Statistical testing of the individual staining methods compared to both will be computed using Chi-square test of independence. |
Time Frame | through 6 weeks post-operative |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These are positive sentinel lymph nodes |
Arm/Group Title | IHC Only | H&E Only | Both IHC and H&E |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Positive node identified with IHC dye only | Positive node identified with H&E only | Positive node identified with both IHC and H&E dye |
Measure Participants | NA | NA | NA |
Measure Nodes | 18 | 91 | 18 |
Sentinel Nodes |
16
|
31
|
16
|
Pelvic Nodes Only |
1
|
36
|
2
|
Aortic |
1
|
14
|
0
|
Infrarenal |
0
|
10
|
0
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Post-op follow up 6 weeks | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | ISB Only Adverse Events | ICG Adverse Events | ||
Arm/Group Description | ISB only Adverse Events categories reported during post-op follow up 6 weeks | ICG Adverse Events categories reported during post-op follow up 6 weeks | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
ISB Only Adverse Events | ICG Adverse Events | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
ISB Only Adverse Events | ICG Adverse Events | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/20 (0%) | 0/180 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
ISB Only Adverse Events | ICG Adverse Events | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 5/20 (25%) | 29/180 (16.1%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Blood and lymphatic system complications | 2/20 (10%) | 8/180 (4.4%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Cardiac complications | 1/20 (5%) | 3/180 (1.7%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Gastrointestinal complications | 0/20 (0%) | 3/180 (1.7%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
General disorders and administration site conditions | 1/20 (5%) | 4/180 (2.2%) | ||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Renal and urinary complications | 0/20 (0%) | 4/180 (2.2%) | ||
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||
Reproductive system complications | 2/20 (10%) | 7/180 (3.9%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Respiratory, thoracic, and pulmonary complications | 0/20 (0%) | 3/180 (1.7%) | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Cellulitis | 1/20 (5%) | 5/180 (2.8%) | ||
Surgical and medical procedures | ||||
Wound complications | 2/20 (10%) | 1/180 (0.6%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
Vascular complications | 1/20 (5%) | 0/180 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Robert W. Holloway |
---|---|
Organization | Florida Hospital Gynecologic Oncology |
Phone | 407-303-2400 |
robhollowaymd@gmail.com |
- SLN Mapping