Study to Compare the Oestradiol Suppression, Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Two Formulations of Triptorelin (Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month and Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month) in Chinese Subjects With Endometriosis
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
To assess the efficacy of triptorelin pamoate prolonged release (PR) 3-month formulation in Chinese female subjects with endometriosis by demonstrating the non-inferiority of triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month formulation injected once as compared to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month formulation injected 3 times consecutively.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month Subjects received 15 mg triptorelin pamoate per injection, administered as an intramuscular injection once every 12 weeks (a total of 2 injections, at baseline and Week 12). |
Drug: Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month
15mg/injection, administered as an intramuscular injection once every 12 weeks (a total of 2 injections).
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Triptorelin acetate PR 1-month Subjects received 3.75 mg triptorelin acetate per injection, administered as an intramuscular injection once every 4 weeks (a total of 6 injections, at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20). |
Drug: Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month
3.75mg/injection, administered as an intramuscular injection once every 4 weeks (a total of 6 injections)
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Percentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤184 Pmol/L or 50 pg/mL) at Week 12 [Week 12]
Castration was defined as serum oestradiol (E2) ≤184 picomoles/litre (pmol/L) or 50 picograms/millilitre (pg/mL). The primary endpoint was evaluated based on centralised blinded bioanalysis of serum samples for E2. The percentage of subjects castrated and the 95% asymptotic confidence intervals (CIs), calculated from binomial distribution, are presented.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Percentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤184 Pmol/L or 50 pg/mL) at Weeks 4 and 8 [Weeks 4 and 8]
The percentages of subjects who were castrated at Weeks 4 and 8 where castration was defined as serum E2 ≤184 pmol/L or 50 pg/mL are presented. The 95% asymptotic CIs were calculated from the binomial distribution.
- Percentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤110 Pmol/L or 30 pg/mL) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 [Weeks 4, 8 and 12]
The percentages of subjects who were castrated at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 where castration was defined as serum E2 ≤110 pmol/L or 30 pg/mL are presented. The 95% asymptotic CIs were calculated from the binomial distribution.
- Change From Baseline in Endometriosis-associated Pelvic Pain at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 [Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8 and 12]
Endometriosis-associated pelvic pain was assessed using a 100 millimetres (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS) where subjects indicated the subjective level of their most severe endometriosis pain over the last 4 weeks by making a single vertical mark on the line ranging from 'absence of pain' (0 mm) to 'unbearable pain' (100 mm). Lower scores indicated a better outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first dose of study medication. The least squares (LS) mean change from baseline at each timepoint as measured by the VAS is presented.
- Mean E2 Concentration at Weeks Baseline and 4, 8 and 12 [Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8 and 12]
The mean serum E2 concentrations at baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 are presented.
- Mean Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Concentration at Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 [Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8 and 12]
The mean FSH concentrations at baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 are presented.
- Mean Luteinising Hormone (LH) Concentration at Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 [Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12]
The mean LH concentrations at baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 are presented.
- Median Time to Menses Recovery [Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 40 (end of study visit)]
Time to menses recovery was defined as the time (in days) between the date of the last dose of study medication and the date of the first day the subject observed menstrual bleeding of the next menstrual period. Menses recovery status was assessed at all study visits from Day 1 to the end of study visit. The median time to menses recovery was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Female subjects aged from 18 to 45 years inclusive at the date of informed consent.
-
A history of active and regular menstrual cycles of 21 to 35 days (inclusive) in the 6 months prior to the screening visit.
-
A diagnosis of endometriosis, confirmed by laparoscopy or laparotomy within10 years prior to the screening visit.
-
Requires treatment with a Gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist for a period of 6 months in the judgement of the investigator.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
A current history of undiagnosed abnormal genital bleeding.
-
Received treatment with a GnRH agonist within 6 months prior to the screening visit.
-
Received any other hormonal treatment within 3 months prior to the screening visit (oestrogens, progestogens, danazol, gestrinone and cyproterone acetate etc).
-
Chronic pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis, that would interfere with the assessment of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University | Beijing | China | 100006 | |
2 | Peking University First Hospital | Beijing | China | 100034 | |
3 | Chinese PLA General Hospital | Beijing | China | 100039 | |
4 | Peking University People's Hospital | Beijing | China | 100044 | |
5 | Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University | Beijing | China | 100069 | |
6 | Peking University Third Hospital | Beijing | China | 100191 | |
7 | Peking Union Medical College Hospital | Beijing | China | 100730 | |
8 | The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University | Dalian | China | 116011 | |
9 | The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University | Guangzhou | China | 510120 | |
10 | Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University | Guangzhou | China | 510235 | |
11 | The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University | Guangzhou | China | 510630 | |
12 | Hainan General Hospital | Haikou | China | 570311 | |
13 | Women's Hospital, School of Medicine Zhejiang University | Hangzhou | China | 310006 | |
14 | Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital school of medicine, Zhejiang University | Hangzhou | China | 310020 | |
15 | Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital | Nanjing | China | 210004 | |
16 | Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University | Nanjing | China | 210009 | |
17 | The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region | Nanning | China | 530021 | |
18 | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital of Fudan University | Shanghai | China | 200011 | |
19 | Shanghai Tongji Hospital | Shanghai | China | 200065 | |
20 | The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University | Shijiazhuang | China | 050000 | |
21 | Tianjin Medical University General Hospital | Tianjin | China | 300052 | |
22 | The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University | Tianjin | China | 300211 | |
23 | Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital | Yangzhou | China | 225001 | |
24 | General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University | Yinchuan | China | 750004 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Ipsen
Investigators
- Study Director: Ipsen Medical Director, Ipsen
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- D-CN-52014-220
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Female subjects aged from 18 to 45 years were recruited to this Phase 3 randomised, open-label study at 24 study centres in China between 28 July 2017 and 16 November 2019. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | Subjects who met the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were randomised in a 1:1 ratio, stratified according to endometriotic surgical history and the severity of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. |
Arm/Group Title | Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month | Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects received 15 milligrams (mg) triptorelin pamoate per injection, administered as an intramuscular (IM) injection once every 12 weeks (a total of 2 injections, at baseline and Week 12). | Subjects received 3.75 mg triptorelin acetate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 4 weeks (a total of 6 injections, at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20). |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 150 | 150 |
Received Treatment | 149 | 150 |
Completed Week 12 | 143 | 148 |
Completed Week 24 | 143 | 144 |
COMPLETED | 143 | 144 |
NOT COMPLETED | 7 | 6 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month | Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects received 15 mg triptorelin pamoate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 12 weeks (a total of 2 injections, at baseline and Week 12). | Subjects received 3.75 mg triptorelin acetate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 4 weeks (a total of 6 injections, at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20). | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 150 | 150 | 300 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
32.4
(6.1)
|
32.6
(6.2)
|
32.5
(6.1)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
150
100%
|
150
100%
|
300
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | |||
Chinese |
150
100%
|
150
100%
|
300
100%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
150
100%
|
150
100%
|
300
100%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
China |
150
100%
|
150
100%
|
300
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Percentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤184 Pmol/L or 50 pg/mL) at Week 12 |
---|---|
Description | Castration was defined as serum oestradiol (E2) ≤184 picomoles/litre (pmol/L) or 50 picograms/millilitre (pg/mL). The primary endpoint was evaluated based on centralised blinded bioanalysis of serum samples for E2. The percentage of subjects castrated and the 95% asymptotic confidence intervals (CIs), calculated from binomial distribution, are presented. |
Time Frame | Week 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The per protocol set included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication with at least one baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter, and without major protocol violations/deviations affecting the primary efficacy endpoint. |
Arm/Group Title | Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month | Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects received 15 mg triptorelin pamoate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 12 weeks (a total of 2 injections, at baseline and Week 12). | Subjects received 3.75 mg triptorelin acetate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 4 weeks (a total of 6 injections, at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20). |
Measure Participants | 142 | 146 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of subjects] |
98.6
|
99.3
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month, Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis was that triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month was inferior to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month. The alternative hypothesis was that triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month was non-inferior to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority | |
Comments | If the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference was >-10%, triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month non-inferiority to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month was confirmed. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Rate difference (%) |
Estimated Value | -0.7 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -4.41 to 2.58 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The rate difference (triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month - triptorelin acetate PR 1-month) and the 2-sided 95% CI of the difference were calculated using the Miettinen and Nurminen method, stratified by randomisation stratification factors. |
Title | Percentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤184 Pmol/L or 50 pg/mL) at Weeks 4 and 8 |
---|---|
Description | The percentages of subjects who were castrated at Weeks 4 and 8 where castration was defined as serum E2 ≤184 pmol/L or 50 pg/mL are presented. The 95% asymptotic CIs were calculated from the binomial distribution. |
Time Frame | Weeks 4 and 8 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The full analysis set included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication with at least one baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter. |
Arm/Group Title | Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month | Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects received 15 mg triptorelin pamoate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 12 weeks (a total of 2 injections, at baseline and Week 12). | Subjects received 3.75 mg triptorelin acetate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 4 weeks (a total of 6 injections, at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20). |
Measure Participants | 147 | 150 |
Week 4 |
98.0
|
99.3
|
Week 8 |
97.3
|
100.0
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month, Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month |
---|---|---|
Comments | Rate difference at Week 4. The null hypothesis was that triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month was inferior to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month. The alternative hypothesis was that triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month was non-inferior to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority | |
Comments | If the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference was >-10%, triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month non-inferiority to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month was observed without multiplicity adjustment. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Rate difference (%) |
Estimated Value | -1.3 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -5.26 to 1.93 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The rate difference (triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month - triptorelin acetate PR 1-month) and the 2-sided 95% CI of the difference were calculated using the Miettinen and Nurminen method, stratified by randomisation stratification factors. |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month, Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month |
---|---|---|
Comments | Rate difference at Week 8. The null hypothesis was that triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month was inferior to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month. The alternative hypothesis was that triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month was non-inferior to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority | |
Comments | If the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference was >-10%, triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month non-inferiority to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month was observed without multiplicity adjustment. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Rate difference (%) |
Estimated Value | -2.7 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -6.80 to -0.16 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The rate difference (triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month - triptorelin acetate PR 1-month) and the 2-sided 95% CI of the difference were calculated using the Miettinen and Nurminen method, stratified by randomisation stratification factors. |
Title | Percentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤110 Pmol/L or 30 pg/mL) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
---|---|
Description | The percentages of subjects who were castrated at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 where castration was defined as serum E2 ≤110 pmol/L or 30 pg/mL are presented. The 95% asymptotic CIs were calculated from the binomial distribution. |
Time Frame | Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The full analysis set included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication with at least one baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter. |
Arm/Group Title | Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month | Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects received 15 mg triptorelin pamoate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 12 weeks (a total of 2 injections, at baseline and Week 12). | Subjects received 3.75 mg triptorelin acetate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 4 weeks (a total of 6 injections, at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20). |
Measure Participants | 147 | 150 |
Week 4 |
98.0
|
99.3
|
Week 8 |
95.2
|
99.3
|
Week 12 |
95.9
|
98.7
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month, Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month |
---|---|---|
Comments | Rate difference at Week 4. The null hypothesis was that triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month was inferior to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month. The alternative hypothesis was that triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month was non-inferior to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority | |
Comments | If the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference was >-10%, triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month non-inferiority to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month was observed without multiplicity adjustment. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Rate difference (%) |
Estimated Value | -1.3 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -5.26 to 1.93 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The rate difference (triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month - triptorelin acetate PR 1-month) and the 2-sided 95% CI of the difference were calculated using the Miettinen and Nurminen method, stratified by randomisation stratification factors. |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month, Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month |
---|---|---|
Comments | Rate difference at Week 8. The null hypothesis was that triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month was inferior to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month. The alternative hypothesis was that triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month was non-inferior to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority | |
Comments | If the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference was >-10%, triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month non-inferiority to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month was observed without multiplicity adjustment. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Rate difference (%) |
Estimated Value | -4.1 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -8.93 to -0.52 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The rate difference (triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month - triptorelin acetate PR 1-month) and the 2-sided 95% CI of the difference were calculated using the Miettinen and Nurminen method, stratified by randomisation stratification factors. |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month, Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month |
---|---|---|
Comments | Rate difference at Week 12. The null hypothesis was that triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month was inferior to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month. The alternative hypothesis was that triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month was non-inferior to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority | |
Comments | If the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference was >-10%, triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month non-inferiority to triptorelin acetate PR 1-month was observed without multiplicity adjustment. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Rate difference (%) |
Estimated Value | -2.7 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -7.44 to 1.17 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The rate difference (triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month - triptorelin acetate PR 1-month) and the 2-sided 95% CI of the difference were calculated using the Miettinen and Nurminen method, stratified by randomisation stratification factors. |
Title | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis-associated Pelvic Pain at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
---|---|
Description | Endometriosis-associated pelvic pain was assessed using a 100 millimetres (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS) where subjects indicated the subjective level of their most severe endometriosis pain over the last 4 weeks by making a single vertical mark on the line ranging from 'absence of pain' (0 mm) to 'unbearable pain' (100 mm). Lower scores indicated a better outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first dose of study medication. The least squares (LS) mean change from baseline at each timepoint as measured by the VAS is presented. |
Time Frame | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The full analysis set included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication with at least one baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter. |
Arm/Group Title | Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month | Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects received 15 mg triptorelin pamoate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 12 weeks (a total of 2 injections, at baseline and Week 12). | Subjects received 3.75 mg triptorelin acetate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 4 weeks (a total of 6 injections, at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20). |
Measure Participants | 147 | 150 |
Week 4 |
-24.4
|
-24.4
|
Week 8 |
-28.5
|
-27.8
|
Week 12 |
-28.1
|
-28.4
|
Title | Mean E2 Concentration at Weeks Baseline and 4, 8 and 12 |
---|---|
Description | The mean serum E2 concentrations at baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 are presented. |
Time Frame | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The full analysis set included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication with at least one baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter. |
Arm/Group Title | Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month | Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects received 15 mg triptorelin pamoate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 12 weeks (a total of 2 injections, at baseline and Week 12). | Subjects received 3.75 mg triptorelin acetate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 4 weeks (a total of 6 injections, at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20). |
Measure Participants | 147 | 150 |
Baseline |
192.302
(258.209)
|
218.893
(296.825)
|
Week 4 |
25.347
(46.253)
|
18.959
(3.944)
|
Week 8 |
47.175
(156.521)
|
21.863
(12.550)
|
Week 12 |
36.600
(76.882)
|
26.695
(31.174)
|
Title | Mean Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Concentration at Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
---|---|
Description | The mean FSH concentrations at baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 are presented. |
Time Frame | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The full analysis set included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication with at least one baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter. |
Arm/Group Title | Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month | Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects received 15 mg triptorelin pamoate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 12 weeks (a total of 2 injections, at baseline and Week 12). | Subjects received 3.75 mg triptorelin acetate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 4 weeks (a total of 6 injections, at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20). |
Measure Participants | 147 | 150 |
Baseline |
6.099
(3.929)
|
6.258
(4.520)
|
Week 4 |
1.762
(1.373)
|
1.699
(1.049)
|
Week 8 |
2.891
(1.163)
|
2.766
(1.329)
|
Week 12 |
3.344
(1.347)
|
3.325
(1.414)
|
Title | Mean Luteinising Hormone (LH) Concentration at Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
---|---|
Description | The mean LH concentrations at baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 are presented. |
Time Frame | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The full analysis set included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication with at least one baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter. |
Arm/Group Title | Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month | Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects received 15 mg triptorelin pamoate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 12 weeks (a total of 2 injections, at baseline and Week 12). | Subjects received 3.75 mg triptorelin acetate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 4 weeks (a total of 6 injections, at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20). |
Measure Participants | 147 | 150 |
Baseline |
3.376
(1.902)
|
3.487
(1.858)
|
Week 4 |
0.660
(1.771)
|
0.500
(0.173)
|
Week 8 |
0.444
(1.928)
|
0.255
(0.122)
|
Week 12 |
0.324
(0.555)
|
0.251
(0.239)
|
Title | Median Time to Menses Recovery |
---|---|
Description | Time to menses recovery was defined as the time (in days) between the date of the last dose of study medication and the date of the first day the subject observed menstrual bleeding of the next menstrual period. Menses recovery status was assessed at all study visits from Day 1 to the end of study visit. The median time to menses recovery was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
Time Frame | Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 40 (end of study visit) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The full analysis set included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication with at least one baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter. |
Arm/Group Title | Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month | Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects received 15 mg triptorelin pamoate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 12 weeks (a total of 2 injections, at baseline and Week 12). | Subjects received 3.75 mg triptorelin acetate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 4 weeks (a total of 6 injections, at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20). |
Measure Participants | 147 | 150 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [days] |
179.0
|
85.0
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored from Day 1 up to Week 28 (approximately 7 months). | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | A TEAE was defined as any adverse event that occurred or worsened on or after the first dose, through 112 days (16 weeks) after last injection of triptorelin pamoate PR 3-month or through 56 days (8 weeks) after last injection for triptorelin acetate PR 1-month. TEAEs are presented for the safety set which included all subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. | |||
Arm/Group Title | Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month | Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month | ||
Arm/Group Description | Subjects received 15 mg triptorelin pamoate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 12 weeks (a total of 2 injections, at baseline and Week 12). | Subjects received 3.75 mg triptorelin acetate per injection, administered as an IM injection once every 4 weeks (a total of 6 injections, at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20). | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month | Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/149 (0%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month | Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 2/149 (1.3%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Arrhythmia | 1/149 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/150 (0%) | 0 |
Sinus bradycardia | 1/149 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/150 (0%) | 0 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Abdominal pain | 0/149 (0%) | 0 | 1/150 (0.7%) | 1 |
Infections and infestations | ||||
Pyelonephritis acute | 1/149 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/150 (0%) | 0 |
Sepsis | 1/149 (0.7%) | 1 | 0/150 (0%) | 0 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month | Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 132/149 (88.6%) | 135/150 (90%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Abdominal pain lower | 4/149 (2.7%) | 4 | 13/150 (8.7%) | 19 |
Abdominal pain upper | 6/149 (4%) | 7 | 8/150 (5.3%) | 10 |
Diarrhoea | 8/149 (5.4%) | 8 | 4/150 (2.7%) | 4 |
General disorders | ||||
Pyrexia | 6/149 (4%) | 6 | 8/150 (5.3%) | 9 |
Infections and infestations | ||||
Nasopharyngitis | 16/149 (10.7%) | 19 | 24/150 (16%) | 30 |
Upper respiratory tract infection | 37/149 (24.8%) | 46 | 27/150 (18%) | 34 |
Vaginal infection | 8/149 (5.4%) | 9 | 7/150 (4.7%) | 7 |
Investigations | ||||
Protein urine present | 9/149 (6%) | 9 | 8/150 (5.3%) | 8 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Arthralgia | 12/149 (8.1%) | 19 | 13/150 (8.7%) | 15 |
Back pain | 9/149 (6%) | 11 | 9/150 (6%) | 10 |
Pain in extremity | 2/149 (1.3%) | 3 | 9/150 (6%) | 13 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Dizziness | 6/149 (4%) | 7 | 9/150 (6%) | 11 |
Headache | 10/149 (6.7%) | 11 | 9/150 (6%) | 11 |
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Insomnia | 14/149 (9.4%) | 14 | 8/150 (5.3%) | 8 |
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||
Menorrhagia | 11/149 (7.4%) | 13 | 6/150 (4%) | 6 |
Vaginal haemorrhage | 66/149 (44.3%) | 79 | 68/150 (45.3%) | 82 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Oropharyngeal pain | 4/149 (2.7%) | 4 | 8/150 (5.3%) | 9 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Hyperhidrosis | 10/149 (6.7%) | 10 | 12/150 (8%) | 12 |
Night sweats | 19/149 (12.8%) | 20 | 13/150 (8.7%) | 13 |
Vascular disorders | ||||
Hot flush | 86/149 (57.7%) | 90 | 89/150 (59.3%) | 91 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Medical Director |
---|---|
Organization | Ipsen Pharma |
Phone | see email |
clinical.trials@ipsen.com |
- D-CN-52014-220