Efficacy and Safety of BG2109 in Chinese Subjects With Endometriosis

Sponsor
Bio Genuine (Shanghai) Biotech Co., Ltd. (Industry)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05894135
Collaborator
(none)
540
3
20

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of BG2109 administered orally once daily at a dose of 100 mg alone or of 200 mg in combination with add-back hormone replacement therapy (ABT: estradiol (E2) 1 mg / norethisterone acetate (NETA) 0.5 mg) versus placebo, while under randomized treatment, in the management of moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain (EAP) in chinese women with surgically confirmed endometriosis

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: BG2109 100mg
  • Drug: BG2109 200mg
  • Drug: ABT(E2 1 mg / NETA 0.5 mg)
  • Drug: BG2109 100mg Placebo
  • Drug: BG2109 200mg Placebo
  • Drug: ABT Placebo
Phase 3

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of BG2109 administered orally once daily at doses of 100 mg alone and 200 mg in combination with low dose ABT (E2 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg) versus placebo in the management of moderate to severe EAP in chinese women with surgically confirmed endometriosis.

The entire study is divided into the core stage and the extension stage, with a total duration of approximately 72 weeks. This includes the prescreening wash-out period (if applicable), screening period (approximately 5-8 weeks), core stage (24 weeks) and extension stage (28 weeks), and the safety follow-up period (approximately 12 weeks)

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
540 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BG2109 in Chinese Subjects With Endometriosis
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: BG2109 100 mg group

Drug: BG2109 100mg
One tablet of BG2109 100mg , oral , once daily

Drug: BG2109 200mg Placebo
One tablet of BG2109 200mg Placebo, oral , once daily.

Drug: ABT Placebo
One tablet of ABT Placebo, oral, once-daily

Experimental: BG2109 200 mg +ABT group

Drug: BG2109 200mg
One tablet of BG2109 200mg, oral , once daily.

Drug: ABT(E2 1 mg / NETA 0.5 mg)
One tablet of ABT(E2 1 mg / NETA 0.5 mg), oral, once-daily

Drug: BG2109 100mg Placebo
One tablet of BG2109 100mg Placebo, oral , once daily.

Placebo Comparator: Placebo group

Drug: BG2109 100mg Placebo
One tablet of BG2109 100mg Placebo, oral , once daily.

Drug: BG2109 200mg Placebo
One tablet of BG2109 200mg Placebo, oral , once daily.

Drug: ABT Placebo
One tablet of ABT Placebo, oral, once-daily

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Dysmenorrhea (DYS) response rate at Week 12 [Week 12]

    responders are defined as those with a significant decrease in mean DYS score measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse) compared to baseline, with decreased or stable analgesic use for EAP

  2. Non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) response rate at Week 12 [Week 12]

    responders are defined as those with a significant decrease in mean NMPP score measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse) compared to baseline, with decreased or stable analgesic use for EAP

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change of the interference of pain with the ability to perform daily activities from the baseline at week 24 [Week 24]

    measured using the pain dimension in Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30)(0-100, higher scores mean worse)

  2. Change of the mean overall pelvic pain(OPP) score from the baseline at week 24 [Week 24]

    measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse)

  3. Change of the mean DYS score from the baseline at week 24 [Week 24]

    measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse)

  4. Change of the mean NMPP score from the baseline at week 24 [Week 24]

    measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse)

  5. Ratio of subjects who do not use analgesics to treat EAP at week 24 [Week 24]

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Change of mean pelvic pain scores of DYS from the baseline to each scheduled assessment [during the previous 35 days of Week 4,8,12,24,28,32,36,52,56,64]

    measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse)

  2. Change of mean pelvic pain scores of NMPP from the baseline to each scheduled assessment [during the previous 35 days of Week 4,8,12,24,28,32,36,52,56,64]

    measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse)

  3. Change of mean pelvic pain scores of overall pelvic pain(OPP) from the baseline to each scheduled assessment [during the previous 35 days of Week 4,8,12,24,28,32,36,52,56,64]

    measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse)

  4. Change of mean scores of dyschezia from the baseline to each scheduled assessment [during the previous 35 days of Week 4,8,12,24,28,32,36,52,56,64]

    measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse)

  5. Change of mean scores of dyspareunia from the baseline to each scheduled assessment [during the previous 35 days of Week 4,8,12,24,28,32,36,52,56,64]

    measured using Verbal rating scale - VRS(0-3, higher scores mean worse)

  6. Change of the number of days with moderate to severe pelvic pain from the baseline to each scheduled assessment [during the previous 35 days of Week 4,8,12,24,28,32,36,52,56,64]

    measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse)

  7. Change of the number of days with uterine bleeding (including spotting) from the baseline to each scheduled assessment [during the previous 35 days of Week 4,8,12,24,28,32,36,52,56,64]

    measured using the uterine bleeding scale(0-3, higher scores mean worse)

  8. Change of the number of days of analgesic use (including any class) for EAP from the baseline to each scheduled assessment [during the previous 35 days of Week 4,8,12,24,28,32,36,52,56,64]

  9. Change of the mean worst pelvic pain score defined as the mean of the 5 highest daily pain scores from the baseline to each scheduled assessment [during the previous 35 days of Week 4,8,12,24,28,32,36,52,56,64]

    measured using Numeric Rating Scale - NRS(0-10, higher scores mean worse)

  10. Change of scores in the dimensions of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, self-image, and sexual relationships from the baseline to each scheduled assessment [during the previous 28 days of Week 4,8,12,24,36,52,56,64]

    measured using the EHP-30 core questionnaire(contains 5 dimensions:pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, self-image; all are 0-100 score, higher scores mean worse) and Module C(0-100 score, higher scores mean worse)

  11. Change of score of quality of life from the baseline to week 24 and week 52 [during the previous 28 days of Week 24,52,]

    measured using SF-36v2 ® Health Survey (SF-36v2)(0-100 score, higher scores mean better )

  12. Change of uterine size of a patient with concomitant adenomyosis from the baseline to week 12, week 24, and week 52 [Week 12,24,52]

  13. Change of BMD on lumbar (L1-L4), femoral neck, and total hip from the baseline to week 24 and week 52 [Week 24,52]

    measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)

  14. Incidence and severity of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during treatment period [from first dose to Week 52]

  15. Incidence and severity of hypoestrogenic TEAEs (vasomotor symptoms) [from first dose to Week 52]

  16. Time to the first post-treatment menses [Week 56 or 64]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Key Inclusion Criteria:
  1. The subject must be a premenopausal woman aged ≥18 years.

  2. The subject must have had her most recent surgical and histological diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis (laparoscopy, laparotomy, vaginal fornix or other biopsy) within 10 years and at least 2 months ago prior to screening.

  3. The subject has moderate to severe EAP during the screening period defined as:

  4. At the screening visit, a score of at least 2 for DYS and at least 2 for NMPP for the previous month assessed with the modified Biberoglu & Behrman (mB&B) scale

  5. Subject is confirmed to meet the following criteria during the screening period, within 35 consecutive calendar days prior to the baseline visit:

  1. Mean overall pelvic pain scores on the 0-10 NRS over the 5 days with the highest score ≥ 4; ii. At least two days with "moderate" or "severe" pain on the 0-3 VRS for pelvic pain over the days with uterine bleeding; iii. At least two days with "moderate" or "severe" pain on the 0-3 VRS for pelvic pain over the days without uterine bleeding;
  1. The subject has a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 18 kg/m2 at the screening visit
Key Exclusion Criteria:
  1. The subject is pregnant or breastfeeding, or plans to become pregnant during the study treatment period.

  2. The subject has a surgical history of:

  3. Hysterectomy,

  4. Bilateral oophorectomy,

  5. Surgeries that interfere with gastrointestinal motility, pH value, or absorption (including vagotomy, enterectomy, or gastric surgery),

  6. Any major abdominal surgery (including laparotomy for endometriosis) within 6 months or any interventional surgery for endometriosis (i.e. laparoscopy) performed within a period of 2 months before screening, or the subject is scheduled for a surgical abdominal procedure during the course of the study.

  7. The subject may need to take prohibited medications during the study or in the stipulated time before screening

  8. The subject has a contra-indication to ABT

  9. The subject has chronic pelvic pain that, in the opinion of the Investigator, is not caused by endometriosis and requires chronic analgesic or other chronic therapy which would interfere with the assessment of EAP

  10. The subject has conditions that affect bone mass density (BMD) assessment

  11. The subject did not respond to prior treatment with GnRH agonists or GnRH antagonists for endometriosis

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Bio Genuine (Shanghai) Biotech Co., Ltd.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Congjian Xu, Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Bio Genuine (Shanghai) Biotech Co., Ltd.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05894135
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • BG2109-AB-301
First Posted:
Jun 8, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Jun 8, 2023
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 8, 2023