A Clinical Study To Investigate The Effectiveness And Safety Of Tanezumab In Treating Pain Associated With Endometriosis

Sponsor
Pfizer (Industry)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT00784693
Collaborator
(none)
48
30
2
15.5
1.6
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether tanezumab is effective and safe in the treatment of pain associated with endometriosis.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Biological: Tanezumab
  • Drug: Placebo
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
48 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A PHASE 2, 16 WEEK, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND PLACEBO CONTROLLED, PARALLEL GROUP PROOF OF CONCEPT STUDY EVALUATING THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TANEZUMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS
Actual Study Start Date :
Dec 18, 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 27, 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :
Apr 5, 2010

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Tanezumab

Biological: Tanezumab
15 mg IV single dose

Placebo Comparator: Placebo

Drug: Placebo
Placebo IV single dose

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change From Baseline in Average Daily Endometriosis Pain Score at Week 8 [Baseline, Week 8]

    Participants assessed daily endometriosis pain on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 28 days in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Average Daily Endometriosis Pain Score at Weeks 4, 12, and 16 [Weeks 4, 12, and 16]

    Participants assessed daily endometriosis pain on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 28 days in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.

  2. Average Daily Endometriosis Pain Score During Menstruation at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 [Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16]

    Endometriosis pain during menstruation was derived from the average endometriosis pain severity as recorded on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine) over the episode of menstruation (at least 3 days of spotting or bleeding) for the 28-day period in baseline observation period and preceding each post-baseline visit. Higher score indicated greater pain.

  3. Average Daily Non-Menstrual Endometriosis Pain Score at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 [Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16]

    Non-menstrual endometriosis pain was derived from the average endometriosis pain severity as recorded on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine) on the non-menstrual days for the 28-day period in baseline observation period and preceding each post-baseline visit. Higher score indicated greater pain.

  4. Worst Daily Endometriosis Pain Score at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 [Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16]

    Participants assessed worst endometriosis pain in the last 24 hours on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 28 days in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.

  5. Worst Daily Endometriosis Pain Score During Menstruation at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 [Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16]

    Participants assessed worst endometriosis pain during menstruation in the last 24 hours on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the episode of menstruation (at least 3 days of spotting or bleeding) for the 28-day period in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the episode of menstruation (at least 3 days of spotting or bleeding) for the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.

  6. Worst Daily Non-Menstrual Endometriosis Pain Score at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 [Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16]

    Participants assessed worst endometriosis non-menstrual pain in the last 24 hours on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores on non-menstrual days for the 28-day period in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores on non-menstrual days for the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.

  7. Average Pain Score With Intercourse at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 [Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16]

    Pain related to sexual intercourse was defined as the discomfort or pain that may occur during or after sexual intercourse with vaginal penetration. Participants assessed pain during or after sexual intercourse on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 28 days in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.

  8. Endometriosis Symptom Severity Score (ESSS) Total Score at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 [Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16]

    Investigator assessed the severity of the dysmenorrhea (menstrual pain), pelvic pain and dyspareunia (painful sexual intercourse) experienced by participants occurring during the most recent menstrual cycle on a 4-point scale, where 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. Total score was calculated as a sum of the individual pain scores for dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and pelvic pain. The total score range: 0 (no pain) to 9 (worst possible pain).

  9. Endometriosis Health Profile 30 (EHP-30) Score at Baseline and Week 8 [Baseline and Week 8]

    EHP-30 is a validated quality of life (QoL) scale assessing emotional, physical and sexual function. EHP-30 consists of 30 items that assess the frequency of physical and mental manifestations of endometriosis during the previous 4 weeks on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, 4 = always).. Scores for 6 domains (pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, self image, and sexual intercourse) were obtained as a sum of all relevant item scores and transformed to a 0 to 100 score range. Each domain score ranges from 0 (best possible health status) to 100 (worst possible health status).

  10. Global Response Assessment (GRA) at Week 8 [Week 8]

    GRA questionnaire is a 7-point symmetric scale which measures participant-reported overall response to treatment compared to baseline as 1 of the following possible responses: markedly worse, moderately worse, slightly worse, no change, slightly improved, moderately improved, and markedly improved. Number of participants with each response is reported.

  11. Participant Global Satisfaction at Week 8 [Week 8]

    Participant global satisfaction is assessed using Patient Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) which is a self-administered questionnaire containing four items to assess participant satisfaction, previous treatment, preference and willingness to continue using the study medication. Participant's response is rated on a 5-point scale where 1 = extremely satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = dissatisfied and 5 = extremely dissatisfied. Number of participants with each response is reported.

  12. Participant Global Preference at Week 8 [Week 8]

    Participant global preference is assessed using PRTI, which is a self-administered questionnaire containing four items to assess participant satisfaction, previous treatment, preference and willingness to continue using the study medication. Participant reported previous treatment under following categories: hormonal contraceptive, painkiller, and hormone treatment by injection, hormone treatment by tablet, surgery, and no treatment. Participant preference was assessed using following categories: definitely prefer study medication, slightly prefer study medication, no preference, slightly prefer previous treatment, and definitely prefer previous treatment. Number of participants under each of the categories is reported. For previous treatment, a single participant may be represented in more than 1 category.

  13. Participant Willingness to Re-use Study Medication [Week 8]

    Participant willingness to re-use study medication is assessed using PRTI, which is a self-administered questionnaire containing four items to assess participant satisfaction, previous treatment, preference and willingness to continue using the study medication. Participant willingness to re-use study medication was assessed using following categories: definitely want to re-use, might want to re-use, not sure, might not want to re-use, definitely would not want to re-use.

  14. Plasma Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Concentration [Day 1, Week 8, and Week 16 (End of Treatment)]

  15. Amount of Rescue Medication Used [Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16]

    Mean amount of daily rescue medication (acetaminophen 500 mg tablet/capsule) taken for endometriosis associated pain (in mg) was assessed.

  16. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [Baseline up to 113 days after last dose of study medication]

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to 113 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or worsened relative to pre-treatment state.

  17. Number of Participants With New or Worsened Neurological Examinations [Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16]

    A neurological evaluation was performed by a consulting neurologist if adverse events suggested new or worsening peripheral neuropathy with respect to baseline or any adverse event of abnormal peripheral sensation was recorded. A neurological evaluation was done as soon as the above signs and symptoms were known, preferably within 7 days of becoming aware of such problems if possible. Neurological evaluation was done using Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) by investigator. Neurologic examination assessment included strength of groups of muscles of the head and neck, upper limbs and lower limbs, deep tendon reflexes and sensation (tactile, vibration, joint position sense and pin prick) of index fingers and great toes. Abnormality was judged by the investigator.

  18. Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) [Day 1 (pre-dose), Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 16]

    Serum samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies using validated semi-quantitative enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

  19. Number of Participants With Positive Urine or Serum Pregnancy Test [Screening, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and Early termination]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 49 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Pre-menstrual women with moderate to severe endometriosis. The diagnosis of endometriosis must have been confirmed surgically within the last 8 years.

  • Subjects should have regular menstrual cycle (21 - 35 days) and must be willing to use adequate contraception (2 forms of birth control, one of which must be a barrier method). Contraception is required throughout the study (screening to 16 weeks post treatment), even if subjects discontinue prematurely.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Previous hysterectomy

  • Surgical treatment for endometriosis within last 6 months.

  • Medical treatment for endometriosis other than combined oral contraceptive pill within the last 3 months

  • Current use of the coil or progesterone only contraceptive (the combined oral contraceptive pill is allowed).

  • Any history of malignant disease (cancer)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Bay Area Physicians for Women Mobile Alabama United States 36608
2 Springhill Medical Center Mobile Alabama United States 36608
3 Wilmax Clinical Research Mobile Alabama United States 36608
4 Visions Clinical Research - Tucson Tucson Arizona United States 85712
5 Genesis Center for Clinical Research San Diego California United States 92103
6 Medical Center for Clinical Research San Diego California United States 92108
7 Visions Clinical Research Boynton Beach Florida United States 33472
8 Nature Coast Clinical Research, LLC Crystal River Florida United States 34429
9 Jacksonville Center for Clnical Research Jacksonville Florida United States 32216
10 Advanced Women's Healthcare West Palm Beach Florida United States 33409
11 Comprehensive Clinical Trials, LLC West Palm Beach Florida United States 33409
12 Mount Vernon Clinical Research Atlanta Georgia United States 30328
13 Radiant Research Overland Park Kansas United States 66202
14 Women's Healthcare Group Overland Park Kansas United States 66215
15 N.E.C.C.R, Fall River LLC Fall River Massachusetts United States 02720
16 Beyer Research - Women's Health Care Specialists, PC Paw Paw Michigan United States 49079
17 Women's Clinic of Lincoln, PC Lincoln Nebraska United States 68510
18 Lyndhurst Clinical Research Kernersville North Carolina United States 27284
19 Lyndhurst Clinical Research Winston-Salem North Carolina United States 27103
20 Columbus Center for Women's Health Research Columbus Ohio United States 43213
21 Planned Parenthood of Arkansas and Eastern Oklahoma Tulsa Oklahoma United States 74105
22 Allegheny Pain Management Altoona Pennsylvania United States 16602
23 Greenville Hospital System University Medical Group, Department of OB/GYN Greenville South Carolina United States 29605
24 ClinSearch, LLC Chattanooga Tennessee United States 37421
25 Whitaker's Women Care East Ridge Tennessee United States 37412
26 Advances In Health, Inc. Houston Texas United States 77030
27 Allon Health Care Houston Texas United States 77079
28 Old Farm Obstetrics and Gynecology Salt Lake City Utah United States 84107
29 Salt Lake Research Salt Lake City Utah United States 84107
30 Women's Clinical Research Center Seattle Washington United States 98105

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Pfizer

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Pfizer
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00784693
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • A4091023
  • ENDOMETRIOSIS POC
First Posted:
Nov 4, 2008
Last Update Posted:
Apr 30, 2021
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Keywords provided by Pfizer
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 23 25
Treated 22 25
COMPLETED 20 19
NOT COMPLETED 3 6

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo Total
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 22 25 47
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
30
(6.7)
30.4
(6.4)
30.2
(6.4)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
22
100%
25
100%
47
100%
Male
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Average Daily Endometriosis Pain Score at Week 8
Description Participants assessed daily endometriosis pain on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 28 days in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 8

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Restricted full analysis set (rFAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and completed >=12 days of baseline observation period and who had provided baseline and primary efficacy data for >=12 days of the baseline and >=15 days of each of first 2 post-randomization 28-day observation periods.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 19 16
Baseline
5.45
(1.218)
5.50
(1.363)
Change at Week 8
-2.88
(2.653)
-3.51
(1.714)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Tanezumab, Placebo
Comments Week 8: Analysis was based on analysis of co-variance (ANCOVA) model with main effects of treatment, contraceptive use and baseline severity of pain.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Least Squares Mean Difference
Estimated Value 0.41
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 90%
-0.87 to 1.69
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.75
Estimation Comments
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Average Daily Endometriosis Pain Score at Weeks 4, 12, and 16
Description Participants assessed daily endometriosis pain on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 28 days in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.
Time Frame Weeks 4, 12, and 16

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Restricted FAS. Here 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time point for each treatment arm, respectively.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 19 16
Week 4
3.55
(1.999)
2.94
(1.814)
Week 12
2.22
(2.113)
1.45
(1.631)
Week 16
3.12
(2.320)
2.15
(2.338)
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Average Daily Endometriosis Pain Score During Menstruation at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Description Endometriosis pain during menstruation was derived from the average endometriosis pain severity as recorded on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine) over the episode of menstruation (at least 3 days of spotting or bleeding) for the 28-day period in baseline observation period and preceding each post-baseline visit. Higher score indicated greater pain.
Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Restricted FAS. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time point for each treatment arm, respectively.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 18 15
Baseline
6.04
(1.377)
6.54
(1.756)
Week 4
3.98
(2.503)
3.72
(2.155)
Week 8
2.99
(2.724)
2.18
(1.540)
Week 12
2.92
(2.801)
1.52
(2.117)
Week 16
4.66
(2.297)
2.94
(2.847)
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Average Daily Non-Menstrual Endometriosis Pain Score at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Description Non-menstrual endometriosis pain was derived from the average endometriosis pain severity as recorded on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine) on the non-menstrual days for the 28-day period in baseline observation period and preceding each post-baseline visit. Higher score indicated greater pain.
Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Restricted FAS. Here 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time point for each treatment arm, respectively.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 19 16
Baseline
5.25
(1.617)
5.21
(1.348)
Week 4
3.42
(1.935)
2.77
(1.885)
Week 8
2.38
(2.240)
1.81
(2.038)
Week 12
1.98
(2.124)
1.33
(1.513)
Week 16
2.86
(2.341)
1.91
(2.288)
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Worst Daily Endometriosis Pain Score at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Description Participants assessed worst endometriosis pain in the last 24 hours on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 28 days in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.
Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Restricted FAS. Here 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time point for each treatment arm, respectively.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 19 16
Baseline
6.20
(1.265)
6.84
(1.297)
Week 4
4.21
(2.053)
4.00
(2.216)
Week 8
3.20
(2.465)
2.64
(2.373)
Week 12
3.02
(2.612)
2.18
(2.465)
Week 16
3.87
(2.477)
3.12
(2.818)
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Worst Daily Endometriosis Pain Score During Menstruation at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Description Participants assessed worst endometriosis pain during menstruation in the last 24 hours on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the episode of menstruation (at least 3 days of spotting or bleeding) for the 28-day period in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the episode of menstruation (at least 3 days of spotting or bleeding) for the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.
Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Restricted FAS. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time point for each treatment arm, respectively.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 18 15
Baseline
6.98
(1.084)
7.67
(1.632)
Week 4
4.78
(2.532)
5.02
(2.488)
Week 8
3.60
(3.022)
3.19
(2.356)
Week 12
3.58
(3.198)
2.34
(3.072)
Week 16
5.54
(2.752)
4.03
(3.306)
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Worst Daily Non-Menstrual Endometriosis Pain Score at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Description Participants assessed worst endometriosis non-menstrual pain in the last 24 hours on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores on non-menstrual days for the 28-day period in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores on non-menstrual days for the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.
Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Restricted FAS. Here 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time point for each treatment arm, respectively.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 19 16
Baseline
5.86
(1.629)
6.60
(1.299)
Week 4
4.06
(2.038)
3.75
(2.360)
Week 8
2.99
(2.331)
2.37
(2.527)
Week 12
2.79
(2.646)
2.03
(2.358)
Week 16
3.61
(2.475)
2.85
(2.807)
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Average Pain Score With Intercourse at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Description Pain related to sexual intercourse was defined as the discomfort or pain that may occur during or after sexual intercourse with vaginal penetration. Participants assessed pain during or after sexual intercourse on an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher score indicated greater pain. Baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over 28 days in the baseline observation period. Post-baseline value was calculated as mean of the scores over the 28-day period preceding the post-baseline visit.
Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Restricted FAS. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time point for each treatment arm, respectively.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 15 14
Baseline
5.21
(3.209)
5.19
(2.757)
Week 4
3.32
(2.687)
3.03
(2.298)
Week 8
2.70
(2.884)
2.92
(2.869)
Week 12
2.99
(2.485)
2.57
(2.337)
Week 16
3.29
(2.976)
3.05
(2.442)
9. Secondary Outcome
Title Endometriosis Symptom Severity Score (ESSS) Total Score at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Description Investigator assessed the severity of the dysmenorrhea (menstrual pain), pelvic pain and dyspareunia (painful sexual intercourse) experienced by participants occurring during the most recent menstrual cycle on a 4-point scale, where 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. Total score was calculated as a sum of the individual pain scores for dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and pelvic pain. The total score range: 0 (no pain) to 9 (worst possible pain).
Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Restricted FAS. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time point for each treatment arm, respectively.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 12 14
Baseline
7.08
(1.379)
7.00
(1.109)
Week 4
5.00
(1.871)
4.58
(2.712)
Week 8
2.89
(2.571)
3.83
(2.443)
Week 12
3.42
(2.575)
2.63
(1.996)
Week 16
4.83
(3.070)
3.17
(2.791)
10. Secondary Outcome
Title Endometriosis Health Profile 30 (EHP-30) Score at Baseline and Week 8
Description EHP-30 is a validated quality of life (QoL) scale assessing emotional, physical and sexual function. EHP-30 consists of 30 items that assess the frequency of physical and mental manifestations of endometriosis during the previous 4 weeks on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, 4 = always).. Scores for 6 domains (pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, self image, and sexual intercourse) were obtained as a sum of all relevant item scores and transformed to a 0 to 100 score range. Each domain score ranges from 0 (best possible health status) to 100 (worst possible health status).
Time Frame Baseline and Week 8

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Restricted FAS. Here 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for specified category for each treatment arm, respectively.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 19 16
Baseline: Pain
58.97
(14.661)
56.68
(13.213)
Baseline: Control & Powerlessness
69.96
(20.250)
64.84
(22.098)
Baseline: Emotional well-being
52.85
(18.005)
41.15
(21.671)
Baseline: Social support
57.57
(24.701)
46.48
(26.018)
Baseline: Self-image
53.51
(29.700)
45.31
(27.550)
Baseline: Sexual intercourse
58.93
(37.835)
65.36
(23.490)
Week 8: Pain
28.34
(17.179)
26.30
(23.325)
Week 8: Control & Powerlessness
28.92
(20.437)
27.98
(34.298)
Week 8: Emotional well-being
27.94
(17.664)
16.37
(19.300)
Week 8: Social support
36.33
(28.706)
26.34
(30.636)
Week 8: Self-image
31.86
(23.613)
24.40
(27.632)
Week 8: Sexual intercourse
45.45
(32.822)
29.20
(31.654)
11. Secondary Outcome
Title Global Response Assessment (GRA) at Week 8
Description GRA questionnaire is a 7-point symmetric scale which measures participant-reported overall response to treatment compared to baseline as 1 of the following possible responses: markedly worse, moderately worse, slightly worse, no change, slightly improved, moderately improved, and markedly improved. Number of participants with each response is reported.
Time Frame Week 8

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Restricted FAS. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 17 14
Markedly Worse
0
0%
1
4%
Moderately Worse
0
0%
0
0%
Slightly Worse
0
0%
0
0%
No Change
3
13.6%
2
8%
Slightly Improved
4
18.2%
2
8%
Moderately Improved
8
36.4%
6
24%
Markedly Improved
2
9.1%
3
12%
12. Secondary Outcome
Title Participant Global Satisfaction at Week 8
Description Participant global satisfaction is assessed using Patient Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) which is a self-administered questionnaire containing four items to assess participant satisfaction, previous treatment, preference and willingness to continue using the study medication. Participant's response is rated on a 5-point scale where 1 = extremely satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = dissatisfied and 5 = extremely dissatisfied. Number of participants with each response is reported.
Time Frame Week 8

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Restricted FAS. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 17 14
Extremely satisfied
5
22.7%
3
12%
Satisfied
7
31.8%
7
28%
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
5
22.7%
2
8%
Dissatisfied
0
0%
0
0%
Extremely dissatisfied
0
0%
2
8%
13. Secondary Outcome
Title Participant Global Preference at Week 8
Description Participant global preference is assessed using PRTI, which is a self-administered questionnaire containing four items to assess participant satisfaction, previous treatment, preference and willingness to continue using the study medication. Participant reported previous treatment under following categories: hormonal contraceptive, painkiller, and hormone treatment by injection, hormone treatment by tablet, surgery, and no treatment. Participant preference was assessed using following categories: definitely prefer study medication, slightly prefer study medication, no preference, slightly prefer previous treatment, and definitely prefer previous treatment. Number of participants under each of the categories is reported. For previous treatment, a single participant may be represented in more than 1 category.
Time Frame Week 8

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Restricted FAS. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 17 14
Hormonal contraceptive
7
31.8%
7
28%
Painkiller
11
50%
7
28%
Hormone treatment by injection
1
4.5%
1
4%
Hormone treatment by tablet
1
4.5%
0
0%
Surgery
5
22.7%
5
20%
No treatment
4
18.2%
1
4%
Definitely prefer study medication
11
50%
6
24%
Slightly prefer study medication
3
13.6%
3
12%
No preference
0
0%
2
8%
Slightly prefer previous treatment
1
4.5%
1
4%
Definitely prefer previous treatment
2
9.1%
2
8%
14. Secondary Outcome
Title Participant Willingness to Re-use Study Medication
Description Participant willingness to re-use study medication is assessed using PRTI, which is a self-administered questionnaire containing four items to assess participant satisfaction, previous treatment, preference and willingness to continue using the study medication. Participant willingness to re-use study medication was assessed using following categories: definitely want to re-use, might want to re-use, not sure, might not want to re-use, definitely would not want to re-use.
Time Frame Week 8

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Restricted FAS. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 17 14
Definitely want to re-use
13
59.1%
7
28%
Might want to re-use
1
4.5%
1
4%
Not sure
2
9.1%
3
12%
Might not want to re-use
1
4.5%
1
4%
Definitely would not want to re-use
0
0%
2
8%
15. Secondary Outcome
Title Plasma Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Concentration
Description
Time Frame Day 1, Week 8, and Week 16 (End of Treatment)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time point for each treatment arm, respectively.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 21 24
Day 1
301
(1217)
32.7
(10.6)
Week 8
4053
(1276)
30.7
(7.8)
Week 16
3010
(921)
31.4
(10.6)
16. Secondary Outcome
Title Amount of Rescue Medication Used
Description Mean amount of daily rescue medication (acetaminophen 500 mg tablet/capsule) taken for endometriosis associated pain (in mg) was assessed.
Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Restricted FAS. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time point for each treatment arm, respectively.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 18 15
Baseline
66.78
(34.60)
56.60
(61.39)
Week 4
41.78
(38.69)
48.86
(50.57)
Week 8
34.73
(37.21)
43.20
(28.95)
Week 12
21.25
(20.57)
29.33
(28.09)
Week 16
24.13
(27.33)
28.40
(25.81)
17. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Description An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to 113 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or worsened relative to pre-treatment state.
Time Frame Baseline up to 113 days after last dose of study medication

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 22 25
AEs
16
72.7%
21
84%
SAEs
0
0%
3
12%
18. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With New or Worsened Neurological Examinations
Description A neurological evaluation was performed by a consulting neurologist if adverse events suggested new or worsening peripheral neuropathy with respect to baseline or any adverse event of abnormal peripheral sensation was recorded. A neurological evaluation was done as soon as the above signs and symptoms were known, preferably within 7 days of becoming aware of such problems if possible. Neurological evaluation was done using Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) by investigator. Neurologic examination assessment included strength of groups of muscles of the head and neck, upper limbs and lower limbs, deep tendon reflexes and sensation (tactile, vibration, joint position sense and pin prick) of index fingers and great toes. Abnormality was judged by the investigator.
Time Frame Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time point for each treatment arm, respectively.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 22 23
Week 2
3
13.6%
1
4%
Week 4
0
0%
0
0%
Week 8
1
4.5%
1
4%
Week 12
1
4.5%
2
8%
Week 16
1
4.5%
0
0%
19. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA)
Description Serum samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies using validated semi-quantitative enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Time Frame Day 1 (pre-dose), Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 16

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time point. Only participants who received tanezumab were planned to be analyzed for this outcome measure.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 22
Day 1
0
0%
Week 2
0
0%
Week 4
0
0%
Week 8
0
0%
Week 16
0
0%
20. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Positive Urine or Serum Pregnancy Test
Description
Time Frame Screening, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and Early termination

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
Measure Participants 22 23
Count of Participants [Participants]
0
0%
0
0%

Adverse Events

Time Frame
Adverse Event Reporting Description The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Arm/Group Title Tanezumab Placebo
Arm/Group Description A single dose of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 15 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16. A single dose of placebo matched to tanezumab intravenous infusion on Day 1. Participants were followed up to Week 16.
All Cause Mortality
Tanezumab Placebo
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
Tanezumab Placebo
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/22 (0%) 3/25 (12%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Nausea 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Vomiting 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
General disorders
Chest pain 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Tanezumab Placebo
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 16/22 (72.7%) 21/25 (84%)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia 1/22 (4.5%) 0/25 (0%)
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Eye disorders
Eyelid ptosis 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Gaze palsy 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Vision blurred 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Visual impairment 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Constipation 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Diarrhoea 0/22 (0%) 2/25 (8%)
Dyspepsia 1/22 (4.5%) 1/25 (4%)
Nausea 2/22 (9.1%) 1/25 (4%)
Toothache 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Vomiting 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
General disorders
Asthenia 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Chest discomfort 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Fatigue 1/22 (4.5%) 2/25 (8%)
Feeling cold 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Infusion site pain 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Injection site erythema 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Oedema peripheral 2/22 (9.1%) 2/25 (8%)
Temperature intolerance 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis 0/22 (0%) 2/25 (8%)
Cystitis 1/22 (4.5%) 0/25 (0%)
Ear infection 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Folliculitis 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Fungal infection 1/22 (4.5%) 0/25 (0%)
Gastroenteritis 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Hordeolum 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Influenza 1/22 (4.5%) 2/25 (8%)
Laryngitis 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Nasopharyngitis 1/22 (4.5%) 1/25 (4%)
Otitis media 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Pharyngitis streptococcal 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Sinusitis 0/22 (0%) 2/25 (8%)
Upper respiratory tract infection 2/22 (9.1%) 2/25 (8%)
Urinary tract infection 1/22 (4.5%) 2/25 (8%)
Viral infection 1/22 (4.5%) 0/25 (0%)
Viral upper respiratory tract infection 1/22 (4.5%) 0/25 (0%)
Vulvovaginal mycotic infection 0/22 (0%) 3/25 (12%)
Wound infection staphylococcal 1/22 (4.5%) 0/25 (0%)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion 0/22 (0%) 2/25 (8%)
Limb injury 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Venomous sting 1/22 (4.5%) 0/25 (0%)
Investigations
Blood iron decreased 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Cardiac murmur 1/22 (4.5%) 0/25 (0%)
Platelet count decreased 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Weight increased 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia 4/22 (18.2%) 1/25 (4%)
Back pain 1/22 (4.5%) 0/25 (0%)
Facial asymmetry 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Muscular weakness 1/22 (4.5%) 0/25 (0%)
Musculoskeletal stiffness 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Myalgia 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Pain in extremity 1/22 (4.5%) 0/25 (0%)
Nervous system disorders
Allodynia 1/22 (4.5%) 0/25 (0%)
Carpal tunnel syndrome 1/22 (4.5%) 0/25 (0%)
Dizziness 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Dysarthria 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Dysgeusia 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Facial neuralgia 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Headache 2/22 (9.1%) 4/25 (16%)
Hyperreflexia 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Hypoaesthesia 1/22 (4.5%) 2/25 (8%)
Mental impairment 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Migraine 1/22 (4.5%) 1/25 (4%)
Paraesthesia 5/22 (22.7%) 3/25 (12%)
Tremor 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Depression 1/22 (4.5%) 0/25 (0%)
Panic attack 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Dysmenorrhoea 1/22 (4.5%) 1/25 (4%)
Endometriosis 1/22 (4.5%) 0/25 (0%)
Genital haemorrhage 1/22 (4.5%) 0/25 (0%)
Vaginal haemorrhage 1/22 (4.5%) 0/25 (0%)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Dyspnoea 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Oropharyngeal pain 1/22 (4.5%) 2/25 (8%)
Pharyngeal disorder 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Rhinitis seasonal 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Madarosis 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Pruritus 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
Rash 0/22 (0%) 2/25 (8%)
Vascular disorders
Peripheral coldness 0/22 (0%) 1/25 (4%)

Limitations/Caveats

Nerve growth factor (NGF) results were reported only for plasma since a reliable assay was not available for analyzing NGF in urine. Study was prematurely terminated and recruitment was stopped due to futility shown in pre-planned interim analysis.

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
Organization Pfizer, Inc.
Phone 1-800-718-1021
Email ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquiries@pfizer.com
Responsible Party:
Pfizer
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00784693
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • A4091023
  • ENDOMETRIOSIS POC
First Posted:
Nov 4, 2008
Last Update Posted:
Apr 30, 2021
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2021