Endoscopic Surgery for Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Multicenter Registry Study
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Currently, there is limited multi-center data on endoscopic surgery outcomes in western populations.
Evaluation of these measurement would help the investigators compare them to conventional treatment modalities within current tertiary facilities; and consequently help the investigators identify appropriate treatment techniques and improve clinical management of patients at Rutgers RWJMS.
The purpose of this retrospective registry study is to assess long term data on efficacy, safety and clinical outcome of Endoscopic Surgery within the gastrointestinal tract.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
Our tertiary-care institution performs clinically-indicated various Endoscopic Surgery procedures gastrointestinal indications in more than 800-1000 patients annually.
The study investigators would collect data on a large sample size of subjects undergoing various endoscopic resection procedures such as POEM (Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy), EMR (Endoscopic Mucosal Resection), ESD (Endoscopic submucosal dissection), STER (Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection), NOTES (Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery), TIF (Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication), Endoscopic Fistula Closure, Endoscopic Suturing, Capsule Endoscopy and EFTR (Endoscopic full-thickness resection). Clinical metrics will be collected including procedure times, length of follow-up, specific tumor characteristics, resection method, pathology results, procedural complications, additional therapy required, and disease-free survival time.
Various endoscopic surgical procedures are less invasive than traditional surgery, have fewer side effects and provide better efficacy. Moreover, they can be available to patients who are ineligible for surgery or who have refused more aggressive surgical intervention.
They improve quality of life and extend survival duration.
Endoscopic surgery procedures can be an appropriate approach in many gastrointestinal disorders including early neoplasms, challenging adenomas or sub-epithelial lesions that requires the resection of the superficial layers, mucosa and submucosa, or full thickness resection of the tract wall.
Currently, there is limited multi-center data on endoscopic surgery outcomes in western populations.
Evaluation of these measurement would help the investigators compare them to conventional treatment modalities within current tertiary facilities; and consequently help the investigators identify appropriate treatment techniques and improve clinical management of patients at Rutgers RWJMS.
The purpose of this retrospective registry study is to assess long term data on efficacy, safety and clinical outcome of Endoscopic Surgery within the gastrointestinal tract.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Subjects undergoing Endoscopic Surgery These procedures include: POEM (Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy) for Achalasia, G-POEM (Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy) for gastric outlet obstruction, Z-POEM (Peroral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker's Diverticulum), EMR (Endoscopic Mucosal Resection), ESD (Endoscopic submucosal dissection), STER (Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection), NOTES (Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery), TIF (Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication), Endoscopic Fistula Closure, Endoscopic Suturing, Capsule Endoscopy and EFTR (Endoscopic full-thickness resection). |
Procedure: Endoscopic Surgery
These procedures include: POEM (Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy) for Achalasia, G-POEM (Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy) for gastric outlet obstruction, Z-POEM (Peroral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker's Diverticulum), EMR (Endoscopic Mucosal Resection), ESD (Endoscopic submucosal dissection), STER (Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection), NOTES (Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery), TIF (Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication), Endoscopic Fistula Closure, Endoscopic Suturing, Capsule Endoscopy and EFTR (Endoscopic full-thickness resection).
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Efficacy of procedure [Upto 1 year]
Technical and clinical success rate
- Safety of procedure [Upto 1 year]
Type, frequency and intensity of adverse events
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Quality of Life after procedure [Upto 1 year]
Chart Review of quality-of-life improvement and overall survival duration
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects undergoing Endoscopic Surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects not undergoing Endoscopic Surgery
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Advanced Endoscopy Research, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Rutgers University | New Brunswick | New Jersey | United States | 08901 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Advanced Endoscopy Research, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Rutgers University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michel Kahaleh, MD, Advanced Endoscopy Research, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Rutgers University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- Pro2020002798