SuperNo2VA: Comparison of Oxygenation Between Nasal PAP vs Nasal During Propofol-based Sedation for EUS
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Randomized controlled single site study involves oxygenation, continuous positive airway pressure, and ventilation of subject via nasal mask and oxygenationvia closed facemask. The intervention of the study are delivery form of supplemental oxygen, bag-mask ventilation, and continuous nasal CPAP intraoperatively and in the post anesthesia care period.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
124 patients with BMI> or equal to 35kg.m2 or documented Obstructive Sleep Apnea scheduled for an EUS with Propofol sedation will be randomized to CPAP vs nasal mask for oxygenation during their procedure. Patients will be monitored every 2 minutes during the procedure and in the recovery area until discharge. If patients have difficulty or refuse to wear the mask, 2 or more simultaneous or non-synchronous adverse events, change in heart rhythm or ST changes on EKG they will immediately changed to the other group. The ansethesiologist, gastroenterologist & patient will complete post-procedure questionnaires regarding their opinion of the oxygen delivery system.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Facial mask facial mask for oxygen delivery |
Device: SuperNO2VA
SUPERNO2VA is nasal PAP device for oxygen delivery
|
Experimental: SuperNO2VA SuperNO2VA is CPAP device to deliver oxygen with nasal mask rather than with facial mask |
Device: SuperNO2VA
SUPERNO2VA is nasal PAP device for oxygen delivery
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Benefit of nasal PAP versus nasal administration of oxygen [oxygen saturation below 90% for >15 seconds during procedure]
Compare the incidence, duration, and severity of oxygen desaturation
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Total amount of Propofol for adequate sedation [Total duration of procedure]
Compares amounts of Propofol for induction and entire procedure
- Modified observer's Assessment and Alertness/Sedation Scale (MOAAS) [baseline, during procedure,and immediate post procedure in recovery area]
Compare MOAAS immediately prior to intubation and during procedure
- Procedural interruptions [Baseline & duration of procedure]
Compare incidence, duration and reason for procedural interruptions
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Age 18 years of age or older
-
Patients undergoing upper endoscopic ultrasound
-
American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Physical Status I-III
-
BMI ≥35 kg/m2 or documented Obstructive Sleep Apnea
-
Has provided written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Inpatient status
-
Active Congestive Heart Failure Exacerbation
-
Untreated ischemic heart disease
-
Acute exacerbation of respiratory disorders, including COPD and asthma
-
Emergent procedures
-
Pregnancy
-
Previous enrollment in this study
-
Inability to provide informed consent
-
Additional medical testing planned for the same day
-
History of allergic reaction to Propofol
-
Tracheostomy
-
Supra-glottic or sub-glottic tumor
-
Gastrointestinal tract obstruction or delayed transit (including delayed gastric emptying, gastric bezoar, achalasia, toxic megacolon).
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Indiana University Health University Hospital | Indianapolis | Indiana | United States | 46202-5121 |
2 | Indiana University Hospital | Indianapolis | Indiana | United States | 46202-5121 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Indiana University
- Vyaire Medical
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: john M DeWitt, MD, Indiana University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 1810997768