TOSI: Comparing Interventions for Indoor Air -Related Functional Symptoms

Sponsor
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02069002
Collaborator
Finnish Work Environment Fund (Other), The Social Insurance Institution of Finland (Other), The Occupational Health Centre of the city of Espoo (Other), Terveystalo healthcare service company (Finland) (Other), Mehiläinen Oy healthcare service company (Finland) (Other), The Occupational Health Centre of the city of Vantaa (Other), City of Helsinki (Other)
75
1
3
53.9
1.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of the current study is to compare the effictiveness of three different psychosocial therapies for treating functional disorders caused by indoor air problems.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
  • Behavioral: Applied relaxation group therapy
  • Behavioral: Information session (psychoeducation)
N/A

Detailed Description

Indoor air -related respiratory and other multiple organ symptoms are common in work environments in Finland. Symptoms effect on well-being and quality of life and may lead to impaired social and cognitive functioning and decreased work ability. All indoor air -related conditions are not explained by underlying physical factors and remain medically unexplained. Functional disorders are conditions where patients complain of multiple medically unexplained physical symptoms or physical problems don´t correlate with symptom severity. Indoor air -related symptoms and functional disorders are strongly associated to each other but there are no well-established diagnostic criteria for the condition . So far, there is no available treatment program to the indoor air -related symptoms to offer in primary or occupational health care services in Finland.

In randomized controlled trials, cognitive behavioral treatment has shown to be effective for patients suffering from functional disorders. In addition, a relaxation technique entitled as applied relaxation (Tuomisto & al, 1996) have shown to been shown to been effective to treat different kind of functional problems.

There are no published trials on treatment for individuals of indoor air related symptomatology. The present study is designed as a pragmatic trial to investigate the effect of three different treatment programs as compared to treatment as usual (TAU) for indoor air- related problems in order to improve the (1) work capacity and (2) well-being. A secondary aim of the study is to identify psychological factors affecting the patients' response to the treatment.

The patients are recruited from occupational health care services to establish and to evaluate the efficacy and usability of the treatment procedures. Participants will first undergo baseline assessment including medical examination of the respiratory symptoms. Then they are randomized to one of the study groups: TAU or one of the intervention groups. All study patients receive TAU at occupational health care services for their medical problems during the study. Patients randomized to the study groups receive also the intervention with TAU.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
75 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Psychosocial Interventions for Indoor Air -Related Functional Symptoms - Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 29, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 30, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT)

There will be ten (10) manualized session, fist 90 minutes and nine (9) 45-minute individual sessions conducted at weekly intervals, last two sessions 2 weeks intervals. One booster session will be conducted three months after the treatment. Sessions include psychoeducation about indoor air related symptoms and personal health behavior factors integrated on patients individual symptomatology, cognitive restructuring, behavioral experiments of patients health promoting behavior, imagery rescripting and relapse prevention. Intervention: Behavioral: Psychotherapy (CBT)

Behavioral: Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT)

Experimental: Applied relaxation group therapy

There will be seven (7) manualized session, first 120 minutes and six (6) 90-minute group sessions conducted at weekly intervals, last two sessions 2 weeks intervals. One booster session will be conducted three months after treatment. Sessions include information about indoor air related symptoms, behavioral training and experiments focusing on applied relaxation technique and relapse prevention. Intervention: Behavioral: group therapy (ART) NB: The Applied Relaxation group Therapy won´t be carried out due to slow and prolonged recruiting process (A steering group agreement 4/2015 and the Ethics Committee approval 5/2015 for the change of the study plan).

Behavioral: Applied relaxation group therapy

Experimental: Information session (psychoeducation)

There will be one (1) manualized 90-minute individual session. The session includes information about indoor air related symptoms and factors affecting individual health behavior. Intervention: Information session (psychoeducation)

Behavioral: Information session (psychoeducation)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. 15D - instrument [baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline]

    The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument (Sintonen, 2001)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. • Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) [baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline]

    Self-report measure that assesses anxiety symptoms

  2. Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) [baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline]

    Self-report measure that assesses insomnia severity

  3. The Symptom checkList-90 (SCL-90) [baseline, 6 and 12 months from the baseline]

    Self-report measure that assesses general psychological and somatic symptoms and severity

  4. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) [baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline]

    Self-report measure that assesses depressive symptoms

  5. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) [baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline]

    Self-report measure that assesses respiratory symptom severity

  6. The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-2 (AAQ-2) [baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline]

    Self-report measure focuses on experiential avoidance and psychological inflexibility

  7. Illness Worry Scale (IWS) [baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline]

    Self-report measure that focuses on illness worries and attitudes towards illness

  8. Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) [baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline]

    Self-report measure that focuses on mourning and continuous worrying toughs

  9. Need for Recovery (NRF) [baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline]

    Self-report measure that focuses on time needed on the recovery after work day

  10. Strategy and Attribution Questionnaire (SAQ) [baseline, 6 and 12 months from the baseline]

    Self-report measure focuses on personal attribute strategies.

  11. Self-assessed work ability [baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline]

    Self-assessed work ability (on a scale 0-10) (Tuomi & al. 1998)

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) [after the first, fifth and the last session of the CBT]

    Self-report measure that assesses three key aspects of the therapeutic alliance: (a) agreement on the tasks of therapy, (b) agreement on the goals of therapy and (c) development of an affective bond; for therapists and the patient of the individual cognitive-behavior therapy

  2. Sense of coherence Group (SOC-G-20) [after the first, fourth and the last session of the grouptherapy]

    For the group therapy patients to evaluate the groups therapeutic alliance.

  3. Satisfaction of the treatment [3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline]

    Questionnaire for the intervention groups patients to evaluate the satisfaction of the treatment and its efficacy.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
25 Years to 58 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Self-assessed work ability not more than 7 (on a scale 0-10, compared to lifetime best) (removed, see below)

  2. Employed minimum three (3) or more years

  3. Symptoms related to work environment indoor air (non-industrial workplaces)

  4. Respiratory symptoms related to indoor air

  5. And symptoms involve more than one other organ system

  6. Symptoms onset maximum three years before the study

  7. Symptoms are recurrent

  8. Symptoms appear more than one (1) environment or continue after repairs environmental exposure(s)

  9. No single widely acceptable test of organ system function can explain the symptoms (symptoms are medically unexplained)

  10. Minimum of one sick leave due to indoor air symptoms during the preceding half year

  11. Fluent Finnish (write/read/speak) (due the interventions)

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. six (6) months or more sick leave sick leaves due to indoor air symptoms during the preceding two years and currently unable to work

  2. Planned changes in the work (for example retirement, study free period, pregnancy etc.) during the study

  3. An acute, untreated medical disorder or illnesses:

  4. Somatic disease that explains the symptoms

  5. An acute, untreated mental disorder (depression, bipolar disorder, psychotic disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, eating disorders, personality disorders)

  6. Abuse of narcotics or alcohol or (non-prescribed) medicine

  7. Developmental disorders

  8. Psychotherapy (current or has ended preceding two years)

  9. No inform consent

  10. Other: Patient refusal; not actively participating working life (retired or unemployed)

Based on a steering group´s advice and agreement (10.10.2014), inclusion criteria (Self-assessed work ability not more than 7, on a scale 0-10, compared to lifetime best) was removed. Recruitment continues without this question as an inclusion criteria.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (Finland) Helsinki Uusimaa Finland 00250

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
  • Finnish Work Environment Fund
  • The Social Insurance Institution of Finland
  • The Occupational Health Centre of the city of Espoo
  • Terveystalo healthcare service company (Finland)
  • Mehiläinen Oy healthcare service company (Finland)
  • The Occupational Health Centre of the city of Vantaa
  • City of Helsinki

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tiina M. Paunio, MD, PhD, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health and University of Helsinki

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02069002
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • TSR113076
  • TTL338270202
First Posted:
Feb 21, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Aug 7, 2018
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2017
Keywords provided by Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 7, 2018