Epidemiology Study of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION)

Sponsor
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01260324
Collaborator
(none)
21,283
19

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The objectives of this study were to: (1) evaluate the natural history of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION); (2) estimate the population incidence of NAION; and (3) identify potential risk factors for NAION.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: No intervention given in this observational study
  • Other: No intervention given in this observational study

Detailed Description

The study population consisted of members of the Ingenix Normative Health Informatics (NHI) Database during 01/01/2003 through 12/31/2007, who were 18 years of age or older with at least 183 days of continuous enrollment in the database and without any doctor visits associated with a diagnosis of ischemic optic neuropathy during the 183 days prior to cohort entry.

From the study population, patients with a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were identified as potential NAION cases (n = 3,732). From the potential NAION cases, definite and possible NAION cases were identified using medical record review and a claims algorithm (n=1,283).

From the study population, patients without a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were randomly selected as controls (n = 20,000)

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
21283 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Control
Time Perspective:
Retrospective
Official Title:
The Detection and Epidemiology of NAION in a Commercially Insured Population in the United States.
Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2010

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
NAION cases

From the study population, patients with a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were identified as potential NAION cases (n = 3,732). From the potential NAION cases, definite and possible NAION cases were identified using medical record review and a claims algorithm (n=1,283). Data from definite and possible NAION cases contributed to the analysis.

Other: No intervention given in this observational study
No intervention given in this observational study

Controls

From the study population, patients without a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were randomly selected as controls (n = 20,000)

Other: No intervention given in this observational study
No intervention given in this observational study

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Crude Incidence Rate of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) Per 1000 Person-years by Age [01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007]

    Person-years estimated by dividing the number of Controls participants by the derived sampling fraction (20,000 divided by the total person-time at risk). Age categorized by years.

  2. Crude Incidence Rate of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) Per 1000 Person-years by Sex [01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007]

    Person-years estimated by dividing the number of Controls participants by the derived sampling fraction (20,000 divided by the total person-time at risk). Sex categorized as Female or Male.

  3. Crude Incidence Rate of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) Per 1000 Person-years by Calendar Year [01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007]

    Person-years estimated by dividing the number of Controls participants by the derived sampling fraction (20,000 divided by the total person-time at risk). Calendar years include years 2003 to 2007.

  4. Crude Incidence Rate of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) Per 1000 Person-years by Region [01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007]

    Person-years estimated by dividing the number of Controls participants by the derived sampling fraction (20,000 divided by the total person-time at risk). Region of the United States categorized as Northeast, Midwest, South, and West.

  5. Crude Incidence Rate of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) Per 1000 Person-years by Baseline Risk Factors [01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007]

    Person-years estimated by dividing number of Controls (20,000) by derived sampling fraction (total person-time at risk). Risk factors include diabetes, smoking, obesity, erectile dysfunction, hyperlipidemia, myocardial infarction, other coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, use of beta or calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, nitrates, anti-platelet agents, diuretics, and recent phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors use. Recent use=any dispensing in the 60 days preceding date of diagnosis for NAION cases or index date for Controls.

  6. Crude Incidence Rate of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) Per 1000 Person-years by Comorbid Diagnoses [01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007]

    Person-years estimated by dividing the number of Controls participants by the derived sampling fraction (20,000 divided by the total person-time at risk). Comorbid diagnoses categorized according to the International Classification of Diseases ninth-edition (ICD-9) diagnoses. Categories include Occlusion and stenosis of precerebral arteries (Occlusion / Stenosis), Other disorders of bone and cartilage (Bone and Cartilage), Symptoms involving head and neck (Head and Neck), and Other ill defined and unknown causes of morbidity and mortality (Ill defined / Unknown causes).

  7. Crude Incidence Rate of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) Per 1000 Person-years by PDE-5 Inhibitor Use [01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007]

    Person-years estimated by dividing the number of Controls by the derived sampling fraction (20,000 divided by total person-time at risk). PDE-5 inhibitor use categorized by frequency of use in the number of days specific preceding diagnosis for NAION Cases or preceding the index date for Controls: Recent use=any dispensing in the preceding 60 days; Any use=any PDE-5 inhibitors use; Chronic use=at least a total of 26 days supply or 5 dispensings in the preceding 183 days; Non-chronic use=any dispensing in the preceding 183 days that does not meet the criteria for chronic use; Never use=none.

  8. Number of Participants With NAION by Time Course of Visual Change Onset: Intermittent, Abrupt (Acute), or Chronic (Adjudicated by Medical Record Review) [01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007]

  9. Incidence Rate Ratio Between NAION Risk Factors and Resolution of Visual Symptoms of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) [01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007]

    Categorized by risk factors of age (years) and sex (male or female). Incidence rate ratio and the 95% confidence interval adjusted for all the other covariates in the table.

  10. Incidence Rate Ratio Between NAION Risk Factors and Recurrence of Visual Symptoms of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) [01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007]

    Categorized by risk factors of age (years) and sex (male or female). Incidence rate ratio and the 95% confidence interval adjusted for all the other covariates in the table.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Member of the Ingenix Normative Health Informatics (NHI) Database during 01/01/2003 through 12/31/2007

  • 18 years of age or older

  • Had at least 183 days of continuous enrollment in the database

  • No doctor visits associated with a diagnosis of ischemic optic neuropathy during the 183 days prior to cohort entry

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Less than 18 years of age

  • Less than 183 days of continuous enrollment in the database

  • At least one doctor visit associated with a diagnosis of ischemic optic neuropathy during the 183 days prior to cohort entry

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01260324
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • A1481282
First Posted:
Dec 15, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Feb 1, 2021
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2021

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title NAION Cases Controls
Arm/Group Description Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). From the study population, patients with a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were identified as potential NAION cases (n = 3,732). From the potential NAION cases, definite and possible NAION cases were identified using medical record review and a claims algorithm (n=1,283). Data from definite and possible NAION cases contributed to the analysis. From the study population, patients without a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were randomly selected as controls (n = 20,000)
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 1283 20000
COMPLETED 1283 20000
NOT COMPLETED 0 0

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title NAION Cases Controls Total
Arm/Group Description Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). From the study population, patients with a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were identified as potential NAION cases (n = 3,732). From the potential NAION cases, definite and possible NAION cases were identified using medical record review and a claims algorithm (n=1,283). Data from definite and possible NAION cases contributed to the analysis. From the study population, patients without a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were randomly selected as controls (n = 20,000) Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 1283 20000 21283
Age, Customized (participants) [Number]
18 to 34 years
43
3.4%
5954
29.8%
5997
28.2%
35 to 44 years
59
4.6%
4937
24.7%
4996
23.5%
45 to 54 years
208
16.2%
4655
23.3%
4863
22.8%
55 to 64 years
481
37.5%
3041
15.2%
3522
16.5%
65 to 74 years
247
19.3%
902
4.5%
1149
5.4%
≥75 years
245
19.1%
511
2.6%
756
3.6%
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
595
46.4%
10669
53.3%
11264
52.9%
Male
688
53.6%
9331
46.7%
10019
47.1%
Number of participants with NAION diagnosis per calendar year (participants) [Number]
Year 2003
285
22.2%
3953
19.8%
4238
19.9%
Year 2004
236
18.4%
3990
20%
4226
19.9%
Year 2005
284
22.1%
4137
20.7%
4421
20.8%
Year 2006
231
18%
4081
20.4%
4312
20.3%
Year 2007
247
19.3%
3839
19.2%
4086
19.2%
Number of participants with NAION diagnosis per region of United States (participants) [Number]
Northeast
100
7.8%
2456
12.3%
2556
12%
Midwest
362
28.2%
5345
26.7%
5707
26.8%
South
656
51.1%
9158
45.8%
9814
46.1%
West
165
12.9%
3041
15.2%
3206
15.1%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Crude Incidence Rate of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) Per 1000 Person-years by Age
Description Person-years estimated by dividing the number of Controls participants by the derived sampling fraction (20,000 divided by the total person-time at risk). Age categorized by years.
Time Frame 01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Combined NAION cases and Controls populations; (n)=number of participants for NAION cases and Controls, respectively, per estimated person-years [(NAION cases n, Controls n) / person-years].
Arm/Group Title Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Arm/Group Description NAION cases: from the study population, patients with a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were identified as potential NAION cases (n = 3,732). From the potential NAION cases, definite and possible NAION cases were identified using medical record review and a claims algorithm (n=1,283). Data from definite and possible NAION cases contributed to the analysis. Controls: from the study population, patients without a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were randomly selected as controls (n = 20,000).
Measure Participants 21283
Age 18 to 34 (n=43, 5,954) / 8,042,997
0.01
Age 35 to 44 (n=59, 4,937) / 6,669,176
0.01
Age 45 to 54 (n=208, 4,655) / 6,288,235
0.03
Age 55 to 64 (n=481, 3,041) / 4,107,953
0.12
Age 65 to 74 (n=247, 902) / 1,218,472
0.20
Age ≥75 (n=245, 511) / 690,287
0.35
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Age 18 to 34
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.01
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.01 to 0.01
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Age 35 to 44
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.01
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.01 to 0.01
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Age 45 to 54
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.03
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.03 to 0.04
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Age 55 to 64
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.08
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.07 to 0.09
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Age 65 to 74
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.12
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.11 to 0.14
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Age ≥75
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.18
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.15 to 0.21
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Age 18 to 34
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.09
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.06 to 0.13
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Age 35 to 44
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.11
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.08 to 0.16
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Age 45 to 54
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.37
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.30 to 0.45
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Age 65 to 74
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 3.83
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
2.68 to 5.47
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 11
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Age ≥75
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 5.73
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
4.00 to 8.22
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
2. Primary Outcome
Title Crude Incidence Rate of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) Per 1000 Person-years by Sex
Description Person-years estimated by dividing the number of Controls participants by the derived sampling fraction (20,000 divided by the total person-time at risk). Sex categorized as Female or Male.
Time Frame 01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Combined population includes NAION cases and Controls population; (n)=number of participants for NAION cases and Controls, respectively, and estimated person-years [(n=NAION cases, Controls) / person-years].
Arm/Group Title Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Arm/Group Description NAION cases: from the study population, patients with a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were identified as potential NAION cases (n = 3,732). From the potential NAION cases, definite and possible NAION cases were identified using medical record review and a claims algorithm (n=1,283). Data from definite and possible NAION cases contributed to the analysis. Controls: from the study population, patients without a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were randomly selected as controls (n = 20,000).
Measure Participants 21283
Female (n=595, 10,669) / 14,412,283
0.04
Male (n=688, 9,331) / 12,604,837
0.05
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Female
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.04
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.04 to 0.05
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Male
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.05
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.05 to 0.06
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Male
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.83
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.50 to 2.22
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
3. Primary Outcome
Title Crude Incidence Rate of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) Per 1000 Person-years by Calendar Year
Description Person-years estimated by dividing the number of Controls participants by the derived sampling fraction (20,000 divided by the total person-time at risk). Calendar years include years 2003 to 2007.
Time Frame 01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Combined population includes NAION cases and Controls population; (n)=number of participants for NAION cases and Controls, respectively, and estimated person-years [(n=NAION cases, Controls) / person-years].
Arm/Group Title Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Arm/Group Description NAION cases: from the study population, patients with a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were identified as potential NAION cases (n = 3,732). From the potential NAION cases, definite and possible NAION cases were identified using medical record review and a claims algorithm (n=1,283). Data from definite and possible NAION cases contributed to the analysis. Controls: from the study population, patients without a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were randomly selected as controls (n = 20,000).
Measure Participants 21283
Year 2003 (n=285, 3953) / 5,339,934
0.05
Year 2004 (n=236, 3,990) / 5,389,915
0.04
Year 2005 (n=284, 4,137) / 5,588,491
0.05
Year 2006 (n=231, 4,081) / 5,512,843
0.04
Year 2007 (n=247, 3,839) / 5,185,936
0.05
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Year 2003
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.05
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.04 to 0.05
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Year 2004
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.05
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.04 to 0.05
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Year 2005
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.05
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.04 to 0.05
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Year 2006
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.04
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.04 to 0.05
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Year 2007
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.05
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.04 to 0.05
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Year 2004
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.77
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.61 to 0.96
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Year 2005
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.73
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.58 to 0.91
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Year 2006
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.87
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.68 to 1.12
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Year 2007
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.93
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.72 to 1.19
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
4. Primary Outcome
Title Crude Incidence Rate of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) Per 1000 Person-years by Region
Description Person-years estimated by dividing the number of Controls participants by the derived sampling fraction (20,000 divided by the total person-time at risk). Region of the United States categorized as Northeast, Midwest, South, and West.
Time Frame 01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Combined population includes NAION cases and Controls population; (n)=number of participants for NAION cases and Controls, respectively, and estimated person-years [(n=NAION cases, Controls) / person-years].
Arm/Group Title Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Arm/Group Description NAION cases: from the study population, patients with a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were identified as potential NAION cases (n = 3,732). From the potential NAION cases, definite and possible NAION cases were identified using medical record review and a claims algorithm (n=1,283). Data from definite and possible NAION cases contributed to the analysis. Controls: from the study population, patients without a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were randomly selected as controls (n = 20,000).
Measure Participants 21283
Northeast (n=100, 2,456) / 3,317,702
0.03
Midwest (n=362, 5,345) / 7,220,325
0.05
South (n=656, 9,158) / 12,371,139
0.05
West (n=165, 3,041) / 4,107,953
0.04
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Northeast
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.05
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.04 to 0.06
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Midwest
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.05
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.04 to 0.05
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate South
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.05
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.05 to 0.06
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate West
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.04
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.04 to 0.05
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Northeast
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.41
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.31 to 0.56
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Midwest
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.68
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.56 to 0.84
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio West
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.73
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.57 to 0.93
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
5. Primary Outcome
Title Crude Incidence Rate of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) Per 1000 Person-years by Baseline Risk Factors
Description Person-years estimated by dividing number of Controls (20,000) by derived sampling fraction (total person-time at risk). Risk factors include diabetes, smoking, obesity, erectile dysfunction, hyperlipidemia, myocardial infarction, other coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, use of beta or calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, nitrates, anti-platelet agents, diuretics, and recent phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors use. Recent use=any dispensing in the 60 days preceding date of diagnosis for NAION cases or index date for Controls.
Time Frame 01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Combined population; (n)=number of participants for NAION cases and Controls, respectively, and estimated person-years [(n=NAION cases, Controls) / person-years]. Only the covariates selected by the step wise regression procedure were summarized.
Arm/Group Title Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Arm/Group Description NAION cases: from the study population, patients with a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were identified as potential NAION cases (n = 3,732). From the potential NAION cases, definite and possible NAION cases were identified using medical record review and a claims algorithm (n=1,283). Data from definite and possible NAION cases contributed to the analysis. Controls: from the study population, patients without a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were randomly selected as controls (n = 20,000).
Measure Participants 21283
Diabetes (n=349, 1,131) / 1,527,818
0.23
Smoking (n=48, 232) / 313,399
0.15
Obesity (n=25, 273) / 368,784
0.07
Nitrates (n=71, 171) / 230,996
0.31
Anti-platelet agents (n=127, 182) / 245,856
0.52
Diuretics (n=134, 296) / 399,853
0.34
Recent PDE-5 inhibitors use (n=17, 202) / 272,873
0.06
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Diabetes
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.09
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.08 to 0.10
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Smoking
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.11
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.08 to 0.14
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Obesity
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.04
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.03 to 0.06
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Nitrates
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.07
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.06 to 0.09
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Anti-platelet agents
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.15
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.12 to 0.18
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Diuretics
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.13
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.09 to 0.17
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Recent PDE-5 inhibitors use
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.03
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.01 to 0.04
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Diabetes
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.82
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.47 to 2.25
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Smoking
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.34
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.63 to 2.85
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Obesity
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.43
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.23 to 0.81
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 11
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Nitrates
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.63
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.42 to 0.94
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 12
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Anti-platelet agents
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.12
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.53 to 2.94
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 13
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Diuretics
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.24
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.46 to 3.43
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 14
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Recent PDE-5 inhibitors use
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.57
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.31 to 1.04
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
6. Primary Outcome
Title Crude Incidence Rate of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) Per 1000 Person-years by Comorbid Diagnoses
Description Person-years estimated by dividing the number of Controls participants by the derived sampling fraction (20,000 divided by the total person-time at risk). Comorbid diagnoses categorized according to the International Classification of Diseases ninth-edition (ICD-9) diagnoses. Categories include Occlusion and stenosis of precerebral arteries (Occlusion / Stenosis), Other disorders of bone and cartilage (Bone and Cartilage), Symptoms involving head and neck (Head and Neck), and Other ill defined and unknown causes of morbidity and mortality (Ill defined / Unknown causes).
Time Frame 01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Combined population includes NAION cases and Controls population; (n)=number of participants for NAION cases and Controls, respectively, and estimated person-years [(n=NAION cases, Controls) / person-years].
Arm/Group Title Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Arm/Group Description NAION cases: from the study population, patients with a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were identified as potential NAION cases (n = 3,732). From the potential NAION cases, definite and possible NAION cases were identified using medical record review and a claims algorithm (n=1,283). Data from definite and possible NAION cases contributed to the analysis. Controls: from the study population, patients without a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were randomly selected as controls (n = 20,000).
Measure Participants 21283
Other retinal disorders (n=337, 240) / 324,205
1.04
Glaucoma (n=161, 353) / 476,852
0.34
Cataract (n=245, 405) / 547,097
0.45
Visual disturbances (n=291, 130) / 175,611
1.66
Blindness and low vision (n=103, 11) / 14,859
6.93
Other disorders of eye (n=143, 201) / 271,522
0.53
Occlusion / Stenosis (n=98, 75) / 101,314
0.97
Acute sinusitis (n=92, 1,123) / 1,517,011
0.06
Other dermatoses (n=114, 536) / 724,059
0.16
Bone and cartilage (n=114, 504) / 680,831
0.17
Head and neck (n=181, 771) / 1,041,510
0.17
Ill defined / Unknown causes (n=71, 183) / 247,207
0.29
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Other retinal disorders
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.33
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.28 to 0.39
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Glaucoma
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.13
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.11 to 0.16
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Cataract
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.20
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.08 to 0.41
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Visual disturbances
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.99
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.83 to 1.17
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Blindness and low vision
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 2.00
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.60 to 2.46
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Other disorders of eye
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.19
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.16 to 0.23
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Occlusion and stenosis of precerebral arteries
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.22
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.18 to 0.27
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Acute sinusitis
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.07
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.05 to 0.08
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Other dermatoses
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.06
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.05 to 0.08
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Other disorders of bone and cartilage
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.08
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.06 to 0.10
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 11
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Symptoms involving head and neck
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.12
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.10 to 0.14
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 12
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Other ill defined and unknown causes of morbidity and mortality
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.14
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.10 to 0.18
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability of having NAION predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 13
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Other retinal disorders
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 6.65
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
4.72 to 9.38
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 14
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Glaucoma
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.60
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.77 to 3.81
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 15
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Cataract
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.31
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.02 to 1.68
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 16
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Visual disturbances
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 14.20
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
10.40 to 19.30
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 17
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Blindness and low vision
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 15.10
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
6.60 to 34.50
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 18
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Other disorders of eye
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.02
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.44 to 2.82
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 19
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Occlusion and stenosis of precerebral arteries
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.22
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.64 to 2.31
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 20
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Acute sinusitis
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.29
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.96 to 1.74
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 21
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Other dermatoses
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.34
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.02 to 1.77
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 22
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Other disorders of bone and cartilage
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.32
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.98 to 1.77
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 23
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Symptoms involving head and neck
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.37
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.02 to 1.84
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
Statistical Analysis 24
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Odds ratio Ill defined and unknown causes of morbidity and mortality
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.64
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.08 to 2.49
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Odds ratio derived from covariate-adjusted logisitic regression model and adjusted for all other covariates in the table.
7. Primary Outcome
Title Crude Incidence Rate of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) Per 1000 Person-years by PDE-5 Inhibitor Use
Description Person-years estimated by dividing the number of Controls by the derived sampling fraction (20,000 divided by total person-time at risk). PDE-5 inhibitor use categorized by frequency of use in the number of days specific preceding diagnosis for NAION Cases or preceding the index date for Controls: Recent use=any dispensing in the preceding 60 days; Any use=any PDE-5 inhibitors use; Chronic use=at least a total of 26 days supply or 5 dispensings in the preceding 183 days; Non-chronic use=any dispensing in the preceding 183 days that does not meet the criteria for chronic use; Never use=none.
Time Frame 01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Combined NAION cases and Controls populations. N=number of participants according to frequency of PDE-5 inhibitor use for males 40 years or older; (n)=number of participants for NAION cases and Controls, respectively, per variable of frequency of use and estimated person-years [(n=NAION cases, Controls) / person-years].
Arm/Group Title Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Arm/Group Description NAION cases: from the study population, patients with a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were identified as potential NAION cases (n = 3,732). From the potential NAION cases, definite and possible NAION cases were identified using medical record review and a claims algorithm (n=1,283). Data from definite and possible NAION cases contributed to the analysis. Controls: from the study population, patients without a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were randomly selected as controls (n = 20,000).
Measure Participants 6219
Recent use (n=17, 187) / 254,239
0.05
Any use (n=32, 322) / 437,780
0.06
Chronic use (n=16, 162) / 220,249
0.06
Non-chronic use (n=16, 160) / 217,530
0.07
Never use (n=631, 5,234) / 7,115,962
0.09
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Recent use
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.05
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.03 to 0.07
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Any use (includes chronic and non-chronic use)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.06
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.04 to 0.08
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Chronic use
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.05
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.03 to 0.08
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Non-chronic use
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.06
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.03 to 0.11
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Combined NAION Cases and Controls
Comments Incidence rate Never use
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Incidence rate per 1000 person-years
Estimated Value 0.09
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.08 to 0.10
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Standardized to the quintiles of the probability predicted by all the other risk factors of NAION among the Controls.
8. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With NAION by Time Course of Visual Change Onset: Intermittent, Abrupt (Acute), or Chronic (Adjudicated by Medical Record Review)
Description
Time Frame 01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Participants from the NAION cases population adjudicated by medical record review.
Arm/Group Title NAION Cases
Arm/Group Description NAION cases: from the study population, patients with a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were identified as potential NAION cases (n = 3,732). From the potential NAION cases, definite and possible NAION cases were identified using medical record review. Data from definite and possible NAION cases identified from medical record review only contributed to the analysis.
Measure Participants 74
Acute
35
2.7%
Intermittent
3
0.2%
Chronic
1
0.1%
Unknown
35
2.7%
9. Primary Outcome
Title Incidence Rate Ratio Between NAION Risk Factors and Resolution of Visual Symptoms of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION)
Description Categorized by risk factors of age (years) and sex (male or female). Incidence rate ratio and the 95% confidence interval adjusted for all the other covariates in the table.
Time Frame 01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Participant population with definite and possible NAION cases identified by medical record review. N=number of participants with resolution of visual symptoms (each set of variables); (n)=number of participants for variable (age or sex) for NAION cases and estimated person-years [(n=NAION cases) / person-years].
Arm/Group Title NAION Cases
Arm/Group Description NAION cases: from the study population, patients with a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were identified as potential NAION cases (n = 3,732). From the potential NAION cases, definite and possible NAION cases were identified using medical record review. Data from definite and possible NAION cases identified from medical record review only contributed to the analysis.
Measure Participants 57
Age 18 to 64 years (n=18) / 25.53
1.00
Age ≥65 years (n=9) / 29.94
0.56
Female (n=14) / 31.69
1.00
Male (n=13) / 23.77
1.22
10. Primary Outcome
Title Incidence Rate Ratio Between NAION Risk Factors and Recurrence of Visual Symptoms of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION)
Description Categorized by risk factors of age (years) and sex (male or female). Incidence rate ratio and the 95% confidence interval adjusted for all the other covariates in the table.
Time Frame 01-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Participant population with definite and possible NAION cases identified by medical record review. N=number of participants with recurrence of visual symptoms; (n)=number of participants for variable (age or sex) for NAION cases and estimated person-years [(n=NAION cases) / person-years].
Arm/Group Title NAION Cases
Arm/Group Description NAION cases: from the study population, patients with a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were identified as potential NAION cases (n = 3,732). From the potential NAION cases, definite and possible NAION cases were identified using medical record review. Data from definite and possible NAION cases identified from medical record review only contributed to the analysis.
Measure Participants 74
Age 18 to 64 years (n=2) / 66.63
1.00
Age ≥65 years (n=1) / 57.39
0.62
Female (n=1) / 66.05
1.00
Male (n=2) / 57.97
2.03

Adverse Events

Time Frame 1-January-2003 up to 31-December-2007
Adverse Event Reporting Description The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Arm/Group Title NAION Cases Controls
Arm/Group Description Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). From the study population, patients with a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were identified as potential NAION cases (n = 3,732). From the potential NAION cases, definite and possible NAION cases were identified using medical record review and a claims algorithm (n=1,283). Data from definite and possible NAION cases contributed to the analysis. From the study population, patients without a claim associated with an ischemic optic neuropathy diagnosis code were randomly selected as controls (n = 20,000)
All Cause Mortality
NAION Cases Controls
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
NAION Cases Controls
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/1283 (0%) 0/20000 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
NAION Cases Controls
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/1283 (0%) 0/20000 (0%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
Organization Pfizer, Inc.
Phone 1-800-718-1021
Email ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquiries@pfizer.com
Responsible Party:
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01260324
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • A1481282
First Posted:
Dec 15, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Feb 1, 2021
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2021