Study Evaluating LAMICTAL Extended-Release Therapy Added To Current Seizure Treatments In Patients With Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures (PGTC) Seizures

Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00104416
Collaborator
(none)
153
146
2
43
1
0

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study is being conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of LAMICTAL (lamotrigine) extended-release with placebo in the treatment of Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic (PGTC) seizures. LAMICTAL extended-release is an investigational drug. Placebo tablets look like LAMICTAL extended-release tablets but do not contain active medication. In this study, LAMICTAL extended-release or placebo tablets will be added to current seizure treatments.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: lamotrigine (LAMICTAL) extended-release
  • Drug: Placebo
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
153 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel-group Evaluation of LAMICTAL Extended-Release Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures
Study Start Date :
Dec 1, 2004
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2008
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2008

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo

Drug: Placebo
Placebo control

Experimental: lamotrigine (LAMICTAL) extended-relesase

Drug: lamotrigine (LAMICTAL) extended-release
Primary experimental dosage form

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Primary Generalized Tonic-clonic (PGTC) Seizure Frequency During the Entire Double-Blind Treatment Phase [Baseline through end of Double-Blind Treatment Phase (up to Week 19)]

    Percent change from baseline is calculated as the number of seizures by week during the Double-Blind Treatment Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 19) compared to the number of seizures per week during the Baseline Phase (Baseline Week 1 up to Week 8). A positive number equals a reduction in seizure frequency. PGTC seizures are more commonly known as gran mal seizures.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of Participants With >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, or 100% Reduction in PGTC Seizure Frequency During the Entire Double-Blind (DB)Treatment Phase (TP), the Escalation Phase, the Maintenance Phase, and the Last 8 Weeks of the Maintenance Phase [Entire DB Treatment Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 19), Escalation Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 7), Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 8 up to Week 19), and the last 8 weeks of the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 12 up to Week 19)]

    Change in seizure frequency was calculated as the average seizure frequency during each of the following: the Entire DB Treatment Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 19); the Escalation Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 7); the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 8 up to Week 19); and the last 8 weeks of the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 12 up to Week 19), minus the seizure frequency at Baseline.

  2. Percent Change From Baseline in PGTC Seizure Frequency During the Escalation Phase, the Maintenance Phase, and During the Last 8 Weeks of the Maintenance Phase of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase [Escalation Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 7), Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 8 up to Week 19), and the last 8 weeks of the Maintenance Phase (Week 12 up to Week 19)]

    Percent change from baseline is calculated as the number of seizures by week during the Escalation Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 7), the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 8 up to Week 19), and during the last 8 weeks of the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 12 up to Week 19) compared to the number of seizures per week during the Baseline Phase (Baseline Week 1 up to Week 8). A positive number equals a reduction in seizure frequency.

  3. Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to >=50% Reduction in Seizure Frequency in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase [Baseline through end of Double-Blind Treatment Phase (up to Week 19)]

    50% reduction in seizure frequency is defined as the time at which a participant first achieved and maintained a >=50% reduction in seizure frequency following exposure to at least 1 week of study drug.

  4. Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase [Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)]

    Change from baseline in body weight is calculated as the Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) value minus the Baseline value.

  5. Number of Participants With Improved Clinical Status on the Investigator's Global Assessment in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase [Week 19 (or last on-study assessment in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)]

    The investigators rated the participants' overall clinical status based on 7 clinical factors and an overall factor: seizure frequency, duration, and intensity; adverse experiences; social, intellectual, and motor functioning. Using a 7-point scale (marked deterioration [1], moderate deterioration [2], mild deterioration [3], no change [4], mild improvement [5], moderate improvement [6], or marked improvement [7]), the investigators assessed the participants' status compared to their condition prior to initiating study medication.

  6. Number of Participants With Improved Satisfaction With Seizure Control on the Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase [Week 19 (or last on-study assessment in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)]

    Participants were asked to rate their satisfaction with their seizure control compared to their seizure control prior to initiating study drug on a 7 point scale: marked deterioration (1), moderate deterioration (2), mild deterioration (3), no change (4), mild improvement (5), moderate improvement (6), or marked improvement (7).

  7. Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly PGTC Seizure Frequency During the Entire Continuation Phase (CP), the Transition Phase, the Open-Label Phase, and the Last 8 Weeks of the Open-Label Phase [Entire CP (CP Week 1 up to Week 52), the Transition Phase (CP Week 1 up to Week 7), the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 8 up to Week 52), and the last 8 weeks of the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 45 up to Week 52)]

    Percent change from baseline is calculated as the number of seizures by week during the entire CP (CP Week 1 up to Week 52), the Transition Phase (CP Week 1 up to Week 7), the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 8 up to Week 52), and the last 8 weeks of the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 45 up to Week 52) minus the number of seizures per week during the Baseline Phase (Baseline Week 1 through Week 8). A positive number equals a reduction in seizure frequency.

  8. Number of Participants With >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, or 100% Reduction or >=50% Increase From Baseline in Weekly PGTC Seizure Frequency for the Entire Continuation Phase, the Transition Phase, the Open-Label (OL) Phase, and the Last 8 Weeks of the OL Phase. [Entire CP (CP Week 1 up to Week 52), the Transition Phase (CP Week 1 up to Week 7), the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 8 up to Week 52), and the last 8 weeks of the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 45 up to Week 52)]

    Change in seizure frequency was calculated as the average seizure frequency during each of the following: the Entire CP (CP Week 1 up to Week 52); the Transition Phase (CP Week 1 up to Week 7); the Open-Label (OL) Phase (CP Week 8 up to Week 52); and the last 8 weeks of the Open Label Phase (CP Week 45 up to Week 52) minus the seizure frequency at Baseline. W, Week.

  9. Mean Change From Baseline in the Profile of Mood State (POMS) Mood Disturbance Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase [Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)]

    The POMS is a self-administered 65-item questionnaire that evaluates the participants' perception of their mood state in 6 areas: tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, vigor-activity, fatigue-inertia, and confusion-bewilderment. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely), with higher scores indicating a more negative mood state. A total score (from 0 to 24) is obtained by summing the scores of the six domains.

  10. Mean Change From Baseline in the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase [Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)]

    The 20-item CES-D questionnaire is self-administered and asks respondents to report the frequency to which the 20 events were experienced over the past week. A 4-point Likert scale is used and ranges from rarely or none of the time (0) to most or all of the time (3). The total score, a sum across the 20 items (ranging from 0 to 60), determines the extent to which a participant may be experiencing depression. Higher scores indicate a higher severity of depression.

  11. Mean Change From Baseline in the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory-Epilepsy (NDDI-E) 6-Item Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase [Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)]

    The NDDI-E is a self-reported questionnaire composed of 46 brief phrases/words to identify mood disorders across the spectrum of depression. It was developed to capture depressive moods that are co-morbid with the disease of epilepsy or its treatment as well as to measure the depressive state of the participant. All phrases are measured on a 4-point Likert scale of Never (1) to Always/often (4) and refer to the participants' mood over the past week. Scoring is comprised of a total mood score calculated by summing the scores of 6 specific items (from 6=never to 24=always or often).

  12. Mean Change From Baseline in the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31-P (QOLIE-31P) Overall Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase [Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)]

    The QOLIE-31 is a 31-item questionnaire that evaluates the participants' perception of his or her quality of life in 7 domains: seizure worry, emotional well being, energy/fatigue, cognitive functioning, medication effects, social functioning, and overall quality of life. Each domain (with scores ranging from 0 to 100) is summed and divided by the total number of questions that were answered. The overall score is derived by weighting and then summing up the seven domain scores.

  13. Mean Change From Baseline in the Adverse Experience Profile (AEP) Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase [Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)]

    The AEP is a list of 19 items covering many possible side effects attributable to drug treatment. The participants respond by assessing how much each event has been a problem for them over the past 4 weeks (1=Never a Problem to 4=Always a Problem). Each individual item can be examined; an overall adverse events score is calculated as the sum of the scores across the 19 items. The AEP total score ranges from 19 to 76, with a higher score indicating a higher degree of adverse event severity.

  14. Mean Change From Baseline in the Seizure Severity Questionnaire (SSQ) Global Bother Score at Week 19 Double-Blind Treatment Phase [Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)]

    The SSQ is a self-reported instrument developed to assess the severity of seizures and seizure symptoms. The scale consists of 10 major clinical features/symptoms of seizures that the participants rate on a 7-point Likert scale (ranging from very mild/helpful/no bother at all [1] to very severe/no help/bothersome [7]). The Global Bother Domain is the primary score used for the analysis of the SSQ and has scores ranging from 1 to 7.

  15. Mean Change From Baseline in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) 8-Item Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase [Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)]

    The ESS is an 8-item, self-administered questionnaire that measures excessive daytime sleepiness in adults. The instrument captures information on the extent to which the participant would be likely, or not, to fall asleep in certain situations. The stimulus question is: How likely are you to doze off or fall asleep in the following situations, in contrast to feeling just tired? Questions are answered on a 4-point scale (would never doze [0] to high chance of dozing [3]). The total score ranges from 0 to 24, where a higher score indicates a higher chance of dozing.

  16. Serum Concentrations and Population (POP) Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Lamotrigine [Blood samples drawn at Treatment Weeks 11, 15, and 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)]

    Serum samples for participants on lamotrigine were analyzed with a validated analytical method based on solid phase extraction of serum followed by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Mass Spectrometry (MS)/MS analysis. The lower limit of quantification (LLQ) for serum lamotrigine was 4 nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL), using a 50 microliter (µL) aliquot of human serum with a higher limit of quantification (HLQ) of 4,000 ng/mL. PK data cannot be reported, as PK data from several different studies have been combined into one POP/PK analysis and cannot be separated by study.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
13 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Is ≥13 years of age (male or female).

  • Has a confident diagnosis of epilepsy with PGTC seizures for more than 24 weeks prior to the Baseline Phase.

  • Has electroencephalogram (EEG) evidence of either spike-and-wave discharges consistent with PGTC, or at least 2 EEGs with no indication of focal abnormalities. The EEG may be historical or prospective. Investigators may use a historical EEG as long as there is appropriate documentation.

  • Has a documented history of PGTC seizures with or without other generalized seizure type(s) with no focal onset, and at least 1 PGTC seizure during the eight consecutive weeks (i.e., 56 consecutive days) prior to starting the 8-week Baseline Phase.

  • Has at least 3 PGTC seizures occurring anytime during an 8-week (i.e., 56 days) prospective Baseline Phase.

  • NOTE: When a historical baseline is used, the same time period cannot count for documentation of inclusion criteria 4 and 5. Additionally, innumerable seizure activity will not count towards the number of seizures required for randomization.

  • NOTE: With authorization from GSK, a maximum of four weeks (i.e., 28 days) of historical seizure data may replace up to four weeks (i.e., 28 days) of the prospective Baseline Phase for subjects providing reliable documentation of the following:

  1. complete daily seizure diary that includes the number of seizures experienced each day along with the exact classification of each seizure type for consecutive days prior to the prospective Baseline Phase

  2. stability of prescribed dosages of background antiepileptic drugs (AEDs)

  3. compliance with background AEDs.

  • All subjects permitted to use historical seizure data must complete a minimum of four weeks (i.e., 28 days) of the prospective Baseline Phase. The historical Baseline Phase and the prospective Baseline Phase must equal 56 consecutive days.

  • Is currently treated with a stable regimen of one or two AED(s) for at least four weeks prior to starting the Baseline Phase (historical or prospective).

  • NOTE: Benzodiazepines used chronically will be considered to be concurrent AEDs.

  • NOTE: Subjects with surgically implanted vagal nerve stimulators (VNS) will be allowed to enter the study provided that all of the following conditions are met:

  1. VNS has been in place for at least 24 weeks prior to the Baseline Phase.

  2. The settings must remain the same for at least 28 days prior to the Baseline Phase.

  3. The settings must remain the same during the Baseline, Escalation, Maintenance and Transition Phases.

  4. The battery is expected to last for the duration of the study.

  5. VNS is counted as a "concurrent AED."

  • Is able and willing to maintain an accurate and complete daily written seizure diary, or has a parent/caregiver who is able and willing to maintain an accurate and complete daily written seizure diary for the entire duration of the study.

  • Is able to comply with dosing of study drugs, background AEDs and all study procedures.

  • Has given written informed consent, or has a parent/legally authorized representative who has given written informed consent, prior to the performance of any study assessments.

  • If female, and of childbearing potential, must be using an acceptable form of birth control, to include one of the following:

  1. Complete abstinence from intercourse for two weeks before exposure to the study drug, throughout the clinical trial, and for a period after the trial to account for elimination of the drug (a minimum of 3 weeks).

  2. Consistent and correct use of one of the following methods of birth control:

  • Male partner who is sterile prior to the female subject's entry into the study and is the sole sexual partner for that female subject

  • Implants of levonorgestrel

  • Injectable progestogen

  • Oral contraceptive (either combined, with at least 50mcg estrogen for women on enzyme-induced AEDs, or progestogen only)

  • Any intrauterine device (IUD) with a documented failure rate of less than 1% per year

  • Double barrier method consisting of spermicide plus a mechanical barrier (e.g., spermicide plus a male condom or a female diaphragm).

  • NOTE: Women who have had a hysterectomy, tubal ligation, or are post-menopausal are considered to be of non-childbearing potential.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Has a history of partial seizures or interictal expression of partial seizures as evidenced by EEG NOTE: EEG may be historical or prospective.

  • Has had status epilepticus within the 24 weeks prior to, or during, the Baseline Phase.

  • Is taking three or more background AEDs chronically.

  • Has Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

  • Is currently using or has previously used lamotrigine.

  • Is currently taking felbamate.

  • Is abusing alcohol and/or other substance(s).

  • Has taken an investigational drug within the previous 30 days or plans to take an investigational drug anytime during the study.

  • Is receiving chronic treatment with any medication that could influence seizure control. NOTE: Use of benzodiazepines is allowed.

  • Is currently following the ketogenic diet.

  • Is planning surgery to control seizures during the study.

  • Is suffering from acute or progressive neurological disease, severe psychiatric disease, or severe mental abnormality that are likely to interfere with the objectives of the study.

  • Has any clinically significant cardiac, renal, hepatic condition, or a condition that affects the absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of drugs.

  • Is pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant during the study or within the three weeks after the last dose of study drug.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 GSK Investigational Site Anniston Alabama United States 36207
2 GSK Investigational Site Birmingham Alabama United States 35294-0021
3 GSK Investigational Site Northport Alabama United States 35476
4 GSK Investigational Site Tuscaloosa Alabama United States 35406
5 GSK Investigational Site Phoenix Arizona United States 85006
6 GSK Investigational Site Phoenix Arizona United States 85013
7 GSK Investigational Site Scottsdale Arizona United States 85259
8 GSK Investigational Site Tucson Arizona United States 85712
9 GSK Investigational Site Little Rock Arkansas United States 72205
10 GSK Investigational Site Los Angeles California United States 90033
11 GSK Investigational Site Los Angeles California United States 90073
12 GSK Investigational Site Newport Beach California United States 92660
13 GSK Investigational Site Santa Monica California United States 90404
14 GSK Investigational Site Sepuldeva California United States 91343
15 GSK Investigational Site Washington District of Columbia United States 20037
16 GSK Investigational Site Hollywood Florida United States 33021
17 GSK Investigational Site Maitland Florida United States 32751
18 GSK Investigational Site Ocala Florida United States 34471
19 GSK Investigational Site Atlanta Georgia United States 30342
20 GSK Investigational Site Augusta Georgia United States 30912-3200
21 GSK Investigational Site Marietta Georgia United States 30060
22 GSK Investigational Site Savannah Georgia United States 31405
23 GSK Investigational Site Suwanee Georgia United States 30024
24 GSK Investigational Site Chicago Illinois United States 60612
25 GSK Investigational Site Flossmoor Illinois United States 60422
26 GSK Investigational Site Springfield Illinois United States 62702
27 GSK Investigational Site Des Moines Iowa United States 50309-1426
28 GSK Investigational Site Wichita Kansas United States 67214
29 GSK Investigational Site Crestview Hills Kentucky United States 41017
30 GSK Investigational Site Louisville Kentucky United States 40202
31 GSK Investigational Site Lafayette Louisiana United States 70503
32 GSK Investigational Site Boston Massachusetts United States 02118
33 GSK Investigational Site Detroit Michigan United States 48202
34 GSK Investigational Site Grand Rapids Michigan United States 49525
35 GSK Investigational Site Traverse City Michigan United States 49684
36 GSK Investigational Site Minneapolis Minnesota United States 55422
37 GSK Investigational Site Minneapolis Minnesota United States 55455
38 GSK Investigational Site Chesterfield Missouri United States 63017
39 GSK Investigational Site Kansas City Missouri United States 64111
40 GSK Investigational Site Las Vegas Nevada United States 89106
41 GSK Investigational Site Edison New Jersey United States 08818
42 GSK Investigational Site West Orange New Jersey United States 07052
43 GSK Investigational Site Amherst New York United States 14226
44 GSK Investigational Site New York New York United States 10016
45 GSK Investigational Site Asheville North Carolina United States 28801
46 GSK Investigational Site Greenville North Carolina United States 27834
47 GSK Investigational Site Raleigh North Carolina United States 27607
48 GSK Investigational Site Columbus Ohio United States 43210-1250
49 GSK Investigational Site Oklahoma City Oklahoma United States 73104
50 GSK Investigational Site Oklahoma City Oklahoma United States 73112
51 GSK Investigational Site Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19107
52 GSK Investigational Site Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19140
53 GSK Investigational Site Pittsburgh Pennsylvania United States 15215
54 GSK Investigational Site Germantown Tennessee United States 38138
55 GSK Investigational Site Dallas Texas United States 75230
56 GSK Investigational Site Galveston Texas United States 77555
57 GSK Investigational Site Houston Texas United States 77005
58 GSK Investigational Site San Antonio Texas United States 78258
59 GSK Investigational Site Wichita Falls Texas United States 76301
60 GSK Investigational Site Salt Lake City Utah United States 84107
61 GSK Investigational Site Burlington Vermont United States 05401
62 GSK Investigational Site Richmond Virginia United States 23220
63 GSK Investigational Site Madison Wisconsin United States 53715
64 GSK Investigational Site Milwaukee Wisconsin United States 53215
65 GSK Investigational Site Capital Federal Buenos Aires Argentina 1181
66 GSK Investigational Site Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires Argentina C1221ADC
67 GSK Investigational Site Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Argentina 1425
68 GSK Investigational Site Curitiba Paraná Brazil 80069-900
69 GSK Investigational Site Campinas São Paulo Brazil 13083-970
70 GSK Investigational Site São Paulo Brazil 05403-900
71 GSK Investigational Site Santiago Región Metro De Santiago Chile 7571831
72 GSK Investigational Site Santiago Región Metro De Santiago Chile
73 GSK Investigational Site Singen Baden-Wuerttemberg Germany 78224
74 GSK Investigational Site Ulm Baden-Wuerttemberg Germany 89073
75 GSK Investigational Site Alzenau Bayern Germany 63755
76 GSK Investigational Site Bamberg Bayern Germany 96047
77 GSK Investigational Site Fuerth Bayern Germany 90762
78 GSK Investigational Site Muenchen Bayern Germany 80331
79 GSK Investigational Site Neuoetting Bayern Germany 84524
80 GSK Investigational Site Straubing Bayern Germany 94315
81 GSK Investigational Site Unterhaching Bayern Germany 82008
82 GSK Investigational Site Wuerzburg Bayern Germany 97070
83 GSK Investigational Site Bernau Brandenburg Germany 16321
84 GSK Investigational Site Ludwigsfelde Brandenburg Germany 14974
85 GSK Investigational Site Bad Homburg Hessen Germany 61348
86 GSK Investigational Site Frankfurt Hessen Germany 60594
87 GSK Investigational Site Wismar Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Germany 23966
88 GSK Investigational Site Wismar Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Germany 23970
89 GSK Investigational Site Bueckeburg Niedersachsen Germany 31675
90 GSK Investigational Site Goettingen Niedersachsen Germany 37075
91 GSK Investigational Site Osnabrueck Niedersachsen Germany 49074
92 GSK Investigational Site Baesweiler Nordrhein-Westfalen Germany 52499
93 GSK Investigational Site Bochum Nordrhein-Westfalen Germany 44795
94 GSK Investigational Site Bochum Nordrhein-Westfalen Germany 44892
95 GSK Investigational Site Essen Nordrhein-Westfalen Germany 45122
96 GSK Investigational Site Essen Nordrhein-Westfalen Germany 45138
97 GSK Investigational Site Hattingen Nordrhein-Westfalen Germany 45525
98 GSK Investigational Site Koeln Nordrhein-Westfalen Germany 50767
99 GSK Investigational Site Moenchengladbach Nordrhein-Westfalen Germany 41061
100 GSK Investigational Site Muenster Nordrhein-Westfalen Germany 48149
101 GSK Investigational Site Limburgerhof Rheinland-Pfalz Germany 67117
102 GSK Investigational Site Bernburg Sachsen-Anhalt Germany 06406
103 GSK Investigational Site Halle Sachsen-Anhalt Germany 06118
104 GSK Investigational Site Koethen Sachsen-Anhalt Germany 06366
105 GSK Investigational Site Magdeburg Sachsen-Anhalt Germany 39104
106 GSK Investigational Site Magdeburg Sachsen-Anhalt Germany 39124
107 GSK Investigational Site Naumburg Sachsen-Anhalt Germany 06618
108 GSK Investigational Site Floeha Sachsen Germany 09557
109 GSK Investigational Site Leipzig Sachsen Germany 04105
110 GSK Investigational Site Leipzig Sachsen Germany 04157
111 GSK Investigational Site Kiel Schleswig-Holstein Germany 24105
112 GSK Investigational Site Jena Thueringen Germany 07743
113 GSK Investigational Site Berlin Germany 10117
114 GSK Investigational Site Berlin Germany 10969
115 GSK Investigational Site Berlin Germany 13353
116 GSK Investigational Site Hamburg Germany 20249
117 GSK Investigational Site Hamburg Germany 21029
118 GSK Investigational Site Hamburg Germany 22083
119 GSK Investigational Site Hamburg Germany 22523
120 GSK Investigational Site Hamburg Germany 22527
121 GSK Investigational Site Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh India 500482
122 GSK Investigational Site Lucknow India 226003
123 GSK Investigational Site New Delhi India
124 GSK Investigational Site Daejeon Korea, Republic of 301-721
125 GSK Investigational Site Seoul Korea, Republic of 110-744
126 GSK Investigational Site Seoul Korea, Republic of 120-752
127 GSK Investigational Site Seoul Korea, Republic of 135-710
128 GSK Investigational Site Seoul Korea, Republic of 139-711
129 GSK Investigational Site Kubang Kerian Malaysia 16150
130 GSK Investigational Site San German Puerto Rico 00683
131 GSK Investigational Site San Juan Puerto Rico 00918
132 GSK Investigational Site San Juan Puerto Rico 00936
133 GSK Investigational Site Ekaterinburg Russian Federation 620102
134 GSK Investigational Site Moscow Russian Federation 105066
135 GSK Investigational Site Moscow Russian Federation 107076
136 GSK Investigational Site Moscow Russian Federation 111539
137 GSK Investigational Site Moscow Russian Federation 117049
138 GSK Investigational Site Moscow Russian Federation 119334
139 GSK Investigational Site Moscow Russian Federation 125412
140 GSK Investigational Site Samara Russian Federation 443095
141 GSK Investigational Site St'Petersburg Russian Federation 197136
142 GSK Investigational Site St.-Petersburg Russian Federation 193019
143 GSK Investigational Site St.-Petersburg Russian Federation 194291
144 GSK Investigational Site Kharkiv Ukraine 61068
145 GSK Investigational Site Kyiv Ukraine 02660
146 GSK Investigational Site Lviv Ukraine 79021

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • GlaxoSmithKline

Investigators

  • Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials, GlaxoSmithKline

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00104416
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • LAM100036
First Posted:
Mar 1, 2005
Last Update Posted:
Jan 2, 2017
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2016
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Keywords provided by GlaxoSmithKline
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details All participants (par.) that complete the Treatment Phase (TP) and all Baseline Failures (par. who did not meet randomization seizure criteria necessary to qualify for the TP) are eligible to enter the Continuation Phase (CP). The CP is for long-term safety exposure to lamotrigine (LTG) extended release (XR); it is not a cross-over phase.
Pre-assignment Detail The number of par. starting the CP does not equal the number completing the TP, as 1) the CP was optional, 2) not everyone from the TP was eligible to enter the CP, and 3) Baseline Failures were allowed to enter the CP, however they were not included in the "started" count for the TP.
Arm/Group Title Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR Continuation Phase: Placebo/LTG Continuation Phase: LTG/LTG Baseline Failures
Arm/Group Description Control - matching placebo once daily Lamotrigine (LTG) extended release (XR) once daily Participants who received placebo in the Double-Blind Phase and then entered the CP, in which they received LTG Participants who received LTG XR in the Double-Blind Phase and then entered the CP, in which they received LTG Baseline failures who entered the CP without receiving treatment in the Double-Blind Phase. Baseline Failures were participants that successfully progressed through the Screening Phase and completed the Baseline Phase of the Double-blind Study, but ultimately did not meet the seizure frequency criteria for randomization into the Double-Blind Treatment Phase of the study. As a result, they were not counted as having started in the Double-Blind Study, but were eligible to enter the CP of the study.
Period Title: Double-Blind Phase
STARTED 77 76 0 0 0
COMPLETED 69 66 0 0 0
NOT COMPLETED 8 10 0 0 0
Period Title: Double-Blind Phase
STARTED 0 0 69 67 32
COMPLETED 0 0 63 65 27
NOT COMPLETED 0 0 6 2 5

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR Total
Arm/Group Description Control - matching placebo once daily LTG XR once daily Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 73 70 143
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
28.4
(11.48)
29.4
(12.78)
28.9
(12.10)
Gender (Count of Participants)
Female
38
52.1%
32
45.7%
70
49%
Male
35
47.9%
38
54.3%
73
51%
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number]
African American/African Heritage
1
1.4%
2
2.9%
3
2.1%
Asian
31
42.5%
31
44.3%
62
43.4%
White
38
52.1%
37
52.9%
75
52.4%
American Indian or Alaskan Native and White
2
2.7%
0
0%
2
1.4%
Asian and White
1
1.4%
0
0%
1
0.7%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Primary Generalized Tonic-clonic (PGTC) Seizure Frequency During the Entire Double-Blind Treatment Phase
Description Percent change from baseline is calculated as the number of seizures by week during the Double-Blind Treatment Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 19) compared to the number of seizures per week during the Baseline Phase (Baseline Week 1 up to Week 8). A positive number equals a reduction in seizure frequency. PGTC seizures are more commonly known as gran mal seizures.
Time Frame Baseline through end of Double-Blind Treatment Phase (up to Week 19)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants who took at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase. One participant in each treatment group did not have any PGTC seizures during the Baseline Phase.
Arm/Group Title Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR
Arm/Group Description Control - matching placebo once daily LTG XR once daily
Measure Participants 72 69
Median (Full Range) [percent change]
32.1
75.4
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Double-Blind Phase: Placebo, Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments
Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Median Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value 31.6
Confidence Interval () 95%
15.8 to 48.1
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, or 100% Reduction in PGTC Seizure Frequency During the Entire Double-Blind (DB)Treatment Phase (TP), the Escalation Phase, the Maintenance Phase, and the Last 8 Weeks of the Maintenance Phase
Description Change in seizure frequency was calculated as the average seizure frequency during each of the following: the Entire DB Treatment Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 19); the Escalation Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 7); the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 8 up to Week 19); and the last 8 weeks of the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 12 up to Week 19), minus the seizure frequency at Baseline.
Time Frame Entire DB Treatment Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 19), Escalation Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 7), Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 8 up to Week 19), and the last 8 weeks of the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 12 up to Week 19)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population. One participant in each treatment group did not have any PGTC seizures during the Baseline Phase, as a result they were not counted in this efficacy endpoint; an additional 2 and 1 participants in the Placebo and LTG XR group, respectively, were not counted in the Maintenance Phase (MP) or last 8 weeks of MP due to study withdrawal.
Arm/Group Title Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR
Arm/Group Description Control - matching placebo once daily LTG XR once daily
Measure Participants 72 69
>=25% reduction, Entire DB TP, n=72, 69
43
58.9%
56
80%
>=50% reduction, Entire DB TP, n=72, 69
23
31.5%
48
68.6%
>=75% reduction, Entire DB TP, n=72, 69
14
19.2%
35
50%
100% reduction, Entire DB TP, n=72, 69
7
9.6%
14
20%
>=25% reduction, Escalation Phase, n=72, 69
39
53.4%
51
72.9%
>=50% reduction, Escalation Phase, n=72, 69
23
31.5%
38
54.3%
>=75% reduction, Escalation Phase, n=72, 69
14
19.2%
24
34.3%
100% reduction, Escalation Phase, n=72, 69
9
12.3%
15
21.4%
>=25% reduction, Maintenance Phase, n=70, 68
46
63%
60
85.7%
>=50% reduction, Maintenance Phase, n=70, 68
29
39.7%
51
72.9%
>=75% reduction, Maintenance Phase, n=70, 68
14
19.2%
40
57.1%
100% reduction, Maintenance Phase, n=70, 68
10
13.7%
31
44.3%
>=25% reduction, Last 8 Weeks of MP, n=70, 68
47
64.4%
61
87.1%
>=50% reduction, Last 8 Weeks of MP, n=70, 68
29
39.7%
54
77.1%
>=75% reduction, Last 8 Weeks of MP, n=70, 68
18
24.7%
44
62.9%
100% reduction, Last 8 Weeks of MP, n=70, 68
15
20.5%
35
50%
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Percent Change From Baseline in PGTC Seizure Frequency During the Escalation Phase, the Maintenance Phase, and During the Last 8 Weeks of the Maintenance Phase of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase
Description Percent change from baseline is calculated as the number of seizures by week during the Escalation Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 7), the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 8 up to Week 19), and during the last 8 weeks of the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 12 up to Week 19) compared to the number of seizures per week during the Baseline Phase (Baseline Week 1 up to Week 8). A positive number equals a reduction in seizure frequency.
Time Frame Escalation Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 7), Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 8 up to Week 19), and the last 8 weeks of the Maintenance Phase (Week 12 up to Week 19)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population. One participant in each treatment group did not have any PGTC seizures during the Baseline Phase as a result they were not counted for this efficacy endpoint; an additional 2 and 1 participants in the Placebo and LTG XR group, respectively, were not counted in the Maintenance Phase (MP) or last 8 weeks of MP due to study withdrawal.
Arm/Group Title Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR
Arm/Group Description Control - matching placebo once daily LTG XR once daily
Measure Participants 72 69
Escalation Phase, n=72, 69
30.6
61.9
Maintenance Phase, n=70, 68
33.3
89.7
Last 8 weeks of the Maintenance Phase, n=70, 68
35.4
100.0
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to >=50% Reduction in Seizure Frequency in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase
Description 50% reduction in seizure frequency is defined as the time at which a participant first achieved and maintained a >=50% reduction in seizure frequency following exposure to at least 1 week of study drug.
Time Frame Baseline through end of Double-Blind Treatment Phase (up to Week 19)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population
Arm/Group Title Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR
Arm/Group Description Control - matching placebo once daily LTG XR once daily
Measure Participants 73 70
2 weeks
12
16.4%
22
31.4%
4 weeks
12
16.4%
28
40%
8 weeks
14
19.2%
39
55.7%
12 weeks
20
27.4%
43
61.4%
16 weeks
23
31.5%
48
68.6%
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase
Description Change from baseline in body weight is calculated as the Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) value minus the Baseline value.
Time Frame Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population
Arm/Group Title Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR
Arm/Group Description Control - matching placebo once daily LTG XR once daily
Measure Participants 73 70
Median (Full Range) [kilograms]
1.00
0.00
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Improved Clinical Status on the Investigator's Global Assessment in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase
Description The investigators rated the participants' overall clinical status based on 7 clinical factors and an overall factor: seizure frequency, duration, and intensity; adverse experiences; social, intellectual, and motor functioning. Using a 7-point scale (marked deterioration [1], moderate deterioration [2], mild deterioration [3], no change [4], mild improvement [5], moderate improvement [6], or marked improvement [7]), the investigators assessed the participants' status compared to their condition prior to initiating study medication.
Time Frame Week 19 (or last on-study assessment in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population. Overall clinical status not assessed for 2 participants in each of the Placebo and LTG XR groups, respectively.
Arm/Group Title Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR
Arm/Group Description Control - matching placebo once daily LTG XR once daily
Measure Participants 71 68
Any improvement, score of 5-7
36
49.3%
57
81.4%
No change, score of 4
33
45.2%
10
14.3%
Any deterioration, score of 1-3
2
2.7%
1
1.4%
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Improved Satisfaction With Seizure Control on the Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase
Description Participants were asked to rate their satisfaction with their seizure control compared to their seizure control prior to initiating study drug on a 7 point scale: marked deterioration (1), moderate deterioration (2), mild deterioration (3), no change (4), mild improvement (5), moderate improvement (6), or marked improvement (7).
Time Frame Week 19 (or last on-study assessment in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population. Participant satisfaction was not assessed for 2 participants in each of the Placebo and LTG XR groups, respectively.
Arm/Group Title Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR
Arm/Group Description Control - matching placebo once daily LTG XR once daily
Measure Participants 71 68
Any improvement, score of 5-7
53
72.6%
60
85.7%
No change, score of 4
13
17.8%
6
8.6%
Any deterioration, score of 1-3
5
6.8%
2
2.9%
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly PGTC Seizure Frequency During the Entire Continuation Phase (CP), the Transition Phase, the Open-Label Phase, and the Last 8 Weeks of the Open-Label Phase
Description Percent change from baseline is calculated as the number of seizures by week during the entire CP (CP Week 1 up to Week 52), the Transition Phase (CP Week 1 up to Week 7), the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 8 up to Week 52), and the last 8 weeks of the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 45 up to Week 52) minus the number of seizures per week during the Baseline Phase (Baseline Week 1 through Week 8). A positive number equals a reduction in seizure frequency.
Time Frame Entire CP (CP Week 1 up to Week 52), the Transition Phase (CP Week 1 up to Week 7), the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 8 up to Week 52), and the last 8 weeks of the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 45 up to Week 52)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population for CP: all participants who took at least one dose of study medication during the CP and had at least one post baseline seizure assessment during the CP. Variability in participant numbers are due to not having any PGTC seizures during the Baseline Phase and study withdrawal prior to progressing to the next phase.
Arm/Group Title Continuation Phase: Placebo/LTG Continuation Phase: LTG/LTG Baseline Failures
Arm/Group Description Placebo participants who entered the CP LTG XR participants who entered the CP Baseline failures who entered the CP
Measure Participants 68 66 24
Entire Continuation Phase, n=68, 66, 24
85.2
95.1
21.7
Transition Phase, n=68, 66, 20
73.1
100.0
100.0
Open-Label Phase, n=68, 64, 23
89.2
95.0
31.7
Last 8 weeks of Open-Label Phase, n=68, 63, 19
100.0
100.0
100.0
9. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, or 100% Reduction or >=50% Increase From Baseline in Weekly PGTC Seizure Frequency for the Entire Continuation Phase, the Transition Phase, the Open-Label (OL) Phase, and the Last 8 Weeks of the OL Phase.
Description Change in seizure frequency was calculated as the average seizure frequency during each of the following: the Entire CP (CP Week 1 up to Week 52); the Transition Phase (CP Week 1 up to Week 7); the Open-Label (OL) Phase (CP Week 8 up to Week 52); and the last 8 weeks of the Open Label Phase (CP Week 45 up to Week 52) minus the seizure frequency at Baseline. W, Week.
Time Frame Entire CP (CP Week 1 up to Week 52), the Transition Phase (CP Week 1 up to Week 7), the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 8 up to Week 52), and the last 8 weeks of the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 45 up to Week 52)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population for CP. Variability in participant numbers are due to not having any PGTC seizures during the Baseline Phase and study withdrawal prior to progressing to the next phase.
Arm/Group Title Continuation Phase: Placebo/LTG Continuation Phase: LTG/LTG Baseline Failures
Arm/Group Description Placebo participants who entered the CP LTG XR participants who entered the CP Baseline failures who entered the CP
Measure Participants 68 66 24
>=25% reduction, Entire CP, n=68, 66, 24
59
80.8%
63
90%
11
7.7%
>=50% reduction, Entire CP, n=68, 66, 24
57
78.1%
59
84.3%
11
7.7%
>=75% reduction, Entire CP, n=68, 66, 24
46
63%
49
70%
8
5.6%
100% reduction, Entire CP, n=68, 66, 24
16
21.9%
28
40%
6
4.2%
>=50% increase, Entire CP, n=68, 66, 24
2
2.7%
1
1.4%
10
7%
>=25% reduction, Transition Phase, n=68, 66, 20
51
69.9%
60
85.7%
13
9.1%
>=50% reduction, Transition Phase, n=68, 66, 20
44
60.3%
56
80%
12
8.4%
>=75% reduction, Transition Phase, n=68, 66, 20
33
45.2%
46
65.7%
12
8.4%
100% reduction, Transition Phase, n=68, 66, 20
27
37%
41
58.6%
12
8.4%
>=50% increase, Transition Phase, n=68, 66, 20
3
4.1%
1
1.4%
3
2.1%
>=25% reduction, Open-Label Phase, n=68, 64, 23
61
83.6%
61
87.1%
12
8.4%
>=50% reduction, Open-Label Phase, n=68, 64, 23
56
76.7%
57
81.4%
10
7%
>=75% reduction, Open-Label Phase, n=68, 64, 23
47
64.4%
49
70%
8
5.6%
100% reduction, Open-Label Phase, n=68, 64, 23
21
28.8%
28
40%
6
4.2%
>=50% increase, Open-Label Phase, n=68, 64, 23
2
2.7%
1
1.4%
10
7%
>=25% reduction, Last 8 W of OL Phase,n=68, 63, 19
60
82.2%
60
85.7%
10
7%
>=50% reduction, Last 8 W of OL Phase,n=68, 63, 19
53
72.6%
53
75.7%
10
7%
>=75% reduction, Last 8 W of OL Phase,n=68, 63, 19
45
61.6%
47
67.1%
10
7%
100% reduction, Last 8 W of OL Phase, n=68, 63, 19
35
47.9%
41
58.6%
10
7%
>=50% increase, Last 8 W of OL Phase, n=68, 63, 19
2
2.7%
1
1.4%
4
2.8%
10. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline in the Profile of Mood State (POMS) Mood Disturbance Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase
Description The POMS is a self-administered 65-item questionnaire that evaluates the participants' perception of their mood state in 6 areas: tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, vigor-activity, fatigue-inertia, and confusion-bewilderment. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely), with higher scores indicating a more negative mood state. A total score (from 0 to 24) is obtained by summing the scores of the six domains.
Time Frame Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population. The questionnaire was not completed by 53 and 57 participants in the Placebo and LTG XR groups, respectively. Only participants completing the questionnaire were included in the analysis of this outcome measure.
Arm/Group Title Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR
Arm/Group Description Control - matching placebo once daily LTG XR once daily
Measure Participants 20 13
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [points on a scale]
2.4
(6.97)
9.7
(8.65)
11. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline in the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase
Description The 20-item CES-D questionnaire is self-administered and asks respondents to report the frequency to which the 20 events were experienced over the past week. A 4-point Likert scale is used and ranges from rarely or none of the time (0) to most or all of the time (3). The total score, a sum across the 20 items (ranging from 0 to 60), determines the extent to which a participant may be experiencing depression. Higher scores indicate a higher severity of depression.
Time Frame Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population. The questionnaire was not completed by 64 and 59 participants in the Placebo and LTG XR groups, respectively. Only participants completing the questionnaire were included in the analysis of this outcome measure.
Arm/Group Title Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR
Arm/Group Description Control - matching placebo once daily LTG XR once daily
Measure Participants 9 11
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [points on a scale]
2.9
(2.81)
2.4
(2.54)
12. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline in the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory-Epilepsy (NDDI-E) 6-Item Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase
Description The NDDI-E is a self-reported questionnaire composed of 46 brief phrases/words to identify mood disorders across the spectrum of depression. It was developed to capture depressive moods that are co-morbid with the disease of epilepsy or its treatment as well as to measure the depressive state of the participant. All phrases are measured on a 4-point Likert scale of Never (1) to Always/often (4) and refer to the participants' mood over the past week. Scoring is comprised of a total mood score calculated by summing the scores of 6 specific items (from 6=never to 24=always or often).
Time Frame Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population. The questionnaire was not completed by 65 participants in both the Placebo and LTG XR groups. Only participants completing the questionnaire were included in the analysis of this outcome measure.
Arm/Group Title Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR
Arm/Group Description Control - matching placebo once daily LTG XR once daily
Measure Participants 8 5
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [points on a scale]
-0.1
(0.98)
-2.4
(1.24)
13. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline in the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31-P (QOLIE-31P) Overall Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase
Description The QOLIE-31 is a 31-item questionnaire that evaluates the participants' perception of his or her quality of life in 7 domains: seizure worry, emotional well being, energy/fatigue, cognitive functioning, medication effects, social functioning, and overall quality of life. Each domain (with scores ranging from 0 to 100) is summed and divided by the total number of questions that were answered. The overall score is derived by weighting and then summing up the seven domain scores.
Time Frame Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population. The questionnaire was not completed by 55 participants in both the Placebo and LTG XR groups. Only participants completing the questionnaire were included in the analysis of this outcome measure.
Arm/Group Title Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR
Arm/Group Description Control - matching placebo once daily LTG XR once daily
Measure Participants 18 15
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [points on a scale]
-6.5
(3.97)
-8.5
(4.35)
14. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline in the Adverse Experience Profile (AEP) Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase
Description The AEP is a list of 19 items covering many possible side effects attributable to drug treatment. The participants respond by assessing how much each event has been a problem for them over the past 4 weeks (1=Never a Problem to 4=Always a Problem). Each individual item can be examined; an overall adverse events score is calculated as the sum of the scores across the 19 items. The AEP total score ranges from 19 to 76, with a higher score indicating a higher degree of adverse event severity.
Time Frame Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population. The questionnaire was not completed by 65 participants in both the Placebo and LTG XR groups. Only participants completing the questionnaire were included in the analysis of this outcome measure.
Arm/Group Title Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR
Arm/Group Description Control - matching placebo once daily LTG XR once daily
Measure Participants 8 5
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [points on a scale]
3.0
(2.16)
1.4
(2.77)
15. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline in the Seizure Severity Questionnaire (SSQ) Global Bother Score at Week 19 Double-Blind Treatment Phase
Description The SSQ is a self-reported instrument developed to assess the severity of seizures and seizure symptoms. The scale consists of 10 major clinical features/symptoms of seizures that the participants rate on a 7-point Likert scale (ranging from very mild/helpful/no bother at all [1] to very severe/no help/bothersome [7]). The Global Bother Domain is the primary score used for the analysis of the SSQ and has scores ranging from 1 to 7.
Time Frame Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population. The questionnaire was not completed by 68 and 67 participants in the Placebo and LTG XR groups, respectively. Only participants completing the questionnaire were included in the analysis of this outcome measure.
Arm/Group Title Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR
Arm/Group Description Control - matching placebo once daily LTG XR once daily
Measure Participants 5 3
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [points on a scale]
0.86
(0.84)
1.23
(1.08)
16. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change From Baseline in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) 8-Item Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase
Description The ESS is an 8-item, self-administered questionnaire that measures excessive daytime sleepiness in adults. The instrument captures information on the extent to which the participant would be likely, or not, to fall asleep in certain situations. The stimulus question is: How likely are you to doze off or fall asleep in the following situations, in contrast to feeling just tired? Questions are answered on a 4-point scale (would never doze [0] to high chance of dozing [3]). The total score ranges from 0 to 24, where a higher score indicates a higher chance of dozing.
Time Frame Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT Population. The questionnaire was not completed by 55 and 51 participants in the Placebo and LTG XR groups, respectively. Only participants completing the questionnaire were included in the analysis of this outcome measure.
Arm/Group Title Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR
Arm/Group Description Control - matching placebo once daily LTG XR once daily
Measure Participants 18 19
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [points on a scale]
-0.6
(0.69)
1.0
(0.67)
17. Secondary Outcome
Title Serum Concentrations and Population (POP) Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Lamotrigine
Description Serum samples for participants on lamotrigine were analyzed with a validated analytical method based on solid phase extraction of serum followed by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Mass Spectrometry (MS)/MS analysis. The lower limit of quantification (LLQ) for serum lamotrigine was 4 nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL), using a 50 microliter (µL) aliquot of human serum with a higher limit of quantification (HLQ) of 4,000 ng/mL. PK data cannot be reported, as PK data from several different studies have been combined into one POP/PK analysis and cannot be separated by study.
Time Frame Blood samples drawn at Treatment Weeks 11, 15, and 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
PK Population: Number of participants analyzed for PK data cannot be reported, as PK data from several different studies have been combined into one POP/PK analysis and cannot be separated by study.
Arm/Group Title Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR
Arm/Group Description Control - matching placebo once daily LTG XR once daily
Measure Participants 0 0

Adverse Events

Time Frame
Adverse Event Reporting Description Serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants in the Safety Population. The Safety Population was defined as all participants who took at least one dose of study drug.
Arm/Group Title Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR Continuation Phase: Placebo/LTG Continuation Phase: LTG/LTG Baseline Failures
Arm/Group Description Control - matching placebo once daily Lamotrigine (LTG) extended release (XR) once daily Participants who received placebo in the Double-Blind Phase and then entered the CP, in which they received LTG Participants who received LTG XR in the Double-Blind Phase and then entered the CP, in which they received LTG Baseline failures who entered the CP without receiving treatment in the Double-Blind Phase. Baseline Failures were participants that successfully progressed through the Screening Phase and completed the Baseline Phase of the Double-blind Study, but ultimately did not meet the seizure frequency criteria for randomization into the Double-Blind Treatment Phase of the study. As a result, they were not counted as having started in the Double-Blind Study, but were eligible to enter the CP of the study.
All Cause Mortality
Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR Continuation Phase: Placebo/LTG Continuation Phase: LTG/LTG Baseline Failures
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR Continuation Phase: Placebo/LTG Continuation Phase: LTG/LTG Baseline Failures
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/74 (0%) 1/72 (1.4%) 3/69 (4.3%) 3/67 (4.5%) 1/32 (3.1%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain 0/74 (0%) 0/72 (0%) 0/69 (0%) 0/67 (0%) 1/32 (3.1%)
Nausea 0/74 (0%) 0/72 (0%) 0/69 (0%) 0/67 (0%) 1/32 (3.1%)
Vomiting 0/74 (0%) 0/72 (0%) 0/69 (0%) 0/67 (0%) 1/32 (3.1%)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bile duct cancer 0/74 (0%) 0/72 (0%) 1/69 (1.4%) 0/67 (0%) 0/32 (0%)
Uterine leiomyoma 0/74 (0%) 0/72 (0%) 0/69 (0%) 1/67 (1.5%) 0/32 (0%)
Nervous system disorders
Altered state of consciousness 0/74 (0%) 0/72 (0%) 1/69 (1.4%) 0/67 (0%) 0/32 (0%)
Ataxia 0/74 (0%) 0/72 (0%) 0/69 (0%) 0/67 (0%) 1/32 (3.1%)
Hemiparesis 0/74 (0%) 0/72 (0%) 1/69 (1.4%) 0/67 (0%) 0/32 (0%)
Hydrocephalus 0/74 (0%) 0/72 (0%) 1/69 (1.4%) 0/67 (0%) 0/32 (0%)
Nystagmus 0/74 (0%) 0/72 (0%) 0/69 (0%) 0/67 (0%) 1/32 (3.1%)
Syncope vasovagal 0/74 (0%) 0/72 (0%) 0/69 (0%) 1/67 (1.5%) 0/32 (0%)
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion spontaneous 0/74 (0%) 0/72 (0%) 0/69 (0%) 1/67 (1.5%) 0/32 (0%)
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state 0/74 (0%) 1/72 (1.4%) 0/69 (0%) 0/67 (0%) 0/32 (0%)
Conversion disorder 0/74 (0%) 0/72 (0%) 1/69 (1.4%) 0/67 (0%) 0/32 (0%)
Suicide attempt 0/74 (0%) 0/72 (0%) 0/69 (0%) 0/67 (0%) 1/32 (3.1%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Double-Blind Phase: Placebo Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR Continuation Phase: Placebo/LTG Continuation Phase: LTG/LTG Baseline Failures
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 21/74 (28.4%) 27/72 (37.5%) 29/69 (42%) 21/67 (31.3%) 18/32 (56.3%)
Eye disorders
Diplopia 1/74 (1.4%) 4/72 (5.6%) 4/69 (5.8%) 1/67 (1.5%) 2/32 (6.3%)
Vision blurred 0/74 (0%) 0/72 (0%) 1/69 (1.4%) 0/67 (0%) 2/32 (6.3%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting 3/74 (4.1%) 7/72 (9.7%) 5/69 (7.2%) 2/67 (3%) 2/32 (6.3%)
Nausea 4/74 (5.4%) 5/72 (6.9%) 1/69 (1.4%) 1/67 (1.5%) 5/32 (15.6%)
Diarrhoea 0/74 (0%) 1/72 (1.4%) 3/69 (4.3%) 1/67 (1.5%) 2/32 (6.3%)
Abdominal pain 3/74 (4.1%) 0/72 (0%) 1/69 (1.4%) 0/67 (0%) 2/32 (6.3%)
General disorders
Pyrexia 4/74 (5.4%) 5/72 (6.9%) 7/69 (10.1%) 5/67 (7.5%) 3/32 (9.4%)
Pain 2/74 (2.7%) 2/72 (2.8%) 3/69 (4.3%) 2/67 (3%) 2/32 (6.3%)
Fatigue 2/74 (2.7%) 1/72 (1.4%) 1/69 (1.4%) 0/67 (0%) 3/32 (9.4%)
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis 1/74 (1.4%) 2/72 (2.8%) 4/69 (5.8%) 4/67 (6%) 2/32 (6.3%)
Nervous system disorders
Headache 12/74 (16.2%) 10/72 (13.9%) 11/69 (15.9%) 5/67 (7.5%) 9/32 (28.1%)
Dizziness 5/74 (6.8%) 4/72 (5.6%) 7/69 (10.1%) 4/67 (6%) 7/32 (21.9%)
Tremor 0/74 (0%) 4/72 (5.6%) 5/69 (7.2%) 3/67 (4.5%) 3/32 (9.4%)
Ataxia 0/74 (0%) 0/72 (0%) 2/69 (2.9%) 2/67 (3%) 2/32 (6.3%)
Somnolence 0/74 (0%) 1/72 (1.4%) 1/69 (1.4%) 2/67 (3%) 2/32 (6.3%)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
All rash 4/74 (5.4%) 2/72 (2.8%) 2/69 (2.9%) 1/67 (1.5%) 2/32 (6.3%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title GSK Response Center
Organization GlaxoSmithKline
Phone 866-435-7343
Email
Responsible Party:
GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00104416
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • LAM100036
First Posted:
Mar 1, 2005
Last Update Posted:
Jan 2, 2017
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2016