Protocol AM: Randomized Trial Comparing Immediate vs. Deferred Surgery for Symptomatic ERM

Sponsor
Jaeb Center for Health Research (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05145491
Collaborator
National Institutes of Health (NIH) (NIH), National Eye Institute (NEI) (NIH), Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (Other)
400
19
2
58.3
21.1
0.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Vitrectomy to remove an epiretinal membrane (ERM) is one of the most common procedures performed by retinal surgeons. Patients who present with significant macular changes on optical coherence tomography (OCT) but relatively good vision are often advised to defer surgery until vision declines to 20/40 or worse. However, it is unknown if delaying surgery, which allows the foveal architecture to remain compromised and potentially to deteriorate, results in worse visual acuity outcomes than if surgery is performed earlier. In addition, there is a need to better understand predictors of outcomes when surgery is performed and predictors of progression when surgery is deferred. Finally, one of the most common presenting symptoms from an ERM is distortion or metamorphopsia. There are several objective measures of metamorphopsia but none have ever been employed to evaluate ERMs in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) and their usefulness is unknown. The purposes of this study are to better understand the optimal timing of surgery to produce the best visual result, to better understand predictors of outcomes in those who undergo surgery and predictors of progression in those whose are observed, and to better characterize and evaluate the usefulness of metamorphopsia and reading speed measures.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Immediate Vitrectomy
  • Procedure: Deferred Vitrectomy
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
400 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Randomized Trial Comparing Immediate Versus Deferred Surgery for Symptomatic Epiretinal Membranes
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 22, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2026
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2026

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Immediate Vitrectomy

Procedure: Immediate Vitrectomy
Surgery to remove epiretinal membrane (ERM). Vitrectomy will be performed on eyes within 1 month of randomization

Other: Deferred Vitrectomy

Procedure: Deferred Vitrectomy
Vitrectomy may be performed only if at least one of the following criteria is met: Decrease in visual acuity ≥10 letters from baseline at a single visit presumed to be from ERM Decrease in visual acuity ≥5 letters from baseline at two consecutive visits presumed to be from ERM a. Visits must be at least one month apart Participant actively requests surgery due to worsening symptoms Complication requires prompt surgical intervention (e.g., macular hole, retinal detachment, non-clearing vitreous hemorrhage)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Mean change in visual acuity letter score from baseline to 36 months [Baseline to 36 months]

    Visual acuity is measured as a continuous integer letter score from 0 to 100, with higher numbers indicating better visual acuity. A letter score of 85 is approximately 20/20 and a letter score of 70 is approximately 20/40, the legal unrestricted driving limit in most states. A 5-letter change for an individual is approximately equal to a 1-line change on a vision chart.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
50 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Key Inclusion Criteria:
  • Visual acuity 20/25 to 20/40

o Epiretinal membrane (ERM) must be thought to be the primary cause of vision loss

  • ERM meeting the following criteria

  • Symptoms of visual loss and/or distortion (and in the opinion of the investigator, the ERM is contributing to the participant's symptoms); either new or worsening in the past 24 months

  • Epiretinal membrane involving or altering the central 3 mm of the macula on optical coherence tomography (OCT)

  • Distortion within the central subfield by ERM on OCT

  • Immediate vitrectomy not required (investigator and participant are willing to wait at least 4 weeks to see if vision remains stable without having to proceed to vitrectomy)

  • No known medical problems that will be a contraindication to surgery

Key Exclusion Criteria:
  • Secondary ERM due to retinal vascular disease, vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment, inflammatory disease, or associations other than vitreous syneresis, retinal break, or posterior vitreous detachment
  1. History of vitreous hemorrhage is permitted provided the vitreous hemorrhage did not cause the ERM in the investigator's opinion

  2. Prior retinal tears treated with laser or cryosurgical retinopexy are permitted provided the laser or cryosurgical retinopexy is completed at least one month prior to randomization

  • Prior intraocular surgery (except uncomplicated cataract extraction)

  • Cataract extraction within prior 3 months

  • History of diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), or uveitis

  • Past or current macular hole or degenerative lamellar macular hole

  • Vitreomacular traction within 1,500 microns of the foveal center

  • Central serous chorioretinopathy

  • Nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy or worse (diabetic retinopathy severity >20)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Kent W. Small, MD, AMC Glendale California United States 91203-1971
2 Salehi Retina Institute Inc. Huntington Beach California United States 92647-8693
3 Retina Vitreous Associates, Northern California Retina Vitreous Assoc Medical Group, Inc. Mountain View California United States 94040-4123
4 East Bay Retina Consultants, Inc. Oakland California United States 94609-3028
5 Florida Retina Institute, James A. Staman, MD, PA- Jacksonville Jacksonville Florida United States 32216
6 Sarasota Retina Institute Sarasota Florida United States 34239
7 SEASHORE RETINA LLC DBA Retina Specialists of Tampa Wesley Chapel Florida United States 33544
8 Thomas Eye Group Sandy Springs Georgia United States 30328
9 Illinois Retina Associates SC - Oak Park Site Oak Park Illinois United States 60304
10 Joseph E. Humble and Raymond Haik PTRS DBA Eye Assoc of Northeast Louisiana West Monroe Louisiana United States 71291-4452
11 Elman Retina Group, P.A. Baltimore Maryland United States 21237
12 Joslin Diabetes Center Boston Massachusetts United States 02215
13 Retina Research Institute, LLC Saint Louis Missouri United States 63128-1729
14 Retina-Vitreous Surgeons of Central NY, PC Liverpool New York United States 13088
15 Retina Associates of Western NY, P.C. Rochester New York United States 14620-4655
16 Retina Vitreous Center Edmond Oklahoma United States 73013-9791
17 Hilton Head Retina Institute Hilton Head Island South Carolina United States 29926
18 Texas Retina Associates Lubbock Texas United States 79424
19 Retinal Consultants of San Antonio San Antonio Texas United States 78240

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Jaeb Center for Health Research
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  • National Eye Institute (NEI)
  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Jaeb Center for Health Research
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05145491
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • DRCR.net Protocol AM
  • UG1EY014231
First Posted:
Dec 6, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Aug 18, 2022
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 18, 2022