Floseal Treatment for Posterior Epistaxis Study
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Effectiveness of Floseal for the treatment of posterior epistaxis.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Floseal, a hemostatic agent, is an effective treatment for anterior epistaxis as well as numerous other acute bleeding conditions throughout the body. The investigators hypothesize that Floseal is an effective treatment for posterior epistaxis. If so, then this will also lead to significant cost savings in comparison to any other method of treatment of posterior epistaxis. The investigators have planned a prospective, nonblinded, nonrandomised study with a total of 40 subjects with posterior epistaxis to be included in this study.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Floseal Received 1 syringe of Floseal for treatment of posterior epistaxis. |
Drug: Floseal
Received 1 syringe of Floseal as treatment for posterior epistaxis.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Effectiveness of Floseal for the Treatment of Posterior Epistaxis. [Immediate effect with 1 hour observation and follow-up at 5 and 30 days following treatment.]
Successful treatment using the gelatin-thrombin matrix protocol (Floseal) was any case of posterior epistaxis that stopped following the immediate application of either one or two syringes of Floseal® and the epistaxis did not resume within fourteen days of the treatment date.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Cost Savings of Floseal Treatment in Comparison to Posterior Packing, Surgical, and Embolisation Treatments for Posterior Epistaxis. [30 days]
The institutional cost for the treatment of posterior epistaxis patients with posterior packing, endoscopic surgery, and endovascular embolization, at TOH were calculated and compared with the institutional cost of a patient visit for posterior epistaxis successfully treated with the study protocol using Floseal. All costs were calculated in Canadian dollars (CAD), they were converted to US dollars (USD) using the current monetary exchange rate (total CAD x 1.03= total USD). For all of the patients treated in this study, the total institution cost was $24487.53 (USD). The minimal institutional cost of successfully treating all of the study patients with endoscopic surgery, would have been $53933.89 (USD) or 2.2 times the actual expense. (Total cost 20 participants Floseal/expected total cost 20 endoscopic surgery*100)This represents savings of $29446.39 (USD) or 45.40%
Other Outcome Measures
- Total Institutional Cost Savings [End of study. Cost calculated after 20 patients were treated with Floseal]
Difference between the total institutional cost of successfully treating 20 study patients with Floseal compared to the total institutional cost of treating the same number of patient with endoscopic surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
age greater than 18 years of age
-
posterior epistaxis
Exclusion Criteria:
-
patients with anterior epistaxis
-
known sensitivity to any of the materials of Floseal or the topical medications administered as part of the evaluation and treatment of epistaxis (lidocaine, xylometazoline hydrochloride)
-
pregnant or breast feeding woman
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Shaun Kilty, MD, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
None provided.- Baxter BS09-000313
- REB 2009428-01H
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Patients who presented to the emergency department with posterior epistaxis or who were already admitted to hospital for another diagnosis and had posterior epistaxis were offered enrollment. Recruitment period April 2010- April 2012 |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Floseal. |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Floseal® was used for posterior epistaxis treatment with simultaneous ipsilateral choanal occlusion. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 20 |
COMPLETED | 20 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Floseal |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Received Floseal treatment for posterior epistaxis. Floseal : Received Floseal as treatment for posterior epistaxis. |
Overall Participants | 20 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
12
60%
|
>=65 years |
8
40%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
57.8
(20.06)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
10
50%
|
Male |
10
50%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
Canada |
20
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Effectiveness of Floseal for the Treatment of Posterior Epistaxis. |
---|---|
Description | Successful treatment using the gelatin-thrombin matrix protocol (Floseal) was any case of posterior epistaxis that stopped following the immediate application of either one or two syringes of Floseal® and the epistaxis did not resume within fourteen days of the treatment date. |
Time Frame | Immediate effect with 1 hour observation and follow-up at 5 and 30 days following treatment. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Floseal |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Floseal® was used for posterior epistaxis treatment with simultaneous ipsilateral choanal occlusion |
Measure Participants | 20 |
Number [participants] |
20
100%
|
Title | Cost Savings of Floseal Treatment in Comparison to Posterior Packing, Surgical, and Embolisation Treatments for Posterior Epistaxis. |
---|---|
Description | The institutional cost for the treatment of posterior epistaxis patients with posterior packing, endoscopic surgery, and endovascular embolization, at TOH were calculated and compared with the institutional cost of a patient visit for posterior epistaxis successfully treated with the study protocol using Floseal. All costs were calculated in Canadian dollars (CAD), they were converted to US dollars (USD) using the current monetary exchange rate (total CAD x 1.03= total USD). For all of the patients treated in this study, the total institution cost was $24487.53 (USD). The minimal institutional cost of successfully treating all of the study patients with endoscopic surgery, would have been $53933.89 (USD) or 2.2 times the actual expense. (Total cost 20 participants Floseal/expected total cost 20 endoscopic surgery*100)This represents savings of $29446.39 (USD) or 45.40% |
Time Frame | 30 days |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Floseal |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Floseal® was used for posterior epistaxis treatment with simultaneous ipsilateral choanal occlusion |
Measure Participants | 20 |
Number [percentage of expected cost] |
45.40
|
Title | Total Institutional Cost Savings |
---|---|
Description | Difference between the total institutional cost of successfully treating 20 study patients with Floseal compared to the total institutional cost of treating the same number of patient with endoscopic surgery |
Time Frame | End of study. Cost calculated after 20 patients were treated with Floseal |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | FLOSEAL | Endoscopic Surgery |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Institutional cost of treating all study patients with Floseal for posterior epistaxis | The calculated minimal institutional cost if all the study patients had been treated with endoscopic surgery for posterior epistaxis |
Measure Participants | 20 | 20 |
Number [US Dollars] |
24487.53
|
53933.89
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Adverse events were evaluated from the time of treatment with Floseal and up to 30 30 days after treatment with Floseal | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||
Arm/Group Title | Floseal | |
Arm/Group Description | Floseal® was used for posterior epistaxis treatment with simultaneous ipsilateral choanal occlusion | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
Floseal | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Floseal | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/20 (0%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Floseal | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/20 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Shaun Kilty |
---|---|
Organization | Ottawa Hospital Research Institute |
Phone | 613-798-5555 ext 18514 |
skilty@ottawahospital.on.ca |
- Baxter BS09-000313
- REB 2009428-01H